Current Affairs 06 June 2026

Current Affairs Analysis
06 June 2026  |  UPSC CSE — GS Papers 1, 2 & 3
Contents
06 June 2026
  1. India’s Climate Science at Risk — MSV-2035 Report and the Instrument Crisis GS3
  2. UNSC Non-Permanent Members Elected for 2027–28 — Germany’s Upset Loss GS2
  3. Navachar Mantra — MSDE’s National Initiative for Grassroots Innovators GS2
  4. India’s GDP Grows at 7.7% in FY 2025-26 — Fastest in Two Years GS3
  5. RBI MPC Holds Repo Rate at 5.25%, Cuts Growth Forecast to 6.6% GS3
  6. Nilgiri Tahr Population Rises to 1,364 in Tamil Nadu GS3
  7. Fourth Global Coral Bleaching Event Ended in Mid-2025, Fastest on Record GS3
  8. Maulana Barkatullah Bhopali — First PM of India’s Government in Exile GS1
Article 01
India’s Climate Science at Risk — MSV-2035 Report and the Instrument Crisis
GS Paper 3 — Science & Technology | Environment | Governance | Atmanirbhar Bharat
Why in News

The Mega Science Vision-2035 (MSV-2035) Report on Climate Research, submitted to the Office of the Principal Scientific Adviser (PSA) to the Union Government, has raised a sharp alarm: India has nearly lost its domestic scientific instrument-manufacturing capacity. Years of reliance on uncalibrated imported instruments have produced flawed climate data published in national and international scientific journals, directly threatening the credibility of India’s climate research globally.

About MSV-2035
  • Nodal Institution: Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bengaluru.
  • Submitted to: Office of the Principal Scientific Adviser (PSA), Government of India.
  • Consulted approximately 3,200 researchers during drafting; reviewed by PSA and Ministry of Earth Sciences.
  • Proposes 8 mega science projects in three 5-year phases up to 2035.
  • Funding estimate: ₹795 crore (conservative) to ₹1,359 crore (ambitious) — modest compared to major national science missions.
  • The report is a community-authored roadmap, not a government policy or funding commitment.
Key Findings
Loss of Instrument-Manufacturing Culture
  • India’s climate sector has almost entirely lost domestic instrument-manufacturing capacity.
  • Critical environmental data relies on imported equipment routinely operated without calibration for years, leading to incorrect data in scientific journals — triggering global questions about the credibility of India’s scientific output.
GeM Procurement Conflict
  • Under Atmanirbhar Bharat, publicly-funded institutions were mandated to use the Government e-Marketplace (GeM), prioritising the lowest-bidding India-registered vendor.
  • Vendors frequently unable to meet technical specifications for high-precision equipment.
  • In June 2025, the Finance Ministry relaxed norms: select institutions may procure outside GeM for purchases up to ₹200 crore.
Foreign-Dependent Earth System Models (ESMs)
  • India’s ESMs are primarily adapted from US and European models, sensitive to regional inputs they were never designed to integrate.
  • MSV-2035 recommends building an indigenous ESM from first principles using AI and ML for India-specific conditions.
Renewable Energy Monitoring Gap
  • As of February 2026, non-fossil sources account for 52.57% of India’s installed electricity capacity — ahead of its 2030 Paris Agreement target.
  • Yet the long-term climate consequences of massive solar and wind installations remain “poorly understood”, requiring systematic environmental monitoring.
The 8 Mega Science Projects (2026–2035)
#Project Focus
1Expand surface weather stations, ocean buoy networks and GHG monitoring
2Invest in domestic production of scientific instruments and calibration technologies
3Launch dedicated satellites to track GHG concentrations, glaciers and cloud behaviour
4Build India-specific climate forecasting models using AI/ML
5Shift from foreign ESMs to domestic datasets
6Coordinated field research on aerosols, urban heat and glacial behaviour
7R&D on carbon capture toward India’s 2070 net-zero target
8Adaptation science — national observatories linking environmental data to public health
Concerns
  • Data Credibility: Flawed instruments produce flawed peer-reviewed data, compromising climate policy decisions.
  • Atmanirbhar Paradox: The lowest-cost domestic procurement mandate inadvertently undermined scientific quality.
  • ESM Dependence: Over 3,000 Indian climate researchers routinely rely on datasets designed for temperate regions.
  • Underfunding: The ₹795–1,359 crore estimate carries no government funding commitment.
Way Forward
  • Revive Indigenous Manufacturing: Dedicated national programme for climate instrumentation and calibration technologies.
  • Reform GeM for Science: Extend June 2025 relaxation nationally; create a separate procurement framework for advanced scientific equipment.
  • India-Specific ESM: Mission-mode development integrating India’s monsoon dynamics, Himalayan hydrology and tropical oceanography.
  • Implement Polluter Pays: Devise the Social Cost of Carbon for domestic policy use.
Conclusion
India’s climate research community has produced a sobering self-assessment: a nation aspiring to climate leadership by 2070 cannot afford to operate on borrowed instruments and borrowed models. The MSV-2035 roadmap is a call to invest in the scientific infrastructure that underpins credible climate action. The gap between India’s climate ambitions and its measurement capabilities must close — urgently.
Prelims Pointers
  • MSV-2035 = Mega Science Vision-2035; Nodal institution: IISc, Bengaluru; Submitted to Office of PSA.
  • PSA = Principal Scientific Adviser to GoI; office established November 1999.
  • ESM (Earth System Model) = Combines oceanic, atmospheric, land and ecological data to simulate long-term climate trajectories.
  • GeM = Government e-Marketplace; mandatory procurement portal under Atmanirbhar Bharat.
  • Finance Ministry in June 2025: allowed select institutions to procure scientific instruments outside GeM up to ₹200 crore.
  • India’s non-fossil power capacity = 52.57% of installed capacity as of February 2026; Paris target = 500 GW by 2030.
  • India submitted its 2035 NDC on April 24, 2026: 60% non-fossil capacity by 2035, 47% emissions intensity cut.
  • India’s net-zero target = 2070 (announced COP26, Glasgow, 2021).
  • Social Cost of Carbon = Economic cost of damages per additional tonne of CO₂.
  • Mission Mausam and BharatFS = Key national meteorological forecasting initiatives.
Practice Mains Question

“India’s Atmanirbhar Bharat vision and the demands of high-precision climate science have come into direct conflict, as revealed by the MSV-2035 Report. Analyse the structural deficits in India’s climate research infrastructure and suggest a comprehensive roadmap to build scientific self-reliance without compromising data quality.”

GS Paper 3  |  250 words  |  15 marks
Prelims Practice MCQ

With reference to the Mega Science Vision-2035 (MSV-2035) Report on Climate Research, consider the following statements:
1. MSV-2035 is a government policy document carrying official funding commitments from the Union Government.
2. The nodal institution for MSV-2035 is the Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bengaluru.
3. The report proposes building India’s own Earth System Model using AI/ML suited to Indian conditions.
4. The Finance Ministry in 2025 mandated that all institutions must procure instruments exclusively through GeM without exception.

Which of the above are correct?

  • (a) 1 and 3 only
  • (b) 2 and 3 only
  • (c) 1, 2, and 3 only
  • (d) 2, 3, and 4 only
Correct Answer: (b)
Statement 1 is incorrect — MSV-2035 is a community-authored roadmap, not a government policy or funding commitment. Statement 2 is correct — IISc Bengaluru is the nodal institution. Statement 3 is correct. Statement 4 is incorrect — in June 2025, the Finance Ministry relaxed the GeM mandate, allowing procurement outside GeM up to ₹200 crore.
Article 02
UNSC Non-Permanent Members Elected for 2027–28 — Germany’s Upset Loss
GS Paper 2 — International Relations | Important International Institutions | India’s Foreign Policy
Why in News

On June 3, 2026, the UN General Assembly (UNGA) elected five countries as non-permanent members of the UN Security Council (UNSC) for two-year terms beginning January 1, 2027. Notably, Kyrgyzstan secured its first-ever UNSC seat after four rounds of voting against the Philippines, while Germany failed despite intense lobbying — losing to Portugal and Austria in the Western European and Others Group (WEOG) contest.

Elected Members — 2027–28 Term
CountryRegional GroupVotesReplaces
ZimbabweAfrican Group182 (uncontested)Somalia
Trinidad & TobagoLatin American & Caribbean181 (uncontested)Panama
PortugalWEOG134Denmark
AustriaWEOG131Greece
KyrgyzstanAsia-Pacific142 (4th round)Pakistan

Germany received only 104 votes — well below the minimum threshold of 127 (two-thirds of 191 voting members).

UNSC — Key Facts
  • Established: 1945 under the UN Charter.
  • Composition: 15 members — 5 permanent (P5) with veto power (China, France, Russia, UK, USA) + 10 non-permanent elected for 2-year terms.
  • Regional allocation of non-permanent seats: 5 for African & Asian States; 1 for Eastern European; 2 for Latin American & Caribbean; 2 for Western European & Others.
  • Binding Authority: Only UN body whose decisions are legally binding on all member states.
  • Election: Two-thirds majority through secret ballot; required even for uncontested candidates.
India’s UNSC History

India has served as a non-permanent UNSC member eight times: 1950–51, 1967–68, 1972–73, 1977–78, 1984–85, 1991–92, 2011–12, and 2021–22 (most recent). India is part of the G4 group (India, Germany, Japan, Brazil) advocating for UNSC reform and permanent membership.

Concerns and Significance
  • Germany’s Defeat: A G4 partner failing to even win a non-permanent seat reflects the unpredictability of UNGA electoral politics and growing frustration with Western geopolitical positioning.
  • Kyrgyzstan’s Historic Win: First Central Asian country to win a contested UNSC election — signals growing multipolarity.
  • India’s Strategic Interest: Germany’s loss indirectly signals the difficulty of the G4’s permanent membership campaign; India must intensify coalition-building.
  • Geopolitical Context: Held amid deepening UNSC divisions over West Asia, Ukraine, and Sudan conflicts.
Conclusion
The 2026 UNSC election underscores both the democratic unpredictability of multilateral diplomacy and the deepening tensions within global governance. Kyrgyzstan’s historic win and Germany’s surprising defeat are reminders that international legitimacy must be earned, not assumed. For India, the moment reinforces the urgency of UNSC structural reform for a 21st-century world.
Prelims Pointers
  • UNSC = 15 members; P5 (China, France, Russia, UK, USA) have veto power.
  • Non-permanent seats: 10; 5 replaced annually; 2-year terms.
  • Election threshold: two-thirds majority; minimum 127 votes (if all 193 vote); by secret ballot.
  • Kyrgyzstan: First-ever UNSC seat; UN member since 1992; Asia-Pacific Group.
  • Germany: G4 member; received 104 votes — failed to win WEOG seat.
  • G4 Group: India, Germany, Japan, Brazil — advocates for UNSC permanent membership expansion.
  • India’s last UNSC term: 2021–22; total times served: 8.
  • Outgoing members (end 2026): Denmark, Greece, Pakistan, Panama, Somalia.
  • Continuing members (through 2027): Bahrain, Colombia, DRC, Latvia, Liberia.
  • UNGA 81st Session President: Khalilur Rahman of Bangladesh (elected June 3, 2026).
Practice Mains Question

“The UN Security Council’s composition no longer reflects 21st-century realities. In light of the 2026 UNSC elections, critically examine the structural deficits of the Security Council and evaluate India’s prospects and approach towards permanent membership.”

GS Paper 2  |  250 words  |  15 marks
Prelims Practice MCQ

Consider the following statements about the UNSC elections of June 2026:
1. Kyrgyzstan secured a UNSC non-permanent seat for the first time since it joined the UN in 1992.
2. Germany won one of the two WEOG seats, defeating Portugal in the second round.
3. A two-thirds majority of the UN General Assembly members present and voting is required to secure a non-permanent seat.
4. The five newly elected members will begin their two-year terms on January 1, 2027.

Which are correct?

  • (a) 1 and 3 only
  • (b) 2 and 4 only
  • (c) 1, 3, and 4 only
  • (d) 1, 2, 3, and 4
Correct Answer: (c)
Statements 1, 3, and 4 are correct. Statement 2 is incorrect — Germany failed to win; Portugal (134 votes) and Austria (131 votes) won the WEOG seats; Germany received only 104 votes.
Article 03
Navachar Mantra — MSDE’s National Initiative for Grassroots Innovators
GS Paper 2 — Government Policies | GS Paper 3 — Economy | Start-up Ecosystem | Entrepreneurship
Why in News

The Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship (MSDE) launched Navachar Mantra on June 3, 2026 at IIT Delhi — a national initiative to identify, nurture and scale India’s most promising grassroots innovators and early-stage entrepreneurs, especially from Tier-2 and Tier-3 cities, aspirational districts, and underserved geographies.

Key Institutional Structure
FeatureDetail
Launched byMinistry of Skill Development & Entrepreneurship (MSDE); Minister: Jayant Chaudhary (MoS IC)
Implementing AgencyNIESBUD (National Institute for Entrepreneurship and Small Business Development)
Technical Knowledge PartnerFITT (Foundation for Innovation and Technology Transfer), IIT Delhi
Application DeadlineJuly 5, 2026
Programme DurationYear-long engagement for selected innovators
Priority SectorsAgritech, HealthTech, EdTech & Skilling, Climate & Sustainability, Rural Commerce, MSME Enablement
Support Framework
  • Pathways for innovators from Tier-2/3 cities and aspirational districts to access mentorship, visibility and growth opportunities.
  • Year-long programme: mentorship roundtables, thematic webinars, innovation showcases, investor interactions.
  • Guidance on business development, IP, regulatory compliance, fundraising and scaling.
  • Culminates in a national showcase event bringing together innovators, investors and policymakers.
Significance
  • Bridging the Innovation Divide: India’s startup ecosystem is heavily metro-concentrated; Navachar Mantra specifically targets innovators outside these hubs.
  • Viksit Bharat 2047: Builds a pipeline of grassroots innovators to support India’s developed-nation vision.
  • Complementary to Skill India: Focuses not just on employable skills but on entrepreneurial and innovation-oriented capacities.
Concerns
  • Execution Risk: Past grassroots innovation schemes (ASPIRE, NIF) have struggled with reach and post-programme follow-through.
  • Digital Divide: Digital-only application process may exclude innovators in poor-connectivity areas — ironically the very target group.
  • No Direct Capital: The initiative offers mentorship but no seed fund or grant component, limiting appeal to early-stage innovators who need capital.
Related Initiatives
  • Startup India (2016) — DPIIT-led; tax exemptions, Fund of Funds, recognition framework.
  • Atal Innovation Mission (AIM) — NITI Aayog; Atal Tinkering Labs (ATLs), Atal Incubation Centres (AICs).
  • ASPIRE — Scheme for Promotion of Innovation, Rural Industry and Entrepreneurship (MSME Ministry).
  • National Innovation Foundation (NIF) — DST body; scouts and scales grassroots innovations.
Conclusion
Navachar Mantra reflects a recognition that India’s innovation potential is not confined to its metros. If executed with genuine mentorship depth, seed capital access and robust follow-through beyond the programme year, it could become a meaningful channel for translating grassroots creativity into scalable enterprise — and for shifting India’s innovation story from concentrated excellence to distributed transformation.
Prelims Pointers
  • Navachar Mantra = MSDE initiative; launched June 3, 2026; implementing body: NIESBUD; technical partner: FITT, IIT Delhi.
  • NIESBUD = National Institute for Entrepreneurship and Small Business Development; under MSDE.
  • FITT = Foundation for Innovation and Technology Transfer; IIT Delhi’s tech commercialisation arm.
  • Jayant Chaudhary = MoS (IC) for Skill Development & Entrepreneurship and MoS for Education.
  • Startup India = Launched January 16, 2016; administered by DPIIT.
  • Atal Innovation Mission = NITI Aayog; Atal Tinkering Labs (ATLs) in schools; Atal Incubation Centres (AICs).
  • NIF = National Innovation Foundation; autonomous body under DST; grassroots innovation.
  • Aspirational Districts Programme = NITI Aayog; covers 112 under-developed districts.
  • Viksit Bharat 2047 = India’s vision to become a developed nation by its centenary of independence.
Practice Mains Question

“India’s innovation ecosystem remains disproportionately concentrated in a handful of metro cities, leaving vast grassroots potential untapped. Examine the structural barriers faced by innovators in Tier-2 and Tier-3 India and evaluate the role of government initiatives like Navachar Mantra in bridging this gap.”

GS Paper 3  |  250 words  |  15 marks
Prelims Practice MCQ

Which of the following correctly describes the institutional structure of the Navachar Mantra initiative launched in June 2026?

  • (a) Launched by DPIIT; implemented by Startup India; technical partner: IIT Bombay.
  • (b) Launched by MSDE; implemented by NIESBUD; technical partner: FITT, IIT Delhi.
  • (c) Launched by NITI Aayog; implemented by AIM; technical partner: FITT, IIT Delhi.
  • (d) Launched by MSME Ministry; implemented by NIESBUD; technical partner: NIF.
Correct Answer: (b)
Navachar Mantra is a national initiative of the Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship (MSDE), implemented by NIESBUD with FITT (Foundation for Innovation and Technology Transfer), IIT Delhi as the Technical Knowledge Partner. Launched by Minister Jayant Chaudhary on June 3, 2026 at IIT Delhi.
Article 04
India’s GDP Grows at 7.7% in FY 2025-26 — Fastest in Two Years
GS Paper 3 — Indian Economy | Growth & Development | Economic Statistics
Why in News

MoSPI released the Provisional Estimates of GDP for FY 2025-26 on June 5, 2026. India’s real GDP grew at 7.7% (constant 2022-23 prices), accelerating from 7.1% in FY 2024-25 — the fastest pace in two years. Q4 (January–March 2026) growth stood at 7.8%. This marks India’s third consecutive year of above-7% real GDP growth.

Key Data — Provisional Estimates FY 2025-26
IndicatorFY 2025-26FY 2024-25
Real GDP Growth7.7%7.1%
Real GDP (₹ lakh crore, 2022-23 prices)₹323.12 lakh crore₹299.89 lakh crore
Nominal GDP Growth8.9%
Nominal GDP₹346.36 lakh crore₹318.07 lakh crore
Real GVA Growth7.9%7.3%
Private Final Consumption Growth7.7%5.8%
Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF)8.2%6.4%
Sectoral Performance
  • Manufacturing: 10.7% in FY26 (up from 9.3%); Q4 at 7.3% (slower than Q4 FY25’s 11.8%).
  • Trade, Hotels, Transport, Communication & Broadcasting: 11% in FY26 (up from 6.6%); Q4 at 12.4%.
  • Financial, Real Estate & Professional Services: Double-digit growth at constant and current prices.
  • Agriculture: Slowed to 3% in FY26 (from 4.2% in FY25).
  • Tertiary Sector (Services overall): 9.3% aggregate growth.
Base Year Note

Estimates use 2022-23 as the new base year — part of India’s comprehensive statistical overhaul in 2026 (also applicable to IIP, WPI, and PPI series).

Concerns and Outlook
  • Deceleration Ahead: RBI projects FY 2026-27 growth at 6.6%, citing West Asia conflict spillovers and elevated energy prices.
  • Agriculture Slowdown: 3% growth in a sector employing ~45% of India’s workforce signals rural income stress.
  • Investment Momentum: GFCF at 8.2% (vs 6.4%) is positive — sustained capital formation is critical for long-term potential output.
  • Private Consumption Recovery: Jump from 5.8% to 7.7% signals strengthening household demand.
Conclusion
India’s 7.7% GDP growth in FY 2025-26 reflects the resilience of its domestic demand-driven economy. However, the RBI’s projection of a slowdown to 6.6% in FY 2026-27 is a sobering reminder that sustaining momentum requires structural reforms, not just cyclical tailwinds — especially in agriculture, manufacturing exports, and fiscal consolidation.
Prelims Pointers
  • MoSPI = Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation; publishes GDP, CPI, IIP; Secretary: Saurabh Garg.
  • Real GDP = GDP at constant prices (adjusted for inflation); base year: 2022-23 (new series).
  • Nominal GDP = GDP at current market prices; FY26: ₹346.36 lakh crore; growth: 8.9%.
  • GVA = Gross Value Added = GDP minus net taxes; FY26 growth: 7.9%.
  • GFCF = Gross Fixed Capital Formation = proxy for investment; FY26: 8.2%.
  • Private Final Consumption = Household spending; FY26: 7.7% (up from 5.8%).
  • India: world’s fastest-growing major economy and 5th largest nominal GDP globally.
  • 3rd consecutive year above 7%: FY24 (9.2%), FY25 (7.1%), FY26 (7.7%).
  • CEA = Chief Economic Adviser: V. Anantha Nageswaran.
  • RBI FY27 GDP forecast: 6.6%; CPI inflation FY27: 5.1%.
Practice Mains Question

“India’s GDP growth of 7.7% in FY 2025-26 masks emerging structural vulnerabilities. Analyse the growth drivers, sectoral imbalances, and headwinds that will shape India’s economic trajectory in FY 2026-27.”

GS Paper 3  |  250 words  |  15 marks
Prelims Practice MCQ

As per the Provisional Estimates released by MoSPI in June 2026, which statements about India’s GDP in FY 2025-26 are correct?
1. Real GDP growth was 7.7%, an acceleration from 7.1% in FY 2024-25.
2. The manufacturing sector grew at 10.7% for the full year but slowed to 7.3% in Q4.
3. Agriculture recorded its highest growth rate in five years at 5.2%.
4. The new GDP series uses 2022-23 as the base year.

  • (a) 1, 2, and 4 only
  • (b) 1 and 3 only
  • (c) 2, 3, and 4 only
  • (d) 1, 2, 3, and 4
Correct Answer: (a)
Statements 1, 2, and 4 are correct. Statement 3 is incorrect — agriculture actually slowed to 3% in FY 2025-26 (down from 4.2% in FY25). It did not record a five-year high.
Article 05
RBI MPC Holds Repo Rate at 5.25%, Cuts Growth Forecast to 6.6%
GS Paper 3 — Indian Economy | Monetary Policy | Inflation | Banking & Finance
Why in News

The RBI’s Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) unanimously voted on June 5, 2026 to hold the policy repo rate at 5.25% — its third consecutive meeting without a rate change — while revising down its FY 2026-27 GDP growth forecast to 6.6% and revising up its CPI inflation forecast to 5.1% (up 50 bps). Governor Sanjay Malhotra cited West Asia conflict spillovers and sub-normal monsoon risks.

MPC Decisions — June 2026
ParameterDecision / Forecast
Policy Repo Rate (LAF)5.25% (unchanged — 3rd consecutive hold)
Standing Deposit Facility (SDF)5.00%
Marginal Standing Facility (MSF) / Bank Rate5.50%
Policy StanceNeutral (maintained)
FY 2026-27 GDP Forecast6.6% (cut from 6.9%); Q1: 6.6%, Q2: 6.3%, Q3: 6.5%, Q4: 6.8%
CPI Inflation FY 2026-275.1% (raised by 50 bps)
Current CPI (June 2026)3.48% (within 2–6% band)
RBI Rate Cut Trajectory (Feb 2025 – June 2026)
MeetingActionRepo Rate
Feb 2025Cut 25 bps6.25%
Apr 2025Cut 25 bps6.00%
Jun 2025Cut 50 bps5.50%
Aug–Oct 2025Hold (×2)5.50%
Dec 2025Cut 25 bps5.25%
Feb–Jun 2026Hold (×3)5.25%

Total: 125 bps of cuts from February–December 2025; repo rate down from 6.5% to 5.25%.

Rationale and Concerns
  • West Asia Conflict: Elevated energy prices and supply chain disruptions are weighing on growth and pushing inflation higher.
  • Sub-Normal Monsoon + El Niño: Amplify food inflation uncertainty; could constrain rural demand.
  • Inflation Trending Up: Headline CPI expected to firm up toward the upper tolerance band (6%) in Q3 FY27.
  • Second-Round Effects: Risk of inflation expectations generalising through wages — warrants “close vigil.”
  • Rupee Vulnerability: Rupee near ₹95.7/USD, edging toward the 100-mark, amplified by capital outflows.
Key Capital Market Measures Announced
  • Expanding “specified securities” under FAR (Fully Accessible Route) to include all new issuances of 15-, 30-, and 40-year G-secs.
  • Removing limits on short-term investments and FPI concentration under the General Route.
  • Increasing equity investment limits for NRIs and OCIs without SEBI registration.
Conclusion
The RBI’s June 2026 hold reflects a calculated pause — acknowledging India’s strong FY26 performance while signalling vigilance about the inflation-growth trade-off ahead. The MPC’s neutral stance preserves flexibility for both further cuts and hikes depending on how global shocks, monsoon outcomes, and energy prices evolve through FY 2026-27.
Prelims Pointers
  • MPC = Monetary Policy Committee; 6 members (3 RBI + 3 external government-appointed); RBI Governor has casting vote.
  • Repo Rate = Rate at which RBI lends to commercial banks overnight; current: 5.25%.
  • SDF = Standing Deposit Facility: banks park excess funds with RBI; always 25 bps below repo = 5.00%.
  • MSF = Marginal Standing Facility: emergency borrowing from RBI; always 25 bps above repo = 5.50%.
  • Inflation Targeting: RBI targets CPI at 4% ± 2% (band: 2–6%); mandate under RBI Act (amended 2016).
  • LAF = Liquidity Adjustment Facility: corridor for RBI’s monetary operations.
  • FAR = Fully Accessible Route: unrestricted FPI investment in specified G-secs.
  • RBI Governor: Sanjay Malhotra (assumed office December 2024).
  • Neutral Stance: MPC can move rates in either direction depending on incoming data.
  • Basis Point = 1/100th of a percentage point; 100 bps = 1%.
Practice Mains Question

“The RBI’s decision to hold the repo rate in June 2026 amid rising inflation forecasts and slowing growth projections reflects the classic dilemma of monetary policy under global uncertainty. Critically examine the inflationary risks India faces in FY 2026-27 and evaluate the efficacy of monetary policy as a stabilisation tool.”

GS Paper 3  |  250 words  |  15 marks
Prelims Practice MCQ

Consider the following statements about RBI’s MPC decision of June 2026:
1. The MPC unanimously voted to cut the repo rate by 25 bps to 5.00%.
2. The MPC revised India’s GDP forecast for FY 2026-27 downward to 6.6%.
3. The MPC raised its CPI inflation forecast for FY 2026-27 by 50 basis points.
4. The Standing Deposit Facility (SDF) rate is always set 25 bps below the repo rate.

Which are correct?

  • (a) 1 and 4 only
  • (b) 2, 3, and 4 only
  • (c) 1, 2, and 3 only
  • (d) 1, 2, 3, and 4
Correct Answer: (b)
Statement 1 is incorrect — the MPC held the repo rate unchanged at 5.25%. Statements 2 and 3 are correct. Statement 4 is correct — SDF is structurally 25 bps below repo rate (5.25% − 0.25% = 5.00%).
Article 06
Nilgiri Tahr Population Rises to 1,364 in Tamil Nadu — Project Nilgiri Tahr
GS Paper 3 — Environment & Ecology | Biodiversity | Conservation | Endangered Species
Why in News

The Tamil Nadu Forest Department released results of the Third Synchronised Nilgiri Tahr Survey (April 24–27, 2026). The population of the endangered Nilgiri Tahr — Tamil Nadu’s State animal — rose to an estimated 1,364 individuals, a 4.68% increase over 2025 (1,303) and over 32% higher than 2024 (1,031). Results carry a 95% confidence interval of 869–2,465 individuals.

Nilgiri Tahr — Nilgiritragus hylocrius — in its Western Ghats habitat
Nilgiri Tahr (Nilgiritragus hylocrius) — the Mountain Monarch — in its montane grassland habitat in the Western Ghats. State animal of Tamil Nadu; IUCN Endangered.
Key Survey Data
FeatureDetail
Coverage14 forest divisions; 177 survey blocks; 126 forest beats; 43 forest ranges
Population Trend2024: 1,031 → 2025: 1,303 → 2026: 1,364
Highest DivisionPollachi Forest Division — 438 individuals
Second HighestUdhagai Division (Mudumalai TR) — 313 individuals
Anamalai Hills share44.87% of TN population
Nilgiris Landscape share29.25% of TN population
TechnologyVARUDAI app — first mobile app for mammalian species survey in Tamil Nadu; real-time GPS data
Age and Sex Structure (2026)
  • Adult females: 38.4%; Adult males: 34.6%; Male-to-female ratio: 55:100.
  • Yearlings: 15.5%; Young animals: 11.5%.
About Nilgiri Tahr
  • Scientific name: Nilgiritragus hylocrius; also called Varayaadu, Nilgiri Ibex, Mountain Monarch.
  • Only mountain ungulate in South India; endemic to the Western Ghats (TN and Kerala).
  • Habitat: Montane grasslands and shola forests at 1,200–2,600 metres.
  • Status: Endangered (IUCN Red List); protected under Schedule I, Wildlife Protection Act 1972.
  • State animal: Tamil Nadu.
  • Combined TN + Kerala population: approximately 2,655 individuals (2025 joint survey).
Project Nilgiri Tahr
  • Dedicated Tamil Nadu conservation project — one of India’s first species-specific conservation projects for a non-tiger mammal at state level.
  • Draws on Sangam-era literature (~2,000 years old) to embed cultural significance in conservation messaging.
  • Conducted jointly with Kerala Forest Department to avoid double-counting at state borders.
  • Partners: IUCN-India, Wildlife Trust of India (WTI), TANUVAS, WWF, Kerala Forest Department.
Ecological Significance and Concerns
  • The shola-grassland ecosystem is one of the world’s most threatened — a critical carbon sink (carbon stored underground in roots).
  • Fragmented Distribution: Species no longer occupies a contiguous range; isolated populations face inbreeding and genetic diversity risks.
  • Habitat Threats: Invasive species (notably Lantana camara), encroachment, and climate-induced grassland degradation.
Conclusion
The Nilgiri Tahr’s steady recovery — from 1,031 in 2024 to 1,364 in 2026 — is one of India’s most encouraging biodiversity success stories. The VARUDAI app’s debut marks a methodological advance in wildlife monitoring. Sustaining this recovery requires addressing habitat fragmentation, invasive species, and climate change — challenges no single survey can resolve, but only sustained ecosystem management can overcome.
Prelims Pointers
  • Nilgiri Tahr = Nilgiritragus hylocrius; Endangered (IUCN); Schedule I WPA 1972; State animal of Tamil Nadu.
  • Only mountain ungulate in South India; endemic to Western Ghats.
  • Habitat: Montane grasslands and shola forests, 1,200–2,600 m.
  • 2026 TN survey: 1,364 individuals (April 24–27, 2026); 4.68% increase over 2025.
  • Survey trend: 2024 = 1,031 → 2025 = 1,303 → 2026 = 1,364 (TN only).
  • VARUDAI app = Mobile app for real-time GPS-based wildlife data; first mammalian species survey use in Tamil Nadu.
  • Anamalai Hills = Highest concentration — 44.87% of TN’s Tahr; Pollachi Forest Division: 438 individuals.
  • Mudumalai Tiger Reserve = Udhagai Division: 313 individuals; part of Nilgiris Biosphere Reserve.
  • Eravikulam National Park (Kerala): Largest single global population (~841 in 2025).
  • Western Ghats = UNESCO World Heritage Site; one of the world’s 8 “hottest” biodiversity hotspots.
Practice Mains Question

“The recovery of the Nilgiri Tahr illustrates that targeted, science-led conservation can yield measurable results even for endangered species in fragmented habitats. Examine the conservation challenges faced by the Nilgiri Tahr and discuss the features of Project Nilgiri Tahr that make it a model for species-specific conservation in India.”

GS Paper 3  |  150 words  |  10 marks
Prelims Practice MCQ

With reference to the Nilgiri Tahr, consider the following statements:
1. It is listed as Endangered on the IUCN Red List and protected under Schedule I of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972.
2. It is the State animal of both Tamil Nadu and Kerala.
3. Its habitat is restricted to montane grasslands and shola forests of the Western Ghats at elevations between 1,200 and 2,600 metres.
4. The 2026 synchronised survey in Tamil Nadu was the first instance of a mobile application being used for a mammalian species survey in the state.

Which are correct?

  • (a) 1 and 3 only
  • (b) 2 and 4 only
  • (c) 1, 3, and 4 only
  • (d) 1, 2, 3, and 4
Correct Answer: (c)
Statements 1, 3, and 4 are correct. Statement 2 is incorrect — Nilgiri Tahr is the State animal of Tamil Nadu only. Kerala’s State animal is the Indian Elephant.
Article 07
Fourth Global Coral Bleaching Event Ended in Mid-2025 — Fastest and Widest on Record
GS Paper 3 — Environment & Ecology | Climate Change | Biodiversity | Marine Ecosystems
Why in News

Scientists from NOAA’s Coral Reef Watch confirmed that the world’s fourth global coral bleaching event — the fastest and most extensive on record — likely ended in mid-2025. Confirmed on April 15, 2024 (having begun in early 2023), it affected 84% of the world’s coral reef area across 83 countries and territories in all three coral-reef-bearing ocean basins.

The Four Global Coral Bleaching Events
EventYear(s)% Reefs Affected
1st Global Bleaching1998~21%
2nd Global Bleaching2010~37%
3rd Global Bleaching2014–2017 (3 years)~68%
4th Global Bleaching2023–2025 (~2.5 years)~84%
What is Coral Bleaching?
  • Corals host zooxanthellae — symbiotic photosynthetic algae that provide ~90% of coral’s energy.
  • When ocean temperatures rise 1–2°C above seasonal maximum for extended periods, corals expel the zooxanthellae — turning white (bleached) and becoming severely stressed.
  • Bleached corals are not dead but are highly vulnerable; prolonged bleaching leads to mass mortality.
  • Primary driver: ocean warming from greenhouse gas emissions; El Niño events amplify the effect.
Key Concerns
  • Near-Annual Bleaching Era: NOAA’s Derek Manzello: “We are now in the era where reefs will bleach on a near-annual basis.” Distinguishing discrete global events from chronic stress is increasingly difficult.
  • El Niño Ahead: NOAA forecasts high bleaching risk in the North Pacific (Hawai’i), Florida and Caribbean due to expected El Niño emergence.
  • Livelihoods at Stake: Coral reefs support the livelihoods of nearly 1 billion people (food, income, coastal protection).
  • Climate Tipping Point: The Global Tipping Points Report 2025 classified coral reef mass bleaching as Earth’s first catastrophic climate tipping point.
  • Persistently High SSTs: Sea surface temperatures remain significantly higher than when the first global bleaching occurred in 1998.
  • India’s Reefs: India’s coral ecosystems — Lakshadweep, Gulf of Mannar, Gulf of Kutch, Andaman & Nicobar — were impacted (Indian Ocean was one of three affected basins).
Way Forward
  • Climate Action: Limiting global warming to below 1.5°C is the only long-term solution; coral reefs cannot survive in a 2°C world.
  • Coral Restoration: NOAA researching heat-tolerant coral varieties for assisted evolution and reef restoration.
  • India: Strengthen coral reef monitoring under the National Coral Reef Research Institute (NCRRI), Port Blair; expand Marine Protected Areas.
  • International: Strengthen the International Coral Reef Initiative (ICRI); integrate coral protection into India’s Blue Economy and ocean governance policies.
Conclusion
The end of the fourth global bleaching event is not a recovery — it is merely a pause. Sea surface temperatures remain historically elevated and El Niño looms. This event is a clarion call: unless warming is arrested well below 1.5°C, coral reefs — some of the planet’s most biodiverse ecosystems and the lifeblood of nearly a billion people — face effective functional extinction within this century.
Prelims Pointers
  • 4th Bleaching Event: 2023–2025; confirmed April 15, 2024 by NOAA / ICRI; ended mid-2025.
  • Affected: 84% of reef area; 83 countries; all 3 reef ocean basins (Pacific, Atlantic, Indian).
  • Zooxanthellae = Symbiotic photosynthetic algae (genus Symbiodinium) in coral tissues; expelled under heat stress causing bleaching.
  • NOAA Coral Reef Watch: US satellite monitoring system; Coordinator: Derek Manzello.
  • ICRI = International Coral Reef Initiative; declared the 4th global event.
  • India’s Coral Reefs: Lakshadweep (largest), Gulf of Mannar, Gulf of Kutch, Andaman & Nicobar.
  • NCRRI = National Coral Reef Research Institute, Port Blair (A&N Islands).
  • Global Tipping Points Report 2025: Coral bleaching = Earth’s first catastrophic climate tipping point.
  • El Niño: Warming of central/eastern tropical Pacific; has coincided with every global bleaching event since 1998.
  • 1.5°C threshold: Target under the Paris Agreement (2015); coral reefs largely unviable above this level.
Practice Mains Question

“The confirmation that the fourth global coral bleaching event affected 84% of the world’s reefs marks a watershed in ocean ecosystem degradation. Analyse the causes and consequences of global coral bleaching and examine India’s role in protecting its own coral ecosystems and contributing to international conservation efforts.”

GS Paper 3  |  250 words  |  15 marks
Prelims Practice MCQ

Consider the following statements about the fourth global coral bleaching event (2023–2025):
1. It was confirmed by NOAA on April 15, 2024 and covered 84% of the world’s coral reef area.
2. The event affected coral reefs in the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans but not the Indian Ocean.
3. Coral bleaching occurs when corals expel their symbiotic zooxanthellae due to elevated ocean temperatures.
4. The Global Tipping Points Report 2025 identified mass coral bleaching as the first activation of a catastrophic climate tipping point.

Which are correct?

  • (a) 1 and 3 only
  • (b) 2 and 4 only
  • (c) 1, 3, and 4 only
  • (d) 1, 2, 3, and 4
Correct Answer: (c)
Statements 1, 3, and 4 are correct. Statement 2 is incorrect — the fourth event affected all three coral-reef-bearing ocean basins: Pacific, Atlantic, and Indian Oceans. India’s reefs in Lakshadweep, Gulf of Mannar, and Andaman & Nicobar were among those impacted.
Article 08
Maulana Barkatullah Bhopali — First PM of India’s Government in Exile
GS Paper 1 — Modern Indian History | Freedom Struggle | Personalities | Composite Nationalism
Why in News

The Executive Council of Barkatullah University, Bhopal has passed a proposal to rename it Vagdevi Bhopal University, reigniting debate about historical recognition of freedom fighters. The university was named in 1988 after Maulana Barkatullah Bhopali — a radical anti-colonial revolutionary who served as Prime Minister of the Provisional Government of India in Kabul (1915), widely regarded as India’s first government in exile.

Maulana Barkatullah Bhopali — revolutionary and first Prime Minister of India's Provisional Government in Kabul (1915)
Maulana Barkatullah Bhopali (1854–1927) — revolutionary, Ghadar Party leader, and Prime Minister of the Provisional Government of India, Kabul (1915).
Who Was Maulana Barkatullah?
  • Born: July 7, 1854, Bhopal. Died: September 1927, Sacramento, California, USA.
  • Went to London for studies; began teaching in Liverpool; encountered Indian revolutionaries.
  • Left for the US in 1899 after writings attracted negative British attention.
  • Corresponded with Maulana Hasrat Mohani — the revolutionary who coined Inquilab Zindabad.
Key Revolutionary Activities
Ghadar Party
  • Worked prominently for the Ghadar Party, founded by Lala Har Dayal in 1913 in San Francisco — aimed at armed revolution against British rule.
  • During WWI, he and associates travelled to Germany to convince captured Indian soldiers to form an anti-British army.
Provisional Government of India, Kabul (1915)
  • Formed: December 1, 1915 — one of the first independent Indian political bodies outside British control.
  • Raja Mahendra Pratap (Hindu prince) = President.
  • Maulana Barkatullah = Prime Minister.
  • Maulana Ubaidullah Sindhi = Minister (also associated with the Silk Letter Movement / Reshmi Rumal Tehreek).
Mission to Soviet Russia
  • Leaders of the Kabul government later travelled to Moscow to meet Vladimir Lenin, seeking Soviet support for Indian independence.
Ideology and Significance
  • Firmly believed India could only be free if Hindus and Muslims fought together and resisted divide-and-rule.
  • The Provisional Government — a Hindu president, Muslim PM, Islamic scholar as minister — is a powerful historical example of composite nationalism.
  • Spent most of his life in exile, connecting India’s freedom struggle with international anti-colonial networks across Europe, Central Asia, and the Americas.
Concerns: The Renaming Controversy
  • Historians oppose: Chaman Lal (Bhagat Singh Archives) and Prof. Ali Nadeem Rezavi (Indian History Congress, AMU) argue naming the university was “a long-due honour” and should not be reversed.
  • Inconsistent Recognition: The Union government has promoted Raja Mahendra Pratap’s legacy (AMU Aligarh campus named after him, 2022). Historians argue Barkatullah, as Pratap’s closest associate, deserves equal recognition.
  • Historical Erasure Risk: Renaming would erase recognition that took decades to achieve for an already insufficiently celebrated figure.
Way Forward
  • Mainstream Barkatullah’s legacy through NCERT history textbooks, research fellowships, and international commemorations (US and Afghanistan).
  • The Provisional Government of Kabul deserves dedicated coverage as a milestone of the Indian freedom struggle — particularly its model of Hindu-Muslim unity.
Conclusion
Maulana Barkatullah’s life is a testament to the global dimensions of India’s freedom struggle — fought across continents, languages, and faiths. The debate over renaming Barkatullah University is ultimately a question of what history a nation chooses to honour. To erase his name would be to forget one of the most internationally connected, ideologically committed, and deliberately neglected heroes of the independence movement.
Prelims Pointers
  • Maulana Barkatullah Bhopali: Born July 7, 1854; died September 1927, Sacramento, USA.
  • Provisional Government of India (Kabul): Formed December 1, 1915; Pratap (President), Barkatullah (PM), Sindhi (Minister).
  • Ghadar Party: Founded by Lala Har Dayal in 1913, San Francisco; aimed at armed revolution.
  • Inquilab Zindabad: Slogan coined by Maulana Hasrat Mohani.
  • Barkatullah University, Bhopal: Named 1988; was Bhopal University before; now facing renaming to Vagdevi Bhopal University.
  • Raja Mahendra Pratap: Hindu prince; President of Kabul govt; AMU campus in Aligarh named after him (2022).
  • Maulana Ubaidullah Sindhi: Islamic scholar; part of Kabul govt; associated with the Silk Letter Movement (Reshmi Rumal Tehreek).
  • Silk Letter Movement: 1916 plan (Sindhi, others) to seek Ottoman/Afghan support for Indian independence.
  • Indian History Congress: Professional body of historians; Secretary: Ali Nadeem Rezavi (AMU).
  • Berlin India Committee (1914): Indian revolutionaries in Germany during WWI; Barkatullah associated.
Practice Mains Question

“The Provisional Government of India established in Kabul in 1915 represents both the global reach of India’s freedom struggle and the power of composite nationalism. Critically assess the contributions of Maulana Barkatullah Bhopali to the independence movement and examine why such figures remain on the margins of official historical memory.”

GS Paper 1  |  250 words  |  15 marks
Prelims Practice MCQ

Consider the following statements about the Provisional Government of India formed in Kabul in 1915:
1. It was formed on December 1, 1915, with Raja Mahendra Pratap as President and Maulana Barkatullah as Prime Minister.
2. The Ghadar Party, which Barkatullah worked with, was founded by Bal Gangadhar Tilak in Pune in 1907.
3. Maulana Ubaidullah Sindhi was also a key figure in the Kabul government and is associated with the Silk Letter Movement.
4. The leaders of the Kabul government later travelled to Moscow to meet Lenin and seek Soviet support.

Which are correct?

  • (a) 1 and 2 only
  • (b) 1, 3, and 4 only
  • (c) 2 and 3 only
  • (d) 1, 2, 3, and 4
Correct Answer: (b)
Statements 1, 3, and 4 are correct. Statement 2 is incorrect — the Ghadar Party was founded by Lala Har Dayal in San Francisco, USA in 1913, not by Tilak in Pune. Bal Gangadhar Tilak was associated with the extremist faction of the INC and the Home Rule League.

Book a Free Demo Class

June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
Categories

Get free Counselling and ₹25,000 Discount

Fill the form – Our experts will call you within 30 mins.