News Analysis — 30–31 August 2026
PM Modi in Uzbekistan — Comprehensive Strategic Partnership Upgraded & SCO Summit Ahead
PM Modi's four-day visit to Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan — his fourth visit to Tashkent — is India's most consequential Central Asia engagement since 2015, covering the SCO summit, the BRICS presidency handover, a UNSC seat contest, and a long-overdue India–Central Asia Summit.
India's relationship with Uzbekistan dates to 1991. The two share civilisational ties rooted in the Mughal period — Babur, founder of the Mughal Empire, hailed from the Fergana Valley in present-day Uzbekistan. Both are full SCO members and have elevated ties steadily over two decades.
- Comprehensive Strategic Partnership: Ties formally elevated to this level during PM Modi's August 2026 state visit; the visit sets concrete goals and a $5 billion annual trade target by 2030.
- Uranium deal: A framework for long-term supply of uranium from Uzbekistan was agreed, in line with India's civil nuclear energy programme.
- Trade trajectory: Bilateral goods trade grew from $500 million in 2010 to $2 billion in 2025; the current volume is over $1 billion; India's exports stood at $1.2 billion in 2025–26.
- UPI in Uzbekistan: NPCI International and Uzbekistan's National Interbank Processing Centre JSC agreed to enable UPI-QR interoperability for cross-border merchant payments — a first in Central Asia.
- Tashkent's historical resonance: The Tashkent Agreement (1966) was signed here ending the 1965 India-Pakistan War; PM Lal Bahadur Shastri died in Tashkent the same day.
- 11 Agreements signed covering mining, tourism, defence, agriculture, pharmaceuticals, health, IT, ayurveda, digital infrastructure, UPI, and education.
- Uranium supply framework: Uzbekistan, which holds significant uranium reserves, agreed to a long-term supply framework for India's civil nuclear energy programme — a strategic resource-security deal.
- Ministerial-level JCS: The existing joint commission was elevated from secretary to ministerial level — a structural upgrade signalling enhanced bilateral priority.
- Buddhist sites: A Letter of Intent for restoration of Fayaz Tepa and Kara Tepa Buddhist monasteries in Uzbekistan — reflecting India's soft-power and civilisational diplomacy.
- Aral Sea grant: India announced $1 million for afforestation around the Aral Sea — environmental diplomacy addressing one of the world's worst ecological disasters.
- Shastri Memorial visit: PM Modi planted a tree at the Presidential Palace and paid tribute at the Shastri Memorial, reinforcing historical and people-to-people ties.
- Venue: Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan — 26th SCO Summit
- SCO Presidency handover: Kyrgyzstan → Pakistan (for 2027)
- Key question: Will PM Modi indicate attendance at the 2027 SCO Summit in Islamabad?
- Iran meet: First Modi–Pezeshkian meeting since the US–Iran war; Hormuz Strait disruption and BRICS joint-statement deadlock (Iran–UAE tensions) are on the agenda.
- BRICS: September 2026 summit — India, as a key voice for the Global South, seeks a consensus position on West Asia and Global South priorities.
- UNSC seat contest 2027: India vs Tajikistan for the Asian bloc's non-permanent seat; India's strategy is to persuade Tajikistan to defer its candidature by one year.
- World Nomad Games: PM Modi to attend the 6th edition — cultural diplomacy and Central Asian soft-power engagement.
- Pakistan blocks India's overland access to Afghanistan and Central Asia; Chabahar Port (Iran) and the International North–South Transport Corridor (INSTC) are India's strategic workarounds.
- China's BRI has grown to $106 billion in China–Central Asia trade by 2025, dwarfing India's $2 billion — the connectivity gap is India's most significant structural challenge in the region.
- India's soft-power assets — IT, education, Bollywood, yoga — remain underutilised in Central Asia. The UPI extension and scholarship programmes are steps in the right direction.
- The India–Central Asia Summit last met in 2022; the delay has created a perception of declining Indian interest which this visit aims to correct.
- Trade at $2 billion is far below potential for a region rich in oil, gas, uranium, and rare-earth minerals — India needs concessional financing and connectivity investment, not just MoUs.
- The $5 billion trade target by 2030 is ambitious given the absence of a direct land route and the dominance of Russian and Chinese intermediary channels.
- INSTC operationalisation remains slow; US sanctions on Iran complicate Chabahar's full potential despite India's exemption for the port.
India's Central Asia policy has been described as "geographically ambitious but logistically constrained." In the context of PM Modi's 2026 state visit to Uzbekistan and the SCO summit, critically analyse India's strategic interests in Central Asia and the structural challenges that limit their realisation. 15 marks · 250 words
OBC Creamy Layer & the Income Test — Why the Supreme Court's March 2026 Ruling Is Hard to Implement
The Supreme Court's March 2026 ruling in the Rohith Nathan case found that the DoPT was practising "hostile discrimination" against OBC candidates from PSUs and private employment by including their salaries in the creamy layer income test — a standard not applied to government servants; the Centre now says retrospective implementation would cause a "cascading effect" across all categories.
The creamy layer concept among OBCs emerged from the Supreme Court's 1992 ruling in Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (Mandal Commission case). The idea was to exclude OBC candidates whose families had accumulated significant social and economic privileges from reservation benefits, ensuring the benefits reach the truly backward.
- 1993 DoPT OM: Operationalised the creamy layer — excluded OBC candidates if gross family income exceeded a threshold for three consecutive years; income from salaries and agricultural land was explicitly excluded from this calculation.
- Income threshold: ₹1 lakh in 1993 → revised several times → currently ₹8 lakh per annum (last revised 2017).
- 2004 DoPT letter (the problem): Paragraph 9 seemed to suggest including salary income for OBC candidates whose parents worked in Central/State PSUs where equivalence with government posts was not established — creating a two-track system.
- The March 11, 2026 ruling held that the 2004 letter created "hostile discrimination" — OBC candidates from PSU/private employment had salary income counted against them, while those with parents in government service did not face this.
- The court called the income test a "residual filter" — meaning salaries were always meant to be excluded; the 2004 letter wrongly reintroduced them for a subset of candidates.
- The court directed the government to create supernumerary posts for OBC candidates who had been wrongly denied non-creamy-layer status since 2015.
- Within six months, the Centre was to implement the ruling across CSE (Civil Services Examinations) batches from 2015 onwards.
- Indra Sawhney (1992): Upheld OBC reservation; introduced creamy layer concept
- 1993 DoPT OM: Operationalised creamy layer exclusion criteria
- 2004 DoPT Letter: Introduced ambiguity on salary inclusion for PSU parents
- Rohith Nathan (March 2026): Struck down salary inclusion as "hostile discrimination"; directed supernumerary posts
- Current status: SC considering a Bench to hear Centre's plea for clarification and for CSE 2025 candidates to continue as settled
- Statute: BNSS 2023, Section 230 (formerly CrPC Section 207) — on document furnishing
- 22 additional court judgments have already been passed applying the Rohith Nathan principles; 12 new cases have been filed by candidates who had not previously approached courts.
- Over 950 CSE 2025 candidates were about to start their Foundation Course based on the old reading of the income test.
- Retrospective adjustment would create seniority disputes and could disadvantage unreserved category candidates — the cascading effect the Centre warns about.
- The Centre also argues that excluding salary income entirely could allow OBC candidates with parents earning up to ₹1 crore to claim non-creamy layer status.
- OBC candidates argue the DoPT was applying the discriminatory standard arbitrarily — and that the Centre had ample time (since the issue was pending for over a decade) to flag implementation concerns earlier.
- The delay in implementing a Supreme Court judgment on reservation rights raises questions about administrative accountability and equitable governance.
- The case also highlights the absence of a uniform equivalence framework for PSU posts vis-à-vis government posts — a structural gap that has persisted since the 1993 OM.
The Supreme Court's ruling in Union of India v. Rohith Nathan (2026) addresses structural discrimination within the OBC creamy layer framework. Critically examine the legal basis of the creamy layer concept, the nature of the discrimination identified by the court, and the challenges in implementing this judgment without creating cascading inequities across categories. 15 marks · 250 words
Can an Accused Be Denied a Copy of the FIR? — The Law, Courts, and the BNSS
The Supreme Court's direction to the Ghaziabad Police to provide journalist Abhishek Upadhyay with a copy of his FIR revives a fundamental question: What does Indian law say about an accused person's right to access an FIR — and how have courts shaped this right over time?
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which replaced the CrPC, does not require the police to furnish the accused with an FIR immediately upon registration.
The law provides for the accused to receive the FIR at a later stage — only after the investigation culminates in the filing of a chargesheet before the magistrate.
- Section 173(2) BNSS: FIR copy to be given "forthwith" and free of cost — but only to the informant or victim, not the accused.
- Section 230 BNSS (formerly Section 207 CrPC): The magistrate must furnish the accused with FIR and chargesheet copies within 14 days of appearance/production before the court.
- Judicial precedents, however, have recognised the right of an accused to obtain the FIR soon after registration — before the chargesheet stage.
- Delhi HC (2010) — Court on Its Own Motion v. State: Directed Delhi Police to upload FIRs on its website within 24 hours; sensitive offences may be withheld through a reasoned DCP-level order.
- HP HC (2014) — Rama Nand Rathore v. State of HP: A person who suspects they are named in an FIR can seek a certified copy from the police within 24 hours; FIRs to be uploaded online.
- Supreme Court (2016) — Youth Bar Association of India v. UoI: Extended the directions pan-India; FIRs must be uploaded on police websites within 24 hours (up to 72 hours where connectivity issues exist); accused entitled to access FIR before Section 207 CrPC stage.
- Sexual offences, POCSO cases, and terror offences are identified as "sensitive" — FIRs may be withheld from online publication.
- Decision must be taken by an officer not below DSP/equivalent rank.
- Even in sensitive cases, the accused or their authorised representative may apply to the magistrate for a certified FIR copy within three days.
- Prelims hook: The SC ruling in Youth Bar Association is the leading case on FIR access; the BNSS (Section 173) is the current statutory framework replacing CrPC Section 154.
Access to an FIR is a precondition for exercising the right to a fair trial and seeking pre-trial remedies. Examine the evolution of the legal framework governing an accused's right to access an FIR in India, with reference to statutory provisions under the BNSS and key Supreme Court judgments. 10 marks · 150 words
Rani Avantibai Lodhi — The Forgotten Warrior Queen of the 1857 Revolt
Defence Minister Rajnath Singh's tribute to Rani Avantibai Lodhi at a centenary event in Lucknow renews attention on one of the lesser-known but fiercely courageous women leaders of the 1857 Revolt — a queen who fought the British not just for political sovereignty but against a system that underestimated women.
Rani Avantibai (1831–1858) was the queen of Ramgarh, in present-day Mandla district of Madhya Pradesh.
When her husband Raja Vikramaditya Singh fell seriously ill, the British invoked the Doctrine of Lapse (which denied inheritance rights when there was no male heir) and placed Ramgarh under a Court of Wards — effectively taking over the administration.
- Avantibai refused to accept British authority and personally organised military resistance, raising an army of around 4,000 soldiers.
- She fought pitched battles against British forces at Kheri and Ghughri in early 1858, pushing back the British initially before being outnumbered.
- Refusing to surrender, she chose to die by her own sword rather than be captured — on 20 March 1858.
- She is one of the few women fighters of 1857 who challenged both the British administration and patriarchal norms simultaneously.
- Commemorated: A PAC battalion in Badaun (UP) is named after her; the Government of India issued a commemorative postage stamp in 2001.
- Rani Avantibai belongs to a group of women leaders who took up arms in 1857, alongside Rani Lakshmibai of Jhansi and Begum Hazrat Mahal of Awadh.
- Unlike Lakshmibai (who has been widely celebrated), Avantibai remains relatively obscure in mainstream historical narratives despite comparable courage and sacrifice.
- The Doctrine of Lapse, employed by Lord Dalhousie as Governor-General, was a primary trigger for the 1857 Revolt — it denied rulers the right to adopt heirs.
- Princely states affected by the Doctrine: Satara (1848), Jaitpur, Sambalpur (1849), Baghat, Udaipur (1852), Jhansi (1853), Nagpur (1854), Awadh (1856).
- The tribute at a public event underlines the growing recognition of regional and community-specific freedom fighters who were sidelined in dominant historical narratives.
- The Lodhi community's celebration of Avantibai also reflects identity politics in Uttar Pradesh, where community pride and electoral mobilisation intersect with historical memory.
- For UPSC, Rani Avantibai is examinable in the context of: (1) the 1857 Revolt's spread and causes; (2) women in the freedom movement; (3) princely states and the Doctrine of Lapse.
The 1857 Revolt saw several women emerging as symbols of resistance against British rule. Critically examine the role of women like Rani Avantibai Lodhi and Rani Lakshmibai in the 1857 uprising, the structural conditions that pushed them to the forefront of resistance, and why many such figures remain marginalised in mainstream historical narratives. 15 marks · 250 words
Javelin Anti-Tank Guided Missiles — Why India Took 16 Years to Finalise the Deal
India's finalisation of the Javelin anti-tank guided missile (ATGM) deal with the US — 16 years after the process began — illustrates the structural complexities of Indian defence procurement: technology transfer disputes, indigenisation imperatives, shifting strategic partnerships, and operational urgency rarely aligning simultaneously.
An Anti-Tank Guided Missile (ATGM) is a precision weapon designed to destroy heavily armoured vehicles including main battle tanks.
The Javelin is a third/fourth-generation, man-portable, fire-and-forget ATGM — meaning once the gunner locks on a target using its infrared imaging seeker, the missile guides itself, freeing the operator to take cover immediately.
- India's Army needed ATGMs to replace ageing Milan-2T and Konkurs systems — both second-generation, wire-guided missiles requiring the operator to remain exposed until impact.
- The Javelin is jointly developed by Lockheed Martin and Raytheon (USA); it uses a top-attack mode to hit tanks at their most vulnerable point — the thin top armour.
- It gained global attention during the Russia-Ukraine War (2022–24) where it proved highly effective against Russian armour.
- 2010: Defence Minister A.K. Antony first announces Javelin procurement intent via the US Foreign Military Sales (FMS) route, including Transfer of Technology (ToT).
- 2013–14: US refuses 100% ToT on the core seeker technology → India pivots to Israel's Spike ATGM (manufactured by Rafael Advanced Defense Systems).
- 2014: Defence Acquisition Council clears purchase of 8,000+ Spike ATGMs; long contract negotiations follow.
- 2017: ₹500 million Spike order cancelled — concerns over performance in trials, ToT terms, and progress in India's own DRDO man-portable ATGM programme.
- 2018: Spike deal briefly revived after PM Netanyahu's India visit; shelved again.
- 2019: Emergency procurement of limited Spike-LR (4th gen) units to plug operational gap.
- 2023: Kalyani Rafael Advanced Systems (JV between Kalyani Group and Rafael) wins ₹287.51 crore MoD order for Spike systems.
- February 2025: Javelin JV (Lockheed Martin + Raytheon) signs MoU with Bharat Dynamics Limited (BDL) for co-assembly and co-production in India.
- May 2025: Operation Sindoor accelerates negotiations — post-conflict urgency.
- November 2025: Washington officially clears the Javelin sale.
- August 2026: Deal finalised via the US FMS process.
- Technology transfer: India demands meaningful ToT on critical technologies; the US historically restricts core seeker/guidance tech even under FMS — a persistent friction point.
- Indigenous vs import: DRDO's own ATGM programme (Nag, Helina/Dhruvastra) has faced delays; the Javelin deal reflects the gap between indigenisation timelines and operational urgency.
- FMS route: The US FMS (Foreign Military Sales) route allows government-to-government sales bypassing commercial negotiations; it is generally faster but offers less flexibility on ToT.
- Bharat Dynamics Limited (BDL): India's premier missile PSU; the co-production arrangement with Javelin JV is consistent with the 'Make in India' defence policy.
- Operation Sindoor effect: The May 2025 military operation accelerated strategic urgency — illustrating how conflict readiness often overrides procurement proceduralism.
India's 16-year journey to acquire the Javelin ATGM reflects the structural tensions between indigenisation imperatives, technology transfer demands, and operational urgency in defence procurement. Critically examine the factors that complicate India's defence acquisition process and suggest reforms to make it more efficient without compromising strategic autonomy. 15 marks · 250 words
A Quiet Move That Saved Dehradun's Vultures — Electrocution, Power Lines, and Conservation
A decade-old study published in the Journal of Threatened Taxa confirms that relocating a livestock carcass dump just 2.4 km away from high-tension power lines near Dehradun dramatically reduced vulture electrocution deaths — offering a simple, scalable conservation intervention for one of India's most endangered bird groups.
India has lost over 99% of its vulture population since the 1990s — one of the fastest mass declines of any bird species in recorded history.
The primary driver was diclofenac, a veterinary NSAID that causes fatal renal failure in vultures when they feed on carcasses of treated livestock. India banned veterinary diclofenac in 2006.
- Nine species of vultures occur in India; three have experienced catastrophic declines: Oriental White-backed (Gyps bengalensis), Long-billed (G. indicus), and Slender-billed (G. tenuirostris).
- Other threats: poisoning (including by diclofenac still in use illegally), food scarcity (as livestock populations change), habitat loss, and — as this study highlights — electrocution.
- Vultures are obligate scavengers — they eat only carcasses. This makes them nature's most effective disease-control mechanism, preventing the spread of anthrax, brucellosis, and other livestock diseases.
- 34 surveys conducted between May 2011 and February 2014 in the Sudhauwala region, recording 743 individual vultures across five species.
- 46 vulture carcasses attributable to electrocution found near high-tension power transmission infrastructure.
- Highest mortality: Himalayan Griffon (Gyps himalayensis), followed by Eurasian Griffon (G. fulvus) and Cinereous Vulture (Aegypius monachus).
- Action: In April 2015, local authorities relocated the carcass dump 2.4 km away from the high-risk electricity infrastructure.
- Outcome: Post-relocation monitoring recorded zero electrocution deaths; other raptors — black kite (Milvus migrans) and crested serpent eagle (Spilornis cheela) — also benefited.
- Electrocution is the most under-reported anthropogenic threat to vultures globally, according to the study — researchers focus on NSAIDs and poisoning while power infrastructure risk is overlooked.
- Vultures are particularly vulnerable because their large wingspans can simultaneously contact two conductors or a conductor and a grounded pole, causing electrocution.
- The study was conducted on a non-systematic basis — the full extent of electrocution mortality across India remains unknown and no nationwide study has been conducted post-2015.
- The intervention — a simple carcass dump relocation — cost virtually nothing compared to captive breeding or pharmaceutical interventions, yet produced measurable results.
- The Wildlife Institute of India (Dehradun) was involved in the study — India's premier wildlife research institution.
- UPSC angle: Vulture conservation connects to: (1) biodiversity and extinction; (2) ecosystem services (disease control); (3) human-wildlife conflict; (4) the diclofenac ban and drug regulation; (5) Project Vulture (MoEFCC).
Vultures provide irreplaceable ecosystem services yet face multiple anthropogenic threats in India. Critically evaluate the current conservation challenges facing vulture populations in India and discuss how community-based, low-cost interventions can complement policy-level conservation measures. 10 marks · 150 words
Blaming Climate Change for Extreme Weather Has Limits — The Science of Attribution Explained
Every time an extreme weather event strikes, scientists race to determine how much climate change contributed. This field — extreme event attribution — has grown rapidly but faces fundamental methodological limits that affect both science and policy, including legal liability for carbon emitters.
Attribution science tries to trace the human fingerprint in extreme weather. It asks: How much more likely or severe was this event because of anthropogenic climate change?
The method uses climate model simulations — first for a counterfactual pre-industrial world (280 ppm CO₂) and then for the present (420+ ppm CO₂) — and calculates the difference in probability or intensity.
- World Weather Attribution (WWA): The leading international research group on extreme event attribution; it attributed the 2026 South Asia heatwave as being ~3x more likely and ~1°C warmer due to climate change.
- Detection vs Attribution: Detection asks whether an event is outside the range of natural variability; attribution asks how much climate change contributed to that deviation.
- Short-duration, sub-daily events: Intense bursts of rain lasting an hour or less are hard to model — most global climate models cannot capture fast-changing processes at this scale.
- Localised events: Land-sea breezes, mountain wind systems, and hyperlocal phenomena require model resolutions of around 10 km or less — currently beyond most operational models.
- Limited historical records: Without long-term hourly or sub-hourly rainfall data for a specific location, it is impossible to define the "natural variability" baseline accurately.
- What counts as 'extreme'? A drought that seems extreme over 20 years may not appear extreme over 500 years — there is no scientific consensus on the definition of 'extreme' at all timescales.
- Model uncertainty: Attribution models cannot perfectly represent a climate that never existed; counterfactual simulations carry inherent uncertainty.
- Attribution science is increasingly being used to assign legal liability to carbon emitters — "carbon majors" — for specific climate damages. The question is whether such findings can withstand judicial scrutiny.
- Climate scientists argue that courts should focus on preparedness and adaptation — improving early warning systems and resilience infrastructure — rather than on attribution-based liability, which is fraught with uncertainty.
- The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) itself acknowledges that local-scale attribution remains one of the most challenging areas of climate science.
Extreme event attribution science seeks to quantify climate change's role in specific weather events, but faces significant methodological limitations. Discuss the scientific basis and the limits of attribution science, and examine its implications for climate litigation, international climate finance, and loss-and-damage negotiations. 15 marks · 250 words
Betelgeuse May Not Be Alone — Astronomers Find Evidence of a Companion Star
Using the Very Large Telescope, astronomers have found strong evidence of a companion star to Betelgeuse — named Betelgeuse B — which may explain why this famous red supergiant's brightness mysteriously dims and brightens on a six-year cycle.
- Betelgeuse: A red supergiant star in the Orion constellation, around 700 light-years from Earth; one of the brightest and largest stars visible to the naked eye; a candidate for a supernova explosion (though not imminent on human timescales).
- Betelgeuse B: The companion star, estimated at 2.6–3.1 solar masses; appears to be a young star whose periodic blocking of Betelgeuse's light causes the six-year brightness variation.
- Instrument: Very Large Telescope (VLT) — operated by the European Southern Observatory (ESO) in Chile, one of the world's most powerful ground-based telescopes.
- Significance: Binary star systems are common, but confirming a companion for Betelgeuse — one of the most observed stars — would significantly revise models of its evolution and eventual fate.
- Prelims hook: Betelgeuse is in the constellation Orion. The VLT is in the Atacama Desert, Chile. The dimming event of 2019–20 (the "Great Dimming") was caused by a dust cloud, not a companion — the six-year cycle is a separate, longer-period phenomenon.
Discuss how ground-based observatories like the Very Large Telescope have advanced our understanding of stellar evolution. What is the significance of discovering companion stars in binary systems, and how does such research contribute to our understanding of the universe? 10 marks · 150 words
A Star with an Extreme Magnetic Field Could Prove Space Is Not Empty — Vacuum Birefringence Explained
A study published in Nature reports that astronomers have observed the quantum electrodynamics (QED) phenomenon of vacuum birefringence around a magnetar — almost confirming a 1930s prediction that empty space is not truly empty, but rather a seething soup of virtual particles.
- Vacuum birefringence: In the presence of extremely strong magnetic fields, the quantum vacuum (empty space) behaves like a crystal — splitting light into two paths by rotating its polarisation. Predicted by Heisenberg and Euler in the 1930s.
- Magnetar 1E 1547.0-5408: Located 14,700 light-years away; one of a rare subclass that also emits radio pulses; its extreme magnetic field (88 trillion times Earth's) makes it the ideal laboratory.
- Evidence: NASA's IXPE (Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer) satellite detected polarisation levels up to 80% in X-rays from the magnetar — consistent with QED predictions of vacuum birefringence.
- Instruments used: IXPE (NASA), NICER (International Space Station), and Murriyang radio telescope (Australia).
- Significance: Confirms that the quantum vacuum is an active medium; could help scientists build better maps of the universe and understand space-weather phenomena.
- Prelims hook: QED — Quantum Electrodynamics — is the theory that describes how light and matter interact at the quantum level. IXPE was launched in 2021 specifically to study X-ray polarisation in extreme cosmic environments.
India's participation in international space science missions and the growth of indigenous space capabilities have expanded our scientific reach. Discuss the significance of space-based telescopes like IXPE in advancing fundamental physics, and examine India's evolving role in space science collaboration. 10 marks · 150 words
Uranium Supply Framework & UPI-QR Goes to Central Asia
India and Uzbekistan agreed a framework for long-term uranium supply — supporting India's civil nuclear energy programme — and enabled UPI-QR interoperability for merchant payments in Uzbekistan, a first in Central Asia. Both sides set a $5 billion annual trade target by 2030 and signed 11 agreements.
- Prelims hook: Uzbekistan is one of the world's top uranium producers. The Atomic Energy Act 1962 governs India's nuclear programme. NPCI International (NIPL) is the overseas arm of NPCI, extending UPI globally. Uzbekistan shares no ocean border (doubly landlocked).
26th SCO Summit in Bishkek — Pakistan Takes Presidency; UNSC Seat Contest in Focus
The 26th SCO Summit in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan sees the SCO presidency pass from Kyrgyzstan to Pakistan for 2027 — raising the question of whether PM Modi will attend the 2027 summit in Islamabad. India is also contesting with Tajikistan for an Asian-bloc UNSC non-permanent seat for 2027, making the summit a key diplomatic platform.
- Prelims hook: SCO founded in 2001 (Shanghai); India full member since 2017. Current members: China, Russia, India, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Iran, Belarus. The SCO's RATS (Regional Anti-Terrorist Structure) is based in Tashkent. UNSC non-permanent seats: 10 elected for 2-year terms by UNGA on regional group basis.
OBC Creamy Layer: From Indra Sawhney (1992) to the 2026 Rohith Nathan Ruling
The OBC creamy layer emerged from the Supreme Court's 1992 Indra Sawhney judgment (Mandal Commission case), operationalised via a 1993 DoPT Office Memorandum. The income threshold (currently ₹8 lakh p.a., last revised 2017) explicitly excludes salary and agricultural income.
The 2026 Rohith Nathan ruling found that a 2004 DoPT clarification had wrongly included salary income for PSU/private-sector parents — constituting "hostile discrimination".
- Prelims hook: Indra Sawhney case: 9-judge bench; upheld 27% OBC quota; introduced creamy layer; capped total reservations at 50% (Devadasan exception). Supernumerary posts: additional posts created over and above sanctioned strength, typically to accommodate court-directed adjustments.
BNSS 2023 and FIR Access — Key Provisions and Landmark Rulings
Under BNSS 2023 (which replaced the CrPC), Section 173(2) requires FIR copies to be given to the informant/victim forthwith — but not to the accused. The accused receives the FIR only after chargesheet filing (Section 230).
However, the Supreme Court's 2016 ruling in Youth Bar Association of India v. UoI directed FIRs to be uploaded on police websites within 24 hours across India, establishing a pan-India right of access for the accused pre-chargesheet.
- Prelims hook: CrPC (1973) → replaced by BNSS (2023, in force July 2024). FIR under Section 173 BNSS (formerly S.154 CrPC). "Sensitive offence" FIR withholding: minimum DSP-rank decision. POCSO Act 2012 offences are categorised as sensitive.
Javelin ATGM — Key Technical and Procurement Facts
The Javelin is a man-portable, fire-and-forget ATGM jointly developed by Lockheed Martin and Raytheon (US). It uses an infrared imaging seeker for autonomous guidance post-launch.
India's deal is through the US Foreign Military Sales (FMS) route with co-production involving Bharat Dynamics Limited (BDL). The Milan-2T and Konkurs (Soviet-origin, wire-guided) are the legacy systems being replaced.
- Prelims hook: Generations of ATGM: 1st — manual command line-of-sight (MCLOS); 2nd — semi-automatic (SACLOS) e.g. Milan, Konkurs; 3rd — fire-and-forget (infrared homing) e.g. Javelin. BDL (Bharat Dynamics Limited): a DPSU under MoD, manufactures guided missile systems; headquartered in Hyderabad. Operation Sindoor (May 2025) accelerated the Javelin procurement timeline.
Vulture Conservation in India — Diclofenac Ban, Threatened Species, and Ecosystem Services
India banned veterinary diclofenac in 2006 after it was identified as the primary cause of the catastrophic 99% decline in vulture populations since the 1990s. Vultures are obligate scavengers that perform irreplaceable disease-control services.
This study identifies electrocution from power lines as a secondary, under-reported threat — carcass dump relocation was a low-cost, effective conservation solution.
- Prelims hook: Critically endangered vultures in India: Oriental White-backed Vulture, Long-billed Vulture, Slender-billed Vulture. Wildlife Institute of India (WII): autonomous body under MoEFCC, headquartered in Dehradun. Journal of Threatened Taxa: peer-reviewed journal publishing threatened species data. Project Vulture (2006): conservation programme by Bombay Natural History Society (BNHS) and RSPB.
World Weather Attribution and the Limits of Extreme Event Attribution Science
World Weather Attribution (WWA) uses counterfactual climate modelling — simulating a world at 280 ppm CO₂ vs. the present 420+ ppm — to estimate the human-induced intensification of extreme weather events.
While useful for policy communication, attribution science faces inherent limits: short-duration events, localised phenomena, and the absence of long-term granular weather data make causal attribution scientifically uncertain.
- Prelims hook: Pre-industrial CO₂: ~280 ppm; present: ~420 ppm. IPCC AR6 (2021–22): acknowledged limits of local attribution. Carbon majors: companies like ExxonMobil, Shell, BP responsible for majority of historical fossil fuel emissions — increasingly targeted in climate litigation globally. Loss and Damage Fund: established at COP27 (Sharm el-Sheikh, 2022).


