- Rise in Women’s Strength in the IAF — First NDA Women Officers Commissioned GS1 / GS3
- DRDO Demonstrates Multi-Layered BMD and NASM-MR in Three Flight Tests GS3
- Can India Protect Its Seafarers in the Gulf? — Strikes on Merchant Vessels GS2 / GS3
- Frogs That Build ‘Cloudy’ Foam Nests — Strength in Numbers GS3
- Sea Star Sports Nature’s Optic Fibres to Focus Light GS3
- How Ants Cope with Disease Outbreaks — Social Immunity & Distancing GS3
- The Giant World of Fungi — First Global Map of AM Fungal Networks GS3
- India–China Joint UNESCO Nomination for Xuanzang’s Records GS1 / GS2
- AN-32: Soviet-Origin Transport Aircraft, the IAF’s Workhorse GS3
At the Combined Graduation Parade (CGP) of the 217th Course at the Air Force Academy (AFA), Dundigal (near Hyderabad), the Indian Air Force marked a historic first — the commissioning of its first batch of women officers trained through the National Defence Academy (NDA) route. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, reviewing the parade, said growing women’s participation was making the force “more balanced and stronger,” and invoked Operation Sindoor as a demonstration of the IAF’s precision-strike capability.
- First NDA-route women officers: the women cadets had passed out of the NDA (Khadakwasla, Pune) on 30 May 2025, then underwent branch-specific training at AFA Dundigal before commissioning — the first time in IAF history that women cadets from the NDA graduated as officers.
- Five women officers were awarded wings: 2 in the fighter stream and 3 in maintenance / ground-duty branches.
- 231 flight cadets graduated in all — 194 men and 37 women.
- Wings were also awarded to 9 Indian Navy officers, 3 Indian Coast Guard officers, and 2 trainees from Vietnam; 3 officers received navigation brevets.
- Top honours: Flying Officer Ashish Kumar Yadav won the President’s Plaque and the Nawanagar Sword of Honour (overall first, Pilot Course); Fg Off Ekta Gupta topped the Navigation stream; Fg Off Divyanshi Singh topped the Ground Duty branches.
- In an unscheduled highlight, the Chief of the Air Staff, Air Chief Marshal Amar Preet Singh, personally flew one aircraft of a three-aircraft Kiran formation flypast over the parade.
- Women were first commissioned into the IAF in 1991–92 under the Short Service Commission (SSC), initially in non-combat branches.
- India’s first three women fighter pilots — Avani Chaturvedi, Bhawana Kanth and Mohana Singh — were commissioned into the fighter stream in 2016 under an experimental scheme later made permanent.
- Permanent Commission for women was secured through the Supreme Court’s rulings — Secretary, Ministry of Defence v. Babita Puniya (2020) for the Army, with parallel relief extending opportunities across services.
- The NDA was opened to women following the Supreme Court’s interim order in Kush Kalra v. Union of India (August 2021); the first women cadets joined the NDA in 2022 — this 217th Course is the first to commission them.
- Institutionalising gender integration: the NDA route (vs. SSC-only entry earlier) places women on the same foundational training pathway as men from the cadet stage.
- Combat normalisation: women entering the fighter stream through the academy pipeline signals a structural, not tokenistic, shift.
- Demographic dividend & talent pool: widening recruitment improves the quality and depth of the officer cadre.
- Constitutional alignment: advances Article 15 (non-discrimination) and Article 16 (equality of opportunity in public employment).
- CGP = Combined Graduation Parade; held at the Air Force Academy, Dundigal (Telangana) — distinct from the NDA at Khadakwasla, Pune.
- Nawanagar Sword of Honour — awarded to the overall topper of the Pilot Course at the AFA.
- First 3 women fighter pilots (2016): Avani Chaturvedi, Bhawana Kanth, Mohana Singh.
- NDA opened to women after SC interim order in Kush Kalra v. UoI (2021); first women cadets joined 2022.
- Babita Puniya case (2020) — SC granted Permanent Commission to women in the Army.
- President’s Plaque — awarded for first position in overall order of merit in a branch/stream.
- Kiran — HAL-built intermediate jet trainer used for stage-II flying training (being succeeded by HJT-36 Sitara/Yashas).
“The induction of women through the National Defence Academy marks a structural rather than symbolic shift in gender integration in the armed forces.” Discuss the evolution of women’s roles in the Indian armed forces and the challenges that remain.
With reference to the entry of women into the Indian armed forces, which of the following statements is NOT correct?
- (a) India’s first women fighter pilots were commissioned into the fighter stream in 2016.
- (b) The National Defence Academy was opened to women candidates following a Supreme Court interim order in 2021.
- (c) Women were first commissioned into the Indian Air Force only after 2016.
- (d) The Combined Graduation Parade is conducted at the Air Force Academy, Dundigal.
The Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) — the R&D wing of the Department of Defence R&D (DDR&D), Ministry of Defence — conducted three consecutive flight tests demonstrating a multi-layered Ballistic Missile Defence (BMD) system and the maiden flight of the Naval Anti-Ship Missile – Medium Range (NASM-MR), strengthening India’s defences against aerial and maritime threats.
- Multi-layered BMD: interceptor missiles successfully engaged and destroyed designated targets, demonstrating layered interception. (The source describes engagement of threats “up to ICBMs”; in practice India’s Phase-II interceptors are designed for long-range / IRBM-class threats — not yet full intercontinental range.)
- NASM-MR maiden test: first flight of an indigenous medium-range anti-ship missile, demonstrating enhanced anti-ship strike capability at medium ranges.
- Trials were witnessed by senior officials of DRDO and the Armed Forces; the Defence Minister and DRDO leadership lauded the combined effort of scientists, industry partners and the Services.
- A two-tiered, two-phase indigenous shield conceived after the late-1990s missile environment.
- Phase-I (lower-tier, against ~2,000 km-class threats): PAD/PDV (Prithvi Air Defence / Prithvi Defence Vehicle) for exo-atmospheric (outside the atmosphere) interception, and AAD (Advanced Air Defence) for endo-atmospheric (within the atmosphere) interception.
- Phase-II (upper-tier): AD-1 and AD-2 interceptors targeting longer-range / IRBM-class missiles.
- Success places India among a select group — alongside the US, Russia, Israel and China — with demonstrated BMD capability.
- NASM-SR (Short Range) was flight-tested earlier (2022) as an indigenous air-launched anti-ship missile (e.g., from the Sea King helicopter), replacing ageing imported systems.
- NASM-MR extends this to medium ranges, deepening indigenous anti-ship strike options for the Navy and reducing import dependence.
- Strategic deterrence: a credible BMD raises the cost of a first strike and stabilises deterrence.
- Atmanirbharta in defence: indigenous interceptors and anti-ship missiles cut reliance on imports and build a domestic missile-tech base.
- Maritime security: NASM-MR strengthens sea-denial in the Indian Ocean Region amid a contested maritime environment.
- DRDO — under the Department of Defence R&D (DDR&D), Ministry of Defence.
- BMD = Ballistic Missile Defence — intercepts incoming ballistic missiles; India’s is a two-phase, two-tiered system.
- Exo-atmospheric = interception outside the atmosphere (PAD/PDV); Endo-atmospheric = within the atmosphere (AAD).
- Phase-II interceptors: AD-1 and AD-2 (longer-range / IRBM-class).
- NASM-MR = Naval Anti-Ship Missile – Medium Range; complements the shorter-range NASM-SR.
- BMD-capable states (demonstrated): USA, Russia, Israel, China, India.
Examine the strategic significance of India’s indigenous Ballistic Missile Defence programme. How does the development of systems such as the NASM family advance the goal of self-reliance in defence?
In the context of India’s Ballistic Missile Defence (BMD) programme, the terms exo-atmospheric and endo-atmospheric interception refer respectively to interception:
- (a) during the boost phase and the terminal phase of the target missile.
- (b) outside the Earth’s atmosphere and within the Earth’s atmosphere.
- (c) over land and over sea.
- (d) by surface-based and by air-based interceptors.
As reported, India lodged a strong protest after US Navy strikes on three merchant tankers — Marivex, Settebello and Jalveer — carrying Indian crew off the coast of Oman, in which three Indian seafarers aboard Settebello were killed. India summoned a US Embassy representative; in a subsequent exchange, the US Secretary of State reportedly told the External Affairs Minister that violations of the American “blockade” and the “illicit transport of Iranian oil” would not be tolerated, while India called the lethal actions against commercial shipping unjustified.
- An estimated 3.5 lakh Indian seafarers serve worldwide; the government estimates over half are in active service, mostly on foreign-flagged ships.
- India is among the largest single suppliers of seafarers globally (commonly cited at roughly 9–10% of the world’s seafarers).
- The Directorate General (DG) of Shipping estimated about 23,000 Indian seafarers in the broader Gulf region, with the UAE accounting for more than half.
- The IMO estimated roughly 20,000 seafarers of all nationalities stranded on ships in the Persian Gulf during the crisis.
- The vessels — all tankers carrying Indian crew — were struck with precision munitions; damage was reportedly above the waterline, disabling propulsion/manoeuvre without sinking them.
- Marivex was struck off Duqm (~400 nm from the Strait of Hormuz); the others off Shinas, Oman, closer to the strait.
- US Central Command stated the crews refused instructions and were transporting Iranian oil in violation of the blockade; the manager of Settebello contradicted this, saying the ship had been stationary for days with no Iranian-oil link.
| Instrument / Body | What It Is | Key Limitation Here |
|---|---|---|
| IMO | UN agency regulating technical, safety, commercial and environmental aspects of global shipping | Acts by consensus; limited enforcement against unilateral state action |
| UNCLOS (1982) | “Constitution of the oceans”; governs navigation incl. transit through straits like Hormuz | US has not ratified it; Iran signed but not ratified |
| Flag of Convenience (FOC) | Registration in a third state (e.g., Panama, Liberia, Marshall Islands) | Limits the legal standing of crew’s home state to act |
| Sanctions regimes | Designations by UN / US (OFAC) / EU / UK on owners, cargo or conduct | Unilateral sanctions are not binding on non-imposing states unless under a UNSC resolution |
- Foreign flags: the tankers flew flags of convenience (with deep Indian ownership/management links), weakening any direct legal basis for Indian intervention.
- The belligerents are the US and Iran: unlike action against Somali pirates or Houthi attacks, India cannot militarily confront a major power.
- Precedent of past protection: under Operation Sankalp (launched 2019 in the Gulf of Oman after tanker attacks; later extended for Red Sea / Houthi threats), the Indian Navy and Coast Guard did escort and protect merchant ships, including foreign-flagged ones with Indian crew.
- A blanket ban on Indian seafarers serving on Hormuz-transiting vessels is neither the industry’s demand nor practical — it would hit employment, global supply chains and India’s standing as a leading crew supplier.
- Calibrated, evidence-based approach: periodic risk assessments, clear advisories, mandatory informed consent for high-risk deployments, and enhanced security protocols — rather than outright bans.
- Inter-ministerial maritime-security framework: bring together maritime regulators, MEA, defence, intelligence, shipowners’ associations and seafarers’ unions for real-time decisions.
- Welfare & war-risk protections: full honouring of war-risk compensation, P&I-club insurance cover, dedicated family contact points, and no professional penalty for declining declared war-risk assignments.
- Diplomatic & multilateral pressure: raise concerns at the UN, IMO and regional maritime-security platforms, and coordinate with flag States and operators.
- IMO = International Maritime Organization — UN agency for global shipping (HQ London).
- UNCLOS (1982) — governs maritime law; US has not ratified; Iran signed but not ratified.
- Strait of Hormuz — chokepoint between the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman; carries roughly a fifth of global oil trade.
- Flags of Convenience — common registries: Panama, Liberia, Marshall Islands.
- Operation Sankalp — Indian Navy mission (since 2019) to protect merchant shipping in the Gulf of Oman / Persian Gulf region.
- OFAC = US Office of Foreign Assets Control — administers US sanctions; not binding on other states absent a UNSC resolution.
- DG Shipping — India’s regulator for merchant shipping & seafarer certification (under the Ministry of Ports, Shipping & Waterways); jurisdiction is primarily over Indian-flagged vessels.
- P&I Clubs = Protection and Indemnity Clubs — mutual marine insurance bodies covering third-party liabilities.
“The safety of Indian seafarers in conflict-prone maritime corridors exposes the limits of both diplomacy and domestic regulation.” In light of recent events in the Gulf, examine the institutional and legal challenges India faces and suggest a framework to protect its seafarers.
Match the maritime instrument/body (List-I) with its description (List-II):
List-I A. IMO B. UNCLOS C. OFAC D. P&I Club
List-II 1. US sanctions administrator 2. UN agency regulating shipping 3. Mutual marine-liability insurer 4. UN convention on the law of the sea
Select the correct match:
- (a) A-2, B-4, C-1, D-3
- (b) A-4, B-2, C-3, D-1
- (c) A-2, B-4, C-3, D-1
- (d) A-1, B-4, C-2, D-3
A study published in the journal Evolution (2 June) on the African grey foam-nest tree frog (Chiromantis xerampelina) found that when many males help a single female build a foam nest, the result is a larger, moister nest with higher tadpole survival — cooperation, not chaos.
- For frogs that lay eggs in water, predation is brutal — about 98% of eggs are eaten by fish and insects before hatching.
- This species took the nest into the air: in the rainy season, a female on a branch over a pool secretes a fluid that the mating pair whisk with their hind legs into a bubbly froth.
- Eggs hatch inside the foam; tadpoles later drop through the bottom into the pool below.
- A single female is often joined by a dozen or more males; more churning legs build nests up to three times larger than a single pair’s.
- Smaller nests dry out quickly, killing eggs; larger nests retain moisture longer, raising survival.
- DNA testing showed paternity is split in crowded nests — by cooperating, each male ensures at least some of his offspring survive rather than losing all to a dried-out nest.
- The males’ skin and fluids are suspected to contain surfactants (detergent-like compounds) that keep the bubbles from popping.
- Research was led by teams from three Australian universities, studying the frogs in South Africa.
- Arboreal foam-nesting is a predator-avoidance strategy; foam also buffers temperature and desiccation.
- It is an example of cooperative breeding shaped by reproductive trade-offs — relevant to debates on kin selection and mutual benefit.
- Related foam-nesting frogs occur in India (e.g., the genera Chiromantis / Polypedates), making the mechanism a useful comparative example.
- The surfactant insight has biomimetic potential for stable, long-lasting foams.
- African grey foam-nest tree frog = Chiromantis xerampelina; builds arboreal foam nests over water.
- Foam nest function — protects eggs from predators and desiccation; larger nests retain moisture longer.
- Surfactants — compounds that lower surface tension and stabilise bubbles/foam (detergent-like).
- Split paternity — multiple males fathering offspring within one nest; favours cooperation.
- Study published in the journal Evolution.
Cooperative behaviour in the animal kingdom often emerges from individual reproductive trade-offs rather than altruism. Discuss with suitable examples.
Consider the following statements:
Assertion (A): In the grey foam-nest tree frog, many males cooperate to build a single large foam nest.
Reason (R): Larger foam nests retain moisture for longer, increasing the survival of developing eggs and tadpoles.
Select the correct option:
- (a) Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.
- (b) Both A and R are true, but R is NOT the correct explanation of A.
- (c) A is true, but R is false.
- (d) A is false, but R is true.
Scientists described a remarkable light-focusing structure in the chocolate-chip sea star (Protoreaster nodosus). At each arm tip, a skeletal element contains an array of cone-shaped structures that behave like optic fibres.
- The cone array transmits about 70% of incident light and concentrates it nearly 3× at the base.
- The array captures light from a wide 120° field of view and effectively brightens it about 8× inside the arm.
- Researchers suggested the design could inspire lightweight optical sensors and displays.
- Sea stars are echinoderms; their skeleton is built of calcite ossicles (magnesium-rich calcium carbonate).
- Echinoderms are known for biological optics — e.g., brittle stars (Ophiocoma) use calcite microlenses embedded in their skeleton.
- This is a case of biomimetics / biomimicry — engineering inspired by biological structures — relevant to optics, materials science and sensor design.
- Chocolate-chip sea star = Protoreaster nodosus; an echinoderm (not a fish).
- Its arm-tip skeletal array transmits ~70% of light, concentrates it ~3×, and brightens ~8× over a 120° field of view.
- Echinoderm skeletons are made of calcite (calcium carbonate); other examples: starfish, brittle stars, sea urchins, sea cucumbers.
- Biomimetics = designing technology by imitating biological structures and processes.
“Nature is the oldest laboratory of design.” Discuss the relevance of biomimetics to technological innovation, with examples.
The chocolate-chip sea star (Protoreaster nodosus), recently in the news for its light-focusing skeletal structures, belongs to which of the following groups of animals?
- (a) Cnidarians
- (b) Molluscs
- (c) Echinoderms
- (d) Crustaceans
New research highlights how social ant colonies limit the spread of pathogens — through chemical “social immunity,” dramatic behaviours like limb amputation, and even re-engineering nest architecture during an epidemic — strategies strikingly similar to human public-health measures.
- In many ant species, individuals spread antimicrobial secretions from the metapleural gland on themselves, on larvae and on nestmates, giving the whole colony baseline protection.
- Researchers (University of Lausanne) found that when a worker’s leg is injured, nestmates amputate it by repeated bites at the joint, removing a route for disease-causing microbes (Current Biology, 2024).
- In a 2025 study (Science), a single queen and ~200 workers built a nest; every ant wore a miniature QR code tracked by cameras, with nest structure mapped by micro-CT scans.
- After 20 workers were exposed to a pathogenic fungus and introduced, infected ants self-isolated — leaving the nest more often and spending more time outside.
- The colony changed nest architecture: entrances were spaced further apart, tunnels grew longer, and there were fewer connections between chambers — increasing segregation.
- High-value individuals — the queen and nurse ants — had significantly lower exposure to foragers and remained healthy.
- These are evolved analogues of human non-pharmaceutical interventions — quarantine, masking, hand-washing and altering contact networks.
- They show that collective discipline and division of labour — classic eusocial traits — are central to epidemic control.
- Studying social immunity can inform epidemiological modelling of how network structure shapes disease spread.
- Social immunity — colony-level disease defence (e.g., antimicrobial secretions from the metapleural gland).
- Limb-amputation behaviour — documented in Florida carpenter ants (Camponotus floridanus), Current Biology (2024).
- Nest-architecture / social-distancing response — studied in the black garden ant (Lasius niger), Science (2025).
- Eusociality — advanced social organisation with cooperative brood care, overlapping generations and division of labour into reproductive and non-reproductive castes.
- Methods used: QR-code tracking and micro-CT scanning of nests.
“Social organisation is both a vulnerability and a defence against disease.” Examine this statement with reference to collective behaviour in social insects and its parallels with human public-health strategies.
Consider the following statements about disease-control behaviour in ants:
1. ‘Social immunity’ in ants includes spreading antimicrobial secretions from the metapleural gland onto nestmates and larvae.
2. During a fungal epidemic, ant colonies have been observed to alter nest architecture so as to increase segregation between groups.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- (a) 1 only
- (b) 2 only
- (c) Both 1 and 2
- (d) Neither 1 nor 2
A new study in Science reported the first global map of Earth’s vast underground network of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi — a “living infrastructure” that has sustained plant life for millions of years but whose scale was largely invisible until now.
- Using machine learning and data from over 16,000 soil cores, the team estimated topsoils hold around 110 quadrillion km of fungal hyphae — roughly equal to nearly a billion round-trips from Earth to the Sun.
- AM networks weigh about 300 million tonnes of carbon — four to six times the weight of the entire human population.
- By forming symbioses with about 70% of plant species (trading nutrients for carbon), they sequester an estimated 4 billion tonnes of CO₂-equivalent a year — roughly 11% of all human-related carbon emissions.
- Grassland ecosystems — such as South Sudan, the Tibetan plateau and India’s Banni grasslands — house about 40% of the world’s AM fungal networks.
- Cropland has roughly 50% lower fungal density than wild ecosystems, and grasslands are being converted to farmland four times faster than forests — putting these networks at extreme risk.
- A mycorrhiza is a symbiotic association between a fungus and plant roots.
- Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi (phylum Glomeromycota) penetrate root cells, forming tree-like arbuscules in the root cortex where nutrient–carbon exchange happens (a type of endomycorrhiza).
- The plant supplies carbon (sugars); the fungus supplies phosphorus, nitrogen, water and micronutrients — vastly extending the root’s reach.
- These networks are central to soil carbon storage, soil structure and ecosystem productivity.
- Climate lever: protecting fungal networks could become a meaningful, low-cost pathway for carbon sequestration.
- Policy blind spot: fungi remain at the periphery of environmental policy; the map (by the Society for the Protection of Underground Networks, SPUN) aims to move them to the centre of climate action.
- Land-use threat: rapid grassland-to-cropland conversion erodes the very networks that store carbon and underpin productivity.
- India link: the Banni grasslands (Kachchh, Gujarat) — among Asia’s largest grasslands and home to Maldhari pastoralists — are flagged as a global hotspot.
- AM fungi = Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi; phylum Glomeromycota; form arbuscules inside root cells (endomycorrhiza).
- Mycorrhiza = symbiosis between fungus and plant roots; plant gives carbon, fungus gives phosphorus/nutrients/water.
- AM networks symbiose with ~70% of plant species and sequester ~4 Gt CO₂-eq/yr (~11% of human emissions).
- Banni grasslands — in Kachchh, Gujarat; among Asia’s largest grasslands; flagged as an AM-fungi hotspot.
- SPUN = Society for the Protection of Underground Networks — led the mapping effort.
- Study published in Science, using ML and 16,000+ soil cores.
“The carbon stored in underground fungal networks may be as significant to climate action as forests.” Examine the ecological role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and the threats they face from changing land use.
With reference to arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, which of the following statements is NOT correct?
- (a) They form a symbiotic association with the roots of a large majority of plant species.
- (b) They supply the plant with phosphorus and other nutrients in exchange for carbon.
- (c) They belong to the phylum Glomeromycota and form structures called arbuscules within root cells.
- (d) They are found in greater density in croplands than in undisturbed wild ecosystems.
India and China are in advanced discussions over a joint UNESCO nomination for ‘The Great Tang Records on the Western Regions’ (Da Tang Xiyu Ji) — the account of the 7th-century Chinese Buddhist monk-scholar Xuanzang (Hiuen Tsang) and his travels through medieval India. The proposal — led by China and supported by India — is under consideration with the Ministry of External Affairs, part of a broader BRICS push for joint heritage nominations.
- Xuanzang journeyed roughly between 629 and 645 CE; of this, he spent about 13–14 years travelling within India (the source’s “19 years” refers loosely to his time away/abroad).
- He studied at Nalanda University and chronicled the political, social and religious life of early-medieval India — including the era of Harshavardhana.
- His Records remain a primary source for reconstructing the history of the period.
- Each country may file only two dossiers per two-year cycle of UNESCO heritage lists; but there is no limit on joint nominations, led by one country and backed by others — a way to “skip the queue.”
- India is also pursuing: Panchatantra (jointly with Iran, given its place in Persian literature) and the philosophy of Satyagraha (jointly with South Africa).
- These emerged from the 2nd BRICS Culture Working Group meeting (held in Varanasi); recommendations go to the BRICS Culture Ministers’ meet in Bhopal (August).
- Precedent of overlap: in 2017, both India and China claimed Sowa-Rigpa (the Tibetan/Himalayan system of medicine) for the Intangible Cultural Heritage list — illustrating why joint, rather than competing, nominations help.
| UNESCO Programme | Governing Instrument | Covers |
|---|---|---|
| World Heritage | 1972 World Heritage Convention | Cultural & natural sites of outstanding universal value |
| Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) | 2003 Convention | Living practices — oral traditions, performing arts, rituals, craftsmanship |
| Memory of the World (MoW) | MoW Programme (1992) | Documentary heritage — manuscripts, archives, texts |
- Civilisational diplomacy: shared Buddhist and literary heritage offers a soft-power bridge between India and China amid a broader diplomatic thaw.
- Efficient safeguarding: joint dossiers let BRICS nations protect overlapping heritage faster.
- India’s cultural footprint: reinforces India as a node of trans-regional exchange (Ramayana traditions with Indonesia; Buddhist scriptures with China; Panchatantra with Iran).
- Xuanzang (Hiuen Tsang) — 7th-century Chinese monk; studied at Nalanda; visited India during Harshavardhana’s reign.
- ‘Great Tang Records on the Western Regions’ (Da Tang Xiyu Ji) — his travel account; a key source for early-medieval Indian history.
- UNESCO programmes: World Heritage (1972, sites) | Intangible Cultural Heritage (2003, living practices) | Memory of the World (1992, documentary heritage).
- UNESCO heritage cycle: each country files up to 2 dossiers per 2 years; no limit on joint nominations.
- India’s pending joint bids: Panchatantra (with Iran); Satyagraha (with South Africa).
- IGNCA = Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts — India’s nodal agency for UNESCO nominations.
- Sowa-Rigpa — Himalayan/Tibetan medical system; subject of an India–China overlap in 2017.
“Shared cultural heritage can be a powerful instrument of diplomacy.” In light of India’s joint UNESCO nominations with partner countries, discuss the role of cultural heritage in India’s foreign policy.
Match the UNESCO programme (List-I) with the type of heritage it primarily protects (List-II):
List-I A. World Heritage B. Intangible Cultural Heritage C. Memory of the World
List-II 1. Documentary heritage (manuscripts, archives) 2. Sites of outstanding universal value 3. Living practices and oral traditions
Select the correct match:
- (a) A-2, B-3, C-1
- (b) A-1, B-3, C-2
- (c) A-2, B-1, C-3
- (d) A-3, B-2, C-1
Five Indian Air Force personnel were killed (and one rescued) when an Antonov AN-32 military transport aircraft crashed during landing at Jorhat, Assam. It is the third major AN-32 crash in a decade, renewing focus on the fleet’s ageing and modernisation. (Casualty figures are per the source report and should be confirmed.)
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Origin / Induction | Designed by Antonov (erstwhile USSR/Ukraine); bought by India in 1984 |
| Type | Twin-engine turboprop tactical transport aircraft |
| Max weight / speed | Up to 27 tonnes; max speed ~530 km/h |
| Payload | Up to 6.7 tonnes of cargo or 50 passengers |
| Key strength | Operates from far-flung airfields with minimal ground infrastructure (STOL) |
| Roles | Troop/cargo transport, paratrooping, limited bombing |
- A critical workhorse of the IAF, prized for moving men and material across difficult terrain.
- Played a key role during the Kargil War (1999) and Operation Parakram (2001–02), transporting personnel and cargo to border areas through multiple sorties.
- After a 2009 crash, India signed a $400-million contract with Ukraine’s Antonov to upgrade most of the IAF’s ~105 AN-32s — airframe and turboprop-engine overhaul plus new navigation and communication equipment.
- The programme stalled after Russia’s annexation of Crimea (2014); India and Ukraine later agreed to resume upgrades with Ukrainian-developed alternatives.
- About half the fleet was modernised in Ukraine; 38 aircraft were being upgraded at the IAF’s Base Repair Depot (BRD), Kanpur.
| Date | Location / Route | Toll |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Jun 2026 | Jorhat, Assam (on landing) | 5 killed, 1 rescued (per source) |
| 22 Jul 2016 | Bay of Bengal (Tambaram, Chennai → Port Blair) | 29 killed; wreck found years later |
| 3 Jun 2019 | Mechuka, West Siang, Arunachal Pradesh (near China border) | 13 killed |
| 10 Jun 2009 | Arunachal Pradesh (similar area) | 13 killed |
- Ageing fleet: the recurrence of crashes underscores the strategic risk of operating a four-decade-old platform in demanding terrain.
- Modernisation & replacement: completing upgrades and planning a successor (alongside inductions like the C-295 replacing the older Avro fleet) is vital for tactical airlift.
- Indigenisation: reduces dependence on a foreign OEM whose supply chain was disrupted by geopolitics (the 2014 Crimea fallout).
- AN-32 — Soviet/Ukrainian-origin twin-engine turboprop tactical transport; inducted by IAF in 1984.
- Specifications: up to 27 t max weight, ~530 km/h, 6.7 t cargo or 50 passengers; STOL from austere airfields.
- BRD, Kanpur — IAF Base Repair Depot where AN-32 upgrades were carried out.
- Upgrade contract (2009): $400 million with Ukraine’s Antonov; stalled after the 2014 Crimea annexation.
- Notable crashes: 2016 (Bay of Bengal, 29), 2019 (Mechuka, 13), 2009 (Arunachal, 13).
- C-295 — transport aircraft being inducted to replace the IAF’s legacy Avro (HS-748) fleet.
Frequent accidents involving ageing transport aircraft highlight the challenges of India’s military airlift capability. Discuss the strategic importance of tactical transport aircraft and the case for indigenisation and fleet modernisation.
With reference to the Antonov AN-32 aircraft, consider the following:
1. It is a twin-engine turboprop tactical transport aircraft inducted by the IAF in the 1980s.
2. Its modernisation programme was disrupted following Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- (a) 1 only
- (b) 2 only
- (c) Both 1 and 2
- (d) Neither 1 nor 2


