Farmer Suicides in India – UPSC Notes

Farmer Suicides in India – Legacy IAS | UPSC
🏛️ Legacy IAS – Bangalore | UPSC Civil Services Coaching

Farmer Suicides in India

GS Paper III – Agriculture & Rural Distress | NCRB 2023 Data | Causes, Regional Patterns, Policy Response | Updated 2024–25 | PYQs + MCQs

📋 GS Paper III 📊 10,786 Suicides (2023) 🌾 Maharashtra 38.5% 🔺 75% Jump Over 2022 🏘️ Vidarbha–Marathwada Crisis 📝 3 Mains PYQs · 5 MCQs
⚠️ Academic Context: This material addresses farmer suicides as a critical socio-economic and policy issue for UPSC preparation. The discussion is analytical and policy-oriented, aimed at understanding structural causes and evidence-based solutions. If you or someone you know is struggling, please reach out: iCall: 9152987821 | Vandrevala Foundation: 1860-2662-345 | iMind: 080-46110007
10,786
Farm Suicides 2023
6.3%
Share of All Suicides
3.94 Lakh
Total (1995–2023)
+75%
Jump Over 2022
38.5%
Maharashtra's Share
29.55
Deaths Per Day (2023)
1. NCRB 2023 Report — Key Data Released Sept 2025
The NCRB's Accidental Deaths and Suicides in India 2023 report — released September 2025 — is the most authoritative dataset on farmer suicides. It shows a sharp reversal of the decline trend seen between 2012 and 2021.
Key Finding: In 2023, 10,786 persons in the farming sector died by suicide — averaging 29.55 deaths per day. For the first time, agricultural labourers (6,096) overtook cultivators/farmers (4,690) — a structural shift indicating that landless wage workers now face more acute distress than land-owning farmers.
1.1 Occupation-wise Breakdown
CategorySuicides (2023)MaleFemaleKey Observation
Cultivators / Farmers 4,690 4,553 137 Land-owning or leasing farmers; predominantly male
Agricultural Labourers 6,096 5,433 663 First time exceeding cultivator deaths; landless, wage-dependent; more vulnerable to economic shocks
Total Agriculture Sector 10,786 9,986 800 6.3% of all 1,71,418 suicides in India in 2023
1.2 State-wise Distribution (2023)
StateShare of Farm SuicidesNumbers (approx.)Key Crop Belt / Context
Maharashtra 38.5% ~4,151 (cultivators + labourers combined) Vidarbha (cotton) + Marathwada (soybean, cotton) — historic epicentres
Karnataka 22.5% ~2,423 Drought-prone north Karnataka; coffee estates; groundnut belt
Andhra Pradesh 8.6% ~928 Rayalaseema cotton belt; high-debt zone; inherited from combined AP's distress legacy
Madhya Pradesh 7.2% ~777 Soybean belt (Malwa); untimely rains; input cost burden
Tamil Nadu 5.9% ~636 Cauvery delta; water crisis; banana and rice farmers
Chhattisgarh, UP, others Remaining ~17% Various Scattered; increasing distress in UTs (+50% in Dadra & Nagar Haveli + Daman & Diu)
West Bengal, Bihar, Odisha, NE states Zero reported 0 (official) Widely questioned — experts and activists allege severe underreporting and classification issues
Data Reliability Concern: Several states officially report zero farmer suicides — West Bengal, Bihar, Odisha, Jharkhand, Himachal Pradesh — despite known rural distress. Farmer organisations like All India Kisan Sabha (AIKS) allege widespread underreporting, misclassification of deaths, and exclusion of landless labourers from the "farmer" category. The NCRB data therefore likely represents a floor, not a ceiling.
3. Root Causes of Farmer Suicides
Primary Cause

💸 Debt Trap & Informal Credit

Indebtedness is the most consistently cited cause across states and studies. Private moneylenders charge 24–60% annual interest; institutional credit (banks, cooperatives) is inaccessible to many smallholders. A 2012 study in Vidarbha ranked debt as the foremost cause — 87% of farmer suicide families cited indebtedness. Input costs for cotton range ₹6,500–7,000 per quintal in Marathwada while market price hovers around ₹6,800 — leaving near-zero or negative margins. The Kisan Credit Card scheme exists but its penetration remains incomplete.

Structural

🌧️ Climate Stress & Crop Failure

Erratic monsoons, prolonged droughts, unseasonal rains, and pest attacks cause repeated crop failures. Research confirms that farmer suicides are consistently higher in years with rainfall deficits. Only 10–12% of Vidarbha's farmland is irrigated — rain-fed farming leaves farmers acutely vulnerable to weather shocks. Pink bollworm resistance to Bt cotton (emerged ~2015–17) has caused widespread cotton crop failures in Maharashtra, Telangana, and Gujarat. 2022: heatwave during harvest destroyed wheat in 9 states.

Economic

📈 Input Cost Inflation vs. Stagnant Output Prices

Rising costs of seeds (especially Bt cotton hybrids), fertilisers, pesticides, and diesel have outpaced MSP increases. Input costs often exceed returns — farmers invest ₹20,000–30,000 per acre and recover less than half. Bt cotton seed prices rose sharply after commercial introduction; royalty disputes between Monsanto and Indian government added to cost volatility. US government subsidises its cotton farmers with ~USD 4 billion annually — making US cotton cheaper globally and undermining Indian cotton prices. Removal of 11% import duty on cotton (2024) exacerbated Indian farmer distress.

Market Failure

📉 Market Volatility & Middlemen Exploitation

Price fluctuations in key crops — cotton, soybean, onion, pulses — are extreme and unpredictable. Farmers dependent on middlemen (commission agents/arthiyas) receive much less than market price. MSP coverage is inadequate — mainly rice and wheat receive effective procurement. Non-MSP crops (cotton, soybean, vegetables) remain exposed to market gluts. P-AASHA (PDPS/PSS) is operational but procurement remains sporadic in distress zones.

Structural

🌾 Cropping Pattern Changes in Arid Regions

Traditional subsistence crops (millets, jowar) suited to arid conditions have been replaced by cash crops (cotton, sugarcane) that are water-intensive and market-dependent. Marathwada and Rayalaseema shifted from drought-resistant millets to cotton/sugarcane — a mismatch of crop with agro-climatic reality. Monoculture dependency creates extreme vulnerability to single-crop price or weather shocks. Bt cotton's promise of higher yields was not reliably fulfilled in rain-fed, semi-arid conditions.

Social

🧠 Socio-Psychological & Cultural Factors

Long-term debt combined with social stigma around financial failure drives mental health deterioration. Loans for social obligations (dowry, marriages, funerals) add non-agricultural debt burdens. Alcohol/drug addiction as a coping mechanism exacerbates economic and family stress. Cultural expectation that male farmer is the "provider" creates psychological pressure when crop fails. Rural mental health infrastructure is near-absent — no counselling, no crisis intervention at village level.

Exclusion

🚪 Policy Gaps — Exclusion of Labourers & Landless

PM-KISAN excludes tenant farmers and agricultural labourers (not land-owning families). PMFBY's penetration has been patchy — claims delayed, states have opted out. Loan waiver schemes benefit landowner-borrowers; landless labourers are excluded. MGNREGA wages have not kept pace with inflation in several states. Compensation for farmer suicide families requires proving the death was agriculture-related — a bureaucratic hurdle that rejects many applications on "technical grounds."

2023 Shift — Why Labourers Now Outnumber Cultivators: Agricultural labourers face wage insecurity (no regular work), seasonal unemployment, no land as collateral for credit, no crop insurance access, and no PM-KISAN support. Rising food prices and limited social protection make them extremely vulnerable. The 2023 data signals a deepening of rural distress beyond landowning farmers into the landless poor.
4. Regional Analysis — Agrarian Distress Zones
Epicentre

🌑 Vidarbha & Marathwada (Maharashtra)

  • Vidarbha: ~3.4 million cotton farmers; 95% struggling with massive debt
  • Only 10–12% farmland irrigated — entirely rain-fed cotton
  • Cotton input costs exceed market price; zero profit margin common
  • Pink bollworm resistance to Bt cotton (post-2015) caused repeated crop failures
  • Amravati division alone: 21,000+ farmer suicides in past decade
  • Government compensation rejected on "technical grounds" for majority of families
  • Maharashtra consistently accounts for 35–40% of national farmer suicides
High Distress

🌿 Northern Karnataka

  • Drought-prone regions; groundnut, sunflower, cotton belts
  • Coffee estate workers in Coorg face debt and market volatility
  • 2,423 suicides in 2023 — 22.5% of national share
  • Suicide rates consistently ~2.5x national average (Centre for Sustainable Agriculture analysis)
  • Both rain-fed dryland farming and irrigated plantation crops contribute
Legacy Crisis

🏜️ Andhra Pradesh & Telangana

  • Combined: 1,70,000+ suicides since 1995 — among highest in country
  • Telangana (post-2014): Inherited most vulnerable cotton-growing districts from combined AP
  • Rayalaseema: Shift from millets to cotton in arid zone drove crisis
  • High groundwater depletion — farmers invested in borewells that failed
  • AP rice farmers face market and procurement challenges despite paddy dominance
Emerging Zone

🌻 Madhya Pradesh (Malwa)

  • Soybean belt — Malwa plateau; major contributor since 2000s
  • Untimely rains during harvest season cause repeated crop losses
  • Input cost inflation for soybean; poor market infrastructure
  • 7.2% of national share in 2023
  • MP demonstrates that agrarian distress is not only in Western India
Southern-Western Concentration: Southern and western India account for ~72.5% of all farmer suicides recorded since 1995. This is not random — it reflects rain-fed agriculture + cash crop dependency + inadequate irrigation + poor credit infrastructure. The Green Revolution bypassed much of this region, leaving it dependent on market-linked, input-intensive crops without the irrigation and credit safety nets of Punjab and Haryana.
5. Government Policy Response

Relevance to farmer suicides: Aims to reduce post-harvest financial distress and reduce dependence on informal credit after crop failure. World's largest crop insurance by farmer applications (4.19 crore enrolled, 2024-25).

  • Low premiums: 2% Kharif, 1.5% Rabi, 5% Horticulture
  • ₹1.83 lakh crore in claims paid since 2016
  • Limitation: Claims often delayed; states have opted out (Telangana, Bihar, Andhra Pradesh); administrative hurdles discourage non-loanee enrollment; compensation proves inadequate for scale of debt burden

PM-KISAN: ₹6,000/year direct income transfer to landholder farmers. Reduces need for short-term informal borrowing for input purchase. 9.8 crore beneficiaries (19th installment, Feb 2025).

  • KCC: Kisan Credit Card provides short-term institutional credit at subsidised interest (~4% for prompt repayers) — intended to reduce moneylender dependence
  • Limitation: PM-KISAN excludes tenant farmers, sharecroppers, landless labourers — the most distressed groups. KCC penetration in Vidarbha and other distress zones remains inadequate. ₹6,000/year is grossly insufficient against debt burdens of ₹1–5 lakh common in suicide cases.

Central (2008) and state-level loan waivers have been periodically announced:

  • Agricultural Debt Waiver Scheme 2008: Benefited 36 million farmers; cost ₹65,000 crore — provided temporary relief post-suicides peak
  • State waivers: Rajasthan, Maharashtra, UP, Chhattisgarh — periodic announcements during electoral cycles
  • Limitations: Loan waivers address formal institutional loans only; not private moneylender debt (which is dominant in distress zones). One-time fixes don't address structural causes. Poor implementation — many farmers excluded on technicalities. Create moral hazard; discourage credit repayment culture.

India's first comprehensive suicide prevention policy (2022) — aims to reduce suicide mortality by 10% by 2030.

  • Tele-MANAS: 24/7 tele-mental health helpline (launched October 2022) — accessible in regional languages; connects to state mental health cells
  • District Mental Health Programme (DMHP): Community-based mental health services at district level
  • Mental Healthcare Act, 2017: Decriminalises suicide attempt; mandates mental healthcare access as a right
  • Limitation: Rural mental health infrastructure extremely thin. Stigma around mental health in farming communities high. Strategy addresses prevention broadly — insufficient farmer-specific mental health focus. Tele-MANAS requires internet/phone access not available to all farmers.

MGNREGA provided guaranteed 100 days of rural wage employment — acted as a critical income safety net during agricultural lean seasons and droughts.

  • Evidence: Farmer suicide decline from 2010–2019 strongly correlated with MGNREGA expansion
  • Kerala suicides fell from 1,118 (2005) to 105 (2014) — MGNREGA credited as key
  • West Bengal reported zero by 2012; MP saw sustained reduction
  • Limitation: Wage stagnation — MGNREGA wages haven't kept pace with inflation or agricultural wages in many states. Fund delays and administrative failures reduced effectiveness post-2019. Gender wage gaps persist. 100 days insufficient for year-round income security.

MSP (Minimum Support Price) is announced for 23 crops annually — but effective procurement happens mainly for wheat and rice (through FCI/state agencies).

  • Cotton, soybean, pulses — MSP announced but procurement sporadic; farmers in Vidarbha receive below-MSP prices regularly
  • PM-AASHA (PSS + PDPS + PPPS) aims to bridge the MSP gap for oilseeds and pulses — implementation patchy
  • Legal MSP demand: Supreme Court-appointed expert committee recommended legally binding MSP — remains unimplemented as of 2025
  • Only ~6% of farmers sell at MSP nationally (NSSO data)
  • Import duty removal on cotton (11%) in 2024 worsened price realization for Indian cotton farmers
6. Policy Gaps & Critical Perspectives
Structural vs Symptomatic: Most government interventions address symptoms (debt relief, income transfer) rather than structural causes (input cost regulation, assured procurement, water access, crop diversification, rural credit reform). Farmer organisations argue India has treated agrarian distress as a law-and-order problem rather than a development failure.

❌ What Hasn't Worked

  • One-time loan waivers — don't address private moneylender debt; recur every few years
  • PMFBY — claims delayed; states opt out; excludes labourers
  • PM-KISAN — excludes tenants, labourers; ₹6,000 insufficient against multi-lakh debt
  • Bt cotton technology promise — failed in rain-fed semi-arid conditions; secondary pest attacks escalated
  • Special packages (like PM's 2006 Vidarbha package) — relief without structural reform; suicides resumed
  • Import duty removal on cotton — domestic farmers undercut by cheaper US/African cotton

✅ What Has Shown Results

  • MGNREGA — wage security in lean seasons; empirically linked to suicide reduction 2010–2019
  • Expanded crop insurance coverage in some states — partial protection
  • Debt relief + counselling — Maharashtra's specific interventions in crisis districts
  • Crop diversification (millets revival, horticulture) — reduces monoculture risk
  • Drip irrigation support — reduces water stress in some cotton districts
  • KCC expansion — reduces informal moneylender dependence where implemented effectively
Farmer Organisations' Critique (AIKS and others): (1) Trade liberalisation — FTAs threaten domestic farmers in dairy, cotton, edible oil; (2) Import duty removal on cotton (11%) directly benefits US cotton exporters; (3) Government focused on "corporate-driven growth model" rather than smallholder welfare; (4) NCRB data itself underreports — landless labourers historically excluded from "farmer" count; (5) Agrarian distress is "systemic" — not just debt or drought in isolation.
7. Way Forward
Credit Reform

🏦 Institutional Credit Access

Expand rural banking; simplify KCC for small/marginal farmers; regulate informal moneylenders; create farmer-specific micro-credit structures. Extend credit access to tenant farmers and landless labourers.

Price Support

📜 Legal Backing for MSP

As recommended by the Supreme Court expert panel, legally guarantee MSP for a wider basket of crops — especially cotton, soybean, pulses. Strengthen PM-AASHA procurement in distress-hit regions. Review import duty structure to protect domestic producers.

Mental Health

🧠 Rural Mental Health Infrastructure

Farmer-specific counselling centres at block level; train ASHA workers and ANMs in mental health first aid; destigmatise mental illness in farming communities. Expand Tele-MANAS into local-language farmer helplines.

Diversification

🌾 Crop & Income Diversification

Incentivise shift from water-intensive cash crops (cotton, sugarcane) back to drought-resistant crops (millets, pulses) in arid regions. Promote horticulture, fisheries, and animal husbandry as supplementary income. Link farmers to FPOs for collective market access.

Climate Adaptation

🌊 Climate-Resilient Agriculture

Expand drip/sprinkler irrigation in Vidarbha and Marathwada. Promote drought-resistant crop varieties through ICAR. Strengthen PMKSY's watershed and rainwater harvesting component. Climate risk profiling at district level for targeted insurance and support.

Social Protection

🤝 Universal Social Protection

Extend PM-KISAN to tenant farmers and sharecroppers via land records reform. Strengthen MGNREGA wages and coverage — revive its role as anti-distress buffer. Include agricultural labourers in social security net. Fast-track PM-KMY enrollment for old-age security.

8. UPSC Mains PYQs
15 Marks
⏱ ~18 minutes | 200 words
GS Paper III2023Agrarian Distress
Farmer suicides in India reflect a deep-rooted agrarian crisis. Examine the causes and suggest a comprehensive policy framework to address this challenge.
Introduction: NCRB 2023: 10,786 farm sector suicides — 75% surge over 2022; 3.94 lakh deaths since 1995. Agricultural labourers (6,096) overtook cultivators (4,690) for the first time — deepening structural crisis.

Causes:
  1. Debt trap: Private moneylenders at 24–60% interest; institutional credit inaccessible for smallholders; KCC penetration inadequate in distress zones
  2. Input cost inflation: Bt cotton seeds, fertilisers, pesticides outpace MSP; cotton production cost ~₹6,500–7,000/quintal vs ₹6,800 market price
  3. Climate stress: Erratic monsoons, drought, pink bollworm resistance to Bt cotton; only 10–12% of Vidarbha irrigated
  4. Market distortions: MSP only effective for rice/wheat; cotton/soybean/pulses exposed to price crashes and import competition (11% duty removal on cotton)
  5. Cropping pattern mismatch: Arid regions (Marathwada, Rayalaseema) shifted from drought-resistant millets to water-intensive cotton — structural vulnerability
  6. Policy gaps: PM-KISAN excludes labourers and tenants; PMFBY has delayed claims; loan waivers address formal debt only
  7. Socio-psychological: Stigma, alcohol addiction, no rural mental health infrastructure
Policy Framework:
  1. Legal MSP guarantee for non-rice/wheat crops; strengthen PM-AASHA procurement
  2. Expand institutional credit to tenant farmers; regulate informal moneylenders
  3. Revive MGNREGA with inflation-linked wages — proven to reduce suicides (2010–19)
  4. Drip irrigation expansion in Vidarbha + crop diversification incentives
  5. Block-level farmer counselling; expand Tele-MANAS into rural mental health
  6. Include agricultural labourers in PM-KISAN, PMFBY — universal social protection
  7. Review import duty structure; protect domestic cotton and oilseed producers from subsidised imports
Conclusion: Farmer suicides are a systemic failure of agrarian policy, not just individual tragedy. Short-term relief must be paired with structural reform — assured prices, water security, and social protection for all cultivators.
10 Marks
⏱ ~12 minutes | 150 words
GS Paper III2021Rural Distress
Why are farmer suicides concentrated in Maharashtra, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh? What structural factors explain this regional pattern?
Introduction: Southern and western India account for ~72.5% of farmer suicides since 1995. Maharashtra (38.5%) and Karnataka (22.5%) alone contributed over 60% of the 10,786 deaths in 2023.

Structural Factors Explaining Regional Concentration:
  1. Rain-fed cash crop dependency: Vidarbha/Marathwada (cotton), northern Karnataka (groundnut, cotton), Rayalaseema (cotton), Malwa (soybean) — monoculture makes farmers extremely vulnerable to single-crop failure
  2. Irrigation deficit: Only 10–12% of Vidarbha irrigated; entire farming dependent on erratic monsoon; Punjab/Haryana farmers protected by canal irrigation from severe climate shocks
  3. Bt cotton adoption in arid zones: Bt cotton promoted for rain-fed semi-arid regions; initial benefits followed by pest resistance failures (pink bollworm); high seed and input costs not recoverable when yields collapse
  4. WTO liberalisation effect: Post-1995 reduced tariff protection hit cotton and oilseed farmers in these states most; international price competition made domestic farming unviable
  5. Informal credit dominance: Weak cooperative banking; private moneylenders dominate rural credit in these states; 24–60% annual interest rates
  6. Green Revolution bypass: Punjab and Haryana received irrigation, credit, and procurement infrastructure — southern/western regions did not; left to market without adequate support systems
Conclusion: Regional concentration is not coincidence — it maps precisely onto India's rain-fed, cash-crop-dependent, inadequately supported farming zones. Green Revolution's geography of exclusion created today's geography of despair.
10 Marks
⏱ ~12 minutes | 150 words
GS Paper II/III2019Social Issue
Critically examine the role of MGNREGA in alleviating rural distress and preventing farmer suicides. What reforms are needed to strengthen its effectiveness?
Introduction: MGNREGA (2005) — world's largest rural employment guarantee; 100 days guaranteed wage employment for rural households. Empirically linked to the decline in farmer suicides from 2010–2019 after the peak crisis of 2000–2009.

MGNREGA's Role in Reducing Rural Distress:
  1. Income floor: Guaranteed wages during agricultural lean season — prevents farmers from taking emergency loans from moneylenders
  2. Drought buffer: Employment during failed crop seasons; reduces despair from crop loss
  3. Evidence: Kerala suicides fell from 1,118 (2005) to 105 (2014); West Bengal reported zero by 2012; strong correlation between MGNREGA expansion and suicide decline
  4. Women's economic agency: ~50% of MGNREGA workers are women — improves family financial resilience
  5. Asset creation: MGNREGA builds rural infrastructure (ponds, roads, land development) that improves agricultural productivity over time
Limitations:
  1. Wage stagnation — MGNREGA wages fall below market agricultural wages in many states; real wages declining with inflation
  2. Fund delays — states owe workers back wages; reduces willingness to enroll
  3. Only 100 days — insufficient for year-round income security; families still vulnerable in remaining months
  4. Implementation quality — targeting of works is poor in some states; little attention to productive asset creation
Reforms Needed: Index wages to CPI; increase to 150 days in drought-prone districts; strengthen grievance redressal; link MGNREGA works to watershed development under PMKSY; ensure timely Fund Transfer Orders to states.
9. Practice MCQs
Q 1
According to the NCRB 2023 report, which of the following correctly describes the composition of the 10,786 farm sector suicides?
NCRB 2023 data: Cultivators/Farmers: 4,690; Agricultural Labourers: 6,096. The significant and unprecedented finding is that for the first time, agricultural labourers outnumbered cultivators in farm sector suicides. This represents a structural shift — distress has deepened beyond land-owning/leasing farmers into the landless wage-dependent rural poor. Of cultivator deaths: 4,553 male, 137 female. Of labourer deaths: 5,433 male, 663 female. Total farm sector deaths = 10,786 = 6.3% of all 1,71,418 suicides in India in 2023. Correct answer: (b).
Q 2
Which of the following states reported the highest share of farmer suicides in 2023, and what was its approximate share?
Maharashtra reported the highest share at 38.5% of farm sector suicides in 2023 — approximately 4,151 deaths (cultivators and labourers combined). Vidarbha and Marathwada remain the epicentres, driven by cotton and soybean farming under severe climate and market stress. Karnataka was second with 22.5% (~2,423 suicides). Together, Maharashtra and Karnataka accounted for over 60% of national farm sector suicides in 2023. This concentration has persisted for over two decades — Maharashtra and Karnataka have had suicide rates ~2.5 times the national average since the mid-1990s (Centre for Sustainable Agriculture analysis). Correct answer: (b).
Q 3
Consider the following statements about farmer suicides in India:
1. Between 1995 and 2023, approximately 3.94 lakh farmers and agricultural labourers died by suicide.
2. The 2023 data represents a ~75% increase over 2022 farmer suicide numbers.
3. MGNREGA has been empirically linked to the decline in farmer suicides between 2010 and 2019.
4. States like West Bengal, Bihar, and Odisha officially report zero farmer suicides, and experts accept this data as accurate.
Which are CORRECT?
Statement 4 is WRONG: While West Bengal, Bihar, Odisha, and several NE states officially report zero farmer suicides, experts, activists, and farmer organisations widely question this data. The AIKS and other groups allege severe underreporting, misclassification, and deliberate non-registration of farm sector deaths in these states. Independent researchers suggest the figures represent administrative fiction, not ground reality. Statement 1 ✅ (3.94 lakh since 1995 — CSA/NCRB data); Statement 2 ✅ (75% jump over 2022 cultivator numbers — sharp reversal); Statement 3 ✅ (empirical correlation between MGNREGA expansion and suicide decline 2010-2019 — Kerala from 1,118 to 105; West Bengal reported zero by 2012 using a different methodology). Correct answer: (b).
Q 4
Why are farmer suicides predominantly concentrated in the cotton belts of Vidarbha (Maharashtra) and northern Karnataka rather than in Punjab and Haryana, which are also major agricultural states?
The correct answer captures the structural difference: Punjab/Haryana farmers benefit from (1) canal irrigation — insulated from monsoon failure; (2) assured MSP procurement — FCI buys wheat and rice at guaranteed prices; (3) strong institutional credit — cooperatives, PACS, nationalised banks; (4) Green Revolution infrastructure investment. Vidarbha/Karnataka farmers face (1) rain-fed cotton farming (only 10–12% irrigated in Vidarbha); (2) no effective MSP procurement for cotton/soybean/groundnut; (3) private moneylender dominance (24–60% interest); (4) cash crop monoculture vulnerable to single-year failure. This is the "Green Revolution's geography of exclusion" — states that received irrigation, credit, and procurement infrastructure avoided the worst agrarian distress. Correct answer: (c).
Q 5
Which of the following policy measures has been most empirically supported as effective in reducing farmer suicides in India during 2010–2019?
MGNREGA (launched 2005) is the most empirically supported intervention linked to the farmer suicide decline from 2010 to 2019. PM-KISAN was launched only in 2018-19 — too recent to explain the 2010–2019 decline. PMFBY launched only in 2016. Loan waivers have been criticised as one-time political measures without structural impact. MGNREGA provided wage income during agricultural lean seasons and drought years — reducing emergency debt from moneylenders. Evidence: Kerala (1,118 to 105), West Bengal (zero), MP reduction all coincide with MGNREGA expansion. Research papers link rainfall-deficit years to suicide spikes — MGNREGA provided a buffer during such years. The post-2019 weakening of MGNREGA (wage delays, fund cuts) has been linked to the resurgence in 2020-2023. Correct answer: (c).
0 / 5

Book a Free Demo Class

April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
Categories

Get free Counselling and ₹25,000 Discount

Fill the form – Our experts will call you within 30 mins.