Communalism in India —
Meaning, Causes & Effects
A comprehensive UPSC guide to communalism in India — definition, dimensions, historical evolution, causes, recent trends (2023–2025), the BNS mob lynching provision (July 2024), Supreme Court rulings on hate speech and the Places of Worship Act, Sambhal violence (November 2024), government measures, PYQs, probable questions, and FAQs. All data fact-checked against CSSS 2024–25 data, Supreme Court orders, and BNS 2023 provisions.
Communalism — Meaning
and Dimensions
Communalism views society as divided into separate religious communities, each with distinct political, economic, and social interests — creating an "us vs them" mentality where religious identity overrides all other affiliations. This division leads to competition and conflict as communities perceive each other's gain as their loss.
In its extreme form, communalism becomes particularly dangerous — heightening intolerance, orthodoxy, and the potential for violence. Communities begin to view each other as mutually antagonistic, placing religious identity above national identity, civic values, and constitutional commitments.
Bipin Chandra's three-stage analysis of communalism offers a useful theoretical framework: Stage 1 — Communal consciousness (belief that co-religionists share common interests); Stage 2 — Liberal communalism (promoting one's community's interests but accepting coexistence); Stage 3 — Extreme communalism (seeing the other community as the enemy, justifying violence).
Five Dimensions of
Communalism in India
| Dimension | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Assimilationist | Minorities should abandon their distinct identity and assimilate into the dominant culture | Hindu Code Bill applied to Sikhs, Buddhists, and Jains |
| Welfarist | Minorities need special welfare and affirmative action programmes to improve their status | Jain community associations providing hostels, scholarships, employment |
| Retreatist | Minority communities withdraw into separate, insular communities away from the dominant culture | Ghettoisation of Muslim communities in several Indian cities |
| Retaliatory | Communities retaliate against perceived injustices and discrimination from the dominant group | Communal riots as responses to perceived provocations |
| Separatist | Minorities demand a separate state or independent political entity | Khalistan movement in Punjab (1980s); pre-Partition Muslim League's Pakistan demand |
Communalism — Tested across
GS I, II, Essay & Ethics
Evolution of Communalism
in India
Understanding the historical evolution of communalism — from colonial-era divide and rule to post-independence political manipulation — is essential for contextualising contemporary incidents and policy responses.
Recent Trends in Communalism
in India — 2023–2025
Understanding the evolving patterns of communal tensions — with specific data from CSSS monitoring and PEW Research — is essential for grounding UPSC Mains answers in current evidence.
| Indicator | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Communal riots | 32 incidents | 59 incidents (84% rise) | 29 incidents (51% decline) |
| Mob lynching | Data available | Data available | 14 incidents, 8 lives lost |
| Riot triggers | Nuh-Gurugram procession | Religious processions (44%), Sambhal ASI survey | Religious processions — 28% of riots |
| Geographic spread | Cow-belt + Haryana | Expanded to Maharashtra (12), West Bengal | Maharashtra, West Bengal, Bihar, Jharkhand |
| PEW Social Hostilities Index | India: 9.3/10 — categorised as "Very High" (PEW 2022) | ||
Social Media — Primary Accelerant
WhatsApp forwards, deepfakes, and AI-generated content inflame communal tensions at unprecedented speed. The Nuh-Gurugram violence (2023) was significantly triggered by a video circulated by Monu Manesar. MeitY issued advisories under IT Rules 2021 in 2024–25 to address deepfake-driven communal misinformation. Haryana ordered internet shutdowns during processions.
Religious Processions as Flashpoints
28% of 2025's communal riots were triggered during religious processions or festivals — a trend visible since 2024 when 44% of riots had procession-related triggers. Processions with provocative slogans, weapons, and music near mosques during prayer times have emerged as a primary mechanism of communal provocation. Administrative management of processions — as seen in Nuh 2024 (peaceful, vs 2023 violence) — is a critical governance skill.
Judicial & Supreme Court Interventions (2024)
The Supreme Court in 2024 expressed serious concern over hate speech by elected representatives; reiterated that the Places of Worship Act 1991 is an integral part of the Constitution's secular framework; and ruled that bulldozer demolitions targeting accused persons from specific communities without due process are unconstitutional. The Union Home Ministry circulated revised mob lynching advisories (2024–25) under the Tehseen Poonawalla v. Union of India directions.
Geographic Expansion of Violence
Traditional communal "cow belt" states (UP, Bihar, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh) remain primary theatres, but violence has expanded significantly to Maharashtra (12 riots in 2024), West Bengal (Waqf-related protests 2025), and Haryana. Southern India continues to report far fewer communal riots — reflecting better governance, literacy, and social integration in these states.
Main Causes of
Communalism in India
These causes are multifaceted and mutually reinforcing — a UPSC Mains answer that identifies causes at historical, political, economic, psychological, and technological levels will score significantly higher than one citing only one or two factors.
Historical Factors
British divide-and-rule strategy; the Partition trauma (Two-Nation Theory) entrenched communal identities in the national psyche; and the romanticism of a particular reading of ancient and medieval history that creates communal superiority complexes. The after-effects of Partition continue to shape communal politics through electoral mobilisation.
Political Factors
Vote-bank politics — using communal identity to mobilise electoral support; appeasement politics — selectively accommodating religious demands for electoral benefit; communal speeches and divisive rhetoric by politicians; and the use of religious processions and events as political demonstrations. The Communalisation of Politics is the dominant cause of post-independence communalism.
Socio-Cultural Factors
Cultural dissimilarity between Indic (Hindu, Buddhist, Jain, Sikh) and Abrahamic (Islam, Christianity) traditions creates mutual mistrust. Differential understandings of nationalism and patriotism — fed by political ideologies and biased education — create an atmosphere of distrust. Ghettoisation of minorities produces physical and psychological segregation.
Economic Factors
Poverty, unemployment, and resource competition create fertile ground for communal mobilisation. The Sachar Committee Report (2006) documented Muslim economic backwardness — lower than Scheduled Castes in several indicators — creating a sense of relative deprivation. Economic competition between communities (as in Ahmedabad 1969) can trigger or amplify communal tensions.
Psychological Factors
Fear, insecurity, and identity anxiety among both majority and minority communities. The minority community's experience of being perceived as "foreign" or "threatening" by the majority; the majority's anxieties about demographic change, conversion, or cultural displacement. These psychological insecurities are often manufactured and amplified by political actors for electoral gains.
Social Media & Biased Media
The spread of fake news, hate speech, and provocative content through WhatsApp, X (Twitter), and YouTube — often amplified by biased media channels — creates an environment of permanent communal alert. India's Social Hostilities Index (PEW 2022) is 9.3/10 — "Very High" — reflecting the severity of social-level religious tensions that media and social media amplify. Deepfakes are emerging as a new communal weapon (MeitY advisories, 2024–25).
Failure of Governance
Biased policing (documented by Common Cause-Lokniti-CSDS 2024 Status of Policing study); delayed judicial processes; inadequate early warning systems for communal tension; and impunity for perpetrators of communal violence. Administrative failures — like the absence of the SP in Nuh during the 2023 riots — directly enable communal escalation.
Religious Speeches & Radicalisation
Communal tensions are often incited by religious fundamentalists and fringe elements through inflammatory speeches, incendiary writings, and political provocations. Both Hindu and Muslim extremist organisations have contributed to radicalisation. The Supreme Court's 2024 expression of concern about hate speech by elected representatives reflects the seriousness of this factor.
Constitutional & Legal Provisions
against Communalism
India has a comprehensive constitutional and legal framework to protect communal harmony. Understanding these provisions — particularly the new BNS mob lynching clause (July 2024) and the Places of Worship Act 1991 — is essential for UPSC Mains answers.
Constitutional Provisions
Preamble: India is a Secular, Democratic Republic committed to Fraternity. Articles 14, 15, 16: Equality, non-discrimination, equal opportunity. Articles 25–28: Freedom of religion with reasonable restrictions. Article 51A(e): Fundamental Duty to renounce practices derogatory to women's dignity. Article 51A(f): Duty to value and preserve the rich heritage of India's composite culture.
IPC Section 153A (Now BNS Section 196)
Penalises acts that promote enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc., and acts prejudicial to the maintenance of harmony. Punishment: up to 3 years imprisonment, or fine, or both. The older IPC provision has now been retained under the BNS with the same spirit.
BNS Section 103(2) — Mob Lynching (July 1, 2024)
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 — effective July 1, 2024 — explicitly criminalises mob lynching for the first time. Section 103(2): When a group of five or more persons commits murder on grounds of race, caste, community, sex, place of birth, language, personal belief, or any other similar ground — punishment: death or life imprisonment + fine. Section 117(4): Mob causing grievous hurt under same grounds — up to 7 years imprisonment.
Places of Worship Act, 1991
Prohibits conversion of any place of worship and mandates preservation of the religious character of all places as they existed on August 15, 1947. Specifically excludes the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute. The Supreme Court in 2024 reiterated it is "an integral part of the Constitution's secular framework" — while addressing Gyanvapi Mosque and Sambhal litigation. The Act is critical to preventing historical grievances from being weaponised for communal mobilisation.
Supreme Court — Tehseen Poonawalla v. Union of India
Landmark 2018 SC ruling on mob lynching — directed states to designate nodal officers for mob violence prevention; take preventive action against those sharing inflammatory content online; and ensure fast-track trials for lynching cases. The Union Home Ministry circulated revised advisories under this ruling in 2024–25 following the BNS's explicit criminalisation of mob lynching.
Prevention of Communal Violence Bill (Proposed)
Proposed but not enacted — would have provided a specific legal framework for communal violence, including accountability for state failure to protect. The absence of this legislation means India relies on general law (BNS, IPC) and administrative orders rather than a dedicated communal violence prevention statute. The Srikrishna Commission recommended such legislation but it was never enacted.
Government's Efforts to
Address Communalism
Communal Harmony Guidelines 2008
Contains preventive and administrative measures to tackle communalism — monitoring communal cases, rehabilitation of victims, alerting state governments, and keeping communal organizations under law enforcement watch. Suitable advisories and alert messages are sent to State Governments and UTs based on intelligence inputs.
National Foundation for Communal Harmony (NFCH)
Established 1992 as an autonomous body under the Ministry of Home Affairs — promotes communal harmony and national integration. Provides financial support for rehabilitation of child victims of communal, caste, ethnic, or terrorist violence. Undertakes awareness campaigns and promotes interfaith dialogue.
BNS Mob Lynching Provisions (July 2024)
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, effective July 1, 2024, explicitly criminalises mob lynching under Sections 103(2) and 117(4) — with death or life imprisonment for group murder on communal grounds. This is a significant legislative acknowledgement of the crime and a deterrence mechanism.
Community Policing Models
Kerala's Janamaithri Community Policing programme — creating sustained police-community relationships to identify and defuse communal tensions before they escalate — is cited as a best practice. Regular beat officers maintain relationships with religious leaders, community elders, and youth groups in tension-prone areas.
Social Media Monitoring & MeitY Advisories
MeitY has issued advisories under IT Rules 2021 addressing deepfakes and AI-generated communal content (2024–25). Internet shutdowns during communal events (Nuh 2024, Haryana) reflect administrative recognition of social media as a communal accelerant. Monitoring of social media for communal content by NCRB and state police is expanding.
Educational Initiatives
Promoting scientific temper, constitutional values, and composite cultural heritage in school education. NEP 2020 explicitly includes value education and Constitutional values as core curriculum elements. Reforms in history textbooks to present a more inclusive, pluralist narrative of Indian history are a contested but important policy tool.
Current Events Linked to
Communalism in India — 2024–26
These events are directly testable in UPSC Mains 2026 — linking communalism to constitutional provisions, judicial rulings, and governance failures.
Violence erupted in Sambhal, Uttar Pradesh on November 24, 2024, during a court-ordered ASI survey of the 500-year-old Shahi Jama Masjid — following claims that it was built over a demolished Hindu temple. During the second survey, the mosque's wuzu khana (ablution tank) was drained, triggering community protests that escalated into violence. Four people were killed (all Muslims, shot by police); 20 police personnel were injured.
Significance: The Sambhal violence reflects the growing use of historical religious site claims as communal mobilisation tools — directly challenging the Places of Worship Act 1991's prohibition on converting the religious character of sites. The incident also illustrates the police-community trust deficit in communal situations, with the bail application of the mosque president rejected while inflammatory speeches by politicians face less scrutiny. India witnessed 59 communal riots in all of 2024 (CSSS), an 84% increase over 2023.
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 came into effect on July 1, 2024, replacing the IPC. For the first time in India's criminal law history, mob lynching is explicitly criminalised under Section 103(2) — when a group of 5 or more persons commits murder on grounds of race, caste, community, sex, place of birth, language, or personal belief — punishment: death or life imprisonment + fine. Section 117(4) covers mob-inflicted grievous hurt under the same grounds (up to 7 years).
Critical assessment: While the BNS provision is a landmark legislative step, critics note that religion is not explicitly listed as a ground (though 'personal belief' may cover it). The real challenge is enforcement — mob lynching incidents (14 in 2025, 8 deaths per CSSS) marginally increased even after the provision's enactment, suggesting that deterrence requires equal enforcement regardless of the victim's or perpetrator's community. The Union Home Ministry issued revised advisories to states under the Tehseen Poonawalla SC ruling to operationalise the BNS provisions.
The Supreme Court of India delivered three significant communalism-related rulings in 2024: (1) Expressed serious concern over hate speech by elected representatives and warned that public figures bear special responsibility for restraint; (2) Reiterated that the Places of Worship Act 1991 is an integral part of the Constitution's secular framework — in the context of Gyanvapi Mosque litigation and Sambhal survey; (3) Held that bulldozer demolitions targeting homes and properties of accused persons from specific communities without due process are unconstitutional.
Significance: The Supreme Court's interventions in 2024 represent a crucial judicial check on the use of state power along communal lines. The bulldozer demolition ruling — addressing the phenomenon of "bulldozer justice" where state governments use demolition orders disproportionately against accused persons from minority communities — is particularly significant for the rule of law and communal justice.
According to the Centre for Study of Society and Secularism (CSSS), communal riots declined from 59 (2024) to 29 (2025) — a 51% reduction. However, mob lynching incidents marginally increased to 14, claiming 8 lives. Eight of 29 riots were triggered during religious processions or festivals (28%). West Bengal, Maharashtra, Bihar, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Assam, and Gujarat were the primary theatres.
CSSS analysis: Despite the riot decline, there is no respite in identity-based conflict — it has "taken a different route" through institutionalised discrimination, proliferation of hate speech, forced invisibilisation of minority cultures from public spaces, and persistence of impunity for Hindu right-wing vigilante groups. The Waqf-related violent protests in West Bengal (2025) and the West Bengal Assembly election cycle (2024–26 Murshidabad violence) reflect how communal incidents are increasingly intertwined with electoral cycles.
Measures to Address
Communalism in India
Promote Social Harmony
Encourage interfaith dialogue, cultural exchange programmes, and community peace committees. Kerala's Janamaithri community policing and Gujarat's peace committees (established post-2002) represent successful models of community-state partnership for communal harmony. Sahbhagi Vikas Programmes that bring communities together around shared development goals break communal silos.
Education Reform
Promote scientific temper, constitutional values, and composite cultural heritage in school curricula (NEP 2020 framework). Teach students to distinguish between "free speech" and "hate speech." Inclusive history education that celebrates India's pluralist civilisational legacy rather than emphasising inter-religious conflict. Media literacy programmes to combat fake news consumption.
Address Socio-Economic Inequalities
Implement Sachar Committee recommendations for Muslim community upliftment — education, employment, and economic opportunities. Reduce poverty, unemployment, and relative deprivation among minorities through targeted welfare (PM-USTAAD, scholarships, self-employment schemes). Economic interdependence between communities reduces communal conflict — joint enterprises, market integration, and cooperative development build cross-community bonds.
Regulate Social Media & Hate Speech
Enforce IT Rules against communal misinformation with equal vigour across all religious communities. Develop AI tools to detect deepfake communal content. Mandatory digital literacy education. Strengthen the legal framework to distinguish protected speech from criminally inciting hate speech. Fast-track courts for hate speech cases.
Reform the Criminal Justice System
Speedy trials for communal violence cases — prevent impunity through delay. Enforce BNS Section 103(2) mob lynching provisions equally. Address police bias in minority-related cases (documented by CSDS 2024 Status of Policing study). Establish dedicated fast-track courts for communal crimes. Ensure equal enforcement of bulldozer demolition restrictions established by the Supreme Court (2024).
Strengthen Institutional Mechanisms
Strengthen the National Foundation for Communal Harmony (NFCH). Revive the proposal for a Prevention of Communal and Targeted Violence Bill. Expand community policing models. Implement inter-agency coordination between police, intelligence agencies, and civil society for early warning of communal tension. Ensure independent functioning of minority commissions and the National Human Rights Commission.
UPSC Mains PYQs —
Communalism in India
These are actual UPSC Mains questions on communalism — including the two directly from the source document plus five additional high-value questions with approach notes.
Analyze the social and economic dimensions of communal conflict in India. How do structural inequalities contribute to communal tensions? (UPSC Mains 2023)
Approach: Social: ghettoisation, caste-religion intersection, cultural dissimilarity, biased media. Economic: Sachar Committee — Muslim backwardness worse than SCs in some indicators; relative deprivation as communal mobilisation tool; economic competition (Ahmedabad 1969 as case study). CSSS 2024 data: 59 riots, expanding geography. Structural inequalities: poverty, unemployment, educational gap, discriminatory policing. Way forward: economic inclusion, education, community policing. Link to SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities) and constitutional right to fraternity.
Assess the role of social media in fuelling communal tensions in India. Suggest appropriate regulatory measures. (UPSC Mains 2022)
Approach: Role: rapid spread of fake news (Nuh 2023 — Monu Manesar video); echo chambers deepening polarisation; deepfakes manufacturing false communal narratives; fringe voices amplified. Data: India's Social Hostilities Index 9.3/10 (PEW 2022 — Very High). Regulatory measures: IT Rules 2021 enforcement; MeitY deepfake advisories (2024–25); internet shutdowns as blunt instrument; platform accountability; digital literacy education; stronger hate speech definitions; fast-track courts. Balance with free speech under Article 19. Community-led media literacy as long-term solution.
Discuss the nature and significance of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991. Why has it become controversial in recent years? (UPSC Mains 2021)
Approach: Nature: freezes religious character of all places of worship as of August 15, 1947; prohibits conversion. Significance: statutory expression of India's secular commitment; prevents historical grievances from becoming contemporary communal fuel; reflects Constituent Assembly's intent. Controversy: Babri Masjid exemption; Gyanvapi Mosque suit (Varanasi); Sambhal Masjid ASI survey (November 2024). SC 2024 ruling: Act is "integral to the Constitution's secular framework." Tension between historical justice and social peace. Critical: opening this door could trigger endless historical disputes across thousands of sites.
Explain the evolution of communalism in India from the pre-Independence period to the present, with special focus on its impact on national integration. (UPSC Mains 2019)
Approach: Pre-independence: British divide-and-rule, separate electorates, Two-Nation Theory, Partition (1947). Post-independence: resurgence in 1960s; Punjab crisis (1984); Babri Masjid demolition (1992); Gujarat riots (2002); contemporary — Muzaffarnagar (2013), Delhi riots (2020), Nuh (2023), Sambhal (2024). Impact on national integration: erodes constitutional fraternity; creates parallel loyalties; distorts federalism; weakens social cohesion. Counter: constitutional secularism, interfaith dialogue, economic integration, community policing.
Communalism arises either due to power struggle or relative deprivation. Argue by giving suitable illustrations. (UPSC Mains 2018)
Approach: Power struggle angle: Ahmedabad 1969 riots (Congress factions + economic competition), Indira Gandhi's anti-Sikh rhetoric post-Rajiv Gandhi's "big tree falls, earth shakes"; Muslim League's power politics; vote-bank mobilisation. Relative deprivation: Sachar Committee's findings on Muslim backwardness (literacy, employment, income below national average and even below SC in some indicators); feeling of discrimination in policing and justice delivery. Both operate simultaneously — power-seeking politicians exploit relative deprivation for electoral mobilisation. Quote: Bipin Chandra on the three stages of communalism.
Distinguish between religiousness/religiosity and communalism giving one example of how the former has got transformed into the latter in independent India. (UPSC Mains 2017)
Approach: Religiosity: personal, inward, spiritual faith — attending prayers, following rituals, personal devotion. Communalism: political ideology using religion to mobilise communities against each other. Transformation example: Shah Bano Case (1985–86) — began as a personal law matrimonial dispute; became a political controversy when Muslim leaders opposed the SC verdict; Muslim Personal Law Board mobilisation; Parliament's Muslim Women Act (1986) overturned the SC ruling for political reasons; then Hindu nationalist backlash — unlocking of Babri Masjid — transforming religious sentiment into full-blown communal mobilisation. This chain from personal legal case to mass communal violence illustrates the religiosity-communalism transformation perfectly.
Probable UPSC Mains Questions
on Communalism — 2026
Based on current events (Sambhal violence 2024, BNS mob lynching provision July 2024, SC rulings 2024, CSSS 2024–25 data), UPSC trends, and editorial themes — these are high-probability questions for UPSC Mains 2026.
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, explicitly criminalises mob lynching for the first time in India's criminal law history. Critically examine its provisions, significance, and the challenges in effective implementation.
Expected: 15 Marks · 250 Words · Very High Probability
The Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 has been repeatedly challenged in Indian courts. Critically examine its significance as a constitutional commitment to secularism, with reference to recent judicial developments including the Sambhal Masjid (2024) and Gyanvapi cases.
Expected: 15 Marks · 250 Words · Very High Probability
Deepfakes, AI-generated content, and viral videos have emerged as powerful new weapons of communal mobilisation. Critically examine the role of social media in contemporary communalism and suggest a balanced regulatory framework that protects both free speech and communal harmony.
Expected: 15 Marks · 250 Words · High Probability
Distinguish between religiosity and communalism, and trace how the transformation from one to the other occurs in Indian society. Illustrate with specific historical examples and analyse the role of political actors in this transformation.
Expected: 15 Marks · 250 Words · High Probability (reprised from 2017)
Communalism in India arises from a combination of power struggle and relative deprivation. Critically examine both dimensions with reference to the Sachar Committee findings and recent CSSS data on communal riots (2024–25).
Expected: 15 Marks · 250 Words · High Probability
The Supreme Court's 2024 rulings on hate speech, the Places of Worship Act, and bulldozer demolitions represent significant judicial interventions to protect India's secular fabric. Critically analyse the significance and implications of these rulings for communal harmony.
Expected: 15 Marks · 250 Words · High Probability
"Biased policing is both a cause and consequence of communal conflict." Critically examine the role of the police in communal incidents, with reference to the Nuh-Gurugram violence (2023–24) and the 2024 Status of Policing in India Study.
Expected: 10–15 Marks · Moderate Probability
The Sachar Committee Report documented that Indian Muslims are economically more backward than Scheduled Castes in several indicators. How does this economic deprivation contribute to communal tensions, and what policy interventions are needed for Muslim community development?
Expected: 15 Marks · 250 Words · Moderate Probability
The Partition of 1947 sowed seeds of communalism that continue to germinate in contemporary India. Examine how the Partition trauma is periodically revived and exploited for political purposes, and assess constitutional mechanisms to prevent its recurrence.
Expected: 15 Marks · 250 Words · Moderate Probability
"Communal harmony is not a law-and-order issue alone but a governance, education, and economic challenge." Critically examine this statement and suggest a comprehensive multi-dimensional strategy to address communalism in India.
Expected: 15 Marks · 250 Words · High Probability
FAQs — Communalism in India
for UPSC Preparation
These questions match the most common Google searches by UPSC aspirants on this topic — each answer written for exam depth and Google featured-snippet eligibility.
- Assimilationist: Minorities should adopt the dominant culture (e.g., Hindu Code Bill applying to Sikhs, Jains)
- Welfarist: Special programmes for minority communities' upliftment
- Retreatist: Minority communities withdraw into insular, separate settlements
- Retaliatory: Communities retaliate against perceived discrimination
- Separatist: Demanding a separate state — e.g., Khalistan demand in 1980s Punjab
- Historical: British divide-and-rule; Partition trauma (Two-Nation Theory); romantic readings of medieval history
- Political: Vote-bank politics; communal rhetoric; appeasement politics; divisive electoral strategies
- Socio-cultural: Cultural dissimilarity; differential nationalism; ghettoisation of minorities
- Economic: Poverty, unemployment, relative deprivation — documented by Sachar Committee (Muslim economic backwardness)
- Psychological: Fear, insecurity, identity anxiety among both majority and minority communities
- Social media: Fake news, hate speech, deepfakes — India's Social Hostilities Index 9.3/10 (PEW 2022, Very High)
- Governance failure: Biased policing, delayed justice, impunity for perpetrators
- Preamble: Secular, Democratic Republic; Liberty, Equality, Fraternity
- Articles 14, 15, 16: Equality and non-discrimination on grounds of religion
- Articles 25–28: Freedom of religion with reasonable state restrictions
- Article 51A(e): Renounce practices derogatory to women's dignity
- Article 51A(f): Preserve composite culture of India
- BNS Section 103(2): Mob lynching criminalised — death or life imprisonment (from July 1, 2024)
- Places of Worship Act 1991: Preserves religious character of all places as of August 15, 1947
- IPC/BNS Section 196 (formerly 153A): Penalises promotion of enmity between groups
- NFCH (1992): National Foundation for Communal Harmony — rehabilitation and awareness
Want structured GS I coverage
including Communalism in India?
Join Legacy IAS Regular Batch — Bangalore
Communalism — historical evolution, causes, BNS mob lynching provision, Places of Worship Act, Supreme Court 2024 rulings, Sambhal violence, and current trends — are fully covered in our GS Foundation Phase with PYQ-based discussion and mentor-guided answer writing. Limited to 40 students.
96069 00005Mon – Sat · 9 AM – 6 PM · Seats limited to 40
