PIB Summaries 19 October 2026

Legacy IAS Academy · Daily PIB Analysis

PIB Analysis — 18 & 19 October 2026

3 syllabus-mapped government releases, analysed · scheme anatomy, context and critique · a UPSC-pattern Mains question with every topic
Press Information Bureau Government of India
In-Depth PIB Analysis3 Items
Core TopicImportantConcise
Defence & SecurityGS Paper III · GS Paper II
03Exercise KONKAN-26 (India–UK)
Economy & InfrastructureGeneral Studies Paper III
01

UDAN at Ten: A Decade of Regional Air Connectivity and the ₹28,840-crore Next Phase

Core Topic GS-III · Economy — Infrastructure (Airports), Inclusive Growth Prelims + Mains PIB Backgrounder · Ministry of Civil Aviation · 20 Oct 2026

As the Regional Connectivity Scheme (RCS) – UDAN completes ten years on 21 October 2026, the Centre has moved it into a ten-year next phase (FY 2026-27 to FY 2035-36) with an outlay of ₹28,840 crore — shifting the emphasis from subsidising routes to building aerodromes, helipads and indigenous aircraft capacity.

◈ Background & Static Anchor

Civil aviation is a Union subject: Entry 29, List I (Union List), Seventh Schedule covers airways, aircraft, air navigation and the provision of aerodromes. Yet land, VAT on aviation turbine fuel (ATF), power and policing lie with the States — which is why UDAN was designed as a Centre–State cost-sharing scheme.

  • National Civil Aviation Policy (NCAP), 2016 — India’s first integrated aviation policy, approved by the Union Cabinet in June 2016, made affordable regional connectivity an explicit priority.
  • UDAN — “Ude Desh ka Aam Nagrik” — was launched on 21 October 2016 under the NCAP; the first RCS-UDAN flight (Shimla–Delhi) flew in April 2017.
  • Implementing agency: Airports Authority of India (AAI), a statutory body under the AAI Act, 1994. Nodal ministry: Ministry of Civil Aviation (MoCA).
  • Legal base of the sector: the Bharatiya Vayuyan Adhiniyam, 2024 replaced the Aircraft Act, 1934 (in force from 1 January 2025).
  • Scale today: India is the world’s third-largest domestic aviation market; operational airports have risen from 74 (2014) to 166.
The first decade — the record as reported
687Routes operationalised
95Aerodromes (incl. 17 heliports, 2 water)
3.68 lakhFlights operated
1.72 crorePassengers carried
₹5,091.23 crVGF disbursed (to 15 Oct 2026)
  • North-East: 90 priority RCS routes operationalised; of 52 aerodromes identified in the region (including heliports and water aerodromes), only 12 are operational so far.
  • Employment: the Government reports sector jobs rising from about 3 million (2014) to nearly 7.7 million (2026), and projects a potential of 25 million by 2040 (government projection).
How the UDAN model works
  • Market-based selection: airlines bid for routes through reverse bidding; the operator seeking the lowest Viability Gap Funding (VGF) per seat wins.
  • Fare cap: a capped fare applies to a share of seats (“RCS seats”) — originally about ₹2,500 for a roughly one-hour fixed-wing journey.
  • VGF sharing: Centre : State = 80 : 20 (90 : 10 for North-Eastern States and UTs); the Centre’s share flows from a Regional Connectivity Fund built through a levy on non-RCS domestic flights.
  • Concessions: States offer reduced VAT on ATF, land, security and utilities at concessional rates; AAI waives landing and parking charges at RCS airports.
  • Route exclusivity: three years for the winning operator.
Lineage — from UDAN 1.0 to the next phase
Figure 1 — Evolution of RCS-UDAN, 2016–2036
Timeline of RCS-UDAN versions from 2016 launch to the 2026-36 phase
Each round widened the scheme’s reach — priority areas, water aerodromes, small aircraft — before the 2026–36 phase pivoted to infrastructure. Image courtesy PIB (source: Ministry of Civil Aviation); reproduced with credit for educational use.
  • UDAN 1.0 (2017): first bidding round; strong airline participation.
  • UDAN 2.0 (2018): introduced priority areas — the North-East, hill States and island UTs — and helicopter routes.
  • UDAN 3.0 (2018–19): added tourism routes, seaplane routes and water aerodromes.
  • UDAN 4.0 (2020–22): a small-aircraft sub-scheme for difficult terrain.
  • UDAN 5.0 rounds (2023–25): special rounds for different aircraft categories.
  • Spin-offs: Lifeline UDAN (2020) moved medical cargo during COVID-19; Krishi UDAN 2.0 (October 2021) targeted air freight of perishable farm produce.
  • Next phase (2026–36): first flagged in the Union Budget 2025-26 as a “modified UDAN” to connect 120 new destinations and carry 4 crore passengers over ten years; formally launched on 4 July 2026.
▤ Scheme at a Glance — Next Phase of UDAN
  • Outlay: ₹28,840 crore.
  • Tenure: 10 years — FY 2026-27 to FY 2035-36.
  • Nodal Ministry: Ministry of Civil Aviation; implementation with AAI and participating States/UTs.
  • Launch: formally launched on 4 July 2026; announced in the Union Budget 2025-26.
  • Aerodrome development (CAPEX): 100 airports from existing unserved airstrips; ₹12,159 crore over 8 years (a stated allocation of about ₹100 crore per airport).
  • Operation & Maintenance (O&M): 3 years of support for about 441 aerodromes; ₹2,577 crore; capped at ₹3.06 crore per airport per year and ₹0.90 crore per heliport/water aerodrome per year.
  • Modern helipads: 200 at about ₹15 crore each; ₹3,661 crore over 8 years.
  • VGF for airlines: ₹10,043 crore over 10 years; support for up to 5 years per route, tapered from year 3; route exclusivity limited to 3 years.
  • Indigenous aviation (Atmanirbhar Bharat): ₹400 crore for two HAL Dhruv helicopters (for Pawan Hans) and two HAL Dornier aircraft (for Alliance Air).
  • Federal architecture: 21 MoUs among the Centre, States/UTs and AAI; a Challenge Mode Portal for Aerodrome Development through which States/UTs nominate airstrips and helipads.
  • Stated aim: an ecosystem for Made in India civil aircraft alongside sustainable regional operations (government objective).
Figure 2 — Where the ₹28,840 crore goes (component-wise outlay)
Total outlay ₹28,840 crore · FY 2026-27 to FY 2035-36 Aerodromes — CAPEX (100) ₹12,159 cr · 42.2% VGF for airlines ₹10,043 cr · 34.8% Modern helipads (200) ₹3,661 cr · 12.7% Aerodrome O&M (~441) ₹2,577 cr · 8.9% Indigenous aircraft (4) ₹400 cr · 1.4%
Over half the outlay (CAPEX + O&M + helipads ≈ 64%) now goes to physical infrastructure; route subsidy (VGF) falls to about a third. Data: PIB, Ministry of Civil Aviation.
What changed from the original UDAN
  • From routes to infrastructure: the original scheme subsidised flights on largely existing airstrips; the next phase funds building (CAPEX) and running (O&M) aerodromes.
  • VGF window: extended from three years to up to five years, but tapered from the third year to push routes toward commercial viability.
  • Federalism: from Centre-led bidding to MoU-based Centre–State/UT partnerships and State-nominated sites via a challenge mode.
  • Fleet: a first, modest link to indigenous aircraft procurement (HAL platforms).
On the ground — regional outcomes cited by the Government
  • Purnea, Bihar (2025): serves 10+ districts of Seemanchal–Kosi, earlier dependent on Bagdogra (200+ km away); Bihar’s longest runway (~2.8 km) handles A320/B737; travel to Kolkata ~2 hours, Patna ~1 hour. The region is a hub for makhana (Mithila Makhana holds a GI tag) and litchi.
  • Tezu, Arunachal Pradesh (2021): in Lohit district near the China border; connects 2 lakh+ people, cuts travel to Guwahati to ~1 hour, and enables cargo of ginger, cardamom and rice.
  • Deoghar, Jharkhand (July 2022): serves Baba Baidyanath Dham (one of the 12 Jyotirlingas) and AIIMS Deoghar; the Government reports 10 lakh+ pilgrims flying in annually and 30+ new hotels.
  • Kishangarh, Rajasthan (2017): links the marble hub and the Ajmer Sharif Dargah–Pushkar pilgrim circuit; air cargo for marble exports; hosts a Category ‘A’ Flying Training Organisation.
Why it matters
  • Balanced regional development: tier-2/3 towns gain access to markets, tourism and investment.
  • Strategic and border connectivity: airfields such as Tezu in frontier districts aid disaster response, medical evacuation and administration.
  • Perishable value chains: air cargo for horticulture and specialty produce (makhana, ginger, cardamom).
  • Spiritual and medical tourism: Deoghar and Ajmer–Pushkar show demand-led routes outperforming purely subsidy-led ones.
The critical view
  • Route survival after subsidy: a CAG performance audit (2023) found that fewer than half of awarded routes started operations and only about 7% continued beyond the three-year concession — the scheme’s central weakness.
  • Idle assets: the same audit flagged revived airports and heliports with few or no RCS operations — a risk the ₹12,159-crore CAPEX component must avoid.
  • Cost per passenger: ₹5,091.23 crore of VGF for 1.72 crore passengers works out to roughly ₹2,960 per passenger (derived) — defensible only if wider economic spillovers are captured.
  • Operator fragility: exits of small regional carriers and fleet groundings at larger airlines have repeatedly orphaned routes.
  • North-East gap: only 12 of 52 identified aerodromes are operational — about 23%.
  • Scale of indigenisation: ₹400 crore for four aircraft is a signal, not an industrial policy; regional fleets remain largely imported.
  • Helicopter operations: 200 helipads raise questions of helicopter availability, mountain-weather safety and night-flying capability.
Institutions & terms to know
  • Viability Gap Funding (VGF): a subsidy covering the gap between an operator’s cost and the capped revenue.
  • DGCA, BCAS, AAIB: given statutory status by the Aircraft (Amendment) Act, 2020.
  • Pawan Hans Ltd: government helicopter operator; Alliance Air: government-owned regional airline.
  • HAL Dhruv: the Advanced Light Helicopter (ALH); HAL Dornier (Do-228): licence-built light transport aircraft.
  • Water aerodrome: a defined water area for seaplane take-off and landing; heliport: an aerodrome for helicopters.
✎ Mains Practice Question

A decade of UDAN has widened India’s regional aviation map, but the survival of routes beyond viability gap funding remains uncertain. Critically examine the scheme’s performance and assess whether the design of its next phase (2026–36) addresses these weaknesses. 15 marks · 250 words

02

Pumped Storage Hydropower: Long-Duration Storage for India’s Renewable Transition

Core Topic GS-III · Infrastructure — Energy; Environment — Clean Energy Transition Prelims + Mains PIB Backgrounder · Ministry of Power · 19 Oct 2026

With non-fossil capacity past 300 GW and a 500 GW target for 2030, India’s grid now needs to store surplus solar and wind power for the evening peak — and the Government is positioning Pumped Storage Projects (PSPs) as the backbone of long-duration storage.

◈ Background & Static Anchor
  • Capacity: India crossed 300 GW of installed non-fossil generation capacity by July 2026, adding about 55.29 GW in FY 2025-26.
  • Targets: 500 GW non-fossil by 2030 was announced at COP26, Glasgow (2021) as part of the “Panchamrit”; the updated NDC (August 2022) pledged 50% of cumulative installed capacity from non-fossil sources by 2030 — a share India reached in 2025, ahead of schedule.
  • The problem: solar and wind are variable; solar output collapses at sunset just as demand peaks, so surplus daytime power must be shifted in time.
  • Requirement: the Central Electricity Authority (CEA), in the National Electricity Plan (2023), projects 73.93 GW of storage by 2031-32 — 26.69 GW PSP and 47.24 GW Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS).
  • Statutory hook: the CEA is constituted under Section 70 of the Electricity Act, 2003; Section 8 requires CEA concurrence for hydro schemes above a capital-cost threshold set by the Centre.
How a PSP works — a “water battery”
Figure 3 — The pumped storage cycle
Diagram of pumped hydro storage: renewable energy pumps water uphill, water runs downhill through turbines when needed
Surplus power lifts water to the upper reservoir; at peak demand it flows back through turbines. Image courtesy PIB Backgrounders (source: Australian Renewable Energy Agency); reproduced with credit for educational use.
  • Two reservoirs at different elevations; electricity is stored as gravitational potential energy.
  • Pumping mode: during surplus (e.g., midday solar), reversible pump-turbines lift water to the upper reservoir.
  • Generating mode: at peak demand, water flows down through the turbines.
  • A net consumer of power: round-trip efficiency is typically around 70–80% — its value lies in time-shifting, not in generating new energy.
  • Grid services: peaking support, frequency regulation, spinning reserve, inertia and black-start capability.
Three types — by relation to natural watercourses
Figure 4 — On-stream, off-stream open-loop and off-stream closed-loop schemes
Comparison of on-stream, off-stream open-loop and off-stream closed-loop pumped storage schemes
The fewer reservoirs on a river, the lower the impact on aquatic ecology — and the lighter the approval burden. Image courtesy PIB Backgrounders (AI-generated illustration); reproduced with credit for educational use.
  • On-stream: both reservoirs on a river, stream or nallah.
  • Off-stream open-loop: one reservoir on a watercourse; the other away from any perennial river, stream or nallah.
  • Off-stream closed-loop: neither reservoir on a perennial watercourse — the least ecologically intrusive design.
  • Policy direction: the Government is prioritising off-stream sites for faster execution and lower impact on river ecology.
▤ PSP Status & Potential at a Glance
  • Operational: 7.43 GW across 10 projects (above 25 MW each), as of August 2026.
  • Under construction / implementation: 15.87 GW across 11 PSPs.
  • Concurred / appraised by CEA: 10.40 GW across 8 projects.
  • Identified potential: 345.38 GW across 320 projects — 62 on-stream (56.67 GW) and 258 off-stream (288.71 GW); off-stream sites hold about 84% of the potential.
  • Planned trajectory: 100.81 GW envisaged for commissioning by 2035-36, taking cumulative PSP capacity to 105.56 GW (CEA plan).
  • Nodal Ministry: Ministry of Power; technical appraisal by CEA.
Figure 5 — India’s PSP pipeline against planning benchmarks (GW)
Operational (Aug 2026) 7.43 Under construction 15.87 CEA concurred / appraised 10.40 NEP need by 2031-32 26.69 Cumulative target 2035-36 105.56 Bars to scale · GW
Even counting everything operational, under construction and concurred (≈ 33.7 GW), India is roughly a third of the way to the 2035-36 goal — execution speed is the binding constraint. Data: PIB, Ministry of Power / CEA.
Where the potential lies
Figure 6 — Identified PSP potential by region (GW; total 345.38 GW)
Western 129.72 (Maharashtra 67.36) Southern 97.76 Eastern 53.41 (Odisha 41.53) Northern 50.32 North-Eastern 14.18
The Western Region leads because rivers descending the Western Ghats create steep gradients — ideal head for PSPs. Data: CEA via PIB.
  • Western (129.72 GW): Maharashtra 67.36 GW, Gujarat 33.36 GW — the Western Ghats escarpment provides height differences over short distances.
  • Southern (97.76 GW): led by Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Tamil Nadu.
  • Eastern (53.41 GW): Odisha alone accounts for 41.53 GW.
  • Northern (50.32 GW): led by Uttar Pradesh and Himachal Pradesh; North-Eastern: 14.18 GW.
  • Site appraisal weighs topography, geology, hydrology, seismicity, foundation conditions, environment and transmission connectivity.
▤ Policy Framework at a Glance
  • PSP Guidelines (April 2023): the Ministry of Power’s dedicated framework to promote PSPs.
  • TBCB Guidelines (February 2025): Tariff-Based Competitive Bidding for procuring storage capacity and stored energy from PSPs.
  • ISTS charge waiver: 100% waiver of Inter-State Transmission System charges for 25 years from commercial operation, for PSPs awarded for construction by 30 June 2028.
  • Faster DPR concurrence: CEA timeline cut from 90 to 50 days; clearance of inter-State aspects no longer required.
  • CEA concurrence threshold: raised to ₹3,000 crore for hydro schemes (Gazette notification, 1 August 2025); off-stream closed-loop PSPs exempted regardless of cost.
  • Environmental appraisal: MoEF&CC allows B2 categorisation for eligible PSPs and reduced baseline data for off-stream projects; relaxed forest-land survey and borehole limits for investigation.
  • Enabling infrastructure: budgetary support for roads, bridges, railway sidings, ropeways, communication and transmission lines.
  • Monitoring: CEA’s Jal Vidyut DPR portal for real-time tracking of survey and investigation.
  • Planning: a roadmap to integrate 100 GW of PSP between 2025-26 and 2035-36.
Lineage
  • First generation: PSPs such as Kadamparai (Tamil Nadu), Purulia (West Bengal) and Ghatghar (Maharashtra) were built between the 1980s and 2000s, mainly for peaking.
  • March 2019: large hydro (above 25 MW) was declared renewable energy, with a Hydropower Purchase Obligation.
  • 2022: the Ministry of Power notified an Energy Storage Obligation trajectory for distribution utilities.
  • 2023 → 2025: PSP Guidelines, then the TBCB framework and approval reforms — marking the shift of PSPs from peaking assets to renewable-integration infrastructure.
PSP vs battery storage — complements, not rivals
  • Duration: PSPs typically discharge for 6–10+ hours; most grid batteries for 2–4 hours.
  • Lifespan: PSP civil works last many decades; lithium-ion batteries degrade in about 10–15 years.
  • Gestation: PSPs take several years to build; BESS can be commissioned in months.
  • Supply chain: PSPs rely on domestic civil and electro-mechanical capacity; BESS depends on imported cells and critical minerals such as lithium.
  • Siting: PSPs are site-specific; BESS is modular and can sit at substations or solar parks.
The critical view
  • Ecological footprint: on-stream PSPs alter river flows; even off-stream projects need land, often forest land in ecologically sensitive stretches of the Western Ghats.
  • Diluted scrutiny: under the EIA Notification, 2006, Category B2 projects do not require a full EIA report or public hearing — environmental groups argue this weakens community consultation.
  • Water: initial filling and evaporation losses matter in water-stressed western and southern basins.
  • Economics: high upfront cost and long gestation, while battery prices have fallen sharply; PSPs need long-term contracts and a mature ancillary-services market.
  • Track record: some older PSPs have not consistently run in pumping mode, owing to tail-pond, tariff or inter-State issues.
  • Execution gap: reaching 105.56 GW by 2035-36 from 7.43 GW today requires an unprecedented build rate.
  • Geographic mismatch: potential is concentrated in the West and South, demanding strong inter-regional transmission (e.g., Green Energy Corridors).
Institutions & terms to know
  • Round-trip efficiency: energy recovered ÷ energy used for pumping.
  • Black-start: ability to restart the grid after a total blackout without external power.
  • ISTS: Inter-State Transmission System; TBCB: Tariff-Based Competitive Bidding.
  • DPR: Detailed Project Report, concurred by the CEA.
✎ Mains Practice Question

Why is long-duration energy storage central to India’s target of 500 GW of non-fossil capacity by 2030? Discuss the potential of pumped storage hydropower in this regard and examine the environmental and economic challenges to its rapid expansion. 15 marks · 250 words

Defence & SecurityGeneral Studies Paper III (with GS-II IR)
03

Exercise KONKAN-26: India–UK Naval Exercise Concludes off Plymouth

Concise GS-III · Security — Defence Cooperation; GS-II · IR — India–UK Prelims-oriented PIB · Ministry of Defence · 17 Oct 2026

KONKAN-26, the bilateral maritime exercise between the Indian Navy and the Royal Navy, concluded off Plymouth, UK, on 15 October 2026 after a week of harbour and sea training (8–15 October).

Figure 7 — INS Trishul (F43) at sea during KONKAN-26
INS Trishul with a Royal Navy patrol vessel and a sea boat during Exercise KONKAN-26
The Indian frigate operates alongside a Royal Navy patrol vessel (P163) and a sea boat during the sea phase. Image courtesy PIB / Indian Navy; reproduced with credit for educational use.
▤ Exercise at a Glance
  • Dates: 8–15 October 2026; sea phase of four days, 12–15 October.
  • Indian Navy: INS Trishul — a Talwar-class stealth frigate (Russian-built, commissioned 2003).
  • Royal Navy: HMS Sutherland — a Type 23 (Duke-class) anti-submarine warfare frigate.
  • Conducted by: Fleet Operational Standards and Training (FOST), the Royal Navy’s sea-training organisation at Plymouth.
  • Serials: advanced seamanship, joint tactical drills, communication procedures, anti-surface asymmetric warfare, anti-submarine warfare (ASW) and weapon firings in a multi-threat environment.
Static anchor & significance
  • Series: the KONKAN naval exercise has run since 2004; Konkan Shakti (2021) was the first India–UK tri-service exercise.
  • Other India–UK exercises: Ajeya Warrior (Army) and Indradhanush (Air Force).
  • Strategic frame: the India–UK Comprehensive Strategic Partnership and Roadmap 2030 (2021); the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement signed in July 2025.
  • Why ASW matters: rising submarine activity in the Indian Ocean Region makes ASW interoperability a priority.
  • Reach: exercising in UK waters reflects the Indian Navy’s growing out-of-area deployments to the Atlantic and Mediterranean.
◈ Prelims Corner — India’s Bilateral Naval Exercises
  • KONKAN — UK · Varuna — France · SIMBEX — Singapore · JIMEX — Japan · AUSINDEX — Australia.
  • Indra — Russia · SLINEX — Sri Lanka · Zayed Talwar — UAE · Naseem Al Bahr — Oman · Malabar — multilateral (India, US, Japan, Australia).
✎ Mains Practice Question

Bilateral naval exercises serve both operational interoperability and strategic signalling. Examine this statement in the context of India–UK maritime cooperation. 10 marks · 150 words

Legacy IAS Academy · Daily PIB Analysis 18 & 19 October 2026 · Press Information Bureau

Book a Free Demo Class

October 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
Categories

Get free Counselling and ₹25,000 Discount

Fill the form – Our experts will call you within 30 mins.