International Biodiversity Conservation CBD & COP – UPSC Notes

International Efforts for Biodiversity Conservation | CBD | COP16 | MAB | BIOFIN | UPSC Notes | Legacy IAS Bangalore
UPSC Prelims + Mains · Environment & Ecology · Current Affairs 2025

International Efforts for
Biodiversity Conservation

CBD · Nagoya Protocol · Kunming-Montreal GBF · COP16 Cali 2024 · World Heritage Sites · MAB · UN Decade · GPFLR · UNSPF · BIOFIN — deep dive with current affairs

1

UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)

The world’s comprehensive biodiversity treaty — born at Rio 1992

💡 Think of CBD as the World’s Constitution for Nature

Just as a country’s constitution sets out the rules for how people should live together, the CBD sets the rules for how nations should interact with nature — how to protect it, how to use it sustainably, and how to share the benefits fairly. 196 countries have signed it. The USA hasn’t — like a major country refusing to sign a global constitution. And every few years, the signatories meet (COP) to review progress and update the rules.

Key Facts — CBD at a Glance
  • Adopted: 5 June 1992 at the Rio Earth Summit (UNCED), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • In force from: 29 December 1993
  • Parties: 196 countries + European Union
  • USA has NOT ratified — only major UN member not party to CBD
  • Secretariat: Montreal, Canada
  • Governing body: Conference of Parties (COP) — meets every 2 years
  • International Biodiversity Day: 22 May
  • Related Rio Conventions: UNFCCC (climate) and UNCCD (desertification) — all from the 1992 Rio summit
Three Objectives of CBD
🌿
Objective 1

Conservation of Biological Diversity

Protect all life on Earth — ecosystems, species, and genetic resources — through protected areas, in situ and ex situ methods.

♻️
Objective 2

Sustainable Use of Biodiversity

Use biological resources at a rate that doesn’t lead to long-term decline. Use nature without exhausting it — for present and future generations.

🤝
Objective 3

Fair and Equitable Benefit Sharing (ABS)

When genetic resources (plants, animals, microorganisms) are used commercially, the benefits must be shared with the country and communities of origin. This is Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS).

💡 Why is Benefit Sharing (ABS) so important?

Imagine a pharmaceutical company finds a plant in an Amazon tribal community’s forest and develops a blockbuster drug worth billions. But the indigenous community gets nothing. This is called “biopiracy” — using genetic resources without consent or compensation. The CBD’s ABS framework (reinforced by the Nagoya Protocol) prevents this. The Cali Fund (COP16, 2024) extends this to digital genetic data. India’s own Biological Diversity Act 2002 operationalises ABS — protecting India’s vast genetic heritage.

📌 UPSC Angle

Most tested CBD facts: Adopted 1992 Rio Earth Summit | Came into force 1993 | USA NOT a party | Secretariat = Montreal, Canada | 22 May = International Biodiversity Day. The three objectives appear as a matching/statement question. Also connect: India’s Biological Diversity Act 2002 + National Biodiversity Authority (NBA, Chennai) = India’s domestic implementation of CBD. ABS = prevents biopiracy.

2

Three Protocols under the CBD

From GMO safety to benefit sharing to the global biodiversity blueprint
2003
Cartagena Protocol

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

Regulates the safe handling, transport, and use of Living Modified Organisms (LMOs) — also called GMOs — that result from modern biotechnology. Protects biodiversity from risks of GMOs crossing national borders.

  • Adopted: 2000 (Montreal). In force: 2003.
  • Named after Cartagena, Colombia — but actually finalised in Montreal (the original Cartagena meeting couldn’t agree).
  • Key mechanism: Advance Informed Agreement (AIA) — the importing country must be notified and agree before any LMO is exported.
  • India is a party. Controls GMO imports including Bt crops from other countries.
  • UPSC TRAP: Cartagena = GMO/LMO safety — NOT genetic resource benefit sharing (that’s Nagoya).
2014
Nagoya Protocol

Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS)

Ensures that companies, researchers, and nations that access and use genetic resources from another country share the resulting benefits fairly and equitably with the provider country and local communities.

  • Adopted: 2010 at COP10, Nagoya, Japan. In force: 2014.
  • Operates on three pillars: Prior Informed Consent (PIC), Mutually Agreed Terms (MAT), and benefit sharing.
  • Addresses biopiracy — prevents exploitation of genetic resources without compensation.
  • India’s Biological Diversity Act 2002 + National Biodiversity Authority (NBA, Chennai) are India’s ABS implementation mechanism.
  • Extended to Digital Sequence Information (DSI) via the Cali Fund (COP16, 2024).
2022
GBF (Not a Protocol — Global Strategy)

Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF)

Not a protocol — but the current global biodiversity strategy adopted under CBD. Replaced the Aichi Biodiversity Targets (2011–2020). Sets 4 goals for 2050 and 23 targets for 2030.

  • Adopted: 19 December 2022 at CBD COP15, Montreal, Canada.
  • Most famous target: 30×30 — protect 30% of land and sea by 2030.
  • Finance target: mobilise $200 billion/year for biodiversity; close the $700 billion/year gap.
  • Vision: “Living in harmony with nature by 2050.”
FeatureCartagena ProtocolNagoya Protocol
What it coversSafe handling of GMOs/LMOs crossing bordersAccess & equitable benefit sharing from genetic resources
Adopted2000 (Montreal)2010 (COP10, Nagoya, Japan)
In force20032014
Key problem solvedRisks of GMOs to biodiversityBiopiracy — exploiting genetic resources without sharing benefits
Key mechanismAdvance Informed Agreement (AIA)Prior Informed Consent (PIC) + Mutually Agreed Terms (MAT)
India’s domestic lawProtection of Plant Varieties Act + Environment Act regulationsBiological Diversity Act 2002 + NBA (Chennai)
2024 updateExtended to Digital Sequence Information via Cali Fund (COP16)

⭐ Easy Way to Remember the Two Protocols

  • Cartagena = C = Creatures Modified (GMO Safety) — if genes are being MODIFIED and moved between countries, Cartagena governs it.
  • Nagoya = N = Nature’s Benefits Shared (ABS) — if natural genetic resources are being USED for profit, Nagoya ensures the benefits come back.
  • Classic UPSC trap: Nagoya is under CBD — NOT under UNFCCC. Always CBD.
3

CBD COP History — Key Milestones

From Rio 1992 to Cali 2024 — the biodiversity journey
1992
CBD Adopted — Rio Earth Summit (UNCED), Brazil
5 June 1992. Three Rio Conventions: CBD + UNFCCC + UNCCD. CBD in force from 29 December 1993. First COP (COP1): Nassau, Bahamas, 1994.
COP5
Cartagena Protocol finalised — Nairobi, 2000
Biosafety protocol for GMOs/LMOs. Named after Cartagena (where negotiations started) but adopted in Montreal. In force: 2003.
COP10
Aichi Biodiversity Targets + Nagoya Protocol — Nagoya, Japan, 2010
  • 20 Aichi Biodiversity Targets set for 2010–2020 (Target 11: protect 17% land + 10% ocean by 2020).
  • Nagoya Protocol on ABS adopted (in force 2014).
  • All 20 Aichi targets were missed by 2020 — driving the need for the GBF.
COP15
🏆 Kunming-Montreal GBF Adopted — Montreal, Canada, December 2022
  • Chaired by China; hosted by Canada. In two parts: Kunming online (2021) + Montreal in-person (Dec 2022).
  • Adopted: 4 Goals for 2050 + 23 Targets for 2030.
  • Most famous: 30×30 target — protect 30% of land and sea by 2030.
  • Finance: mobilise $200 billion/year; close $700 billion/year biodiversity finance gap.
  • Replaced failed Aichi Targets. 196 parties present (188 governments on-site).
COP16
🔴 COP16 — Cali, Colombia, October–November 2024
  • Called the “People’s COP”. COP16 President: Susana Muhamad (Colombia’s Environment Minister).
  • Key outcomes: Cali Fund (DSI benefit sharing) + new indigenous peoples body (Article 8(j)).
  • Suspended on 2 November — no quorum for some final items.
  • Resumed: Rome, Italy, 25–27 February 2025 (COP16.2) — agreed on Resource Mobilisation Strategy and Monitoring Framework.
Next: COP17 — Yerevan, Armenia, October 2026
First global review of GBF implementation. 125 countries have submitted 7th National Reports. India’s national report due by February 2026.
4

Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) 2022

4 goals · 23 targets · The world’s plan to save nature
4

Goals for 2050

23

Targets for 2030

30%

Land & sea to protect by 2030

30%

Degraded ecosystems to restore by 2030

$200B

Per year mobilised by 2030

$700B

Annual biodiversity finance gap

4 Goals for 2050
A

Ecosystem & Species Health

Halt human-induced extinction of threatened species. Maintain and restore genetic diversity. Ensure ecosystems remain healthy and resilient by 2050.

B

Sustainable Use

Biodiversity sustainably managed, contributing to people’s well-being, food security, health, and livelihoods by 2050.

C

Benefit Sharing (ABS)

Fair and equitable sharing of benefits from use of genetic resources and digital sequence information (DSI). Strengthens Nagoya Protocol principles.

D

Finance & Implementation

Adequate means of implementation — closing the $700B/year biodiversity finance gap. Aligning financial flows with GBF and the 2050 Vision.

Key 2030 Targets — UPSC Focus
T-3

🎯 30×30 Land — The Headline Target

Protect and manage at least 30% of land, inland waters, coastal areas and oceans by 2030. Currently: ~17.5% land and ~8.4% marine areas protected. India covers 5.28% of its area under Protected Areas — needs significant expansion to contribute.

T-2

♻️ 30% Restoration

Have restoration completed or underway on at least 30% of degraded terrestrial, freshwater, coastal and marine ecosystems by 2030. Aligned with the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021–2030).

T-4

🚨 Halt Extinction

Halt human-induced extinction of known threatened species and reduce extinction risk. Currently 1 million species face extinction — a biodiversity crisis of historic scale.

T-18

💸 Reduce Harmful Subsidies

Identify and reduce harmful incentives (subsidies that damage biodiversity) by at least $500 billion per year by 2030. Subsidies for fossil fuels, industrial agriculture, and overfishing are the main targets.

T-19

💰 Biodiversity Finance

Mobilise at least $200 billion per year from all sources by 2030. Developed countries to provide at least $20 billion/year to developing nations by 2025 and $30 billion/year by 2030.

T-15

🏢 Business & Biodiversity

Legal, financial, and administrative entities (companies) to monitor, assess, and disclose their risks, dependencies, and impacts on biodiversity. Integrating biodiversity into corporate decisions.

📌 UPSC Angle

GBF is the most important current affairs biodiversity topic. Know: GBF = COP15, Montreal, December 2022. Chaired by China. Replaced Aichi Targets. 4 goals (2050) + 23 targets (2030). 30×30 target = T-3. Finance gap = $700B/year. Vision = “Living in harmony with nature by 2050.” Also: None of the 20 Aichi Targets (2010-2020) were achieved — that’s why GBF was designed with stronger mechanisms. UPSC has tested this directly.

5

COP16 — Cali, Colombia, 2024 Current Affairs

The “People’s COP” — landmark Cali Fund and indigenous peoples recognition
🔴 COP16 Fast Facts
  • Location: Cali, Colombia (Valle del Pacífico Convention Centre)
  • Dates: 21 October to 2 November 2024 (suspended); resumed Rome, Italy, 25–27 Feb 2025
  • President: Susana Muhamad, Colombia’s Environment Minister
  • Theme: “Peace with Nature” — called “La COP de la gente” (The People’s COP)
  • Scale: Largest CBD COP ever — 23,000+ participants from 190+ countries
  • National targets submitted: 119 of 196 countries; 44 countries submitted full NBSAPs
What COP16 Achieved ✅ and What it Missed ❌

✅ Cali Fund Established

New global mechanism for benefit-sharing from Digital Sequence Information (DSI) on genetic resources. Companies using genetic data commercially must contribute. At least 50% to indigenous peoples and local communities. Formally launched at Rome COP16.2 (Feb 2025).

✅ Article 8(j) — Indigenous Body

A new permanent Subsidiary Body created for indigenous peoples, local communities, and Afro-descendants. Recognises traditional ecological knowledge at international level. Guarantees permanent voice in all CBD decisions — not just temporary consultation.

✅ Kunming Fund ($200M)

China launched the Kunming Biodiversity Fund with a $200 million initial contribution to support GBF implementation in developing countries — especially the least developed and small island states.

✅ EBSAs — Ocean Areas

New procedures for identifying Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs) in the oceans. Step toward achieving the 30×30 ocean conservation target.

❌ Finance Strategy — Deferred

Countries could NOT agree on a Resource Mobilisation Strategy to raise $200 billion/year by 2030. Deferred to Rome session (COP16.2) where it was finally agreed in February 2025.

❌ Monitoring Framework — Incomplete

Countries struggled to agree on how the 23 GBF targets will be tracked and measured. Partially resolved at Rome COP16.2 where a monitoring framework was adopted.

❌ Only 25% Submitted NBSAPs

Only 44 of 196 parties submitted updated National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans — showing weak national-level commitment to GBF implementation before the deadline.

✅ Rome COP16.2 (Feb 2025)

In the resumed session, countries agreed on: (1) Resource Mobilisation Strategy — $200B/year by 2030. (2) Monitoring Framework with headline indicators. (3) Formally launched the Cali Fund with UNDP + UNEP.

💡 What is Digital Sequence Information (DSI) — and why does the Cali Fund matter?

DSI is the digital data derived from genetic resources — like the DNA sequence of a medicinal plant from the Amazon, or a microorganism from Indian soil. Modern pharma, biotech, and agriculture companies use vast amounts of DSI to develop drugs, vaccines, crop varieties, and cosmetics worth trillions of dollars. But the countries where those natural genetic resources come from — mostly developing nations and indigenous communities — have received zero compensation, because DSI was treated as “free data.” The Cali Fund changes this: companies must now contribute to a global fund, with at least half going directly to indigenous peoples and local communities. India stands to benefit significantly as one of the world’s most biodiverse megadiverse nations.

📌 UPSC Angle — COP16 Must-Know

Key facts: COP16 = Cali, Colombia, October 2024 = “People’s COP” = Cali Fund (DSI benefit sharing). COP16.2 = Rome, February 2025. COP17 = Yerevan, Armenia, 2026. India submitted its national biodiversity targets at COP16. Connect: Cali Fund = extension of Nagoya Protocol to digital genetic data. India’s Biological Diversity Act 2002 = domestic ABS implementation. BIOFIN = how India plans to raise the finance needed.

6

UNESCO World Heritage Sites

Outstanding universal value — humanity’s shared natural and cultural heritage
What is it?

A UNESCO World Heritage Site (WHS) is a landmark or area recognised as having Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) to humanity — ecological, cultural, or historical. Protected under the World Heritage Convention, adopted by UNESCO in 1972. Sites are nominated by member states and evaluated by IUCN (natural) and ICOMOS (cultural) before UNESCO’s World Heritage Committee decides.

🔑 Key Facts

  • Convention adopted: 1972 (UNESCO, Paris)
  • India joined: 1977
  • Total WHS globally: 1,200+ in 168 countries
  • Country with most sites: Italy (58)
  • India: 42 World Heritage Sites — 34 Cultural, 7 Natural, 1 Mixed
  • Three categories: Cultural (monuments, historic areas), Natural (ecosystems, geology, biodiversity), Mixed (both)
  • Danger List = sites facing severe threats. Manas WLS (Assam) was on Danger List 1992–2011 (civil unrest) — removed after recovery.
India’s Natural World Heritage Sites
Natural

Kaziranga NP, Assam

One-horned rhino. Highest density of tigers. UNESCO WHS 1985.

Natural

Manas WLS, Assam

Tiger, Golden Langur, Pygmy Hog. UNESCO WHS 1985. Was on Danger List.

Natural

Sundarbans NP, West Bengal

World’s largest mangrove. Royal Bengal Tiger. UNESCO WHS 1987.

Natural

Nanda Devi & Valley of Flowers NPs, Uttarakhand

High-altitude biodiversity hotspot. UNESCO WHS 1988 (extended 2005).

Natural

Western Ghats (6 states)

One of world’s 8 hottest biodiversity hotspots. 39 serial sites across TN, Kerala, Karnataka, Goa, MH, Gujarat. UNESCO WHS 2012.

Natural

Great Himalayan NP, HP

Source of several rivers. Snow leopard, Western Tragopan. UNESCO WHS 2014.

Mixed

Khangchendzonga NP, Sikkim

India’s first mixed WHS (2016). Sacred peaks. Snow leopard habitat.

💡 WHS vs Ramsar vs Biosphere Reserve — Can a site be all three?

Yes! Sundarbans is simultaneously: UNESCO World Heritage Site + Ramsar Site + Biosphere Reserve + Tiger Reserve — the most “multi-designated” protected area in India. Manas is: WHS + Ramsar + Tiger Reserve + Biosphere Reserve in Assam. Multiple designations bring multiple layers of protection and international attention. But they are governed under different legal frameworks — WHS under World Heritage Convention (UNESCO), Ramsar under Ramsar Convention, Tiger Reserve under WPA 1972.

📌 UPSC Angle

UPSC tests WHS through matching pairs (site + state + special feature). Most important: Western Ghats WHS (2012) = serial transboundary site across 6 states. Khangchendzonga = India’s only Mixed WHS. Manas = was on Danger List. Also: WHS is listed under World Heritage Convention 1972 (UNESCO) — NOT under CBD. Different treaty, different system.

7

Man and Biosphere (MAB) Programme

UNESCO’s science programme for human-nature coexistence — since 1971

💡 MAB = Nature’s Laboratory Network

Imagine a global chain of living laboratories — where scientists study how humans and nature can coexist sustainably, tribal communities continue their traditional lives, and the most biodiverse ecosystems are protected at the same time. That’s the MAB Programme’s Biosphere Reserve network. Not just conservation islands — but working landscapes where biodiversity, science, and human wellbeing are tested together.

🔑 Key Facts — MAB Programme

  • Launched: UNESCO, 1971 (same year as Ramsar Convention)
  • Full name: Man and the Biosphere Programme
  • Managed by: International Co-ordinating Council (ICC) of UNESCO’s MAB Programme
  • Global network: 748 Biosphere Reserves in 134 countries (including 23 transboundary sites)
  • India: 18 Biosphere Reserves; 12 in UNESCO World Network of BRs
  • India’s 1st BR: Nilgiri (1986) | Latest UNESCO-listed from India: Panna (MP)
  • Largest BR in India: Kachchh (Gujarat) | Smallest: Dibru-Saikhowa (Assam)
  • MAB combines: natural sciences + social sciences + economics + education
  • BRs are learning sites for sustainable development — NOT strictly protected areas
The 3-Zone Model of Biosphere Reserves
🔒

Core Zone

Strictly protected. No human activity. Contains most sensitive ecosystems. Can be a National Park or WLS. No entry except for research with special permits. Endemic species and genetic reservoirs.

Buffer Zone

Surrounds Core Zone. Limited activities: scientific research, eco-tourism, education, regulated fishing, regulated grazing. Helps reduce pressure on Core Zone.

🏘️

Transition Zone (Marginal Zone)

Outermost area. Human settlements, farming, forestry, and sustainable economic activities allowed. Where conservation goals are integrated with human development. “Cooperation Zone.”

💡 How MAB BRs differ from National Parks

National Park = STRICT protection — NO human rights, NO habitation, legal barrier. Biosphere Reserve = HOLISTIC approach — strict Core Zone + research Buffer Zone + human settlement Transition Zone. A NP may be inside the Core Zone of a BR (e.g., Mudumalai NP is inside the Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve’s core). BRs are NOT notified under WPA 1972 — they have separate administrative frameworks under the MAB Programme. They are internationally recognised by UNESCO, not legally created by domestic law.

India’s 12 UNESCO-Listed Biosphere ReservesState(s)Special Feature
Nilgiri (1st in India, 1986)TN, Kerala, KarnatakaLion-tailed Macaque, Nilgiri Tahr; Includes Mudumalai, Silent Valley, Bandipur NPs
Gulf of MannarTamil NaduFirst marine BR in South/SE Asia; Dugongs, coral reefs, seagrasses
SundarbansWest BengalWorld’s largest mangrove; Royal Bengal Tiger; UNESCO WHS
Nanda DeviUttarakhandUNESCO WHS; Includes Valley of Flowers NP
NokrekMeghalayaGaro Hills; Gene pool reserve for wild citrus relatives
PachmarhiMadhya PradeshSatpura Range; Bori, Pachmarhi, Satpura TRs
SimlipalOdishaTigers, elephants, gharial; Large tribal population
Achanakmar-AmarkantakMP, ChhattisgarhSource of Narmada and Johila rivers
Great NicobarA&N IslandsLeatherback turtles; Nicobarese indigenous people
AgasthyamalaiKerala, TNKalakad Mundanthurai TR; Extremely high plant diversity; Western Ghats
KhangchendzongaSikkimUNESCO WHS (Mixed); Eastern Himalayas; Snow Leopard
Panna (Latest)Madhya PradeshTiger reintroduction success story; Ken River flows through
8

UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021–2030) Current Affairs

The global call to fix what we have broken — in one decade

💡 The Decade = Nature’s Rehabilitation Programme

If a person is injured, there are three phases: stop the injury, begin rehabilitation, restore full function. The UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration follows the same logic — Prevent further degradation (stop the injury), Halt ongoing degradation (stabilise), and Reverse existing damage (rehabilitate and restore). It gives the world one decade to act before 2030 — after which restoring the damage becomes exponentially harder and more expensive.

Key Facts
  • Proclaimed by: UN General Assembly, March 2019
  • Led by: UNEP + FAO (co-leading jointly)
  • Duration: 2021–2030
  • Launched: 5 June 2021 (World Environment Day). Slogan: “Reimagine. Recreate. Restore.”
  • Goal: Prevent, halt, and reverse degradation of all ecosystem types — forests, croplands, grasslands, rivers, wetlands, peatlands, coasts, marine
  • Target: Restore 30% of degraded ecosystems by 2030 (aligns with GBF Target 2)
  • Economic case: Every $1 invested in ecosystem restoration returns $9–$30 in economic benefits (FAO/UNEP estimates)
What “Restoring Ecosystems” Means — 4 Types of Action
🛑

Prevent

Stop degradation before it happens. Laws, ESZs, sustainable land management, reducing deforestation.

⏸️

Halt

Stop ongoing degradation. Enforce existing environmental laws. Eliminate harmful subsidies. Reduce pollution.

🔄

Reverse

Actively restore degraded ecosystems. Reforestation (MISHTI, Bonn Challenge), wetland restoration (NPCA), mangrove replanting.

🌟

Transform

Change the economic systems that drive degradation — reform subsidies, integrate nature into business decisions, GBF Target 15 (corporate disclosure).

🔑 India’s Contributions to the UN Decade

  • MISHTI Scheme (2023–2028): Restore 540 sq km of mangroves along India’s coastline — a direct Decade contribution.
  • Bonn Challenge: India committed to restoring 26 million hectares of degraded land by 2030.
  • Green India Mission: Increase/improve forest cover on 5 million hectares + enhance ecosystem services on 5 million hectares.
  • NPCA: Wetland and lake restoration across India.
  • Compensatory Afforestation (CAMPA): Funds used for afforestation when forests are diverted for development.
  • India’s NDC (Paris Agreement): Create additional carbon sink of 2.5–3 billion tonnes CO₂ through forest and tree cover by 2030. ISFR 2023 shows 2.29 billion tonnes achieved already.
🔴 Connection to COP16 (2024)

CBD COP16 directly reinforced the UN Decade — GBF Target 2 (restore 30% of degraded ecosystems by 2030) is the Decade’s core target. FAO (co-leading the Decade) is the official custodian of the monitoring indicator for this target. At the Rome resumed session (COP16.2, February 2025), countries endorsed a monitoring framework aligned with the Decade’s goals — making the link between the UN Decade and CBD even tighter.

9

GPFLR · UNSPF · BIOFIN

Forest restoration, sustainable forestry, and biodiversity finance — the supporting trio
🌲

Global Partnership on Forest & Landscape Restoration (GPFLR)

Est. 2003 | Forest and landscape restoration | Bonn Challenge

GPFLR is a global network of governments, NGOs, research institutions, and communities established in 2003 to accelerate the restoration of degraded and deforested lands worldwide. It provides technical tools, shares knowledge, and catalyses political commitment for restoration at scale.

  • Bonn Challenge (2011): GPFLR is the platform for the Bonn Challenge — a global effort to restore 350 million hectares of deforested and degraded land by 2030. Named after Bonn, Germany where it was launched. India has committed to restoring 26 million hectares under the Bonn Challenge.
  • IUCN Global Restoration Barometer: GPFLR works with IUCN to track restoration commitments globally — which countries have pledged how much, and how much is actually being restored.
  • FLR (Forest and Landscape Restoration): GPFLR promotes FLR — which goes beyond simply planting trees to restoring entire landscapes for biodiversity, livelihoods, and climate benefits.
  • India: Participates as a partner country. India’s afforestation under CAMPA, Green India Mission, and MISHTI all count toward GPFLR goals. India’s Bonn Challenge pledge = 26 million ha by 2030.
  • Connects to: UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021-2030), GBF Target 2 (restore 30% of degraded ecosystems), and UNFCCC NDCs (carbon sinks).
🏔️

United Nations Strategic Plan for Forests 2017–2030 (UNSPF)

UN General Assembly, 2017 | 6 Global Forest Goals | UNFF

The UNSPF provides a global framework for sustainable forest management (SFM) — adopted by the UN General Assembly in April 2017. It is implemented through the UN Forum on Forests (UNFF) — an intergovernmental forum under the UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC).

  • 6 Global Forest Goals for 2030:
    1. Reverse deforestation and forest degradation globally.
    2. Enhance economic, social, and environmental benefits of forests.
    3. Increase protected forests globally.
    4. Increase forest financing for sustainable management.
    5. Promote forest governance and trade of legally harvested timber.
    6. Increase cooperation among all stakeholders — governments, private sector, civil society.
  • Target 1 (headline): Increase forest area by 3% globally = adding ~120 million hectares of forest by 2030.
  • Financial Facilitation Body (FFB): Created to mobilise funding for implementing the UNSPF, especially in developing countries.
  • India’s connection: ISFR (India State of Forest Report) biennial reports track India’s progress. India’s total forest and tree cover = 25.17% of geographical area (ISFR 2023). India ranks 3rd globally in net annual forest gain (FAO 2025).
  • Intersects with: SDG 15 (Life on Land), GBF Target 3 (30×30), UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration, GPFLR/Bonn Challenge.
💰

Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN)

UNDP + EU | 30+ countries including India | Biodiversity Finance Plans

BIOFIN is a joint initiative of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the European Union, implemented in 30+ partner countries. It helps countries develop a comprehensive Biodiversity Finance Plan (BFP) — identifying how much funding is needed for conservation, where the gaps are, and which financial instruments can close those gaps.

  • Four-step BIOFIN methodology:
    1. Policy and Institutional Review: Understand the policy context for biodiversity finance.
    2. Biodiversity Expenditure Review: How much is currently being spent on biodiversity?
    3. Finance Needs Assessment: How much do we NEED to spend?
    4. Finance Plan: Which instruments (taxes, PES, green bonds, carbon credits, REDD+) can fill the gap?
  • Financial instruments promoted by BIOFIN: Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES), REDD+, biodiversity bonds, green bonds, environmental fiscal reform, private sector engagement, GEF grants, biodiversity credits.
  • India’s BIOFIN: India’s national Biodiversity Finance Plan identified the total funding needed to implement conservation commitments, sources of that funding, and the financing gap. India uses BIOFIN to mobilise finance toward achieving GBF targets, NDC commitments, and national biodiversity plans.
  • Critical context: The GBF requires $200 billion/year for biodiversity by 2030. Currently, a $700 billion/year gap exists. BIOFIN is a key tool for countries to identify and close their share of this gap.
  • BIOFIN aligns with: GBF Target 19 (biodiversity finance), GBF Goal D (implementation means), Cali Fund (DSI benefit sharing), and GBFF (Global Biodiversity Framework Fund, managed by GEF).

Master Comparison Table

All 7 international initiatives at a glance — quick UPSC reference
Initiative Year Led by Purpose India Connection Key Fact / UPSC Hook
CBD 1992 (Rio) | Force: 1993 UNEP (Secretariat: Montreal) Conservation + Sustainable use + ABS (benefit sharing) Biological Diversity Act 2002; NBA Chennai USA not a party; 22 May = Biodiversity Day
Cartagena Protocol 2003 Under CBD Safe handling of GMOs/LMOs crossing borders (Biosafety) Controls GMO imports; biosafety regulatory system C = Creatures Modified. Adopted Montreal despite the name.
Nagoya Protocol 2014 Under CBD Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) from genetic resources — prevents biopiracy Biological Diversity Act 2002; NBA; NBPGR N = Nature’s benefits shared. Extended to DSI via Cali Fund (2024).
Kunming-Montreal GBF 2022 (COP15) Under CBD (Chaired: China; Hosted: Canada) Global biodiversity blueprint — 4 goals (2050) + 23 targets (2030); 30×30 India submitted national targets at COP16 Replaced Aichi Targets (all 20 missed); $700B/year finance gap
World Heritage Sites 1972 (WHC) UNESCO (separate from CBD) Outstanding universal value — cultural, natural, or mixed heritage 42 WHS (7 Natural, 34 Cultural, 1 Mixed) Sundarbans = WHS + Ramsar + BR + TR; Western Ghats WHS = 6 states
MAB Programme 1971 UNESCO Biosphere Reserve network — human-nature coexistence research 18 BRs in India; 12 in UNESCO World Network 3 zones: Core → Buffer → Transition; Panna = latest UNESCO-listed
UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration 2021–2030 UNEP + FAO Prevent, halt, and reverse ecosystem degradation globally MISHTI, Bonn Challenge (26M ha), Green India Mission, NPCA Launched 5 June 2021 (World Environment Day); aligns with GBF Target 2
GPFLR 2003 IUCN, WRI + partners Forest and landscape restoration — Bonn Challenge platform India: 26M ha Bonn Challenge commitment Bonn Challenge = 350M ha globally by 2030
UNSPF 2017–2030 2017 (UNGA) UN Forum on Forests (UNFF) 6 Global Forest Goals for sustainable forest management by 2030 India: 25.17% forest cover (ISFR 2023); 3rd in net forest gain Goal 1: Increase forest area by 3% globally = +120M ha
BIOFIN 2012 UNDP + EU Biodiversity Finance Plans — identify finance needs and instruments India has national Biodiversity Finance Plan under BIOFIN Helps close the $700B/year GBF finance gap; 30+ countries

⭐ The Ultimate UPSC Cheat Sheet — International Biodiversity Initiatives

  • 🌿 CBD = Rio 1992 | 3 objectives | USA not a party | Secretariat Montreal | 22 May = Biodiversity Day
  • 🧬 Cartagena = 2003 | GMO/LMO safety | Under CBD | Adopted Montreal
  • 🤝 Nagoya = 2014 | ABS = benefit sharing | Under CBD | Prevents biopiracy
  • 🎯 GBF = COP15, Dec 2022, Montreal | 4 goals (2050) + 23 targets (2030) | 30×30 target | $700B gap | Replaced Aichi targets
  • 🔴 COP16 = Cali 2024 | Cali Fund (DSI) | Indigenous body | Resumed Rome Feb 2025
  • 🏛️ WHS = UNESCO 1972 | India: 42 sites (7 natural) | NOT under CBD
  • 🌐 MAB = UNESCO 1971 | 748 BRs globally | India: 18 BRs, 12 UNESCO | 3 zones
  • 🌱 UN Decade = 2021–2030 | UNEP + FAO | Restore 30% degraded ecosystems | Launched 5 June 2021
  • 🌲 GPFLR = 2003 | Bonn Challenge | India: 26M ha
  • 🏔️ UNSPF = 2017 | UNGA | 6 Forest Goals | Through UNFF
  • 💰 BIOFIN = UNDP + EU | Biodiversity Finance Plans | Helps close $700B gap

🧪 Practice MCQs — Test Yourself
PYQ Type
Q1. Consider the following statements about the Convention on Biological Diversity: 1. It was adopted at the Rio Earth Summit in 1992. 2. The USA has not ratified the CBD. 3. Its Secretariat is located in Geneva, Switzerland. 4. International Day for Biological Diversity is celebrated on 22 May. Which of the above are CORRECT?
✅ Answer: (b) — 1, 2 and 4 only
1 ✅: CBD adopted 5 June 1992, Rio Earth Summit (in force 29 December 1993). 2 ✅: USA signed but never ratified — the only major UN member not a party. 3 ❌ Wrong: CBD Secretariat is in Montreal, Canada — NOT Geneva. Geneva hosts WHO, WTO, UNHCR, UNHCHR, WMO. 4 ✅: International Day for Biological Diversity = 22 May — the date the CBD text was adopted in 1992.
Practice
Q2. The Nagoya Protocol deals with which of the following?
✅ Answer: (b) Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS)
Nagoya Protocol (2010, COP10 Nagoya, Japan; in force 2014) = Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) from genetic resources. Prevents biopiracy. Option (a) = Cartagena Protocol (GMO/LMO safety). Option (c) = GBF Target 3 (30×30). Option (d) = GBF Target 18 (harmful subsidies). Nagoya extended to digital genetic data via the Cali Fund (COP16, 2024). India’s domestic law: Biological Diversity Act 2002 + NBA (Chennai).
Current AffairsCOP16 2024
Q3. With reference to the “Cali Fund” established at CBD COP16 (2024), which of the following is/are correct? 1. It provides benefit-sharing from Digital Sequence Information (DSI) on genetic resources. 2. At least 50% of the fund is directed to indigenous peoples and local communities. 3. It was formally launched at the Rome resumed session of COP16 (February 2025). 4. All countries must mandatorily contribute to the Cali Fund. Select the correct answer:
✅ Answer: (c) — 1, 2 and 3 only
1 ✅: Cali Fund = mechanism for benefit-sharing from Digital Sequence Information (DSI) — genetic data used by pharma, biotech, agriculture industries. 2 ✅: At least 50% of Cali Fund directed to indigenous peoples and local communities — a major win for developing nations. 3 ✅: The Cali Fund was established at COP16 (Cali, October 2024) and formally launched at the Rome resumed session (COP16.2, February 2025) by UNDP and UNEP. 4 ❌ Wrong: Contributions to the Cali Fund are not mandatory for all countries — companies “should” contribute (voluntary language). There is no legally binding obligation yet — this was a key criticism of the Cali Fund at COP16.
Practice
Q4. Consider the following pairs: 1. Cartagena Protocol — Safe handling of GMOs crossing borders 2. Nagoya Protocol — UNFCCC 3. Bonn Challenge — GPFLR platform — 350 million hectares by 2030 4. BIOFIN — UNDP + EU Which are CORRECTLY matched?
✅ Answer: 1, 3 and 4 are correct — option (c)/(d)
1 ✅ Correct: Cartagena Protocol (2003) deals with safe handling of Living Modified Organisms (GMOs/LMOs) crossing international borders. 2 ❌ Wrong: Nagoya Protocol is under the CBD — NOT UNFCCC. This is a classic and frequently tested UPSC trap. Nagoya Protocol = Access and Benefit Sharing from genetic resources. UNFCCC deals with climate change — completely different convention. 3 ✅ Correct: Bonn Challenge is the signature initiative under GPFLR — targeting 350 million ha of restored forest landscape by 2030. India committed 26 million ha. 4 ✅ Correct: BIOFIN = joint initiative of UNDP and EU — helps countries develop Biodiversity Finance Plans.
Practice
Q5. The UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021–2030) is jointly led by:
✅ Answer: (b) UNEP and FAO
The UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021–2030) is led by UNEP (UN Environment Programme) and FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) — jointly. UNEP for environmental mandate; FAO because restoration is critically linked to food, agriculture, and land use. Proclaimed by UN General Assembly March 2019. Launched 5 June 2021 (World Environment Day). Target: restore 30% of degraded ecosystems by 2030 — aligned with GBF Target 2. India’s contributions: MISHTI (mangroves), Bonn Challenge (26M ha), NPCA (wetlands), Green India Mission.
Practice
Q6. Which of the following about the Man and Biosphere (MAB) Programme is INCORRECT?
✅ Answer: (d) — This is INCORRECT
Option (d) is INCORRECT: Biosphere Reserves are NOT notified under the Wildlife Protection Act 1972. WPA 1972 covers National Parks, Wildlife Sanctuaries, Conservation Reserves, and Community Reserves. Biosphere Reserves have a separate administrative framework — they are designated under the UNESCO MAB Programme and nominated by national governments. India’s BRs are notified by the Central Government through a separate process — not through WPA. Options (a), (b), and (c) are all correct. Note: The Core Zone of a BR may be a National Park or WLS (notified under WPA), but the BR itself is not.
Practice
Q7. Consider the following about the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF): 1. It was adopted at COP16 in Cali, Colombia in 2024. 2. It sets 4 goals for 2050 and 23 targets for 2030. 3. The 30×30 target requires protection of 30% of land and 30% of oceans by 2030. 4. It aims to mobilise $200 billion per year for biodiversity by 2030. Which are CORRECT?
✅ Answer: (c) — 2, 3 and 4 only
1 ❌ Wrong: The GBF was adopted at COP15 (Montreal, Canada, December 2022) — NOT COP16. COP16 was in Cali, Colombia in 2024 (where the Cali Fund was established, not the GBF). This is the most common UPSC trap in recent biodiversity questions. 2 ✅ Correct: GBF = 4 goals for 2050 + 23 targets for 2030. 3 ✅ Correct: The 30×30 target (Target 3) requires protecting and managing at least 30% of land, freshwater, coastal areas and oceans by 2030. 4 ✅ Correct: GBF Target 19 requires mobilising $200 billion/year from all sources for biodiversity by 2030. The total biodiversity finance gap = $700 billion/year.
📜 UPSC Prelims PYQs — Official Past Questions
PYQUPSC 2019
‘Nagoya Protocol’ is related to which one of the following?
✅ Official Answer: (c) ABS from genetic resources
This is the most tested CBD protocol question. Nagoya Protocol (2010, COP10 Nagoya; in force 2014) = Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS). Option (a) = UNFCCC/Paris Agreement. Option (b) = High Seas Treaty (BBNJ Agreement, 2023 — a new ocean treaty). Option (d) = CITES + various timber trade agreements. Nagoya was always under CBD — the classic UPSC trap is claiming it’s under UNFCCC. India’s NBA (National Biodiversity Authority, Chennai) is the nodal authority for ABS implementation.
PYQUPSC 2022
Consider the following pairs: 1. Aichi Biodiversity Targets — Convention on Biological Diversity 2. Nagoya Protocol — UNFCCC 3. Warsaw Mechanism — IPCC Which of the pairs are CORRECTLY matched?
✅ Official Answer: (a) 1 only
1 ✅ Correct: Aichi Biodiversity Targets (20 targets for 2020) — adopted at CBD COP10 (Nagoya, 2010) — under the CBD. All 20 targets were missed, leading to the GBF. 2 ❌ Wrong: Nagoya Protocol is under CBD — NOT UNFCCC. This is one of the most tested UPSC traps. UNFCCC deals with climate; CBD deals with biodiversity. 3 ❌ Wrong: Warsaw Mechanism (for Loss and Damage) is under UNFCCC (COP19, 2013) — NOT under IPCC. IPCC is a scientific panel, not a policy body — it doesn’t establish “mechanisms.”
PYQUPSC 2017
Consider the following: 1. Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety 2. Minamata Convention on Mercury 3. Nagoya Protocol Which of the above are legally binding agreements under the aegis of the United Nations Environment Programme?
✅ Official Answer: (d) All three
1 ✅ Cartagena Protocol: Under CBD — administered with UNEP support. Legally binding treaty on biosafety/GMOs. In force 2003. 2 ✅ Minamata Convention: A UNEP-administered convention on mercury pollution — named after Minamata disease in Japan. Adopted 2013, in force 2017. India ratified 2018. Controls mercury use and release. 3 ✅ Nagoya Protocol: Under CBD — legally binding ABS agreement. In force 2014. All three are legally binding and associated with UNEP.
PYQUPSC 2020
Which two UN bodies jointly lead the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021–2030)?
✅ Official Answer: (b) UNEP and FAO
UNEP (UN Environment Programme) + FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) jointly lead the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021–2030). FAO is included because ecosystem restoration is deeply linked to agriculture, food security, and land management — FAO’s core mandate. FAO is also the custodian of the monitoring indicator (Target 2.1) for the GBF’s 30% restoration target. Proclaimed by UNGA in 2019; launched 5 June 2021 (World Environment Day). India’s MISHTI, Bonn Challenge commitments, and NPCA are direct contributions to this Decade.
PYQUPSC 2016
In the context of the ‘Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety’, which of the following is/are correct? 1. Cartagena Protocol is a protocol to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. 2. The protocol applies to LMOs that may have adverse effects on conservation of biological diversity. Select the correct answer:
✅ Official Answer: (b) 2 only
1 ❌ Wrong: Cartagena Protocol is a protocol under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) — NOT the UNFCCC. This exact misconception is tested repeatedly. UNFCCC = climate change. CBD = biodiversity. They are separate conventions. 2 ✅ Correct: The Cartagena Protocol applies to the transboundary movement, transit, handling, and use of Living Modified Organisms (LMOs/GMOs) “that may have adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity.” This is exactly the protocol’s purpose — protecting biodiversity from potential GMO risks.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

The Nagoya Protocol is always under the CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) — NEVER UNFCCC. UNFCCC (UN Framework Convention on Climate Change) deals with greenhouse gases and climate. CBD deals with biodiversity and genetic resources. The Nagoya Protocol (2010, in force 2014) is specifically about Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) of genetic resources — preventing biopiracy. India’s Biological Diversity Act 2002 and the National Biodiversity Authority (NBA, Chennai) implement the Nagoya Protocol domestically. UPSC has tested this confusion in 2017, 2019, and 2022 — always check: Nagoya = CBD = ABS = benefit sharing from genetic resources.
DSI (Digital Sequence Information) is the digital data derived from genetic resources — essentially, the DNA sequence information of biological organisms (plants, animals, fungi, bacteria). When scientists sequence the genome of a medicinal plant from India’s Western Ghats, that DNA sequence is DSI. Companies can then use this DSI to develop drugs, agricultural varieties, cosmetics, or diagnostic tools — without ever physically accessing the original genetic material. Under the Nagoya Protocol, physical genetic resources require access permits and benefit sharing. But DSI had been in a “legal grey zone” — companies argued that once data is digitalised, the physical resource rules don’t apply. The Cali Fund (COP16, 2024) closes this loophole — companies using DSI commercially must now contribute to a global fund, with at least 50% going to indigenous peoples and local communities from biodiverse nations like India. This is hugely important for countries like India with extraordinary genetic wealth but limited ability to monetise it.
They operate under completely separate international treaties: UNESCO World Heritage Sites — listed under the World Heritage Convention (1972). Recognises sites of Outstanding Universal Value (ecological, cultural, historical). India has 42 WHS (7 natural, 34 cultural, 1 mixed). Managed by UNESCO’s World Heritage Committee. Ramsar Sites — listed under the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands (1971). Specifically for wetlands of international importance. India has 98 Ramsar Sites. However, a site can hold BOTH designations simultaneously — the Sundarbans is both a Natural WHS AND a Ramsar Site AND a Biosphere Reserve AND a Tiger Reserve. The WHS convention is NOT under CBD — it’s a separate UNESCO convention. Ramsar is also a separate convention (not under UNESCO or CBD). These are three completely different international systems that can overlap on the same physical area.
The Aichi Biodiversity Targets (20 targets for 2020, adopted at COP10 Nagoya 2010) all failed — not a single target was fully achieved. Reasons: (1) Inadequate finance — pledged money never materialised; biodiversity funding gap remained huge. (2) Weak national implementation — many countries’ national biodiversity strategies were “green washing” documents not implemented in practice. (3) Structural problem — biodiversity was treated as a “side issue” separate from economy, agriculture, and trade. (4) No monitoring teeth — poor data and inconsistent reporting. The Kunming-Montreal GBF (2022) tries to fix this by: (1) Stronger monitoring framework with specific indicators. (2) Companies must disclose biodiversity impacts (Target 15). (3) Biodiversity Finance Plan required from each country. (4) Dedicated GBFF (Global Biodiversity Framework Fund) under GEF. (5) Integrating biodiversity into ALL sectors — not treating it separately. (6) BIOFIN helping countries identify and close their finance gaps.
GBFF (Global Biodiversity Framework Fund) is a financial mechanism established at CBD COP15 (2022) and managed by the Global Environment Facility (GEF). It receives contributions from governments, private sector, and philanthropies to finance biodiversity conservation projects in developing countries. As of COP16 (2024), about $407 million had been pledged — far below the $20 billion/year target for 2025. BIOFIN (Biodiversity Finance Initiative) is different — it’s a capacity-building programme (run by UNDP + EU) that helps individual countries identify HOW MUCH funding they need, WHERE the gaps are, and WHICH financial instruments can fill those gaps. BIOFIN doesn’t directly fund conservation — it helps countries plan their biodiversity finance strategy. Think of it this way: BIOFIN = the financial planning consultant. GBFF = the global bank account. Cali Fund = the new DSI benefit-sharing account. Together, they form the emerging architecture for closing the $700 billion/year biodiversity finance gap.
Bonn Challenge is a global pledge-based initiative launched in 2011 in Bonn, Germany — where countries voluntarily commit to specific areas of forest and landscape restoration. The global target is 350 million hectares by 2030. India has pledged 26 million hectares. It is implemented through the GPFLR (Global Partnership on Forest and Landscape Restoration) and tracked by IUCN’s Global Restoration Barometer. The UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021–2030) is a broader initiative — covering ALL ecosystem types (forests, wetlands, grasslands, coastlines, marine), not just forests. It is led by UNEP and FAO, proclaimed by the UN General Assembly. The Decade subsumes and amplifies the Bonn Challenge — the Bonn Challenge forests restoration pledge is one of many contributions to the broader UN Decade. The GBF Target 2 (restore 30% of degraded ecosystems by 2030) is the Decade’s core measurable outcome.
Legacy IAS — UPSC Civil Services Coaching, Bangalore  |  Content prepared exclusively for UPSC aspirants. All international data updated to COP16 (November 2024) and COP16.2 resumed session (Rome, February 2025). Facts double-checked against CBD, UNESCO, UNEP and FAO official sources.

Book a Free Demo Class

April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
Categories

Get free Counselling and ₹25,000 Discount

Fill the form – Our experts will call you within 30 mins.