Current Affairs 24 January 2026

  1. Cyber Slavery: Trafficking of Indian Youth into Forced Cybercrime Networks
  2. Granth Kutir at Rashtrapati Bhavan: Institutionalising India’s Civilisational Knowledge Heritage
  3. Census 2027 and the Expanded Houselisting Phase: India’s Shift towards Data-Driven Governance
  4. India’s Global Hunt for Fugitives: Extradition Challenges in a Globalised Legal Order
  5. India’s ACC Battery PLI Scheme: Ambition–Execution Gap in Clean Energy Manufacturing


  • A Hyderabad youth, lured by a high-paying digital sales job in Bangkok, was trafficked to Myanmar–Thailand border scam centres and forced into cyber fraud under coercion.
  • Indian authorities recently rescued and repatriated hundreds of Indians trapped in similar cybercrime syndicates operating from Southeast Asias lawless border regions.
  • The incident highlights the emergence of cyber slavery, where victims are trafficked not for manual labour but for forced participation in online scams.

Relevance

  • GS 1 (Society): Highlights vulnerabilities arising from youth unemployment, migration aspirations, and digital skills being exploited in transnational human trafficking networks.
  • GS 2 (Governance & IR): Exposes gaps in overseas citizen protection, consular responsibility, and cross-border cooperation against organised cybercrime.
  • GS 3 (Internal Security & Cyber Security): Demonstrates convergence of human trafficking, cyber fraud, money laundering, and organised crime as an emerging non-traditional security threat.
  • Cyber slavery refers to transnational human trafficking where victims are forcibly confined and compelled to execute online financial fraud, phishing, and digital scams under physical and psychological coercion.
  • Victims are deceived with lucrative job offers, have passports confiscated, face violence, and are punished if daily cybercrime targets remain unmet.
Recruitment and Deception
  • Recruiters advertise high-paying overseas jobs in digital marketing, customer service, or call centres, exploiting unemployment, gig insecurity, and aspirational migration among Indian youth.
  • Fake interviews, luxury workplace videos, and promises of visas and accommodation are used to lower suspicion and accelerate overseas travel decisions.
Trafficking and Confinement
  • Victims are transported legally to countries like Thailand, then illegally moved across porous borders into Myanmar-controlled zones beyond effective state policing.
  • On arrival, passports, phones, and identity documents are seized, effectively trapping victims and eliminating escape options.
Forced Cybercrime Operations
  • Trafficked individuals are compelled to work 1820 hours daily running phishing scams, investment frauds, and romance scams targeting foreign victims through digital platforms.
  • Failure to meet daily fraud quotas results in beatings, threats, starvation, or resale to other scam centres, reinforcing total control over victims.
  • Indian agencies estimate thousands of Indians are currently trapped in cyber scam hubs across Myanmar, Cambodia, Laos, and Philippines, forming a significant share of the exploited workforce.
  • Andhra Pradesh and Telangana alone reported 370 rescues in a recent coordinated operation, indicating regional vulnerability linked to youth unemployment and overseas job aspirations.
  • International agencies link these cybercrime hubs to billions of dollars in global financial fraud annually, making cyber slavery a lucrative criminal enterprise.
  • Weak governance, armed group control, and porous borders in Myanmar’s frontier regions allow cybercrime syndicates to operate beyond effective law enforcement reach.
  • Proximity to international travel hubs like Bangkok facilitates easy recruitment, transit, and concealment of trafficking routes.
  • Corruption, conflict, and limited extradition enforcement create safe havens for transnational cybercrime operations.
Violation of Fundamental Human Rights
  • Cyber slavery violates the right to life and dignity, freedom from forced labour, and protection against trafficking, constituting a modern form of slavery.
  • Victims experience severe psychological trauma, prolonged confinement, and moral injury from being forced to harm others digitally.
Gender and Social Vulnerabilities
  • Young men form the majority of victims due to migration pressures, while women trafficked into cyber slavery face added risks of sexual violence and exploitation.
  • Families often remain unaware due to misinformation, delayed contact, or fear instilled in victims by traffickers.
  • Forced cybercrime implicates victims in illegal activities, exposing them to legal risks while strengthening international fraud networks that drain global financial systems.
  • The phenomenon undermines Indias cyber security reputation and increases diplomatic burdens for rescue, repatriation, and rehabilitation operations.
  • Limited awareness of cyber slavery among job seekers and local authorities delays prevention and early detection of trafficking attempts.
  • Jurisdictional complexities, weak cross-border cooperation, and conflict zones restrict timely rescue and prosecution of traffickers.
  • Victims often face stigma or suspicion upon return due to their coerced involvement in cybercrime activities.
Prevention and Awareness
  • Government must launch nationwide awareness campaigns warning against fraudulent overseas job offers, particularly targeting vulnerable districts with high migration aspirations.
  • Mandatory verification of overseas recruitment agencies and stricter monitoring of online job portals can reduce deceptive recruitment.
Diplomatic and Law Enforcement Cooperation
  • Strengthen bilateral and multilateral cooperation with Southeast Asian nations to dismantle scam centres and establish joint rescue protocols.
  • Enhance intelligence-sharing, extradition mechanisms, and financial tracking of cybercrime syndicates operating transnationally.
Victim Rehabilitation and Legal Safeguards
  • Repatriated victims must be treated as trafficking survivors, not criminals, with access to counselling, legal aid, skill rehabilitation, and livelihood reintegration.
  • Clear legal frameworks are required to protect coerced victims from prosecution for crimes committed under duress.
  • Cyber slavery represents a dangerous evolution of human trafficking in the digital age, merging organised crime, forced labour, and global cyber fraud into a single exploitative system.
  • Addressing it requires coordinated prevention, international diplomacy, victim-centric rehabilitation, and recognition that cybercrime victims can also be cybercrime perpetrators under coercion.
  • The UNODC (2023) estimated that organised cyber-fraud networks in Southeast Asia generate over USD 40 billion annually, making forced cybercrime one of the fastest-growing transnational criminal industries.
  • According to INTERPOL, scam centres in Myanmar, Cambodia, and Laos employ over 300,000 trafficked individuals, many coerced into online fraud under threats, confinement, and physical violence.
  • The US Institute of Peace (2024) reported that armed groups controlling Myanmar border regions earn 30–50% of their revenues from cyber-scam operations using trafficked labour.
  • India’s MHA data indicates that overseas job fraud complaints increased by more than 85% between 2021 and 2024, with Southeast Asia emerging as the dominant destination region.
  • The Reserve Bank of India recorded ₹1.25 lakh crore losses from digital fraud between 20202024, much of it linked to cross-border scam networks operating from Southeast Asia.
  • ILO estimates suggest that forced labour in illicit economies yields three times higher profits per victim than traditional forced labour, explaining criminal syndicates’ rapid shift to cyber slavery.
  • A 2024 ASEAN study found that over 70% of cyber-scam workers were recruited through fake job advertisements, primarily targeting unemployed youth with basic digital literacy.
  • The National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal shows that India receives over 1.2 million cybercrime complaints annually, increasing vulnerability to overseas cyber-fraud recruitment pipelines.
  • The Global Slavery Index 2023 notes that modern slavery increasingly involves non-physical labour coercion, where digital skills replace manual labour as the exploited commodity.


  • The President of India inaugurated Granth Kutir, a dedicated library at Rashtrapati Bhavan, showcasing over 2,300 classical Indian books and manuscripts.
  • The initiative aims to preserve, digitise, and democratise access to India’s philosophical, scientific, and literary traditions through a curated institutional framework.
  • It represents a significant step in integrating India’s ancient knowledge systems with modern archival, conservation, and digital dissemination technologies.

Relevance

  • GS 1 (Art & Culture): Represents preservation of Indias classical texts, manuscripts, languages, and civilisational knowledge traditions across disciplines.
  • GS 2 (Governance): Illustrates the role of constitutional institutions in cultural stewardship and state-led knowledge preservation initiatives.
  • Granth Kutir is a specialised knowledge repository housing rare manuscripts, classical texts, and scholarly works representing India’s intellectual traditions across philosophy, science, literature, and governance.
  • The collection spans multiple centuries and languages, reflecting the continuity and diversity of India’s civilisational thought and scholarly output.
  • It functions both as a physical archive and a digital knowledge platform, ensuring long-term preservation and wider scholarly access.
Languages and Textual Diversity
  • Manuscripts and books are available in 11 classical Indian languages, including Sanskrit, Tamil, Malayalam, Odia, Persian, Bengali, and Arabic, reflecting India’s plural intellectual heritage.
  • The multilingual composition highlights India’s historical openness to cross-cultural knowledge exchange and synthesis.
Thematic Coverage
  • The collection covers disciplines such as philosophy, metaphysics, linguistics, mathematics, astronomy, medicine, governance, history, and devotional literature.
  • Works include epics, philosophical treatises, scientific texts, commentaries, and rare scholarly compilations spanning religious and secular traditions.
  • All manuscripts and books housed in Granth Kutir have been systematically digitised to prevent physical degradation and ensure inter-generational knowledge transmission.
  • Advanced conservation techniques and metadata cataloguing support long-term archival integrity and scholarly research usability.
  • Digitisation aligns with global best practices in manuscript preservation and cultural heritage management.
  • Granth Kutir strengthens Rashtrapati Bhavans role as a custodian of Indias civilisational heritage, extending beyond ceremonial functions into intellectual stewardship.
  • The initiative reflects the state’s commitment to preserving non-Western knowledge systems within formal national institutions.
  • It supports evidence-based policymaking by reconnecting governance with India’s historical administrative and ethical traditions.
  • Limited public awareness and scholarly outreach may constrain optimal utilisation of the repository’s academic potential.
  • Sustained funding and expert manpower are required for ongoing conservation, translation, and interpretative research.
  • Ensuring non-ideological, academically rigorous curation remains essential to maintain institutional credibility.
  • Expand collaborative research programmes with universities, IITs, and global institutions to maximise scholarly engagement with Granth Kutir’s collections.
  • Promote systematic translation projects to make classical texts accessible to non-specialist and international audiences.
  • Integrate Granth Kutir’s digitised resources with national digital knowledge portals for wider public and academic reach.
  • Granth Kutir represents a conscious effort to institutionalise India’s civilisational memory within the constitutional heart of the Republic.
  • By preserving and digitising classical texts, it strengthens cultural continuity, academic inquiry, and national identity in a knowledge-driven global order.


  • The Union Government has initiated preparations for Census 2027, with an expanded Foundational Houselisting Phase seeking detailed data on internet usage, digital assets, housing conditions, and sanitation.
  • This phase marks a strategic shift from purely demographic enumeration towards data-driven governance, enabling evidence-based policymaking in welfare delivery, digital inclusion, and infrastructure planning.
  • The exercise follows the delayed Census 2021, positioning Census 2027 as India’s first post-pandemic, digitally-enabled census capturing socio-economic transformations over the last decade.

Relevance

  • GS 1 (Society): Provides foundational data on housing, amenities, inequality, urbanisation, and digital divide shaping Indias social structure.
  • GS 2 (Polity & Governance): Crucial for delimitation, federal balance, welfare targeting, fiscal devolution, and evidence-based policymaking.
  • The houselisting phase precedes population enumeration and focuses on collecting household-level socio-economic information rather than individual demographic characteristics.
  • It gathers data on housing quality, amenities, assets, sanitation, water access, cooking fuel, and now digital connectivity, forming the backbone of census-based policy design.
  • Unlike population enumeration, houselisting maps living conditions and material deprivation across households, supporting targeted welfare and developmental interventions.
  • The houselisting phase establishes the sampling frame for population enumeration, ensuring accurate household coverage, geographic mapping, and avoidance of duplication or omission.
  • It provides granular inputs for measuring multidimensional poverty, infrastructure gaps, and regional disparities beyond income-based indicators.
  • By integrating digital access indicators, it reflects India’s transition into a digitally mediated economy and society.
Shift from Paper-Based to Digital Enumeration
  • Census 2027 will rely predominantly on mobile applications and digital dashboards, replacing paper schedules used in earlier censuses, thereby improving data accuracy and real-time monitoring.
  • Enumerators will upload responses instantly, enabling supervisors to detect inconsistencies, coverage gaps, and enumeration delays through centralised digital monitoring systems.
Inclusion of Internet and Digital Access Indicators
  • For the first time, the census will collect household-level data on internet availability, digital device ownership, and digital service usage, recognising connectivity as a development indicator.
  • This data will help assess the digital divide across rural–urban, gendered, and regional lines, informing digital inclusion strategies and infrastructure expansion.
Housing Quality and Ownership
  • Questions will capture housing type, ownership status, materials used, number of rooms, and vulnerability to congestion, informing urban planning and housing policy.
  • Housing data supports flagship schemes like PM Awas Yojana and enables monitoring of housing adequacy across socio-economic categories.
Water, Sanitation and Energy Access
  • Detailed information will be collected on drinking water sources, toilet facilities, wastewater disposal, and cooking fuel types used by households.
  • This data directly informs public health planning, sanitation drives, and clean energy transitions under programmes such as Swachh Bharat and Ujjwala.
  • The houselisting phase will record ownership of assets such as vehicles, consumer durables, agricultural equipment, and communication devices.
  • Asset data acts as a proxy for household economic status, consumption capacity, and vulnerability, supporting targeting under welfare schemes.
  • New questions on digital assets reflect evolving consumption patterns and technology-driven livelihoods.
  • Census 2027 data will guide delimitation, fiscal transfers, welfare targeting, and infrastructure investment, making its accuracy politically and administratively critical.
  • Ministries and State governments rely on census data for evidence-based decision-making, programme design, and performance evaluation.
  • Delays or inaccuracies could distort representation, resource allocation, and social justice outcomes.
  • Expanded data collection raises concerns regarding data privacy, informed consent, and cybersecurity, particularly with sensitive digital and asset-related information.
  • Robust data protection protocols, anonymisation safeguards, and limited data access frameworks are essential to maintain public trust in census operations.
  • Enumerator training and digital literacy are critical to prevent misuse, data leaks, or exclusion errors.
  • Digital enumeration may face constraints in remote, tribal, and low-connectivity regions, risking undercounting or data quality issues.
  • Enumerator capacity, language diversity, and respondent apprehension towards digital data sharing could affect response accuracy.
  • Coordination between Centre, States, and local administrations remains crucial for timely and credible execution.
  • Strengthen enumerator training in digital tools, ethical data handling, and community engagement to ensure inclusive and accurate enumeration.
  • Ensure offline data collection options in low-connectivity areas to prevent digital exclusion.
  • Integrate census data with national digital platforms cautiously, balancing governance utility with privacy protection.
  • The expanded houselisting phase of Census 2027 signals India’s transition towards data-intensive governance, recognising housing, amenities, and digital access as core development indicators.
  • If implemented transparently and inclusively, it can significantly enhance policy precision, social justice, and developmental accountability in the coming decade.
Census in India
  • India has conducted 16 national population censuses so far, beginning in 1872, with the first synchronous Census held in 1881 under British administration.
  • After Independence, India has conducted 7 decennial censuses from 1951 to 2011, with Census 2021 postponed, making 2011 the latest completed Census.
  • The Census is conducted once every 10 years under the Census Act, 1948, which empowers the government to collect demographic and socio-economic data compulsorily.
  • Each Census consists of two phases: the Houselisting and Housing Census followed by Population Enumeration, usually conducted in consecutive years.
  • Census 2011 covered a population of 1.21 billion people, enumerating over 246 million households, making it one of the largest administrative exercises globally.
  • Census operations typically involve 2.5–3 million enumerators and supervisors, mostly government employees, deployed across urban, rural, and remote regions.
  • Census data determines the allocation of 543 Lok Sabha seats, 4,000+ State Assembly constituencies, and the reservation of seats for SCs and STs.
  • Census figures guide fiscal transfers worth several lakh crore rupees, influencing Finance Commission devolution, centrally sponsored schemes, and State-level welfare planning.
  • The Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India functions under the Ministry of Home Affairs, overseeing nationwide coordination with States and Union Territories.
  • Census data is legally protected, with individual-level information kept confidential for at least 75 years, ensuring statistical use without personal identification.


  • Government data for 2024–25 reveals that 71 fugitives wanted by Indian agencies were located abroad, marking the highest figure in the last twelve years.
  • The information, tabled in Parliament, highlights India’s intensified efforts to trace economic offenders, terror-linked accused, and organised crime fugitives overseas.
  • The trend reflects growing use of Interpol mechanisms, bilateral extradition treaties, and diplomatic engagement to pursue absconders beyond India’s jurisdiction.

Relevance

  • GS 1 (Society): Reflects societal impact of economic offences and erosion of public trust due to prolonged impunity of high-profile offenders.
  • GS 2 (International Relations): Highlights limits of extradition treaties, mutual legal assistance, sovereignty constraints, and diplomatic negotiations.
  • GS 3 (Internal Security): Directly linked to money laundering, economic crimes, terrorism financing, and transnational organised crime.
Scale of the Problem
  • Since 2013, Indian agencies have traced 203 fugitives abroad, with 71 located in 202425 alone, indicating both improved tracking capacity and rising transnational crime mobility.
  • Of these, 27 fugitives have been successfully extradited or deported back to India, underscoring significant procedural and legal bottlenecks in securing physical custody.
Extradition Requests and Outcomes
  • India sent 137 extradition requests to foreign countries during 2024–25, of which 134 requests were accepted, while 125 cases remain pending with foreign authorities.
  • In the previous five years, India issued 535 Letters Rogatory, with 42 requests still pending, highlighting the slow and uncertain nature of judicial cooperation.
Role of the Central Bureau of Investigation
  • The CBIs Global Operations Centre coordinates international efforts by liaising with foreign law enforcement agencies and issuing Interpol Red Notices against wanted criminals.
  • The Centre operates in coordination with the Ministry of Home Affairs and the Ministry of External Affairs, reflecting inter-ministerial cooperation in transnational crime control.
Use of Interpol Channels
  • Interpol notices enable geo-location, provisional arrest, and information sharing but do not guarantee extradition, as final decisions rest with domestic courts of host countries.
  • Legal standards of evidence, human rights concerns, and asylum claims often delay or block extradition despite confirmed location of fugitives.
Extradition Treaties and Arrangements
  • India has signed extradition treaties with 48 countries and extradition arrangements with 12 additional nations, expanding its formal legal framework for fugitive recovery.
  • However, absence of treaties with key safe-haven jurisdictions limits India’s ability to compel surrender of accused persons.
International Legal Constraints
  • Many countries refuse extradition citing concerns over prison conditions, death penalty provisions, or political offence exceptions under their domestic laws.
  • Extradition proceedings often become prolonged judicial battles, allowing fugitives to exploit procedural safeguards and delay tactics.
  • A significant share of fugitives are accused of economic offences, banking frauds, money laundering, and organised financial crimes, exploiting global financial networks.
  • Others include individuals involved in terrorism, drug trafficking, and organised crime, posing both economic and national security risks to India.
Governance and National Security Implications
  • Presence of absconders abroad undermines the credibility of India’s criminal justice system and weakens deterrence against high-value financial and organised crimes.
  • Prolonged delays in extradition erode public confidence and complicate recovery of proceeds of crime stashed in foreign jurisdictions.
Challenges in Fugitive Recovery
  • Extradition is constrained by sovereignty concerns, differing legal systems, human rights litigation, and diplomatic sensitivities with host countries.
  • Limited investigative capacity to meet foreign evidentiary standards and delays in documentation further weaken India’s extradition success rate.
Legal and Institutional Strengthening
  • India must upgrade investigative quality, documentation, and prosecution standards to withstand scrutiny in foreign courts and reduce rejection or delay of extradition cases.
  • Dedicated fugitive-tracking cells and specialised legal teams can improve coordination between investigative and diplomatic arms.
Diplomatic and Multilateral Engagement
  • Expanding extradition treaties with strategic jurisdictions and strengthening mutual legal assistance frameworks should be a diplomatic priority.
  • Leveraging multilateral platforms and financial intelligence sharing can help restrict fugitives’ mobility and access to global banking systems.
  • The record number of fugitives located abroad reflects improved tracking but also highlights the structural limitations of extradition-based justice in a globalised world.
  • Sustainable success requires combining legal reform, diplomatic leverage, and international cooperation to ensure that fleeing India no longer guarantees impunity.
  • Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) is India’s premier central investigative agency, established in 1963, functioning under the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946.
  • The CBI investigates corruption, economic offences, organised crime, terrorism, and transnational crimes, and acts as India’s National Central Bureau (NCB) for INTERPOL.
  • INTERPOL is an international police cooperation body with 195 member countries, facilitating information sharing and coordination, but it does not possess arrest or enforcement powers.
  • Red Notice is the most well-known INTERPOL notice, issued to locate and provisionally arrest a wanted person for extradition or similar legal action.
  • Blue Notice is issued to collect additional information about a person’s identity, location, or activities in relation to a criminal investigation.
  • Green Notice serves as a warning about persons who have committed criminal acts and are likely to repeat offences in other countries.
  • Yellow Notice is used to locate missing persons, especially minors, or to identify individuals unable to identify themselves.
  • Black Notice seeks information on unidentified bodies, helping determine identity through international cooperation.
  • Orange Notice warns of serious and imminent threats posed by objects, events, or processes, such as explosives, weapons, or hazardous materials.
  • INTERPOL notices are not international arrest warrants; action on a notice depends on domestic laws of member countries, and extradition requires separate judicial and diplomatic processes.


  • A 2026 IEEFA–JMK Research report shows India’s ACC Battery PLI scheme achieved only 2.8% of its targeted capacity after four years, signalling serious policy and execution gaps.
  • Launched in October 2021 with an outlay of ₹18,100 crore, the scheme aimed to establish 50 GWh domestic battery cell capacity by 2025.
  • The programme targeted 1.03 million jobs, reduced import dependence, and creation of a domestic battery manufacturing ecosystem supporting EVs and grid-scale storage.

Relevance

  • GS 1 (Society): Impacts employment generation, skill development, and workforce transition in green manufacturing sectors.
  • GS 2 (Governance): Highlights design and implementation challenges in PLI schemes and industrial policy execution.
  • GS 3 (Economy & Environment): Central to electric mobility, energy security, manufacturing competitiveness, and climate transition goals.
  • As of October 2025, only 1.4 GWh capacity has been commissioned within timelines, representing 2.8% of the original 50 GWh target.
  • Ola Electric is the only firm to have commissioned capacity on time, highlighting weak execution by other selected beneficiaries.
  • India remains nearly 100% dependent on imported battery cells, undermining energy security and cost competitiveness of electric mobility.
  • Weak domestic battery manufacturing threatens India’s EV adoption targets, renewable storage expansion, and broader clean energy transition goals.
  • Introduce dedicated incentives for critical minerals sourcing, refining, cell components, equipment manufacturing, and recycling to strengthen the full battery value chain.
  • Relax rigid timelines and DVA norms, attract established global battery manufacturers, and build robust testing, certification, and skilled workforce infrastructure.
  • Advanced Chemistry Cells are rechargeable electrochemical energy storage units that convert chemical energy into electrical energy, forming the core of electric vehicles, renewable storage, and portable electronics.
  • ACCs primarily include lithium-ion, lithium iron phosphate (LFP), nickel-manganese-cobalt (NMC), sodium-ion, and emerging solid-state batteries, distinguished by energy density, safety, and cost profiles.
  • A typical ACC consists of four critical components: cathode, anode, electrolyte, and separator, with performance depending on material chemistry and manufacturing precision.
  • ACC manufacturing is capital-intensive and technology-intensive, requiring giga-scale factories, clean-room conditions, precision coating, cell formation, and advanced quality control systems.
  • Battery cells are different from battery packs; cells are assembled into modules and packs along with battery management systems, making cell manufacturing the most value-critical stage.
  • ACCs are central to electric mobility, determining vehicle range, charging time, safety, and overall cost, with batteries accounting for nearly 30–40% of EV cost.
  • Beyond EVs, ACCs are crucial for grid-scale energy storage, enabling renewable energy integration by balancing intermittency from solar and wind power sources.
  • Global ACC supply chains are highly concentrated, with China dominating cell manufacturing, refining of lithium, cobalt, and graphite, and battery equipment production.
  • Key raw materials for ACCs include lithium, cobalt, nickel, manganese, graphite, and copper, making mineral security and recycling strategically important.
  • Countries promote ACC manufacturing to achieve energy security, decarbonisation goals, industrial competitiveness, and strategic autonomy in the clean energy transition.

January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
Categories