THE HINDU
UPSC Mains-Oriented News Analysis
- India and the U.S. have signed an interim trade agreement ending a period of elevated tariffs (50%) imposed since August 2025.
- The deal involves U.S. tariff reduction to 18% on Indian imports, while India agrees to lower tariffs on U.S. industrial and agricultural goods, commit to purchase $500 billion in U.S. products over 5 years, and reportedly stop Russian oil imports.
- Farmer groups and Opposition have raised concerns about the deal's impact on agriculture, cotton farmers, GM food imports, and India's sovereignty.
- Article 246 + Seventh Schedule: Trade and commerce with foreign countries is a Union subject (Entry 41, Union List).
- Article 302-305: Constitutional provisions on trade, commerce, and intercourse within India.
- WTO Framework: India is a founding member of WTO; MFN principle and national treatment obligations apply.
- India's FTA History: FTAs with ASEAN, Japan, South Korea, UAE (CEPA 2022), EU (2025). India has historically excluded sensitive agricultural items (cereals) from tariff liberalization.
- M.S. Swaminathan Commission (2006): Recommended MSP at C2+50%. Cotton MSP currently at ₹7,710/quintal vs. recommended ₹10,075/quintal.
- Trump's Tariff War: 25% tariffs imposed on India (Aug 2025) + additional 25% penalty for Russian crude oil imports.
Stakeholder Impact Analysis
| Stakeholder | Potential Benefit | Potential Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Indian Manufacturers (Textiles, Leather, Engg goods) | Reduced U.S. tariffs (50%→18%) improve export competitiveness | 18% tariff still 7x higher than pre-trade-war levels (~2.5%) |
| Cotton Farmers | Limited direct benefit | Zero-duty U.S. cotton imports could crash domestic prices; U.S. cotton imports surged 95.5% in 2024-25 |
| MSMEs | Enhanced global market access per PM Modi's stated vision | Compliance burden with global standards; competition from cheap U.S. imports |
| Consumers | Lower prices on imported goods and industrial inputs | Potential health concerns if GM food imports allowed |
| Indian Sovereignty | Strategic alignment with U.S. in Indo-Pacific | U.S. surveillance clause on Russian oil; loss of energy import autonomy |
Issue Linkage Map
Agriculture: Cotton imports at zero duty | Possible GM food entry | Threat to MSP system | Food security
Geopolitical: Russian oil import ban clause | U.S. surveillance on energy purchases | Sovereignty concerns
Social: Farmer distress and suicides | Rural livelihood impact | Consumer health (GM debate)
Legal/WTO: Legitimacy of Trump tariffs challenged in U.S. courts | MFN violations | Non-tariff barriers
- Asymmetric Deal: India eliminates tariffs on U.S. goods while the U.S. retains 18% tariff on Indian exports — a 7-fold increase from pre-trade-war average of ~2.5%. Brazil and China refused similar pressure.
- Agriculture Ambiguity: Unlike all previous Indian FTAs (including EU-India), the interim agreement does not explicitly exclude cereals from tariff reduction — raising fears of full agricultural market opening.
- GM Food Backdoor: By agreeing to resolve 'long-standing NTBs' on U.S. food products, India may have opened the door to GM food imports — the U.S.'s primary non-tariff concern.
- Cotton Farmer Crisis: U.S. cotton imports surged 95.5% in one year. Zero-tariff raw cotton will depress domestic prices further, intensifying farmer distress in Punjab, Gujarat, Maharashtra, and Telangana.
- Sovereignty Concern: Trump's Executive Order allows re-imposition of 25% tariffs if India resumes Russian oil imports — effectively giving the U.S. surveillance power over India's energy choices.
- Bangladesh Parity: Bangladesh also secured a trade deal (Feb 9) with duty-free textile access to the U.S., diluting India's purported comparative advantage.
- Ethical Dimension (GS-IV): Conflict between national interest vs. strategic alignment; duty of government to protect vulnerable farmers vs. geopolitical compulsions.
- Explicit Cereal Exclusion: Final deal must unambiguously exclude cereals and sensitive agricultural products, consistent with India's FTA history.
- GM Food Clarity: India must retain its sovereign right to regulate GM food imports; Precautionary Principle under Cartagena Protocol must be upheld.
- Cotton Farmer Protection: Implement Swaminathan formula (C2+50%) for cotton MSP; create Price Stabilization Fund for cotton.
- Diversify Energy Sources: Pursue multi-source energy policy; avoid binary dependence. Strengthen ties with Gulf nations, develop domestic renewable capacity.
- Parliamentary Scrutiny: Trade deals with major fiscal implications should be debated in Parliament (UK model of treaty scrutiny).
- SDG Linkage: SDG 2 (Zero Hunger), SDG 8 (Decent Work), SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities), SDG 17 (Partnerships).
- India's FTAs: UAE CEPA (2022), EU-India FTA (2025), U.S. Interim Deal (2026)
- M.S. Swaminathan formula: MSP = C2 (comprehensive cost) + 50% margin
- WTO MFN Principle: Non-discrimination among trading partners
- Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Governs transboundary movement of GMOs
- Cotton: India's production 29.22 mn bales (2025-26); U.S.: 14.41 mn bales (2024-25)
"The India-U.S. interim trade agreement raises fundamental questions about the balance between strategic partnerships and protection of domestic agricultural interests." Critically examine the implications of the deal for Indian farmers and India's trade policy autonomy.
- India hosts the AI Impact Summit 2026 (Feb 16-20) at Bharat Mandapam, New Delhi — the first such global AI summit in the Global South.
- Leaders from ~20 countries, tech CEOs (Sundar Pichai, Sam Altman, Dario Amodei), and 3,000+ speakers expected. India champions a 'human-centric' AI approach.
- India's AI Governance Guidelines (Nov 2025): Anchored in trust-based AI development.
- South Korea's AI Basic Act (Jan 22, 2026): Foundation for trustworthy AI governance.
- Previous AI Summits: UK (Bletchley Park, 2023), South Korea (Seoul, 2024), France (Paris, 2025).
- UNESCO Recommendation on Ethics of AI (2021): First global normative instrument on AI ethics.
- IndiaAI Mission (2024): ₹10,372 crore allocation for compute, datasets, innovation.
- NITI Aayog National Strategy for AI (2018): 5 sectors — healthcare, agriculture, education, smart cities, transportation.
Global AI Governance Approaches
| Country | AI Strategy Focus | Key Feature |
|---|---|---|
| India | Human-centric, DPI-based | IndiaAI Mission; AI Governance Guidelines; DPI-based datasets |
| EU | Rights-based regulation | AI Act (2024): Risk-based classification; heavy compliance |
| U.S. | Innovation-first, light regulation | Executive Orders; sector-specific; market-driven |
| China | State-led strategic dominance | Sovereign control; massive compute investment |
| South Korea | Trustworthiness + semiconductor | AI Basic Act (2026); memory chip supply chain leadership |
- Digital Divide: Global South countries are largely consumers of AI systems built elsewhere, with limited influence over design and governance.
- Compute Access Gap: AI training requires massive GPU clusters. India's compute infrastructure remains dependent on imports. U.S. export controls constrain access.
- Data Sovereignty: Transnational data flows and absence of common cybersecurity practices pose challenges. DPDP Act (2023) needs harmonization with AI governance.
- Talent Asymmetry: Brain drain of AI talent to U.S. and Europe persists.
- Ethical Concerns: AI-driven misinformation, deepfakes, algorithmic bias, and job displacement require robust frameworks.
- Shared Trust Framework: Establish interoperable AI governance standards across Asia, building on UNESCO AI Ethics Recommendation and ISO 42001.
- AI Compute as Public Good: Build shared computing infrastructure accessible to developing nations; India's DPI model can be replicated.
- Multilingual AI Datasets: Invest in high-quality datasets reflecting India's linguistic and cultural diversity (22 scheduled languages).
- Regulatory Balance: Avoid heavy-handed EU-style regulation while ensuring accountability. Proportionate, risk-based approach.
- SDG Linkage: SDG 4 (Quality Education), SDG 9 (Industry & Innovation), SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities), SDG 16 (Institutions).
- AI Impact Summit: 4th global AI Summit; 1st in Global South; Bharat Mandapam, Delhi
- IndiaAI Mission: ₹10,372 crore; focus on compute, innovation, datasets, skilling
- UNESCO AI Ethics Recommendation: Adopted 2021; first global normative instrument
- ISO 42001: International standard for AI Management Systems
"India's hosting of the AI Impact Summit positions it as a voice for the Global South in AI governance." Discuss the challenges in building a trusted AI ecosystem in developing countries and suggest a framework for equitable AI governance.
- Editorial argues for creation of an Indian Scientific Service (ISS) — a permanent, all-India scientific cadre to integrate scientific expertise into governance.
- Government scientists currently operate under CCS (Conduct) Rules, 1964 — rules designed for generalist administrators, not scientific independence.
- CCS (Conduct) Rules, 1964: Govern conduct of all civil servants including scientists; emphasize discipline and neutrality.
- Article 312: All-India Services can be created by Parliament (Rajya Sabha resolution + 2/3 majority).
- CSIR, ICAR, ICMR: Have separate recruitment/promotion rules but remain bound by CCS Conduct Rules.
- Global Models: U.S. Scientific Integrity Policies; UK/France/Germany/Japan have dedicated scientific cadres.
- Article 51A(h): Fundamental Duty — develop scientific temper, humanism, spirit of inquiry and reform.
Current System vs. Proposed ISS
| Aspect | Current System | Proposed ISS |
|---|---|---|
| Governance Rules | CCS Conduct Rules, 1964 (designed for administrators) | Separate Scientific Service Rules protecting independence |
| Career Path | No structured scientific career progression | Peer-reviewed recruitment; clear scientific career ladder |
| Role in Policy | Advisory; often reactive; commissioned for immediate needs | Integral participant in decision-making; continuous research |
| Protection | No protection for dissent or contrary scientific opinion | Scientific integrity policies; transparent documentation |
| Accountability | Administrative hierarchy determines outcomes | Evidence-based; scientific assessments on record |
- Science as 'Decoration': Under current rules, scientific inputs remain advisory. Scientists cannot formally record dissent — their role becomes 'symbolic rather than substantive.'
- Structural Mismatch: Scientific work requires questioning assumptions and presenting challenging evidence. Administrative rules prioritize discipline — fundamentally incompatible.
- Implementation Challenge: Creating a new All-India Service requires Constitutional process (Art. 312) and political consensus.
- Bureaucratic Resistance: IAS and existing cadres may resist loss of turf in technically intensive sectors.
- Ethical Core (GS-IV): Tension between scientific integrity and political convenience; duty to present evidence vs. loyalty to hierarchy.
- Constitutional Route: Begin with Rajya Sabha resolution under Article 312; build consensus across States.
- Scientific Integrity Framework: Adopt U.S.-style policies that prevent political interference and protect transparent documentation.
- Pilot in Key Ministries: Start ISS in Environment, Health, and Disaster Management; expand based on results.
- Lateral Entry Enhancement: Expand current lateral entry scheme for domain experts with scientific credentials.
- SDG Linkage: SDG 16 (Effective Institutions); aligns with Art. 51A(h) — scientific temper.
- Article 312: All-India Services; Article 51A(h): Scientific temper
- CCS (Conduct) Rules, 1964: Govern conduct of Central civil servants
- CSIR: Established 1942; ICAR: Established 1929
- Lateral Entry: Introduced 2018 for Joint Secretary-level appointments
"Science that cannot question policy is not science — it is decoration." In the light of this statement, discuss the need for an Indian Scientific Service (ISS) and the challenges in integrating scientific expertise into India's governance framework.
- UAE-India bilateral trade reached $100 billion — five years ahead of the 2030 target under CEPA (2022). New target: $200 billion by 2032.
- Partnership evolved beyond energy to advanced manufacturing, fintech, AI, logistics, and defence. Nearly 5 million Indians form UAE's largest diaspora.
- India-UAE CEPA (2022): Eliminated tariffs on ~90% of tariff lines; first FTA with a Gulf country.
- Bilateral Investment Treaty (2024): Investment protection framework.
- Delhi Declaration (2025): India-Arab cooperation through 2028.
- Bharat Mart (under construction): Wholesale hub for Indian goods targeting Africa, West Asia, Eurasia.
- GIFT City: ADIA — first sovereign wealth fund to establish base in India's IFSC.
| Entity | Investment/Partnership | Sector |
|---|---|---|
| Reliance + TA'ZIZ | $2 bn+ low-carbon chemicals in Abu Dhabi | Petrochemicals |
| DP World | $5 bn additional in Indian infrastructure | Ports & Logistics |
| Emirates NBD | Majority stake in RBL Bank (largest FDI in Indian banking) | Banking |
| ADNOC | Long-term LNG supply with IOCL and HPCL | Energy |
| Mubadala | $4 bn+ across health, renewables, tech | Diversified |
| L&T | World's largest solar+storage project, Abu Dhabi | Renewable Energy |
- Beyond Energy: Non-oil trade grew 20% to $65 billion — structural diversification away from energy dependence.
- Third-Market Expansion: Bharat Mart will serve as India's gateway to Africa, West Asia, Eurasia — force multiplier for exports.
- AI Frontier: UAE (world's first AI Minister of State, 2017) and India are natural partners in AI infrastructure.
- Risks: Over-dependence on a single corridor; geopolitical volatility in Gulf; need to ensure MSME benefits.
- Deepen MSME integration; use Bharat Mart for connecting Indian MSMEs with African/Eurasian markets.
- Establish joint AI research centres and shared computing infrastructure.
- Leverage UPI-like digital payment infrastructure for cross-border transactions.
- SDG Linkage: SDG 7 (Clean Energy), SDG 8 (Decent Work), SDG 9 (Innovation), SDG 17 (Partnerships).
- India-UAE CEPA: Signed 2022; eliminated tariffs on ~90% tariff lines
- GIFT City: Gujarat International Finance Tec-City; India's first IFSC
- Delhi Declaration: India-Arab cooperation framework through 2028
- UAE: First country to appoint Minister of State for AI (2017)
"The India-UAE economic corridor represents a new model of South-South cooperation that extends beyond bilateral trade to third-market integration." Examine the strategic dimensions of the India-UAE partnership and its implications for India's global economic ambitions.
- TN CM Stalin transferred ₹5,000 each to 1.31 Cr women under KMUT — total ₹6,550 crore in one day, weeks before Assembly elections.
- Similar pre-poll welfare seen in Bihar (₹10,000 to 75L women), Maharashtra (Ladki Bahin), West Bengal (Yuva Sathi).
- Raises questions about MCC effectiveness and ECI's consistency.
- Model Code of Conduct: Non-statutory guidelines by ECI; prohibits new schemes after election announcement.
- Article 324: ECI's superintendence and control of elections.
- S. Subramaniam Balaji vs. TN (2013): SC held freebies not corrupt practice under RPA; larger question referred to Constitution Bench.
- ECI Inconsistency: Suspended TN farmer cash scheme (2004), free TVs (2011), but ignored Bihar's ₹10,000 transfer (2025).
| State/Centre | Scheme | Amount/Scale | Election Proximity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tamil Nadu (2026) | KMUT + Summer Assist. | ₹5,000 to 1.31 Cr women (₹6,550 Cr) | Weeks before Assembly polls |
| Bihar (2025) | Mahila Rojgar Yojana | ₹10,000 to 75 lakh women | Just before Assembly polls |
| Maharashtra (2024) | Ladki Bahin Yojana | ₹1,500/month (2 installments at once) | Before State Assembly polls |
| Centre (2019) | PM-KISAN | ₹6,000/year to farmers | 2 months before LS polls |
- ECI Double Standards: Suspended TN schemes (2004, 2011) but turned 'blind eye' to Bihar (2025). Inconsistency undermines MCC credibility.
- Fiscal Irresponsibility: TN's unplanned ₹2,620 Cr 'summer assistance' adds to fiscal stress — even as TN accuses Centre of withholding ₹3,548 Cr.
- Welfare vs. Freebie: KMUT is ongoing since 2023 with 32% SC/ST beneficiaries — has welfare merit. But timing and 'summer bonus' are clearly electoral.
- Cross-Party Practice: No party is exempt — BJP, TMC, AIADMK, DMK all engaged. This is a systemic issue.
- Ethical Dimension (GS-IV): Conflict between welfare duty and electoral manipulation; use of public exchequer for partisan advantage.
- MCC Reform: Make MCC legally binding; define clear timelines for when new schemes/enhancements cannot be announced.
- Fiscal Responsibility: Link welfare schemes to measurable outcomes and sunset clauses.
- ECI Consistency: Apply uniform standards across all States and parties.
- SC Guidance: S. Subramaniam Balaji case (Constitution Bench referral) must be decided urgently.
- SDG Linkage: SDG 1 (No Poverty), SDG 5 (Gender Equality), SDG 16 (Strong Institutions).
- MCC: Non-statutory; enforced by ECI under Article 324 powers
- S. Subramaniam Balaji vs. TN (2013): Freebies not corrupt practice under RPA
- KMUT: TN scheme since Sept 2023; ₹1,000/month to women heads of families
"The proliferation of pre-election welfare announcements blurs the line between genuine social policy and electoral populism." Critically examine the role of the Election Commission in regulating such practices. Suggest institutional reforms to ensure fiscal discipline during elections.
- As of Dec 31, 2025: 574 persons on death row (550 men, 24 women) — 43.5% increase since 2016.
- Of 1,310 death sentences imposed in a decade, only 8.31% upheld by HCs and none confirmed by SC in 3 years.
- 34.65% of HC-decided death sentences resulted in acquittals; SC acquitted 10 in 2025 — highest since 2016.
- Bachan Singh vs. State of Punjab (1980): Death penalty constitutional; only in 'rarest of rare' cases.
- Machhi Singh vs. State of Punjab (1983): Categories for 'rarest of rare.'
- Law Commission 262nd Report (2015): Recommended abolition except for terrorism.
- Article 72/161: Pardoning power of President/Governor.
- Global Trend: 112 countries have abolished death penalty.
| Metric | Data | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Death Row Population | 574 (550 M, 24 F) | 43.5% increase since 2016 |
| Sentences Imposed (Decade) | 1,310 (822 cases) | High imposition by Sessions Courts |
| HC Confirmation Rate | Only 8.31% (70 of 842) | Appellate courts overwhelmingly reject |
| HC Acquittal Rate | 34.65% | Serious concerns about trial quality |
| SC Confirmations (3 yrs) | Zero (0) | Systemic sentencing problem |
| SC Acquittals (2025) | 10 persons released | Highest since 2016 |
- Trial Court Quality Crisis: 34.65% acquittal rate reveals fundamental problems with evidence handling, procedural fairness at Sessions Court level.
- Zero SC Confirmations: Strongest signal that 'rarest of rare' doctrine is being misapplied by lower courts.
- Socioeconomic Bias: Death row inmates disproportionately from marginalized communities — poor, Dalits, minorities.
- HC Variation: Patna HC acquitted 78.31% vs. Karnataka HC 50.46% — arbitrary and inconsistent.
- Ethical Dimension (GS-IV): Retributive vs. restorative justice; irreversibility of error; state's moral authority to take life.
- Implement Law Commission 262: Abolish death penalty except for terrorism; move towards life without remission.
- Trial Court Reform: Mandatory judicial training on sentencing; improve forensic capabilities; ensure quality legal aid.
- Sentencing Guidelines: SC should issue comprehensive guidelines to reduce arbitrariness.
- SDG Linkage: SDG 16 (Peace, Justice & Strong Institutions); ICCPR Article 6 (Right to Life).
- Bachan Singh (1980): 'Rarest of rare' doctrine
- Law Commission 262nd Report (2015): Abolish except for terrorism
- Article 72: Presidential pardon; Article 161: Governor's pardon
- 112 countries have abolished death penalty globally
"The near-zero confirmation rate of death sentences by appellate courts raises fundamental questions about the quality of criminal justice administration in India." Critically examine the case for reforming India's approach to capital punishment.
- Tarique Rahman's BNP won 209/297 seats in Bangladesh's first elections since Hasina's ouster (Aug 2024). JeI alliance won 77 seats — strongest Opposition since 1996.
- LS Speaker Om Birla to represent India at swearing-in (Feb 18). PM Modi declined, citing Macron's visit and AI Summit.
- Student-Led Uprising (Aug 2024): Toppled Awami League; Muhammad Yunus led interim government.
- BNP: Founded by Ziaur Rahman; historically seen as less favorable to India than Awami League.
- India-Bangladesh: Land Boundary Agreement (2015), Ganges Water Treaty (1996), Teesta dispute (unresolved).
- Neighborhood First Policy: Bangladesh central to India's eastern neighborhood diplomacy.
| Dimension | Opportunity | Challenge |
|---|---|---|
| Security | Fresh start on border cooperation | JeI influence may complicate ties |
| Connectivity | Transit routes to NE India | BNP may review India-friendly projects |
| Trade | India's largest S. Asia trade partner | BNP may diversify towards China, Turkey |
| Water | Opportunity to resolve Teesta | Domestic politics may harden positions |
| Geopolitical | Keep Bangladesh in India's orbit | BNP-JeI may tilt towards China/Pakistan |
- Democratic Transition: Smooth transfer strengthens democratic credentials; Yunus's tenure 'successful' for this.
- India's Diplomatic Response: Sending Speaker (not PM/FM) signals calibrated engagement — assessing BNP's posture.
- China Factor: BNP historically closer to China; JeI to Pakistan/Turkey. India must proactively engage.
- Constitutional Reform: 60%+ voters participated in reform referendum — may reshape Bangladesh's governance.
- Proactive Engagement: Invite Rahman for early bilateral visit; resolve Teesta as goodwill gesture.
- Development Partnership: Accelerate India-funded infrastructure; ensure visible benefits for Bangladeshis.
- People-to-People: Ease visas; expand cultural/educational exchanges; leverage shared 1971 history.
- SDG Linkage: SDG 16 (Peace & Justice), SDG 17 (Partnerships).
- Land Boundary Agreement (2015): 100th Constitutional Amendment; resolved 68-yr border dispute
- Ganges Water Treaty (1996): 30-year water sharing agreement
- Teesta River Dispute: Unresolved; involves West Bengal and Bangladesh
"The transition of power in Bangladesh presents both opportunities and challenges for India's neighborhood policy." Discuss the strategic implications of BNP's return to power for India-Bangladesh relations.
- Trump revoked the EPA's 'Endangerment Finding' (2009) — the legal foundation for all U.S. vehicle emission standards.
- Editorial warns of implications for India's automotive sector — automakers may cite U.S. deregulation to lobby for weaker domestic standards.
- Massachusetts vs. EPA (2007): U.S. SC held GHGs are 'air pollutants' under Clean Air Act.
- EPA Endangerment Finding (2009): Six GHGs (CO2, methane, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, SF6) endanger public health — based on IPCC.
- India's BS-VI Norms (2020): Leapfrogged from BS-IV; CAFE norms also in force.
- Paris Agreement: India committed to 45% carbon intensity reduction by 2030; Net Zero by 2070.
- Irreversible Industry Shift: Auto manufacturers have invested decades into electrification. Production lines are optimized for clean vehicles — reversal unlikely.
- China's Dominance: China dominates EV value chain. U.S. rollback won't restore American competitiveness.
- India Risk: Indian automakers may cite U.S. deregulation to lobby for weaker fuel efficiency standards — must be resisted.
- Climate Justice: U.S. (historically largest cumulative emitter) abdicating climate responsibility shifts burden to developing nations.
- India must maintain and strengthen BS-VI and CAFE norms regardless of U.S. policy.
- Accelerate National Electric Mobility Mission and FAME-III; indigenize EV supply chain.
- Strengthen carbon pricing mechanisms; consider carbon border adjustments.
- SDG Linkage: SDG 7 (Clean Energy), SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities), SDG 13 (Climate Action).
- Massachusetts vs. EPA (2007): GHGs = air pollutants under Clean Air Act
- BS-VI Norms: India adopted April 2020; leapfrogged from BS-IV
- CAFE Standards: Corporate Average Fuel Efficiency norms for passenger vehicles
- Six GHGs: CO2, Methane, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, SF6
"The U.S. rollback of environmental regulations on greenhouse gas emissions has implications beyond American borders." Discuss the global impact and examine how India should calibrate its own emission standards for the automotive sector.
- U.S. INDO-PACOM Commander Admiral Paparo praised India's Operation Sindoor, highlighting tactical execution and restraint.
- PM Modi noted record ₹7.85 lakh crore defence budget (2026-27) — 15% higher — and cited Operation Sindoor's lessons.
- Admiral Paparo flagged Chinese-origin weapons used by Pakistan and called for deeper India-U.S. cooperation in AI, space, electronic warfare.
- Operation Sindoor: Indian military operation against Pakistan; triggered by Pahalgam attack.
- Defence Agreements with U.S.: LEMOA (2016), COMCASA (2018), BECA (2020), iCET (2023).
- Major Procurements: Apache helicopters, MQ-9 Reaper drones, GE-414 engines, P-8I, MH-60 Romeo.
- Defence Budget 2026-27: ₹7.85 lakh crore — largest allocation to any ministry.
- Chinese Weapons Proliferation: Pakistan's use of Chinese-origin weapons highlights growing China-Pakistan military nexus.
- Kill Chain Complexity: Modern warfare integrates sensors, comms, propulsion, warheads, seekers. India needs indigenous capability.
- AI in Defence: INDO-PACOM employing AI in military operations. India-U.S. AI defence cooperation is a strategic opportunity.
- Self-Reliance Gap: Despite Atmanirbhar Bharat, India remains dependent on imports for critical platforms.
- Deepen India-U.S. defence tech sharing under iCET framework; focus on AI, space, EW.
- Accelerate indigenous defence production; achieve 25% defence export target.
- Invest in counter-space and cyber warfare; develop integrated theatre commands.
- SDG Linkage: SDG 16 (Peace & Strong Institutions).
- LEMOA (2016), COMCASA (2018), BECA (2020): Foundational defence agreements with U.S.
- iCET (2023): Initiative on Critical and Emerging Technology
- INDO-PACOM: U.S. Indo-Pacific Command; HQ in Hawaii
- Defence Budget 2026-27: ₹7.85 lakh crore (15% increase)
"The lessons from Operation Sindoor underscore the need for continuous defence modernization and strategic partnerships." Analyze the evolving India-U.S. defence cooperation and its implications for India's security architecture in the context of Chinese weapons proliferation in South Asia.
UPSC Civil Services Coaching
This document is for educational purposes only. Content is based on The Hindu newspaper, February 16, 2026, Bengaluru City Edition. All analysis is original and prepared for UPSC exam preparation.
👉 Download the full summary PDF for complete GS-wise analysis, exam-focused insights, and answer enrichment points


