Foreign Travellers Who Visited India
A Comprehensive UPSC Guide — Prelims, GS-I Mains & Interview
1. Introduction & UPSC Relevance
Accounts left by foreign travellers form one of the most vital categories of literary sources for reconstructing Indian history. Where indigenous texts often focus on religious or literary themes, traveller narratives offer first-hand, comparative perspectives on administration, economy, society, and culture.
Why This Topic Matters for UPSC
- Prelims: Direct factual questions on traveller–book–dynasty matching appear frequently.
- GS-I Mains: Questions on “sources of Indian history” or specific dynasties require traveller testimony.
- Interview: Analytical questions on the reliability and bias of historical sources.
How Traveller Accounts Help Reconstruct Indian History
- Corroborative evidence: They verify or challenge claims made in inscriptions and court literature.
- Socio-economic detail: They describe markets, prices, taxes, and daily life — details rarely found in official records.
- Comparative lens: Foreign observers highlight what was unique about India by comparing it with their home societies.
- Chronological markers: Their dated visits help fix timelines for Indian rulers and events.
2. Classification of Foreign Travellers
Foreign travellers to India can be classified into three broad chronological categories. Each period brought visitors with distinct motivations — from Greek diplomatic curiosity to Chinese Buddhist pilgrimage to European mercantile interest.
A. Ancient Period
- Greek & Roman travellers: Megasthenes, Deimachus, Ptolemy
- Chinese Buddhist pilgrims: Fa-Hien, Hiuen Tsang, I-Tsing
- Motivation: Diplomatic missions, religious pilgrimage, scholarly study
B. Medieval Period
- Arab & Persian scholars: Al-Masudi, Al-Beruni, Al-Idrisi, Ibn Battuta
- European travellers: Marco Polo
- Motivation: Trade, intellectual curiosity, Sufi scholarship, exploration
C. Early Modern / Colonial Period
- European merchants & scholars: Nicolo Conti, Domingo Paes, Duarte Barbosa, Bernier, Tavernier
- Motivation: Trade expansion, diplomatic reporting, gem trade, socio-political documentation
3. Ancient Foreign Travellers to India (Detailed)
- Country
- Greece (Seleucid Empire)
- Period
- c. 302–298 BCE
- Ruler Visited
- Chandragupta Maurya
- Major Work
- Indica
- Role
- Ambassador of Seleucus Nicator at Mauryan court
Key Observations
- Described Pataliputra as one of the greatest cities in the ancient world.
- Divided Indian society into seven classes (philosophers, farmers, soldiers, herdsmen, artisans, magistrates, councillors).
- Noted the Mauryan administration: a well-organised bureaucracy, espionage system, and city governance.
- Claimed there was no slavery in India (debated by historians).
- Described Indian agriculture, irrigation, and the importance of the Ganges river system.
- Country
- China
- Period
- c. 399–414 CE
- Ruler/Period
- Chandragupta II (Gupta dynasty)
- Major Work
- A Record of Buddhist Kingdoms (Fo-Kuo-Ki)
- Purpose
- Buddhist pilgrimage; collect sacred texts
Key Observations
- Found Madhyadesha (Middle Country) peaceful and prosperous; people were happy and free.
- Observed that capital punishment was rare; most offences were punished by fines.
- Described the decline of Buddhism in some areas but its flourishing in others (e.g., Mathura).
- Noted that Vaishyas and Shudras were treated differently — Chandalas had to signal their arrival.
- Praised the Gupta-era roads, rest houses, and charitable hospitals.
- Country
- China (Tang dynasty)
- Period
- c. 630–645 CE
- Ruler Visited
- Harshavardhana & Pulakeshin II
- Major Work
- Si-Yu-Ki (Records of the Western World)
- Nickname
- “Prince of Pilgrims”
Key Observations
- Most detailed account of post-Gupta India; visited over 100 kingdoms.
- Described Nalanda University in great detail — 10,000 students, rigorous admissions, vast library.
- Noted Harsha’s generous donations at the Kanauj Assembly and the Prayag Assembly.
- Described the caste system, untouchability, and prevalence of Buddhism and Hinduism side by side.
- Reported a decline in Buddhism in many regions and the growing dominance of Hinduism.
- Gave vivid descriptions of Indian cities, agriculture, and the judicial system.
- Country
- China (Tang dynasty)
- Period
- c. 671–695 CE
- Place Visited
- Nalanda, Sumatra (Srivijaya)
- Major Work
- A Record of the Buddhist Religion as Practised in India and the Malay Archipelago
Key Observations
- Provided a detailed account of Nalanda University after Hiuen Tsang.
- Described Buddhist monastic rules, rituals, and the daily life of monks in India.
- Noted the importance of Srivijaya (Sumatra) as a centre of Buddhist learning.
- Observed that Indian medicine (especially Ayurveda) was highly advanced.
Comparison Table — Ancient Foreign Travellers
| Traveller | Period | Dynasty/Ruler | Key Observations | Major Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Megasthenes | c. 302–298 BCE | Chandragupta Maurya | Seven-fold caste division, Pataliputra, Mauryan admin | Indica |
| Fa-Hien | c. 399–414 CE | Chandragupta II (Gupta) | Peaceful society, mild punishments, Buddhist pilgrim sites | Fo-Kuo-Ki |
| Hiuen Tsang | c. 630–645 CE | Harshavardhana | Nalanda, caste, Harsha’s assemblies, 100+ kingdoms | Si-Yu-Ki |
| I-Tsing | c. 671–695 CE | Post-Harsha period | Nalanda monastic life, Buddhist rituals, medicine | Record of Buddhist Religion |
4. Medieval Foreign Travellers (Core Section)
A. Arab & Persian Travellers
- Country
- Baghdad (Abbasid Caliphate)
- Period
- c. 915–957 CE
- Region Visited
- Western India (Gujarat, Sindh)
- Major Work
- Muruj-ul-Zahab (Meadows of Gold)
Key Observations
- Described the Pratihara rulers and the Rashtrakutas.
- Provided information about Indian Ocean trade, especially the ports of Gujarat.
- Noted Hindu religious practices and temples.
- Called India the “land of wisdom” (Hind).
- Country
- Khwarezm (modern Uzbekistan)
- Period
- c. 1017–1030 CE
- Context
- Came with Mahmud of Ghazni’s campaigns
- Major Work
- Tahqiq-i-Hind (Kitab-ul-Hind)
Key Observations
- Learned Sanskrit and studied Indian texts directly — one of the most scholarly and objective foreign accounts.
- Described the caste system, Hindu philosophy (Samkhya, Patanjali), astronomy, and mathematics.
- Noted Indian concepts of time cycles (yugas), geography, and weights and measures.
- Criticised Indians for being “insular” and reluctant to engage with foreign ideas.
- His work is considered a pioneering comparative study of civilisations.
- Country
- Morocco (Tangier)
- Period
- c. 1333–1347 CE
- Ruler Visited
- Muhammad bin Tughlaq (Delhi Sultanate)
- Major Work
- Rihla (The Travels)
- Role in India
- Appointed Qazi of Delhi by the Sultan
Key Observations
- Vivid account of Muhammad bin Tughlaq — described him as both generous and cruel.
- Described the postal system (Barid) of the Sultanate — horse-post and foot-post.
- Noted the sati practice, Indian agriculture, and the coconut palm economy of Malabar.
- Described cities: Delhi, Daulatabad, Calicut, and the Malabar coast trade.
- Gave detailed accounts of trade with China and Southeast Asia.
- Noted the practice of slavery and the extravagant lifestyle of the Sultan’s court.
- Country
- Morocco / Sicily
- Period
- 12th century CE (c. 1154)
- Major Work
- Nuzhat al-Mushtaq (Tabula Rogeriana)
- Nature
- Geographer — did not personally visit India
Key Observations
- Created one of the most advanced world maps of the medieval period.
- Described Indian ports, trade routes, and commodities.
- His geographical information was based on earlier Arab traders and scholars.
B. European & Other Travellers
- Country
- Venice (Italy)
- Period
- c. 1292–1294 CE
- Region Visited
- South India (Malabar, Coromandel coast), Sri Lanka
- Major Work
- The Travels of Marco Polo (Il Milione)
Key Observations
- Described the Pandya kingdom in South India and the flourishing pepper and spice trade.
- Noted the wealth of Indian ports, especially on the Malabar coast.
- Described sati, caste system, and religious practices of Hindus and Buddhists.
- Mentioned the diamond mines of Golconda region.
- His accounts fuelled European interest in finding a sea route to India.
Comparison Table — Medieval Foreign Travellers
| Traveller | Origin | Period | Dynasty/Region | Focus Area | Major Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al-Masudi | Arab | 10th c. | Pratiharas, Rashtrakutas | Trade, religion | Muruj-ul-Zahab |
| Al-Beruni | Central Asian | 11th c. | Ghaznavid-era India | Philosophy, science, caste | Kitab-ul-Hind |
| Ibn Battuta | Moroccan | 14th c. | Muhammad bin Tughlaq | Administration, society, trade | Rihla |
| Al-Idrisi | Arab/Sicilian | 12th c. | General (geographer) | Geography, trade routes | Nuzhat al-Mushtaq |
| Marco Polo | Venetian | 13th c. | Pandya kingdom, Malabar | Trade, wealth, customs | Il Milione |
5. Early Modern / Colonial Foreign Travellers
- Country
- Venice (Italy)
- Period
- c. 1420–1421 CE
- Region Visited
- Vijayanagara Empire
- Ruler
- Deva Raya I
Key Observations
- Described the grandeur of Vijayanagara city — estimated its circumference at 60 miles.
- Noted the king’s army of 90,000 men.
- Described Indian spice trade and the custom of sati.
- Country
- Portugal
- Period
- c. 1520–1522 CE
- Ruler Visited
- Krishnadeva Raya (Vijayanagara)
Key Observations
- Called Vijayanagara “as large as Rome” and described its bustling markets and grand festivals.
- Praised Krishnadeva Raya as an able administrator and warrior king.
- Described the Mahanavami festival in great detail — parades, music, wrestling.
- Provided important evidence on the social life, trade, and military strength of the empire.
- Country
- Portugal
- Period
- c. 1500–1516 CE
- Region
- Malabar coast, Vijayanagara
- Major Work
- Livro de Duarte Barbosa (The Book of Duarte Barbosa)
Key Observations
- Detailed account of the Malabar coast trade — pepper, ginger, cinnamon.
- Described the Nair warrior community and the matrilineal system of Kerala.
- Noted the presence of different merchant communities — Arab, Jewish, and Chinese traders.
- Described the caste system and the practice of untouchability in detail.
- Country
- France
- Period
- c. 1656–1668 CE
- Ruler
- Aurangzeb (Mughal Empire)
- Major Work
- Travels in the Mogul Empire
- Role
- Physician to Dara Shikoh, later attached to Mughal court
Key Observations
- Witnessed the war of succession among Shah Jahan’s sons.
- Described the Mughal crown ownership of all land — no private property in land (debated).
- Compared Mughal India unfavourably with Europe, calling it a “land of poverty amidst wealth.”
- Described the squalid condition of the common people versus the extreme luxury of the nobility.
- Noted the sati practice and the status of women.
- His accounts influenced European views of Indian “Oriental despotism.”
- Country
- France
- Period
- c. 1640–1668 CE (6 visits)
- Ruler
- Shah Jahan & Aurangzeb
- Major Work
- Travels in India
- Profession
- Gem merchant
Key Observations
- Described the diamond mines of Golconda and the gem trade in detail.
- Provided detailed accounts of Mughal trade, commerce, and currency.
- Described the Peacock Throne and the wealth of the Mughal court.
- Noted the condition of Indian roads, caravanserais, and trading practices.
- Described the Hindu practice of sati and various religious customs.
Region-Wise Summary — Early Modern Travellers
| Region Focus | Traveller | Key Themes |
|---|---|---|
| South India (Vijayanagara & Malabar) | Nicolo Conti | City grandeur, army strength, sati |
| Domingo Paes | Krishnadeva Raya, Mahanavami, markets | |
| Duarte Barbosa | Spice trade, Nairs, caste, Malabar coast | |
| North India (Mughal Empire) | François Bernier | Succession war, land ownership, poverty |
| J.-B. Tavernier | Diamond trade, Peacock Throne, commerce |
6. What Did Foreign Travellers Write About? (Thematic Analysis)
Across all periods, traveller accounts consistently cover five broad thematic areas. The following matrix shows which traveller provides the richest information on each theme.
| Theme | Key Travellers | What They Observed |
|---|---|---|
| Administration & Governance | Megasthenes, Ibn Battuta, Bernier | Mauryan bureaucracy, Sultanate postal system (Barid), Mughal land revenue, judicial systems |
| Economy & Trade | Marco Polo, Barbosa, Tavernier | Spice trade, Malabar ports, Golconda diamonds, currency, guilds, Indian Ocean commerce |
| Social Life & Caste | Megasthenes, Al-Beruni, Fa-Hien, Hiuen Tsang | Caste divisions, untouchability, sati, women’s status, festivals, food habits |
| Religion & Culture | Fa-Hien, Hiuen Tsang, I-Tsing, Al-Beruni | Buddhist monasteries, Hindu temples, Nalanda, philosophical systems, religious syncretism |
| Cities & Architecture | Megasthenes, Domingo Paes, Bernier | Pataliputra’s grandeur, Vijayanagara’s markets, Mughal Delhi, Agra, fortifications |
7. Reliability & Limitations of Foreign Accounts
While foreign accounts are invaluable, they must be used with critical caution. No single traveller’s account can be taken at face value — each must be cross-verified with other sources (inscriptions, archaeological evidence, indigenous literature).
✓ Strengths (Value)
- Provide outsider perspectives free from court flattery.
- Record everyday life — markets, roads, prices — often missing from inscriptions.
- Offer comparative observations across civilisations.
- Help establish chronologies when Indian sources are ambiguous.
- Corroborate or challenge claims in official court histories.
- Scholars like Al-Beruni studied Indian languages, adding depth and accuracy.
✗ Limitations (Biases)
- Cultural bias: Judged Indian customs by their own cultural standards.
- Language barriers: Most could not read Indian texts in the original (exception: Al-Beruni).
- Limited exposure: Many visited only capital cities or court circles — incomplete picture.
- Exaggeration: Some inflated numbers (army sizes, city populations) to impress home audiences.
- Political motives: Diplomats (Megasthenes) had strategic interests shaping their reports.
- Hearsay: Al-Idrisi, for instance, never personally visited India.
8. Interlinkages — Related Topics for UPSC
Foreign traveller accounts are best studied alongside the dynasties and themes they describe. Here are key topics you should study in conjunction:
9. UPSC Exam Orientation
Prelims Focus Areas
- Traveller–Book matching: Megasthenes → Indica; Al-Beruni → Kitab-ul-Hind; Ibn Battuta → Rihla
- Period–Dynasty association: Fa-Hien → Gupta; Hiuen Tsang → Harsha; Bernier → Mughal
- Unique observations: Megasthenes’ seven-fold division; Bernier’s “no private property”; Paes on Mahanavami
Mains Focus Areas
- Critical evaluation of traveller accounts as historical sources.
- Comparison between Chinese pilgrim accounts and Arab scholar accounts.
- Use of traveller evidence to reconstruct administration, trade, and society of specific periods.
Practice MCQs (Prelims Pattern)
1. Fa-Hien visited India during the reign of Harshavardhana.
2. Hiuen Tsang described Nalanda University in detail.
3. I-Tsing visited India after Hiuen Tsang and also described Nalanda.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- (a) 1 and 2 only
- (b) 2 and 3 only
- (c) 1 and 3 only
- (d) 1, 2 and 3
Statement 1 is incorrect: Fa-Hien visited during the reign of Chandragupta II (Gupta dynasty), not Harshavardhana. Statements 2 and 3 are correct — both Hiuen Tsang and I-Tsing described Nalanda.
| A. Indica | 1. Ibn Battuta |
| B. Rihla | 2. Al-Beruni |
| C. Kitab-ul-Hind | 3. Megasthenes |
| D. Si-Yu-Ki | 4. Hiuen Tsang |
- (a) A-3, B-2, C-1, D-4
- (b) A-3, B-1, C-2, D-4
- (c) A-4, B-1, C-2, D-3
- (d) A-3, B-1, C-4, D-2
Indica → Megasthenes; Rihla → Ibn Battuta; Kitab-ul-Hind → Al-Beruni; Si-Yu-Ki → Hiuen Tsang.
1. He was a French traveller who visited India during Akbar’s reign.
2. He described the Mughal emperor as the owner of all land in the empire.
3. He was initially attached to the court of Dara Shikoh.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- (a) 1 only
- (b) 2 and 3 only
- (c) 1 and 2 only
- (d) 1, 2 and 3
Statement 1 is incorrect: Bernier visited during Aurangzeb’s reign (and the period of succession war after Shah Jahan), not Akbar’s. Statements 2 and 3 are correct.
- (a) Nicolo Conti
- (b) Domingo Paes
- (c) Duarte Barbosa
- (d) Marco Polo
Domingo Paes visited during the reign of Krishnadeva Raya (c. 1520–22) and gave a vivid account of the Mahanavami festival, markets, and the grandeur of the Vijayanagara capital.
Mains Practice Questions
Approach Hints
- Introduction: Define what constitutes foreign traveller accounts as historical sources.
- Body — Value: Give 3–4 examples of unique contributions (Megasthenes on Mauryan admin, Hiuen Tsang on Nalanda, Ibn Battuta on Sultanate postal system).
- Body — Problems: Discuss cultural bias, exaggeration, limited exposure, language barriers with specific examples.
- Conclusion: They are valuable when cross-verified with other source categories (inscriptions, archaeology).
Approach Hints
- Introduction: Both groups provide rich but differently oriented accounts.
- Chinese pilgrims: Focused on Buddhism — monasteries, decline/flourishing of the faith, Nalanda, monastic discipline. Motivated by religious pilgrimage.
- Arab scholars: Broader socio-scientific focus — caste, philosophy, astronomy, administration. Motivated by intellectual inquiry and trade.
- Contrast: Chinese accounts are more religious/spiritual; Arab accounts are more analytical/comparative. Al-Beruni learned Sanskrit; Chinese pilgrims also learned local languages.
- Factors influencing perspective: Purpose of visit, home culture, religious background, language competence, duration of stay, political context.
- Conclusion: Together they provide a more complete picture than either alone. The comparative approach is essential for historians.
10. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Arab/Persian scholars (Al-Masudi, Al-Beruni, Ibn Battuta) had a broader scholarly and commercial orientation. They documented Indian philosophy, science, mathematics, administration, economy, and trade alongside society and religion. Al-Beruni, for instance, studied Indian astronomical and mathematical systems in depth. Ibn Battuta described the Sultanate’s postal system, judicial practices, and court life.
In short: Chinese accounts are more spiritually oriented, while Arab accounts are more analytically and socio-economically oriented. Together, they provide complementary perspectives.


