Vinod, an exemplary IAS officer, finds himself at a crossroads when faced with allegations of corruption involving the influential Chairman. Balancing his commitment to ethics and accountability against the potential fallout of exposing political corruption, Vinod navigates a complex decision-making process.

Main Body

(a) Options Available to Vinod

Expose the Chairman:

  • Utilize documents and video recordings provided by the Board Member.
  • Uphold ethical duty to ensure transparency and accountability.

Conduct an Internal Investigation:

  • Initiate an internal inquiry within the State Road Transport Corporation.
  • Demonstrates commitment to due process and fairness.

Seek Legal Counsel:

  • Consult legal experts to understand whistleblower protections and legal implications.
  • Make an informed decision about exposing the Chairman.

Report to Higher Authorities:

  • Escalate the matter to higher state government authorities or anti-corruption agencies.
  • Ensure an independent investigation rather than personal responsibility.

Engage in Dialogue:

  • Attempt to resolve the issues internally through dialogue with the Chairman.
  • Seek cooperation rather than confrontation.

(b) Ethical Issues due to Politicization of Bureaucracy

Misuse of Power:

  • Chairman’s demand for a bribe highlights the misuse of political power.
  • Undermines principles of accountability and integrity.

Pressure on Civil Servants:

  • Chairman’s influence creates pressure on civil servants to compromise ethical principles.
  • Threatens honest officers like Vinod.

Whistleblower Protection:

  • Vinod faces the dilemma of exposing corruption without adequate whistleblower protection.
  • Highlights the need for robust mechanisms in the bureaucracy.

Partisan Interference:

  • Involvement of the Opposition Party and manipulation attempts underscore unethical partisan interference.
  • Raises concerns about the independence of bureaucratic affairs.

Impact on Public Trust:

  • Politicization erodes public trust in government institutions.
  • Perceived as a betrayal of public interests and welfare.

Professional Growth vs. Ethical Duty:

  • Vinod grapples with prioritizing professional growth or upholding the integrity of his office.
    Balancing personal career with ethical obligations.


In this intricate scenario, Vinod must meticulously weigh his options, giving precedence to his ethical duty in the best interests of the public and the organization. As he contemplates potential consequences, it is imperative for him to uphold the principles of transparency, accountability, and integrity in public service, ensuring a robust foundation for ethical decision-making.

Legacy Editor Changed status to publish November 27, 2023