Call Us Now

+91 9606900005 / 04

For Enquiry

legacyiasacademy@gmail.com

189 viewsAll GS PapersGS Paper 3
on 0 Answers

Approach:

  1. Introduction – state the unemployment scenario in India.
  2. State the current position of government recruitment.
  3. Mention the need for creating 1 million jobs.
  4. Mention the issues & challenges associated with the proposal.
  5. Conclusion

The leaked Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) in 2018 revealed that India’s unemployment rate was the highest (6.07%) in four decades. The latest PLFS suggests that the numbers now are not so drastic, with the overall unemployment rate at 4.2% in 2020-21 compared to 4.8% in 2019-20. In terms of the more widely used statistic internationally, the current weekly status of unemployment, the figure of 7.5% for all persons in 2020-21 is still worrisome.

Current status of government recruitment: According to the report of the 7th Pay Commission, the total sanctioned strength of the Union Government fell from 41.76 lakh in 1994 to 38.9 lakh in 2014. In 2021, the strength of the Union Government stood at 34.5 lakh as per the Union budget. Moreover, between 2006-2014, the average recruitment in the Union Government was a little over one lakh each year. Between 2017-18 and 2021-22, the Staff Selection Commission (SSC) and the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) recruited only 1.74 lakh and 24,836 candidates.

Rationale for providing 1 million jobs ?:

  • Changing Structure of Indian Economy: The services sector has rapidly expanded. However, the sector tends to be less employment intensive. Moreover, most of the jobs require skilled workforce. The gig economy does employ the unskilled but fails to create enough jobs for the millions entering the labour force each year. In a similar way, India has not been able to create a robust labour intensive manufacturing sector that is able to absorb the low and semi-skilled sections of the labour force.
  • Pending Vacancies: A significant number of posts in the government sector are already lying vacant which is impairing governance. The latest data showed that there were 8.86 lakh vacant jobs among all Union government civilian posts as of March 2020.
  • Demographic Dividend: India has the largest working force in the world. The demographic dividend window will last till 2040s. Finding productive employment for its youth is an imperative for India, else this dividend can easily be turned into a demographic disaster.
  • Mitigating the Impact of Pandemic: The pandemic led to large loss of livelihoods. Further, it led to a shift of employment into lower productive and unpaid jobs away from salaried employment. Wage rates have continued to remain lower for those employed in either salaried jobs or self-employed compared to the pre-pandemic period. Thus creation of jobs by the government will help in providing some relief.
  • Global Uncertainties: The ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict and a looming threat of global recession would reduce consumer demand and consequently poor economic activity. Unemployment is expected to get worse. In this scenario, the creation of 1 million jobs by the government would be beneficial in mitigating the impact.

Challenges associated with the proposal ? :

  • Lack of Absorptive Capacity of Government: The recent recruitment data shows that government employment actually forms a small proportion of the formal labour force, and an even smaller part of the total labour force. Thus, having 1 million jobs in the Government will not address the problem of widespread unemployment.
  • Against Minimum Government Maximum Governance: This expansion in public sector jobs poses a challenge to the promise and goal of minimum government. Expansion of 1 million jobs may not be feasible especially in the era of digital technology and automation.
  • Budgetary Constraints: The real danger of this mega-recruitment drive is that capital expenditure may be curtailed to make way for higher salary budgets. A reduction in capital expenditure will in turn reduce creation of productive assets that would have generated much more employment.
  • Discouraging Past Performance: On many occasions the government has failed to deliver on its past performances. Further certain inefficiencies still exist in the recruitment process due to which government exams get delayed and the result lingers on for years due to court cases.
  • The capacity of recruitment agencies (UPSC, SSC, RRB) may not be enough to recruit so many employees in the short time span. Further, a National Recruitment Agency set up in 2020 was expected to subsume the role of multiple government recruiting agencies but is not yet functional.
  • Demand Supply Mismatch: While the target is to create 1 million jobs but demand is much more than that. With roughly 12 million individuals entering the working age population each year, around 6 million jobs need to be created each year, assuming a labour force participation rate of 0.5. Thus, the Government’s 1 million jobs plan will have very little impact on wider unemployment in the economy.

The Union Government is at best a marginal source for employment generation and considering the scale of the challenge, this recruitment drive will not be enough. There is a need to acknowledge that enough jobs should be created by the private sector which should be the principal driver of employment generation.

Download PDF