Why is it in news?
- Economic Survey 2025–26, tabled in Parliament, projects a stronger medium-term growth outlook for India while warning of rising global macroeconomic, technological, and geopolitical risks.
Relevance
- GS 3 (Economy): Macroeconomic outlook, growth projections, risk scenarios, AI-led financial excesses, capital flow uncertainty, and export–import dynamics.
- GS 2 (International Relations/Economy): Global economic risks, multipolar fragmentation, trade disruptions, and resilience of open economies.
Basics: role of the Economic Survey
Purpose and nature
- The Economic Survey is an annual policy document prepared by the Chief Economic Adviser, providing macroeconomic assessment, risk analysis, and reform priorities ahead of the Union Budget.
- It is not legally binding, but guides fiscal policy, market expectations, and medium-term reform direction
India’s growth outlook: optimistic fundamentals
Medium-term growth projection
- The Survey raises India’s medium-term growth potential to around 7%, from the earlier estimate of 6.5%, citing capital formation, labour participation, and productivity improvements.
- For FY27, real GDP growth is projected in a range of 6.8%–7.2%, subject to reform continuity and external stability.
Drivers of domestic resilience
- Growth momentum is supported by public investment in physical and digital infrastructure, manufacturing-linked incentives, logistics reforms, and improving corporate balance sheets.
- Rising formalisation, tax administration efficiency, and MSME credit access are highlighted as structural enablers of sustained growth.
Global outlook: increasingly adverse environment
Three global scenarios for 2026
- The Survey outlines three probabilistic global scenarios, emphasising that risks may interact rather than remain isolated, amplifying macroeconomic stress.
Scenario 1: Best case
- Assigned a 40%–45% probability, where 2025 global conditions continue into 2026, albeit with higher volatility, policy uncertainty, and need for occasional government intervention.
Scenario 2: Multipolar breakdown
- Also assigned a 40%–45% probability, involving intensified strategic rivalry, unresolved Russia–Ukraine conflict, trade fragmentation, sanctions proliferation, and weakening collective security arrangements.
Scenario 3: Worst case
- Assigned a 10%–20% probability, where financial, technological, and geopolitical shocks reinforce each other, triggering sharp risk aversion and contraction in global liquidity.
Emerging risk: AI-driven financial excesses
Nature of the risk
- The Survey flags highly leveraged investments in artificial intelligence as a new systemic risk, driven by optimistic timelines, narrow customer bases, and long-duration capital commitments.
- A correction in AI investments may not halt technology adoption, but could tighten global financial conditions and spill over into capital markets.
Potential spillovers
- If combined with geopolitical escalation or trade disruption, AI-led corrections could cause capital flow reversals, currency volatility, and defensive economic responses across regions.
Comparison with past crises
- The Survey warns that under the worst-case scenario, macroeconomic consequences could exceed the 2008 global financial crisis, due to synchronized shocks and weaker multilateral coordination.
Risks and implications for India
Capital flows and currency pressure
- Across all scenarios, the primary common risk for India is disruption of capital flows, with implications for the rupee, external financing, and monetary stability.
- The impact could be persistent rather than short-lived, depending on duration of global stress.
External sector challenge
- The Survey notes that rising incomes will inevitably raise imports, making it essential for India to boost export earnings and sustain investor confidence in foreign currency.
Policy message for India
- India must leverage its relative stability to attract long-term capital, expand export competitiveness, and maintain macroeconomic credibility amid global uncertainty.
- Domestic strength alone is insufficient; external resilience and risk preparedness are critical in a fragmented global economy.


