Current Affairs 29 May 2026

Content

1. SARTHAK-PDS Scheme: Technology-Driven Transformation of India’s Food Security Architecture
2. Illegal Sand Mining in National Chambal Sanctuary: Ecological Crisis and Governance Challenge
3. Humboldtia nairiana: Discovery of a New Endemic Evergreen Tree in the Western Ghats
4. Nearly 1,200 Fishing Harbours to be Brought Under CISF Watch: Centre
5. Will Increasing the Strength of the SC Solve the Pendency Problem?
6. National Health Accounts Figures Indicate High Burden of Health Care Costs on People

---

SARTHAK-PDS Scheme: Technology-Driven Transformation of India’s Food Security Architecture

---

Why in News?

• The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs approved the SARTHAK-PDS Scheme with a Central outlay of ₹25,530 crore for 2026–31 to modernize India’s Public Distribution System using advanced technologies such as Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Blockchain and Natural Language Processing, while strengthening implementation of the National Food Security Act.

Relevance

• GS II – Welfare Schemes, Governance, Food Security, E-Governance
• GS III – Inclusive Growth, Technology, Internal Economy, Digital Governance

Practice Question

• “SARTHAK-PDS marks a transition from subsidy-based food administration to intelligent welfare governance.” Critically examine its potential and challenges in strengthening India’s food security architecture. (250 words)

What is SARTHAK-PDS?

About the Scheme

• SARTHAK-PDS, meaning “Scheme for Assistance in Ration Transport and Handling-Income with Automation in PDS”, is an umbrella scheme aimed at creating a unified, intelligent and interoperable food distribution architecture capable of improving transparency, reducing leakages and ensuring efficient last-mile foodgrain delivery across India.
• The scheme integrates two earlier schemes — assistance for intra-state movement and FPS dealer margins under NFSA, and the SMART-PDS technology reform programme — thereby consolidating financial support and digital modernization into a single governance framework operating till 31 March 2031.

Objectives of SARTHAK-PDS

Technology-Driven Food Security Governance

• The scheme seeks to transform India’s PDS from a subsidy-centric administrative mechanism into a data-driven and predictive governance platform, where AI-powered analytics, blockchain-based monitoring and real-time dashboards improve transparency, operational efficiency and accountability throughout the foodgrain supply chain.

Reduction of Leakages and Diversion

• SARTHAK-PDS aims to reduce diversion of foodgrains, ghost beneficiaries and fraudulent withdrawals by enabling end-to-end digitization, real-time stock tracking, biometric authentication and predictive anomaly detection systems capable of identifying irregular transaction patterns across Fair Price Shops and warehouses.

Citizen-Centric Governance

• The scheme promotes a citizen-focused welfare architecture through interoperable databases, AI-enabled grievance redressal systems and mobile-based beneficiary interfaces, thereby improving ease of access, portability, responsiveness and transparency in delivery of food security entitlements under NFSA.

Strengthening Last-Mile Delivery

• Enhanced financial assistance for intra-state transport, handling costs and improved Fair Price Shop dealer margins seeks to improve operational sustainability of ration shops and ensure uninterrupted foodgrain distribution even in geographically remote, tribal and vulnerable regions.

Public Distribution System (PDS): Background

Meaning and Significance

• India’s Public Distribution System (PDS) is among the world’s largest food security networks, distributing subsidized foodgrains through a nationwide network of Fair Price Shops established to protect vulnerable populations from hunger, malnutrition and inflationary food-price shocks.
• The system functions under a cooperative federal structure where the Central Government procures and allocates foodgrains while State Governments identify beneficiaries, distribute ration cards and supervise last-mile delivery through Fair Price Shops.

National Food Security Act (NFSA), 2013

Rights-Based Food Security Framework

• The National Food Security Act converted food security into a legal entitlement by ensuring subsidized foodgrain access to nearly 75% of the rural population and 50% of the urban population, covering approximately 81.35 crore beneficiaries based on Census 2011.
• NFSA follows a human life-cycle approach emphasizing affordable access to adequate and nutritious food, thereby operationalizing constitutional principles associated with dignity, social justice and welfare-oriented governance under India’s democratic framework.

Categories of Beneficiaries

Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY)

• AAY households, classified as the “poorest of the poor”, receive 35 kg foodgrains per household per month, covering widows, elderly persons, primitive tribal groups, disabled citizens, landless labourers and other highly vulnerable socio-economic categories.

Priority Households (PHH)

• Priority households identified by State Governments receive 5 kg foodgrains per person per month, thereby ensuring broad-based food security support for economically weaker populations vulnerable to nutritional deprivation and income instability.

Key Existing Reforms in PDS

One Nation One Ration Card (ONORC)

• The One Nation One Ration Card has fundamentally transformed portability within India’s food security architecture by enabling migrant beneficiaries to access subsidized foodgrains from any Fair Price Shop nationwide using Aadhaar-based biometric authentication systems.
• ONORC has strengthened national integration of welfare delivery while reducing exclusion risks faced by migrant labourers, particularly during emergencies such as the COVID-19 pandemic when mobility and local identity documentation posed serious barriers.

SMART-PDS and Digitalization

• Since April 2023, SMART-PDS has enabled comprehensive digitization of ration cards, Aadhaar seeding, e-PoS automation and computerized supply-chain management across all States and Union Territories, thereby laying the technological foundation for SARTHAK-PDS integration.

Citizen-Facing Digital Applications

• Applications such as Mera Ration, Anna Mitra, Anna Sahayata and the Rightful Targeting Dashboard have improved beneficiary awareness, transaction transparency, grievance reporting and operational monitoring within the PDS ecosystem.

Key Features of SARTHAK-PDS

AI and Machine Learning Integration

• Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning systems will analyse transaction patterns in real time to identify suspicious withdrawals, detect ghost beneficiaries, predict supply disruptions and strengthen decision-making capacity through predictive governance tools and automated analytics.

Blockchain-Based Supply Chain Monitoring

• Blockchain-enabled records can create tamper-resistant digital trails across procurement, transportation, warehousing and FPS delivery stages, thereby improving traceability, reducing corruption opportunities and strengthening accountability in foodgrain movement.

Unified and Interoperable Databases

• The scheme proposes integrated national and state-level databases capable of enabling seamless coordination between ministries, warehouses, FPS outlets and beneficiary records, thereby reducing duplication, inconsistencies and administrative fragmentation.

State Command and Control Centres

• State-level Command and Control Centres will provide real-time monitoring and data-driven oversight, allowing governments to track stock movements, analyse operational bottlenecks and undertake evidence-based interventions during supply disruptions or emergencies.

Governance and Administrative Significance

Shift Towards Intelligent Governance

• SARTHAK-PDS represents a structural transition from traditional welfare administration towards intelligent governance, where digital technologies enable predictive administration, automated monitoring and citizen-responsive service delivery within India’s food security ecosystem.

Strengthening Cooperative Federalism

• Since PDS implementation depends upon both Central procurement agencies and State-level distribution mechanisms, SARTHAK-PDS requires deep coordination between Union and State Governments to ensure interoperability, technological standardization and administrative harmonization across the country.

Transparency and Accountability

• Real-time dashboards, digital audits and AI-driven analytics reduce discretionary power and administrative opacity, thereby strengthening accountability mechanisms and improving public trust in welfare delivery systems.

Economic Dimensions

Fiscal Implications

• India’s food subsidy expenditure remains among the world’s largest welfare commitments, with PMGKAY alone involving an estimated expenditure of ₹11.8 lakh crore, making efficiency improvements under SARTHAK-PDS economically important for long-term fiscal sustainability.

Reduction in Systemic Losses

• Improved logistics management, leakages reduction and real-time monitoring can reduce wastage, pilferage and storage inefficiencies, thereby enhancing the cost-effectiveness of India’s food subsidy architecture.

Enhancing FPS Viability

• Improved dealer margins aim to make Fair Price Shops financially sustainable, reducing incentives for corrupt diversion practices while encouraging better service delivery standards and operational continuity.

Social Significance

Food Security and Human Dignity

• By ensuring access to affordable foodgrains for over 81 crore beneficiaries, SARTHAK-PDS contributes directly to reduction of hunger, nutritional insecurity and extreme vulnerability, thereby strengthening social justice and human dignity in India’s welfare architecture.

Inclusion of Migrants and Vulnerable Groups

• Integration with ONORC and digital portability mechanisms particularly benefits migrant labourers, homeless populations and informal workers who traditionally faced exclusion from local welfare delivery systems due to mobility and documentation constraints.

Gender and Vulnerability Dimensions

• Women-headed households, elderly citizens, tribal communities and economically marginalized groups stand to benefit significantly from improved last-mile delivery, transparency and reduced corruption in foodgrain distribution systems.

Major Challenges in India’s PDS

Leakages and Diversion

• Despite digitization efforts, foodgrain diversion and corruption continue to remain serious concerns, with a 2024 report estimating that nearly 28% of foodgrains supplied through PDS fail to reach intended beneficiaries due to systemic inefficiencies and leakages.

Exclusion Errors

• A 2022 assessment estimated that more than 90 million eligible individuals remain excluded from TPDS benefits due to outdated Census data, documentation barriers and targeting inefficiencies affecting vulnerable populations.

Technological Exclusion

• Aadhaar authentication failures, biometric mismatch, poor internet connectivity and digital illiteracy continue to disrupt access for elderly beneficiaries, manual labourers and populations residing in remote rural or tribal regions.

Infrastructure Deficits

• Weak warehousing capacity, transportation bottlenecks and uneven FPS infrastructure particularly affect hilly, remote and tribal regions where stock-outs and delayed deliveries remain recurring operational problems.

Critical Concerns Regarding SARTHAK-PDS

Digital Divide and Accessibility Risks

• Excessive dependence on biometric authentication and digital systems may unintentionally exclude vulnerable populations lacking connectivity, documentation or technological literacy, thereby raising concerns regarding welfare exclusion and social equity.

Data Privacy and Surveillance Concerns

• Integration of large beneficiary databases, AI analytics and real-time monitoring systems creates concerns regarding data security, privacy protection and potential misuse of sensitive welfare information by state or private actors.

Federal Coordination Challenges

• Significant variations in technological capacity, digital infrastructure and administrative preparedness among States may create uneven implementation outcomes and widen inter-state disparities in welfare delivery efficiency.

Vendor Dependence and Technological Monopoly

• Overdependence on private technology vendors for AI, blockchain and database management systems may generate strategic vulnerabilities and increase long-term operational dependence on proprietary digital ecosystems.

Way Forward

Dynamic Beneficiary Updating

• Beneficiary databases should be regularly updated using real-time socio-economic indicators and linked with platforms such as e-Shram to reduce exclusion errors resulting from outdated Census-based targeting mechanisms.

Multi-Modal Authentication Systems

• India should adopt multi-layered authentication models including iris scanning, OTP verification and offline authentication systems to ensure uninterrupted access for technologically vulnerable populations and regions with weak internet connectivity.

Strengthening Last-Mile Logistics

• GPS-enabled transport monitoring, decentralized procurement models and warehouse modernization can reduce diversion, improve grain quality and strengthen supply-chain resilience across geographically difficult regions.

Nutrition-Oriented Food Security

• India’s PDS should gradually diversify beyond cereals to include pulses, millets and fortified foods, thereby addressing nutritional deficiencies and aligning food security policy with broader public health objectives.

Human-Centric Technology Deployment

• Technology adoption must remain inclusion-sensitive, ensuring that digital efficiency does not override welfare accessibility, especially for marginalized populations with limited digital literacy or infrastructural access.

Constitutional and Legal Dimensions

Right to Food Jurisprudence

• The Supreme Court has interpreted the Right to Food as part of the broader Right to Life under Article 21, thereby making efficient and inclusive implementation of food security programmes constitutionally significant.

Directive Principles of State Policy

• SARTHAK-PDS advances constitutional goals under Article 47, which directs the State to improve nutrition levels, raise standards of living and enhance public health outcomes for citizens.

Environmental Dimensions

Reducing Foodgrain Wastage

• Better storage infrastructure, digital supply-chain monitoring and optimized transportation systems can reduce post-harvest losses and wastage, thereby improving sustainability within India’s food distribution ecosystem.

Promoting Sustainable Food Systems

• Decentralized procurement and efficient logistics management may lower transportation-related emissions while simultaneously supporting local agricultural economies and region-specific food systems.

Prelims Pointers

• NFSA was enacted in 2013 and legally guarantees subsidized foodgrains to eligible households through TPDS.
• ONORC enables nationwide portability of foodgrain entitlements using Aadhaar-enabled biometric authentication systems.
• SARTHAK-PDS has an approved Central outlay of ₹25,530 crore for the period 2026–31.
• AAY beneficiaries receive 35 kg foodgrains per household, while PHH beneficiaries receive 5 kg per person monthly.

---

Illegal Sand Mining in National Chambal Sanctuary: Ecological Crisis and Governance Challenge

---

Why in News?

• The Supreme Court, while hearing the suo motu case “In Re: Illegal Sand Mining in the National Chambal Sanctuary and Threat to Endangered Aquatic Wildlife”, expressed serious concern over rampant illegal sand mining in the Chambal region and directed Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh to undertake immediate corrective measures to protect the sanctuary ecosystem and endangered wildlife.
• The Court described illegal mining in the sanctuary as an “environmental crisis” that is causing severe degradation of critical habitats of Gharials, Gangetic Dolphins, turtles and other aquatic species, while also questioning administrative inaction and governance failures.

Relevance

• GS III – Environment, Biodiversity Conservation, Disaster and Resource Management
• GS II – Judiciary, Environmental Governance

Practice Question

• Illegal sand mining represents both an ecological crisis and a governance failure. Discuss in the context of the National Chambal Sanctuary. Suggest measures for sustainable river resource management. (250 words)

What is Sand Mining?

Meaning and Importance

• Sand mining refers to the extraction of sand, gravel and sediment from riverbeds, floodplains, coastal zones and dunes for use in construction, infrastructure development, real estate and industrial activities, making it one of the most exploited natural resources globally.
• According to the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), sand is the second most consumed natural resource after water, with global demand exceeding 50 billion tonnes annually, largely driven by urbanization, housing and infrastructure expansion.
• While regulated extraction within replenishment limits may be environmentally sustainable, excessive and illegal mining beyond carrying capacity disrupts river morphology, ecological balance and long-term water security.

Why is Illegal Sand Mining Increasing in India?

Rising Construction Demand

• India’s rapid urbanization, expanding infrastructure pipeline, Smart Cities Mission, industrial corridors and housing programmes have created an unprecedented demand for construction-grade sand, generating a significant gap between legal supply and market demand.
• With India projected to become the world’s third-largest construction market, sand demand is expected to rise substantially, increasing pressure on river ecosystems and incentivizing illegal extraction activities.

High Profitability and Sand Mafia Networks

• Illegal mining remains highly profitable because operators avoid environmental clearance requirements, royalty payments, transport permits and compliance costs, thereby generating substantial illicit revenues that fuel organized criminal networks commonly referred to as “sand mafias.”
• The Supreme Court itself observed that illegal mining syndicates in some regions have become more powerful than local enforcement agencies, posing challenges to governance, law enforcement and environmental protection.

Administrative and Governance Failures

• Weak interdepartmental coordination, shortage of enforcement personnel, corruption, political patronage and inadequate surveillance mechanisms often enable illegal operators to continue extraction despite judicial directives and statutory restrictions.
• The Supreme Court recently criticized the States for an “abysmal state of compliance” regarding previous orders aimed at curbing illegal sand mining in the Chambal Sanctuary.

Policy and Technical Deficiencies

• In several districts, District Survey Reports (DSRs) remain outdated, scientifically weak or inadequately linked to replenishment studies, resulting in unsustainable extraction limits and flawed environmental decision-making.

National Chambal Sanctuary: Ecological Importance

Unique Riverine Protected Area

• The National Chambal Gharial Sanctuary is India’s only major riverine sanctuary jointly managed by Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh, extending over approximately 5,400 sq km along nearly 600 km of the Chambal River system.
• Established during 1978–79, the sanctuary protects one of India’s least-polluted river ecosystems and serves as a critical refuge for several endangered aquatic and riparian species.

Biodiversity Hotspot

• The sanctuary supports globally significant populations of the Critically Endangered Gharial, Endangered Gangetic River Dolphin, Indian Skimmer, Red-Crowned Roofed Turtle, Mugger Crocodile and numerous fish species dependent on intact riverine habitats.
• The Chambal River remains among the few river systems where viable breeding populations of gharials continue to survive, making its conservation nationally and internationally significant.

Ecological Impacts of Illegal Sand Mining

Destruction of Gharial Habitat

• Gharials require undisturbed sandy riverbanks for basking, nesting and breeding. Large-scale removal of sand destroys nesting sites, alters river morphology and directly threatens reproductive success of this Critically Endangered species.
• The Supreme Court specifically noted that illegal mining is jeopardizing decades of conservation investment under India’s gharial recovery programme and threatening habitat continuity within the sanctuary.

Threat to Gangetic River Dolphin

• The Gangetic River Dolphin, India’s National Aquatic Animal, depends on deep river channels, adequate water flow and healthy aquatic ecosystems. Sand mining alters river depth profiles and increases habitat fragmentation, affecting feeding and breeding patterns.
• Increased turbidity, underwater noise and riverbed disturbance negatively affect dolphin echolocation systems, which are essential for navigation and prey detection.

Riverbank Erosion and Habitat Loss

• Excessive extraction destabilizes riverbanks and accelerates erosion processes, leading to loss of riparian vegetation, destruction of floodplain habitats and increased sediment imbalance across the river ecosystem.
• Such disturbances affect turtles, nesting birds and aquatic fauna dependent on stable riverine landscapes for survival and reproduction.

Biodiversity Decline

• Riverbed excavation destroys spawning grounds for fish species and disrupts aquatic food chains, ultimately reducing biodiversity and weakening ecological resilience within the sanctuary ecosystem.

Hydrological and Environmental Consequences

Alteration of River Morphology

• Illegal mining deepens river channels beyond natural replenishment levels, modifies flow patterns and changes sediment transport dynamics, thereby destabilizing the natural geomorphology of river systems.

Groundwater Depletion

• Scientific studies indicate that excessive riverbed mining lowers the water table by increasing riverbed depth, weakening hydraulic connectivity between rivers and surrounding aquifers, thereby reducing groundwater recharge potential.

Increased Flood and Drought Vulnerability

• Disturbed sediment regimes can intensify riverbank collapse during floods while simultaneously reducing groundwater availability during dry seasons, creating a cycle of hydrological instability and ecological degradation.

Economic and Governance Dimensions

Threat to Public Infrastructure

• Excessive sand extraction weakens structural foundations of bridges, embankments, roads and irrigation infrastructure, resulting in increased maintenance costs and risks to public safety.
• Several states have reported infrastructure damage due to uncontrolled riverbed mining, demonstrating that illegal extraction imposes substantial hidden economic costs beyond environmental degradation.

Revenue Loss to States

• Illegal mining deprives State Governments of royalty revenues, permit fees and taxes while simultaneously increasing expenditure on enforcement, restoration and ecological rehabilitation measures.

Criminalization of Natural Resource Governance

• Sand mining has increasingly become associated with organized crime, violence against officials and regulatory capture, undermining rule of law and weakening public trust in environmental governance institutions.

Legal and Constitutional Framework

Constitutional Provisions

• Article 48A directs the State to protect and improve the environment, forests and wildlife, while Article 51A(g) imposes a fundamental duty upon citizens to safeguard natural ecosystems and biodiversity.
• The Supreme Court has repeatedly interpreted Article 21 (Right to Life) to include the right to a healthy environment, sustainable development and ecological balance.

Statutory Framework

Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957

• Sand is classified as a minor mineral, placing primary regulatory responsibility upon State Governments while empowering them to formulate mining rules and enforcement mechanisms.

EIA Notification, 2006

• Environmental clearance is mandatory for sand mining projects, ensuring scientific assessment of ecological impacts before extraction activities commence.

Sustainable Sand Mining Management Guidelines, 2016

• These guidelines mandate scientific assessment of replenishment rates, preparation of District Survey Reports and sustainable extraction practices to minimize ecological damage.

Enforcement and Monitoring Guidelines, 2020

• The guidelines recommend drone surveillance, satellite monitoring, RFID/barcoding of transport vehicles and digital tracking mechanisms to strengthen enforcement against illegal mining.

Important Supreme Court Judgments

Deepak Kumar v. State of Haryana (2012)

• The Supreme Court ruled that environmental clearance is mandatory even for mining leases below 5 hectares, recognizing the cumulative ecological impacts of small-scale mining operations on river ecosystems.

State of Uttar Pradesh v. Gaurav Kumar (2025)

• The Court established the principle of “No District Survey Report, No Sand Mining”, holding that environmental clearances cannot be granted without a finalized and scientifically prepared DSR.

In Re: Illegal Sand Mining in National Chambal Sanctuary (2026)

• The Supreme Court took suo motu cognizance of illegal mining in Chambal Sanctuary, warned States of stringent action, considered accountability of officials and issued comprehensive directions to strengthen enforcement and ecological protection.

Environmental Principles Applied by Judiciary

Public Trust Doctrine

• Originating from M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath (1996), this doctrine holds that natural resources such as rivers, forests and minerals belong collectively to the public, and the State acts merely as a trustee responsible for their protection.

Precautionary Principle

• Recognized in Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India (1996), the principle mandates preventive action against environmental harm even where complete scientific certainty regarding damage is unavailable.

Sustainable Development Principle

• Courts have consistently emphasized balancing developmental needs with ecological sustainability, ensuring that resource extraction does not compromise the interests of future generations.

Challenges in Controlling Illegal Sand Mining

Weak Enforcement Capacity

• Regulatory agencies often lack adequate manpower, surveillance technology, vehicles and interdepartmental coordination needed to effectively monitor large river stretches and remote mining sites.

Inter-State Jurisdictional Issues

• The tri-state nature of the Chambal Sanctuary creates enforcement complexities, allowing illegal operators to exploit jurisdictional gaps between Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh.

Inadequate Technological Monitoring

• Despite guidelines promoting drones and satellite monitoring, technological adoption remains uneven across states due to budgetary constraints and administrative limitations.

Socio-Economic Dependence

• In several regions, local communities depend on mining-related employment, making strict enforcement politically sensitive unless accompanied by alternative livelihood opportunities.

Way Forward

Technology-Based Surveillance

• Mandatory deployment of drones, satellite imagery, GPS-enabled transport monitoring, RFID tags and AI-based analytics platforms can enable real-time detection of illegal excavation and transportation activities.

Scientific District Survey Reports

• DSRs should be prepared using GIS mapping, replenishment studies, hydrological assessments and ecological carrying-capacity analysis, with annual revisions and public disclosure for transparency.

Promotion of Manufactured Sand (M-Sand)

• Expanding adoption of Manufactured Sand (M-Sand) through fiscal incentives, quality certification and public procurement mandates can reduce dependence on ecologically destructive riverbed mining.

Strengthening Accountability

• Officials responsible for regulatory failures should face administrative, financial and legal accountability, consistent with the Supreme Court’s emphasis on fixing responsibility for environmental degradation.

Community-Based Monitoring

• River conservation committees involving local communities, civil society organizations and academic institutions can strengthen surveillance while promoting participatory natural resource governance.

Integrated River Basin Management

• Conservation efforts must move beyond isolated enforcement and adopt holistic river basin management integrating biodiversity conservation, groundwater protection, floodplain regulation and sustainable resource extraction.

Prelims Pointers

• National Chambal Sanctuary is a tri-state sanctuary covering Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh.
• Gharial (Gavialis gangeticus) – IUCN: Critically Endangered; Schedule I, Wildlife Protection Act.
• Gangetic River Dolphin (Platanista gangetica) – IUCN: Endangered; India’s National Aquatic Animal.
• Sand is classified as a Minor Mineral under MMDR Act, 1957.
• Deepak Kumar Case (2012) mandated environmental clearance for mining leases below 5 hectares.

---

Humboldtia nairiana: Discovery of a New Endemic Evergreen Tree in the Western Ghats

---

Why in News?

• Researchers from the Jawaharlal Nehru Tropical Botanic Garden and Research Institute recently discovered a new evergreen tree species named Humboldtia nairiana in the riparian forests of Shendurney Wildlife Sanctuary within the Agasthyamala Biosphere Reserve, highlighting the exceptional biodiversity and endemism of the southern Western Ghats.
• The discovery assumes ecological significance because the species is known from an extremely restricted habitat spread over less than 2 sq. km, with field observations recording fewer than 10 mature trees, indicating high conservation vulnerability and the urgent need for habitat protection.

Relevance

• GS III – Biodiversity, Conservation, Ecology
• GS I – Physical Geography and Biodiversity Hotspots

Practice Question

• The discovery of endemic species in biodiversity hotspots highlights the need for ecosystem-based conservation strategies. Discuss with reference to Humboldtia nairiana and the Western Ghats. (250 words)

What is Humboldtia nairiana?

Taxonomic Classification

• Humboldtia nairiana is a newly identified medium-sized evergreen tree species belonging to the genus Humboldtia under the family Fabaceae, a plant family known for ecological importance in tropical forest ecosystems and nitrogen-fixing associations.
• The species was named in honour of renowned plant biotechnologist M. Nair, former Director of JNTBGRI, recognizing his contribution to botanical research, conservation biology and tropical plant sciences in India.

Key Features of Humboldtia nairiana

Morphological Characteristics

• The species grows approximately 5–8 metres in height and exhibits distinct vegetative and reproductive features including warty pale-brown bark, creamy-white blaze, angled glabrous branchlets and shorter sparsely hairy stipules, distinguishing it from related species within the genus.
• Researchers also identified unique reproductive traits such as larger flowers with longer pedicels and elliptic-oblong fruits possessing a shorter beak, which helped confirm its status as a completely new species through detailed morphological comparison and taxonomic analysis.

Riparian Habitat Adaptation

• The species occurs primarily in riparian evergreen forests, indicating adaptation to moist riverine ecosystems characterized by high humidity, perennial water availability and dense tropical vegetation associated with the southern Western Ghats landscape.

Discovery Process and Scientific Significance

Floristic Survey and Identification

• The discovery originated during a floristic survey conducted along the Cheenikkala–Pandimotta forest trail in 2010, where researchers encountered an unusual plant specimen that differed morphologically from known members of the Humboldtia genus.
• Scientists later cultivated seedlings within the JNTBGRI Arboretum, and after observing flowering and fruiting characteristics in 2022, confirmed through extensive morphological analysis that the specimen represented an entirely new species previously unknown to science.

Significance for Indian Botany

• The discovery demonstrates that even well-studied biodiversity hotspots such as the Western Ghats continue to harbour undocumented species, reflecting gaps in taxonomic exploration and the continuing relevance of field-based botanical research.
• Such discoveries strengthen India’s contribution to global biodiversity science while simultaneously underscoring the ecological importance of preserving fragile tropical forest ecosystems from anthropogenic pressures and climate-induced habitat degradation.

Endemism and Conservation Status

Strict Endemism

• Humboldtia nairiana is presently known only from the Agasthyamala Biosphere Reserve in Kerala at an elevation of nearly 300 metres, making it a narrowly endemic species with extremely limited geographic distribution.
• High endemism in the Western Ghats is linked to unique climatic conditions, geological isolation and long evolutionary histories, making the region one of the world’s most significant biodiversity hotspots.

Conservation Concerns

• Field surveys revealed an extremely fragile population consisting of fewer than 10 mature individuals, raising serious concerns regarding long-term survival, genetic diversity and vulnerability to habitat disturbances.
• Based on current information, researchers have provisionally treated the species as “Data Deficient” under IUCN criteria, though its restricted distribution and tiny population indicate potential future classification under highly threatened categories.

Habitat Vulnerability

• Since the species survives within a highly localized riparian ecosystem, threats such as landslides, climate change, invasive species, hydrological alterations or anthropogenic disturbances could rapidly endanger the remaining wild population.

Agasthyamala Biosphere Reserve

Location and Recognition

• Agasthyamala Biosphere Reserve is located in the southern Western Ghats across Kerala and Tamil Nadu and was included in the UNESCO World Network of Biosphere Reserves in 2016 because of its exceptional biodiversity and ecological significance.
• The biosphere reserve derives its name from Agasthyarkoodam (Agastya Mala), a sacred peak associated with Sage Agastya, reflecting the region’s deep ecological, cultural and spiritual significance.

Protected Areas within the Biosphere Reserve

• The reserve includes major protected landscapes such as Shendurney Wildlife Sanctuary, Peppara Wildlife Sanctuary, Neyyar Wildlife Sanctuary and Kalakkad Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve.

Biodiversity Importance

• Agasthyamala is globally recognized for its tropical evergreen forests, exceptional levels of endemism, medicinal plants, rare orchids, amphibians, reptiles and threatened vertebrate species characteristic of the southern Western Ghats ecosystem.

Western Ghats as a Biodiversity Hotspot

Global Ecological Importance

• Western Ghats is recognized as one of the world’s 36 biodiversity hotspots because of its extraordinary species richness, high endemism and severe habitat loss pressures.
• The Western Ghats influence India’s monsoon systems, support major peninsular rivers and provide crucial ecosystem services such as water security, climate regulation and carbon sequestration.

Endemism in the Western Ghats

• Nearly 50% of flowering plants, around 87% of amphibians and substantial proportions of reptiles and freshwater fish in the Western Ghats are endemic, making conservation of microhabitats critically important.
• Discovery of species like Humboldtia nairiana demonstrates that many ecologically specialized organisms may still remain undocumented within fragmented forest ecosystems.

Ecological Importance of Evergreen Forests

Climate Regulation and Carbon Storage

• Tropical evergreen forests act as major carbon sinks by storing atmospheric carbon dioxide, thereby playing an important role in climate regulation and mitigation of global warming.

Hydrological Stability

• Riparian evergreen forests stabilize riverbanks, maintain stream flow, support groundwater recharge and regulate local hydrological cycles critical for both biodiversity and human settlements.

Biodiversity Support

• Such ecosystems provide habitat for pollinators, seed dispersers, amphibians, insects and microorganisms, thereby sustaining complex ecological interactions essential for long-term ecosystem resilience.

Threats to Western Ghats Biodiversity

Habitat Fragmentation

• Infrastructure expansion, plantations, encroachments, road construction and developmental pressures continue to fragment forest habitats across the Western Ghats, threatening narrowly endemic species with small populations.

Climate Change

• Changes in rainfall patterns, rising temperatures and extreme weather events may alter microclimatic conditions essential for survival of sensitive riparian and evergreen forest species.

Invasive Species

• Invasive flora such as Lantana camara and Senna spectabilis increasingly threaten native forest regeneration and alter ecological composition within protected landscapes.

Lack of Taxonomic Capacity

• India faces a shortage of trained taxonomists, field botanists and biodiversity documentation experts, limiting scientific understanding of lesser-known endemic species and ecosystems.

Governance and Conservation Dimensions

Importance of In-Situ Conservation

• Protection of natural habitats within biosphere reserves and wildlife sanctuaries remains essential because narrowly endemic species with restricted distribution often cannot survive outside their ecological niche.

Role of Botanical Research Institutions

• Institutions such as JNTBGRI play a critical role in biodiversity documentation, ex-situ conservation, ecological monitoring and taxonomic research, contributing to evidence-based conservation planning.

Community Participation

• Involving local communities, indigenous populations and forest-dependent groups in biodiversity conservation improves habitat protection while integrating traditional ecological knowledge into scientific management strategies.

International and National Conservation Frameworks

UNESCO Biosphere Reserve Programme

• Biosphere reserves under UNESCO’s Man and Biosphere Programme aim to balance biodiversity conservation with sustainable development and scientific research through zonation-based ecological management.

Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)

• Discovery and conservation of endemic species support India’s commitments under the Convention on Biological Diversity related to species conservation, ecosystem protection and sustainable biodiversity management.

Way Forward

Comprehensive Population Surveys

• Extensive field studies and ecological surveys should be undertaken across the Agasthyamala landscape to identify additional populations, assess genetic diversity and better understand habitat requirements of Humboldtia nairiana.

Long-Term Ecological Monitoring

• Scientists and forest departments should establish continuous monitoring programmes to track population trends, reproductive success, habitat quality and climate-related vulnerabilities affecting the species.

Habitat Protection and Restoration

• Riparian evergreen habitats within the sanctuary should receive strengthened protection from encroachments, invasive species and anthropogenic disturbances while promoting ecological restoration where degradation has occurred.

Strengthening Taxonomic Research

• India must invest more in taxonomy, herbarium development, botanical exploration and biodiversity informatics to address gaps in species documentation and ecological knowledge.

Ex-Situ Conservation Measures

• Seed banks, arboretums and controlled propagation programmes can help preserve genetic material and support future restoration initiatives for critically localized endemic species.

Constitutional and Environmental Dimensions

Constitutional Duty

• Conservation of endemic biodiversity aligns with Article 48A, which directs the State to protect the environment and wildlife, and Article 51A(g), which imposes a duty upon citizens to safeguard natural ecosystems.

Ecological Security

• Protecting endemic species and biodiversity hotspots contributes to ecological security, climate resilience and sustainable development, especially in ecologically sensitive mountain ecosystems such as the Western Ghats.

Prelims Pointers

• Humboldtia nairiana belongs to the family Fabaceae.
• It was discovered in Shendurney Wildlife Sanctuary within the Agasthyamala Biosphere Reserve.
• Agasthyamala Biosphere Reserve became part of UNESCO’s World Network of Biosphere Reserves in 2016.
• Western Ghats is one of the world’s 36 biodiversity hotspots.
• The species is currently known from fewer than 10 mature trees.

---

Nearly 1,200 fishing harbours to be brought under CISF watch: Centre

---

Why in News?

• The Union Ministry of Home Affairs has proposed bringing nearly 1,200 fishing harbours and fishing landing centres under the security oversight framework of the Central Industrial Security Force as part of a broader strategy to strengthen India’s coastal and maritime security infrastructure.
• The proposal follows the earlier decision to designate the CISF as the security regulator for nearly 250 seaports, reflecting the government’s increasing focus on securing vulnerable maritime entry points after persistent concerns regarding coastal infiltration, smuggling and maritime terrorism.

Relevance

• GS III – Internal Security, Coastal Security, Maritime Security
• GS II – Centre-State Relations, Governance

Practice Question

• Strengthening surveillance of fishing harbours is critical for India’s maritime security architecture. Examine the rationale, benefits and implementation challenges of bringing fishing harbours under CISF oversight. (250 words)

Background: Why Coastal Security Matters

India’s Strategic Maritime Geography

• India possesses a coastline of nearly 11,098 km, including mainland coastline, island territories and extensive maritime zones, making coastal security a critical component of national security, economic stability and maritime governance.
• The country also has nearly 1,382 islands, major commercial ports, fishing harbours, offshore energy assets and busy sea lanes, which together create a complex maritime security environment requiring coordinated surveillance and enforcement.

Post-26/11 Coastal Security Reforms

• The importance of coastal security sharply increased after the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks, where terrorists infiltrated Indian territory through the sea route, exposing major gaps in surveillance, coordination and monitoring of fishing activities.
• Following the attacks, India initiated a multi-layered coastal security architecture involving the Indian Navy, Indian Coast Guard, Marine Police, intelligence agencies and coastal States to strengthen maritime domain awareness.

Why Fishing Harbours are Security Sensitive

Vulnerability to Infiltration and Smuggling

• Fishing harbours and landing centres are highly vulnerable to illegal infiltration, smuggling, arms trafficking, narcotics trade and potential terrorist movement because of large-scale human activity, weak surveillance and fragmented administrative oversight.
• Security agencies have repeatedly identified unregulated fishing vessels and poorly monitored landing points as potential channels for cross-border infiltration, especially along sensitive maritime regions bordering Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh.

Difficulty in Monitoring Fishing Activity

• India has nearly 1,547 notified fishing harbours and landing centres spread across coastal States and Union Territories, making physical surveillance and real-time monitoring administratively difficult and resource-intensive.
• Large numbers of fishermen, informal labourers and small vessels often operate without fully integrated digital identification systems, thereby complicating tracking, verification and security screening processes.

Proposed Role of CISF

Security Regulator and Framework Provider

• The proposal does not involve deployment of CISF personnel at every fishing harbour; instead, the CISF will function as a security regulator and supervisory agency, helping design standardized security templates and operational protocols.
• The CISF is expected to assist local administrations and State authorities in implementing security measures such as biometric attendance systems, smart ID cards, surveillance frameworks and controlled access protocols.

Standardization of Security Procedures

• By extending its expertise from seaport security to fishing harbours, the CISF can introduce uniform operating procedures relating to entry control, cargo monitoring, vessel verification and emergency response systems across diverse coastal locations.

Technological Integration

• Proposed measures include integration of biometric identification systems, digital databases, GPS-enabled vessel monitoring and smart identity cards for fishermen to improve traceability and reduce unauthorized access.

Coastal States and Geographic Coverage

States and UTs Covered

• The proposed oversight framework will cover fishing harbours across major coastal States and Union Territories including West Bengal, Odisha, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka, Goa, Maharashtra and Gujarat.
• Island territories such as Andaman and Nicobar Islands and Lakshadweep are also strategically important because of their location near critical sea lanes and international maritime routes.

Institutional and Governance Structure

Shared Centre-State Responsibility

• Fishing harbours are managed under a mixed governance framework where States primarily handle post-construction operations, maintenance and management, while certain centrally controlled harbours function under Port Trusts and Central Ministries.
• This fragmented governance structure often creates coordination gaps in surveillance, enforcement and data-sharing among security agencies, fisheries departments and local administrations.

Role of Ministry of Fisheries

• The Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying oversees fisheries policy and harbour infrastructure development, while implementation responsibilities are distributed among States, port authorities and local institutions.

Importance of Maritime and Coastal Security

Economic Significance

• India’s maritime sector supports nearly 95% of external trade by volume and around 70% by value, making secure coastal infrastructure essential for economic resilience, trade continuity and energy security.

Blue Economy Vision

• Strengthening security of fishing harbours aligns with India’s broader Blue Economy strategy, which seeks sustainable utilization of marine resources for economic growth, livelihood generation and maritime development.

Strategic Competition in Indian Ocean Region

• Increasing geopolitical competition in the Indian Ocean Region, including concerns regarding maritime terrorism, piracy and transnational crime, has amplified the need for stronger coastal surveillance and maritime governance mechanisms.

Security Challenges Along India’s Coastline

Maritime Terrorism

• Coastal regions remain vulnerable to maritime terrorism, particularly because fishing vessels and small boats are difficult to monitor continuously across India’s vast coastline and Exclusive Economic Zone.

Smuggling and Organized Crime

• Fishing harbours are frequently linked with smuggling of narcotics, gold, arms and contraband goods, especially along western coastal regions connected with international trafficking networks.

Illegal Fishing and Maritime Violations

• Unauthorized fishing activities, illegal entry into foreign waters and unregistered vessels complicate maritime law enforcement and create diplomatic as well as security concerns.

Human Trafficking and Migration

• Certain coastal routes are also vulnerable to illegal migration and human trafficking networks, particularly in ecologically remote or poorly monitored maritime zones.

Technological Dimensions of Coastal Security

Maritime Domain Awareness (MDA)

• India increasingly emphasizes Maritime Domain Awareness, involving integration of radar systems, satellite surveillance, vessel tracking technologies and intelligence-sharing networks to achieve real-time situational awareness across maritime zones.

Smart Surveillance Systems

• Use of AI-driven surveillance, drone monitoring, biometric verification systems and integrated coastal databases can significantly improve identification of suspicious activities and unauthorized vessel movements.

Fishermen as Security Stakeholders

• Fishing communities are increasingly integrated into India’s coastal surveillance framework because fishermen often act as the “eyes and ears” of maritime security agencies by reporting suspicious activities at sea.

Role of CISF in National Security

Mandate and Evolution

• The Central Industrial Security Force was originally established for protection of industrial infrastructure but has gradually evolved into a specialized force responsible for securing airports, metro systems, seaports, government installations and critical infrastructure.

Expertise in Critical Infrastructure Security

• CISF’s experience in access control, surveillance systems, crisis response and infrastructure protection makes it suitable for designing standardized coastal security protocols for vulnerable fishing harbours.

Challenges in Implementing the Proposal

Scale and Resource Constraints

• Monitoring nearly 1,200 fishing harbours and landing centres across multiple States presents enormous logistical and coordination challenges, especially considering varying infrastructure quality and administrative capacity.

Federal Coordination Issues

• Since fisheries and local harbour management involve strong State-level jurisdiction, effective implementation requires sustained cooperation between Central agencies, State governments and local administrations.

Impact on Fisherfolk Livelihoods

• Excessive security protocols or cumbersome documentation systems may inconvenience small fishermen and informal workers, requiring a balance between security concerns and livelihood protection.

Technological and Financial Limitations

• Installation and maintenance of biometric systems, surveillance infrastructure and digital monitoring platforms across remote coastal regions may involve substantial financial and operational costs.

Way Forward

Integrated Coastal Security Framework

• India should strengthen coordination between the Navy, Coast Guard, Marine Police, CISF, Fisheries Departments and intelligence agencies through unified maritime command-and-control mechanisms and interoperable databases.

Universal Fishermen Identification System

• Smart biometric identity cards integrated with vessel registration databases and GPS-enabled tracking systems can improve monitoring without disrupting legitimate fishing activities.

Community-Based Coastal Surveillance

• Fishermen should be actively integrated into coastal security frameworks through awareness programmes, reporting mechanisms and incentive-based participation in maritime vigilance systems.

Technological Modernization

• Expansion of coastal radar chains, AI-enabled surveillance, satellite monitoring and drone-based reconnaissance can improve detection of suspicious maritime activity in real time.

Capacity Building and Training

• Coastal police, harbour authorities and fisheries officials should receive specialized training in maritime security, surveillance technologies and emergency response coordination.

Balancing Security and Livelihoods

• Security reforms must remain sensitive to the socio-economic realities of traditional fishing communities to avoid alienation and ensure cooperative compliance with surveillance systems.

Constitutional and Governance Dimensions

National Security Responsibility

• Coastal security falls within the Union’s responsibility for defence, maritime security and protection of territorial integrity under the constitutional framework governing national security.

Cooperative Federalism

• Effective implementation requires cooperative federalism because operational control over fisheries, local harbour administration and law enforcement significantly involves State Governments.

International and Strategic Dimensions

Indian Ocean Security

• India’s coastal security initiatives are increasingly linked with broader strategic objectives in the Indian Ocean Region, including anti-piracy operations, maritime trade protection and counter-terrorism cooperation.

UNCLOS and Maritime Governance

• Strengthened coastal surveillance supports India’s obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea related to maritime governance, resource protection and coastal jurisdiction enforcement.

Prelims Pointers

• India’s coastline length: approximately 11,098 km.
• CISF functions under the Ministry of Home Affairs.
• India has nearly 1,547 notified fishing harbours and landing centres.
• National Investigation Agency was established after the 2008 Mumbai attacks.
• Maritime Domain Awareness refers to integrated monitoring of maritime activities and threats.

---

Will increasing the strength of the SC solve the pendency problem?

---

Why in News?

• The President recently promulgated the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Ordinance, 2026, increasing the sanctioned strength of the Supreme Court of India from 34 to 38 judges, following Union Cabinet approval aimed at improving disposal rates and ensuring “speedy justice”.
• Soon after the ordinance, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended elevation of four High Court Chief Justices and senior advocate V. Mohana to the apex court, while overall pendency before the Supreme Court crossed nearly 94,000 cases, reviving debate on structural reforms in India’s judicial system.

Relevance

• GS II – Judiciary, Judicial Reforms, Constitutional Governance

Practice Question

• Merely increasing the sanctioned strength of the Supreme Court may not substantially reduce judicial pendency. Critically examine the structural causes of judicial backlog in India. (250 words)

Understanding the Pendency Crisis

Scale of Judicial Backlog

• According to the National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG), pendency before the Supreme Court currently stands at nearly 93,966 cases, reflecting growing pressure on judicial capacity, rising litigation and procedural inefficiencies within the appellate system.
• India’s broader judicial backlog exceeds 5 crore pending cases across all courts, making judicial delay one of the most significant governance and rule-of-law challenges affecting citizens, businesses and constitutional administration.

Nature of Supreme Court Pendency

• A substantial portion of the Supreme Court’s docket consists of Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) filed under Article 136, many involving routine service matters, bail disputes, property issues and appeals that may not necessarily raise substantial constitutional questions.
• The increasing transformation of the Supreme Court into a regular appellate court rather than primarily a constitutional court has significantly contributed to docket explosion and prolonged case disposal timelines.

Ordinance Route: Constitutional and Governance Debate

Was the Ordinance Necessary?

• Critics argue that promulgating an ordinance for increasing judicial strength was unnecessary because Parliament was scheduled to convene shortly, and similar amendments in the past were ordinarily passed with limited legislative opposition.
• Resorting to the ordinance mechanism under Article 123 for a relatively non-emergency administrative reform raises questions regarding legislative bypassing and contributes to institutional scepticism regarding executive motivations.

Constitutional Position

• Under Article 124(1) of the Constitution, Parliament is empowered to regulate the number of Supreme Court judges through legislation, while the President may promulgate ordinances when immediate action is considered necessary.
• The ordinance route remains constitutionally valid but is often criticized when used in situations lacking genuine urgency or exceptional circumstances.

Does Increasing Judicial Strength Reduce Pendency?

Potential Advantages

Higher Disposal Capacity

• Increasing the sanctioned strength theoretically allows the Supreme Court to constitute more Benches simultaneously, thereby improving disposal rates, reducing waiting periods and distributing judicial workload more efficiently.

Faster Hearings

• Additional judges can potentially accelerate hearings in admission matters, constitutional cases and pending appeals, thereby improving litigant access and reducing procedural delays in case listing.

Addressing Vacancy Burden

• Since judicial vacancies frequently reduce actual working strength below sanctioned capacity, increasing the total number of judges provides institutional flexibility to sustain operational efficiency despite retirements and transfers.

Limitations of Increasing Judicial Strength Alone

Structural Nature of Pendency

• Judicial backlog is fundamentally a structural issue involving procedural inefficiencies, excessive appeals, inadequate filtering mechanisms and government litigation culture, meaning that merely adding judges may not substantially resolve systemic delays.

Risk of More Appeals and More Litigation

• Expansion of judicial capacity may paradoxically encourage more litigation because easier access to hearings and greater bench availability can increase incentives for filing appeals, particularly under discretionary jurisdictions such as Article 136.

Greater Doctrinal Inconsistency

• Larger judicial strength means more Division Benches functioning simultaneously, which can increase conflicting rulings among coordinate Benches and generate jurisprudential inconsistency requiring later resolution by larger Constitution Benches.
• Conflicting interpretations by multiple benches may ultimately increase rather than reduce long-term delays because cases often require referral to larger benches for authoritative clarification.

Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) and Pendency

Article 136 and Expanding Jurisdiction

• Article 136 grants the Supreme Court extraordinary discretionary power to hear appeals against judgments from any court or tribunal, originally intended to be exercised sparingly in exceptional circumstances involving substantial injustice or important legal questions.
• Over time, however, SLPs have become a dominant component of the Supreme Court’s workload, transforming the institution into a broad appellate forum rather than primarily a constitutional adjudicatory body.

Absence of Clear Guidelines

• Unlike many other common-law jurisdictions, India lacks robust institutional filters regulating discretionary appeals, resulting in inconsistent admission standards and unpredictable exercise of appellate jurisdiction.
• Critics argue that absence of transparent SLP admission guidelines contributes to excessive pendency, forum shopping and public perceptions regarding arbitrary listing practices or bench preferences.

Should the Supreme Court Become a Constitutional Court?

Arguments in Favour

Focus on Constitutional Adjudication

• Many scholars argue that the Supreme Court should focus primarily on constitutional interpretation, federal disputes and questions of national legal significance while routine appeals should largely end at High Courts.

Improving Judicial Efficiency

• Restricting routine appellate litigation can allow the apex court to dedicate more time to Constitution Benches, rights jurisprudence and nationally significant legal questions requiring authoritative interpretation.

Comparative Jurisprudence

• Courts such as the Supreme Court of the United States and constitutional courts in Europe use strong filtering mechanisms to hear only a limited number of jurisprudentially important cases annually.

Arguments Against a Pure Constitutional Court

India’s Constitutional Design

• The framers of the Constitution envisaged the Supreme Court not merely as a constitutional court but also as the nation’s final appellate forum capable of correcting grave legal errors and ensuring uniformity in interpretation of law.

Importance of Substantial Questions of Law

• Cases appearing “ordinary” may involve wider implications for labour rights, economic freedom, contractual fairness or civil liberties, requiring intervention by the highest court to maintain legal consistency and justice.
• For example, contractual disputes involving employment bonds or restrictive covenants can raise larger constitutional concerns regarding freedom of occupation, labour mobility and economic fairness.

Government Litigation and Judicial Burden

Government as the Largest Litigant

• The Union and State Governments together remain India’s largest litigants, contributing significantly to judicial backlog through repetitive appeals, routine challenges and prolonged litigation strategies across departments and public sector undertakings.

Failure of National Litigation Policy

• Although proposals for a National Litigation Policy (NLP) aimed at reducing unnecessary government litigation were discussed, implementation remained weak and fragmented, resulting in continued proliferation of avoidable cases.

Inconsistent Legal Strategies

• Frequent changes in law officers and absence of coordinated institutional litigation policy often produce contradictory legal positions across cases, increasing confusion, prolonging disputes and burdening courts unnecessarily.

Institutional Reforms Required

Stronger Filtering Mechanisms

• The Supreme Court must develop robust institutional filters for admission of SLPs, ensuring that only cases involving substantial legal or constitutional questions consume apex court judicial time.

Case Management Reforms

• Strict time allocation for oral arguments, greater reliance on written submissions and technology-driven case management systems can improve efficiency and reduce unnecessary adjournments.

Constitution Benches and Judicial Discipline

• More substantial questions of law should be referred to larger benches at earlier stages to reduce conflicting interpretations among coordinate benches and strengthen doctrinal coherence.

Strengthening High Courts

• Empowering High Courts through improved infrastructure, adequate appointments and finality of judgments in routine matters can reduce excessive dependence upon the Supreme Court.

Public Interest Litigations (PILs) and Pendency

Need for Stricter Scrutiny

• While PILs remain important instruments for social justice and constitutional accountability, frivolous or politically motivated PILs increasingly consume valuable judicial time and contribute to pendency.

Balwant Singh Chaufal Guidelines

• In State of Uttaranchal v. Balwant Singh Chaufal, the Supreme Court laid down safeguards against misuse of PIL jurisdiction, emphasizing bona fide public interest and discouraging publicity-oriented litigation.

Gender Representation in Supreme Court

Underrepresentation of Women

• Despite gradual progress, women remain significantly underrepresented in the Supreme Court and higher judiciary, reflecting broader structural inequalities within the legal profession and judicial appointments ecosystem.

Opportunity for Corrective Inclusion

• Expansion of sanctioned judicial strength provides an important opportunity to improve gender diversity, regional representation and social inclusiveness within the apex judiciary.

Seniority Convention Debate

• Critics argue that while conventions of seniority are often relaxed for male judges, the same flexibility is not consistently applied for appointment of women judges, thereby limiting representational diversity.

Governance and Democratic Dimensions

Access to Justice

• Judicial delay directly affects citizens’ access to justice, particularly marginalized litigants lacking financial resources to sustain prolonged litigation, thereby weakening faith in rule of law institutions.

Institutional Legitimacy

• Rising pendency, inconsistent judgments and opaque listing practices can gradually erode public confidence in judicial institutions and weaken democratic constitutionalism.

Separation of Powers

• Effective judicial functioning is essential for maintaining constitutional checks and balances, protecting rights and ensuring accountability of executive and legislative branches.

Technology and Judicial Reform

Digitization and e-Courts

• Expansion of virtual hearings, AI-assisted case management, digital filing systems and integrated judicial databases can significantly improve administrative efficiency and transparency within the judicial process.

National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG)

• Platforms such as the NJDG improve transparency regarding pendency patterns, disposal rates and judicial performance while enabling evidence-based policy interventions.

Comparative Perspective

United States Supreme Court

• The U.S. Supreme Court uses the certiorari system, accepting only a limited number of cases involving major constitutional or federal questions, thereby preventing docket overload.

United Kingdom Model

• The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom primarily focuses on issues of public importance and legal principle rather than functioning as a routine appellate court.

Way Forward

Institutional Filtering of Appeals

• The Supreme Court should evolve transparent criteria for admission of SLPs to ensure judicial time is devoted primarily to constitutionally significant or jurisprudentially important disputes.

National Litigation Policy

• The government must implement a comprehensive litigation policy discouraging routine appeals and promoting pre-litigation dispute resolution mechanisms across departments and public sector entities.

Strengthening High Courts

• Improving infrastructure, staffing and judicial appointments in High Courts can reduce excessive dependence upon the Supreme Court while improving regional access to justice.

Constitution Bench Reforms

• Dedicated Constitution Benches functioning throughout the year can accelerate resolution of major constitutional issues and reduce delays in authoritative interpretation of law.

Judicial Appointments and Diversity

• Appointments should prioritize merit alongside gender, regional and social diversity to strengthen legitimacy and representativeness within the higher judiciary.

Procedural Rationalization

• Strict adjournment rules, enhanced written advocacy and modern case-flow management systems are necessary to improve judicial efficiency and reduce avoidable delays.

Constitutional Provisions

• Article 124 – Establishment and composition of the Supreme Court.
• Article 136 – Special Leave Petition jurisdiction.
• Article 32 – Constitutional remedies jurisdiction.
• Article 123 – Ordinance-making power of the President.

Prelims Pointers

• Supreme Court sanctioned strength increased from 34 to 38 judges in 2026.
• Article 136 provides discretionary SLP jurisdiction to the Supreme Court.
• NJDG stands for National Judicial Data Grid.
• PIL safeguards were emphasized in Balwant Singh Chaufal (2010) case.
• Ordinances are promulgated under Article 123.

---

National Health Accounts figures indicate high burden of health care costs on people

---

Why in News?

• The latest National Health Accounts (NHA) Estimates 2022–23 revealed that despite improvements in public health financing, Indian households continue to bear an extremely high burden of healthcare costs, with Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) accounting for nearly 49.9% of Current Health Expenditure (CHE).
• The report reignited debate over India’s slow progress towards Universal Health Coverage (UHC), inadequate public spending on healthcare, excessive privatization of medical services and weak financial protection mechanisms against catastrophic health expenditure.

Relevance

• GS II – Health, Welfare, Social Justice
• GS III – Human Capital, Inclusive Development

Practice Question

• Despite gradual increases in public health expenditure, Out-of-Pocket Expenditure remains a major challenge in India’s healthcare system. Examine the structural reasons and suggest measures for achieving Universal Health Coverage. (250 words)

What are National Health Accounts (NHA)?

Meaning and Purpose

• The National Health Accounts (NHA) are an internationally accepted accounting framework that systematically tracks financial flows within the health sector, including government expenditure, household spending, insurance contributions and external funding across healthcare services and institutions.
• NHA estimates help policymakers assess healthcare financing patterns, evaluate progress toward Universal Health Coverage, identify inequities in access and monitor the effectiveness of public health spending in reducing financial hardship for citizens.

Key Findings of NHA 2022–23

Government Health Expenditure (GHE)

• Government Health Expenditure increased from nearly 1.15% of GDP in 2013–14 to around 1.43%–1.48% of GDP in 2022–23, indicating gradual improvement but still remaining significantly below national and global benchmarks for adequate public health financing.
• Government health expenditure as a share of total government expenditure rose from 3.78% to 4.89% over the same period, reflecting some increase in policy prioritization of healthcare within overall public spending patterns.

Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE)

• Despite rising public spending, Indian households continue to finance healthcare primarily from personal savings, with OOPE constituting nearly 49.90% of Current Health Expenditure, exposing millions to catastrophic medical expenditure and indebtedness.
• High OOPE reflects inadequate insurance penetration, weak primary healthcare systems, expensive private healthcare dependence and insufficient financial risk protection mechanisms within India’s healthcare architecture.

Current Health Expenditure (CHE)

• India’s Current Health Expenditure (CHE), which measures final consumption of healthcare goods and services excluding capital expenditure, stood at approximately ₹7.66 lakh crore during 2022–23, demonstrating the enormous scale of healthcare financing requirements.

Government Share in Total Health Expenditure

• Government Health Expenditure amounted to approximately ₹3.85 lakh crore, accounting for less than half of Total Health Expenditure, highlighting continued dependence upon private and household healthcare spending.
• State Governments contributed nearly 63% of Government Health Expenditure, while the Union Government’s share remained around 36%, underlining the critical role of States in financing healthcare delivery.

Why High OOPE is a Serious Concern

Financial Catastrophe and Poverty

• Excessive out-of-pocket spending pushes millions of households into poverty every year, especially during medical emergencies involving hospitalization, chronic illnesses or non-communicable diseases requiring long-term treatment and medication.
• According to multiple health-economics studies, healthcare expenses remain one of the largest contributors to household indebtedness and distress asset sales among low-income and vulnerable populations in India.

Weak Universal Health Coverage

• High OOPE indicates incomplete progress toward Universal Health Coverage (UHC) because citizens continue to face major financial barriers in accessing essential healthcare services despite government welfare schemes and insurance programmes.

Inequality in Healthcare Access

• Wealthier households can access advanced private healthcare services while poorer sections often delay treatment, rely on underfunded public facilities or avoid care altogether due to affordability constraints, thereby deepening health inequities.

Public Health Spending: Progress and Limitations

Government’s Position

• The government has highlighted the gradual increase in public health expenditure and claimed that enhanced public financing has contributed to reduction in OOPE and improved healthcare accessibility through various welfare and insurance programmes.

Criticism of Current Spending Levels

• Critics argue that despite marginal increases, India’s public health expenditure remains substantially below the WHO recommendation of at least 5% of GDP required to achieve effective Universal Health Coverage.
• India also remains below the target set under the National Health Policy, which recommended increasing combined Central and State public health expenditure to 2.5% of GDP by 2025.

Post-COVID Decline in Public Financing

• Analysts observed that the temporary rise in public health spending during the COVID-19 pandemic was not sustained, with Government Health Expenditure as a share of CHE falling sharply from 41.1% in 2021–22 to 35.6% in 2022–23.
• This decline indicates that emergency pandemic-driven investments did not translate into long-term structural strengthening of India’s public healthcare financing framework.

Privatization of Healthcare in India

Dominance of Private Hospitals

• The NHA estimates reveal that private hospitals account for nearly 30.83% of Current Health Expenditure, while government hospitals account for only around 16.73%, highlighting the continued dominance of the private healthcare sector.
• India’s healthcare delivery system remains heavily privatized, particularly in secondary and tertiary care, resulting in high treatment costs, uneven regulation and substantial regional disparities in healthcare access.

Risks of Excessive Privatization

• Unregulated private healthcare often leads to irrational treatment practices, unnecessary diagnostics, over-medicalization and inflated healthcare costs, particularly affecting financially vulnerable households lacking insurance protection.

Regional and Social Inequities

• Rural populations, tribal communities and economically weaker groups often face limited access to quality healthcare infrastructure because private providers are concentrated mainly in urban and economically profitable regions.

Health Insurance and Financial Protection

Government-Financed Insurance Schemes

• Total expenditure under government-financed health insurance schemes was approximately ₹26,266 crore, accounting for merely 3% of Total Health Expenditure, indicating limited coverage and financial depth of public insurance systems.

PMJAY and Limitations

• Although schemes such as Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana expanded insurance coverage for vulnerable populations, experts argue that they have not substantially reduced catastrophic healthcare expenditure or dependence on OOPE.

Rise of Private Health Insurance

• Private health insurance expenditure now accounts for nearly 9.2% of Total Health Expenditure, almost three times government-financed insurance spending, reflecting growing commercialization and privatization of healthcare financing.
• However, private insurance is often concentrated among middle- and upper-income groups, leaving informal workers and economically weaker households inadequately protected.

Preventive Healthcare: A Major Weakness

Low Spending on Preventive Care

• Preventive healthcare accounts for only around 8.88% of Current Health Expenditure, which is deeply concerning for a country facing a rapidly increasing burden of non-communicable diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, cancer and cardiovascular disorders.

Consequences of Curative Bias

• India’s health system remains excessively treatment-oriented rather than prevention-oriented, resulting in higher long-term healthcare costs, delayed diagnosis and increased burden on tertiary healthcare infrastructure.

Importance of Preventive Investment

• Stronger investments in vaccination, nutrition, sanitation, screening programmes, mental health awareness and lifestyle interventions can significantly reduce disease burden and improve long-term health outcomes at lower economic cost.

Structural Problems in India’s Health System

Inadequate Public Infrastructure

• Public healthcare infrastructure continues to suffer from shortage of doctors, nurses, specialists, diagnostic facilities and medicines, particularly in rural and aspirational districts, forcing citizens to depend upon expensive private providers.

Urban-Rural Disparities

• Urban areas enjoy greater concentration of healthcare facilities and specialists, while rural populations frequently face long travel distances, understaffed primary health centres and limited emergency care access.

Human Resource Deficits

• India continues to face shortages of trained healthcare personnel relative to WHO norms, affecting service quality, accessibility and continuity of care within public healthcare institutions.

Fragmented Healthcare Governance

• Health being a State subject under the Constitution often results in uneven implementation capacity, disparities in public spending and varying quality of healthcare delivery across States.

Constitutional and Ethical Dimensions

Right to Health under Article 21

• The Supreme Court has repeatedly interpreted Article 21 (Right to Life) to include the right to health, emphasizing the State’s obligation to provide accessible, affordable and quality healthcare services to citizens.

Directive Principles of State Policy

• Article 47 directs the State to improve public health and nutrition standards, making healthcare financing and access central components of India’s constitutional welfare framework.

Equity and Social Justice

• High OOPE disproportionately affects marginalized populations, making healthcare inequity not merely an economic issue but also a question of distributive justice and constitutional equality.

Economic Dimensions

Productivity and Human Capital

• Poor health outcomes and catastrophic healthcare costs weaken labour productivity, reduce workforce participation and undermine long-term human capital formation essential for sustained economic growth.

Fiscal Implications

• Low public spending on healthcare may appear fiscally conservative in the short term, but inadequate preventive and primary care ultimately increases long-term treatment costs and economic burden on society.

Demographic and Epidemiological Transition

• India’s ageing population and rising non-communicable disease burden require stronger healthcare financing systems capable of addressing chronic and long-term healthcare needs.

International Comparisons

Low Public Spending Relative to Peers

• India’s public health expenditure as a share of GDP remains substantially lower than many emerging economies and far below countries with universal healthcare systems funded through strong public financing mechanisms.

Lessons from Universal Health Systems

• Countries achieving effective UHC generally rely on strong tax-funded primary healthcare systems, universal risk pooling and lower dependence on direct household expenditure.

Way Forward

Increase Public Health Expenditure

• India must substantially increase public health spending toward at least 2.5%–3% of GDP in the medium term, consistent with National Health Policy targets and international recommendations for Universal Health Coverage.

Strengthening Primary Healthcare

• Greater investment in Health and Wellness Centres, preventive care, nutrition services and early disease detection can reduce long-term healthcare costs and improve population-level health outcomes.

Regulating Private Healthcare

• Stronger regulation of private hospitals, pricing transparency, standard treatment guidelines and grievance redressal mechanisms are essential to prevent exploitative and irrational medical practices.

Expanding Financial Protection

• PMJAY and State insurance schemes should be expanded with broader outpatient coverage, reduced exclusions and stronger integration with public healthcare infrastructure.

Focus on Preventive Healthcare

• India should increase investments in preventive health, mental health, public awareness campaigns, screening programmes and lifestyle disease management to address the growing NCD burden.

Strengthening Health Federalism

• Since States finance a majority of public health expenditure, cooperative fiscal federalism and higher untied health grants are necessary to improve healthcare infrastructure and delivery capacities.

Prelims Pointers

• NHA stands for National Health Accounts.
• WHO recommends public health spending of at least 5% of GDP.
• National Health Policy 2017 targets 2.5% of GDP public health expenditure.
• PMJAY is a government-financed health insurance scheme.
• OOPE refers to Out-of-Pocket Expenditure by households.

---