Structure of the Essay:
Introduction:
You can start the introduction through following ways:
- Start with a general introduction/anecdote/an example/a short story/a poem/a quote/a recent event or trend etc which can help in describing the need for self-reliance.
- The fundamental human need for the spirit of play is where team sports activities first emerged. Both success and failure are merely results of this playful attitude. Rules-bending and using abusive words toward officials are not “part of the game.” The simple satisfaction of playing, being active, and strengthening relationships are all part of the game. You can’t play, compete, or have fun if you don’t have an opponent. They owe you money just as much as you owe them. Therefore, cooperation is the foundation of play. This concept of cooperative competition is acknowledged by upholding high standards of integrity and fair play.
Thesis Statement:
- It is a transition statement between introduction and body of the essay.
- In thesis statement, you should write outline of the body with your own arguments. You should prove these arguments in body of the essay with relevant examples.
Body of the essay:
People with a competitive spirit are enthusiastic about competition, and they frequently look for a competitive environment in whatever they do. These individuals are frequently regarded as being incredibly self-assured and always up for a challenge. Currently, it’s believed that human competitiveness is an innate quality or a trait that people are born with. People participate in sports as a healthy way to satisfy their drive to compete in what is essentially a harmless competition. Because it takes greater competitive spirit to intentionally put oneself in danger, harm occurs in more popular sports.
The competitive spirit can occasionally be detrimental, such as in cases of hyper-competitiveness, where individuals attempt to make every situation into a competition and are typically identified as having an aggressive disposition. Between having a competitive spirit and being aggressive, there is a fine line. Healthy rivalry can lead to benefits in a variety of spheres of life, including professional success and respect from others.
Importance of competition & Who is the champion?
An event when two or more people compete to deliver their best is called a competition. It might involve business, competitions, etc. But in a student’s life, competition takes place when they take on each other in activities like athletics and academics. They started working hard. The finest setting for comparing our knowledge, talents, and abilities with those of others is this competition. The students gain bravery as a result of this competition. It is a characteristic of a student that is avoidable. The environment, skills, knowledge, and success can only benefit from healthy competition, though. Healthy competition will produce positive outcomes. Conflict can result from unhealthy competitiveness, and conflict will lead to division. Unhealthy competitiveness could erode their sense of equality.
An event when two or more people compete to deliver their best is called a competition. It might involve business, competitions, etc. But in a student’s life, competition takes place when they take on each other in activities like athletics and academics. They started working hard. The finest setting for comparing our knowledge, talents, and abilities with those of others is this competition. The students gain bravery as a result of this competition. It is a characteristic of a student that is avoidable. The environment, skills, knowledge, and success can only benefit from healthy competition, though. Healthy competition will produce positive outcomes. Conflict can result from unhealthy competitiveness, and conflict will lead to division. Unhealthy competitiveness could erode their sense of equality.
Champions are created from a source deep within them. a longing, a dream, or an idea. They must possess the ability and the motivation. But the will needs to be more powerful than the ability. Ali, Muhammad The Latin word “Campio,” which meaning “fighter,” is where the word “champion” originates. This phrase is frequently used, particularly in the realm of sports. We are all aware that champions are created over the course of many years by a player’s unwavering commitment, passion, and drive to win along with their unwavering belief in themselves as the best.
A champion is defined as “a person who has defeated or outperformed all rivals in a competition, especially in athletics,” while a winner is “a person or object that wins something.” A champion and a winner differ in their approach and consistency. A champion is someone who consistently prevails in competitions or tournaments; as a result, they are highly respected. Winners have only ever won. The word “winner” does not carry the same meaning as “heroic figure” or “popular public figure.”
The following are the main distinctions between wins and champions:
- While champions have a “marathon” mentality, winners take advantage of opportunities.
- Winning is sometimes the result of being in the right place at the right moment.
- Winning is a time-limited event.
- Champions are those who learn from setbacks fast.
- Champions are those who work hard even when no one is looking.
- Champions sacrifice self for the welfare of the team.
While getting your way and winning can feel nice, winning can sometimes become the main objective in conflict situations. In other words, people have the capacity to go beyond simply winning to “winning at any costs,” and such interactions have the potential to have lasting negative effects. It becomes challenging to work cooperatively to develop solutions that improve results for all when individuals view competition as a contest—a zero-sum game where someone wins and someone loses. In essence, when we pursue victory at any costs, we are adopting a different strategy that favours competition over cooperation.
Because of how competitive our society is, adopting the winning at any costs strategy is simple. There are some factors of having a competitive attitude that can lead to improved performance. However, we discover that trying to win at all costs has a price in conflict situations. People frequently become defensive when they believe that others are doing everything in their power to get their way. They frequently do not support the conclusion and contribute nothing to its implementation.
Therefore, striving for victory at any costs might harm outcomes while also endangering interpersonal connections. People don’t enjoy having their interests neglected, and relationships can suffer when someone disregards them in order to forward their own agenda. This is especially problematic when relationships span between interdependent individuals who genuinely depend on one another for support both now and in the future. If you tend to be very task-focused and to push yourself to succeed, you might want to consider whether you are engaging in behaviours that prioritise winning at all costs.
If this is the case, it would be wise to take your time and consider how you could contribute to the creation of cooperative solutions that serve your interests while also potentially addressing those of the other parties involved in the disagreement. There are two kinds of competitiveness; one breeds dishonest play and cheap shots, the other inspires inspired play and performance. The definition of competition is “to struggle with, not against; it is a form of collaboration in which rivals encourage one another to reach excellence. Each player pledges to follow the game’s regulations and play to the best of their abilities. These games can be exhilarating to play and watch.
On the other side, treating your rival as an enemy that needs to be vanquished is a sign of poor competition. Cheating, flopping, criticising the officials, and engaging in continual trash talk are all indications that a player sees his or her opponent as an enemy who must be overcome, even humiliated, by any means necessary rather than as a teammate deserving of respect. This non-competitive attitude can negatively affect a player during a game, a team during a match or season, or it might negatively affect an entire sport over time.
Conclusion:
Instilling a competitive spirit in students can be advantageous for both their intellectual abilities and their social and emotional development in an academic setting where students typically maintain pleasant relationships with their peers. Universities are starting to achieve a balance between their main curricula and extracurricular activities in today’s rapidly changing environment. A competitive attitude is frequently instilled in students through extracurricular activities, such as essay writing, public speaking, singing competitions, and sports, in addition to subjects covered in their core curricula. Through these kinds of activities, kids (individually or in a group) learn how to compete positively with other students to achieve greatness and success while maintaining good sportsmanship. Students also learn that winning requires perseverance, hard work, and continuous learning, without which success is merely a pipe dream. The competition also requires that students take responsibility for their acts and accept the results of those actions with humour. It is important to note that efforts to foster a spirit of competition must include not just the intellectual ideals embodied in the core curriculum but also the social, emotional, cultural, and recreational ideals that are all fostered via extracurricular activities.
However, these initiatives should not be taken to indicate that the core curriculum and extracurricular activities are mutually exclusive. Instead, the co-curricular activities and the core curriculum reinforce one another, indicating that they are complementary to one another. More importantly, moral and spiritual development—important qualities that can be implanted through non-academic activities—must be balanced with students’ better intellectual development as a result of their ongoing participation in academic activities.