The Hindu — UPSC Analysis
Wednesday, 24 June 2026
Bengaluru City Edition · Curated for Prelims & Mains | GS I · II · III · IV
📋 Today's Topics
- FCRA: Tighter Norms for Foreign ContributionsGS2
- The Telegram Ban & the Stretching of 'Information'GS2
- Reconnect Public Health with People's NeedsGS2
- From Invention to Global Scale: India's Tech ChallengeGS3
- India's Patchy Industrial Climate StrategyGS3
- El Niño: 111 Districts of 'Primary Concern'GS3
- AI Hallucination & CreativityGS3
- Hormuz Evacuation & the Iran Deal's LimitsGS2 · GS3
- SIR & the Risk to Food SecurityGS2
- Power Sector Reform & DISCOM FinancesGS3
- India–China: Reviving Dialogue MechanismsGS2
- The Defection Endgame: Two TMCs at the ECGS2
- Polity · IR · S&T — Quick RoundupGS1 · GS2 · GS3
- Quick Prelims Revision (MCQ Bank)Prelims
- FAQsRevision
FCRA: Tighter Norms for Foreign Contributions
Context
NGOs seeking foreign funds must now stick to a list of activities specified by the Centre, under the latest amendment to the Rules of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, notified on Monday.
Background & Key Facts
- Activity lists: NGOs register under one of five categories — social, economic, educational, cultural, religious — and, for the first time, separate activity lists are laid out for each (e.g., 22 educational, 19 economic, 30 social, 16 religious activities).
- Disclosure: NGOs must disclose activities, geographical scope, websites, social-media accounts and publications; they pay separate fees for each category and each State/UT (vs the earlier single fee).
- Key functionary: the definition is broadened beyond office-bearers/directors to include trustees, partners, the Karta of a HUF and others controlling the organisation; associations with foreign nationals (other than PIOs) as key functionaries are ordinarily ineligible.
- Penalties: violations attract a minimum fine of ₹1 lakh; misuse of funds can attract up to 30% of the amount or ₹1 lakh, whichever is higher.
- Political guardrail: some categories explicitly exclude political activities (e.g., awareness on constitutional rights must be "strictly non-political").
Regulation vs civil-society space: The government cites uniformity and avoiding duplication; critics worry tighter activity-mapping, fees and disclosure could constrain legitimate NGO work and shrink civic space.
Sovereignty rationale: The FCRA aims to ensure foreign funds don't affect India's sovereignty, communal harmony or friendly relations — but proportionality and clarity are key.
- Ensure transparent, predictable and proportionate compliance norms.
- Provide reasonable transition timelines and grievance redress for genuine NGOs.
- Balance national-security concerns with a healthy civil-society ecosystem (links to SDG 16, SDG 17).
FCRA, 2010 MHA Five FCRA categories Key functionary
MCQ: FCRA
Consider the following statements regarding the FCRA, 2010:
- It is administered by the Ministry of Home Affairs.
- NGOs register under five permitted categories — social, economic, educational, cultural and religious.
- It regulates the acceptance and utilisation of foreign contributions.
- 1 and 2 only
- 2 and 3 only
- 1 and 3 only
- 1, 2 and 3
The Telegram Ban & the Stretching of 'Information'
Context
A news analysis examines how the government temporarily blocked Telegram (to protect the NEET re-test) by stretching the meaning of "information" under the IT Act, 2000 — an interpretation the Delhi High Court endorsed. Access to Telegram was restored after the week-long order expired.
Background & Key Facts
- The legal sleight: Section 2(1)(v) traditionally defined "information" in small units (data, messages, text, images, code, software, databases). The government argued an entire platform is an "aggregation/compilation" of these units.
- Section 69A: empowers the government to block public access to any "information" through a computer resource. The interpretation effectively replaced "information" with an "entire intermediary platform."
- HC view: the June 19 order held that Section 69A's blocking power extends beyond individual content to the "software architecture, codebase, databases and programmatic ecosystem" of an application.
- Telegram's stand: the platform argued Section 69A permits blocking only "specific information"; a sweeping ban disproportionately affected ~150 million users, many of them students sharing study material.
- Proportionality: Telegram cited Anuradha Bhasin — restrictions on rights must be proportionate and use the least-restrictive measure.
Scope creep: Reading whole platforms into "information" hugely expands blocking power — a concern for free speech, due process and proportionality.
Collateral harm: A platform-wide ban harms the very students it sought to protect, raising least-restrictive-means questions.
- Use targeted, content-specific blocking rather than whole-platform bans.
- Ensure proportionality, transparency and judicial review of Section 69A orders.
- Balance exam integrity and security with digital rights (links to SDG 16).
Section 69A IT Act Section 2(1)(v) Anuradha Bhasin case Intermediary
MCQ: IT Act & Blocking
Consider the following statements:
- Section 69A of the IT Act, 2000 empowers the government to block public access to information through a computer resource.
- In Anuradha Bhasin, the Supreme Court held that restrictions on rights must be proportionate.
- The IT Act defines 'information' to include data, text, images and software.
- 1 and 2 only
- 2 and 3 only
- 1 and 3 only
- 1, 2 and 3
Reconnect Public Health with People's Needs
Context
An op-ed argues that recent public-health policy has drifted from evidence and from people's felt needs — using Ayushman Bharat Health and Wellness Centres and the Digital Health Mission to illustrate how policy increasingly emphasises data and individual "well-being" over strengthening institutions and access to care.
Background & Key Facts
- HWC rebranding: the 2018 initiative largely added "Health and Wellness Centre" as a prefix to sub-centres, PHCs and CHCs — creating ambiguity about their mandate.
- Wellness vs health promotion: "wellness" is subjective and individualised, placing responsibility on individuals; public health prefers health promotion, which is population-based and measurable ("if you cannot measure it, you cannot improve it").
- ABDHM/ABHA: the Digital Health Mission (~₹300 crore/year) builds a digital repository (ABHA card) and registries, but an information portal alone cannot fix access when infrastructure is inadequate and private care unaffordable.
- Core problem: inadequate access stems from unaffordable private care and poor-quality public care; databases don't substitute for a robust three-tier institutional mechanism.
Individualisation of health: Framing outcomes around individual well-being risks ignoring structural and social determinants and unmet needs.
Felt needs first: For most people, curative care is the pressing need; policies that ignore this risk serving policymakers' priorities over people's.
- Strengthen the three-tier public health system (SCs, PHCs, CHCs) and curative-care access.
- Use measurable, population-based health-promotion metrics over subjective wellness.
- Ensure digital health (ABHA) is linked to actual service provisioning (links to SDG 3).
Ayushman Bharat HWC ABDHM / ABHA Universal Health Coverage Three-tier health system
MCQ: Public Health
Consider the following statements:
- The ABHA card is part of the Ayushman Bharat Digital Health Mission.
- Primary Health Centres and Community Health Centres are part of India's three-tier rural health system.
- Universal Health Coverage means access to needed health services without financial hardship.
- 1 and 2 only
- 2 and 3 only
- 1 and 3 only
- 1, 2 and 3
From Invention to Global Scale: India's Tech Challenge
Context
In an op-ed, Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw argues that India has never lacked technological vision — but has often failed to convert early invention into globally dominant industries. As India embarks on missions in semiconductors, AI, quantum and space, the lesson is that "invention alone is not enough."
Background & Key Facts
- Missed leads: the Semiconductor Complex Ltd (1970s), ECIL (1967) and the Simputer (1998) showed early vision but didn't scale — unlike Taiwan's TSMC or South Korea's Samsung — due to limited capital, scale, inconsistent policy and an inward public-sector approach.
- Success models: pharma (the "pharmacy of the world"), PARAM supercomputing, Aadhaar and UPI show that platforms designed for scale create ecosystems and global leadership.
- Next frontier: AI, quantum and space will shape the next half-century; DeepSeek showed leadership is also about making intelligence cheaper and more accessible.
- India's edge: just as UPI democratised finance, India can democratise intelligence via low-cost, energy-efficient AI; frugal innovation (Chandrayaan, Mangalyaan) can coexist with world-class ambition (e.g., space-based data centres).
Stopping too soon: India "often stopped too soon" — celebrating capability before building the ecosystems needed for global scale.
Invent + scale: The next phase must combine self-reliance with global ambition — to build, scale and commercialise, not merely invent.
- Build ecosystems (capital, supply chains, markets) around frontier technologies.
- Focus on affordable, scalable AI/quantum applications in health, climate and drug discovery.
- Lead — not just participate in — orbital computing and space-tech conversations (links to SDG 9).
Semiconductor Complex Ltd PARAM UPI / Aadhaar DeepSeek Frugal innovation
MCQ: India's Tech Journey
Consider the following statements:
- The PARAM series of supercomputers was developed indigenously by C-DAC.
- UPI and Aadhaar are examples of India's scalable digital public infrastructure.
- Chandrayaan and Mangalyaan are cited as examples of India's frugal innovation in space.
- 1 and 2 only
- 2 and 3 only
- 1 and 3 only
- 1, 2 and 3
India's Patchy Industrial Climate Strategy
Context
An op-ed flags a gap in India's industrial decarbonisation: the First Biennial Transparency Report (BTR1) shows over 20% of India's 2022 emissions came from industry, but mitigation policies overlook a large block of "non-specific industries."
Background & Key Facts
- Emission split (BTR1): fuel consumption in manufacturing/construction = 13% of total emissions; industrial processes and product use = 9%.
- Two mechanisms: the Perform, Achieve and Trade (PAT) scheme is transitioning to the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS), which targets emission intensity in nine sectors (aluminium, cement, fertilizers, iron & steel, petrochemicals, refining, pulp & paper, textiles, chlor-alkali); four others (thermal power, railways, DISCOMs, commercial buildings) stay under PAT.
- The blind spot: for 2020, specified major sectors were ~55% of manufacturing/construction emissions, while over 40% came from "non-specific industries" — falling outside PAT/CCTS targets (a pattern seen in 2014, 2016, 2019 too, per NITI Aayog's dashboard).
- Goals: Make-in-India, Viksit Bharat (2047) and net-zero (2070) make industrial decarbonisation central.
Administrative grey area: A 40% emissions block lacks sub-sectoral definitions and falls outside efficiency mandates — keeping a big part of the industrial base out of the green transition.
Transparency is domestic: Disaggregated data isn't just an international obligation; it lets policymakers target interventions and course-correct.
- Break down "non-specific industries" with disaggregated, transparent emissions data.
- Identify sub-sectors, their energy-use patterns and emission hotspots in the process chain.
- Extend efficiency/emission-intensity targets to currently uncovered sectors (links to SDG 9, SDG 13).
PAT scheme Carbon Credit Trading Scheme Biennial Transparency Report Net-zero 2070
MCQ: Industrial Decarbonisation
Consider the following statements:
- The Perform, Achieve and Trade (PAT) scheme aims to improve energy efficiency in energy-intensive industries.
- The Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS) targets emission intensity in select industrial sectors.
- India has committed to net-zero emissions by 2070.
- 1 and 2 only
- 2 and 3 only
- 1 and 3 only
- 1, 2 and 3
El Niño: 111 Districts of 'Primary Concern'
Context
With the southwest monsoon delayed by El Niño (rainfall ~43% below normal so far), the Centre has flagged 315 vulnerable districts — of which 111 (across 12 States) are of "primary concern" due to poor irrigation — and is preparing contingency plans in advance.
Background & Key Facts
- The tiers: 111 high-priority districts (irrigation below 25%; 20 in Maharashtra), 76 medium-priority (25–50%), and 128 low-priority (better irrigation).
- Spread: districts span MP, Maharashtra, Gujarat, UP, Rajasthan, Karnataka, Bihar, Jharkhand, Telangana, AP and Odisha.
- Contingency plans: ICAR's district plans prescribe alternative crops, crop diversification, optimal water use and additional income options; weak rainfall is forecast even into early July, threatening kharif (especially rain-fed) crops.
- Water works: water conservation and harvesting under MGNREGA and VB-GRAM-G to be prioritised for jobs + storage; the monsoon finally reached Mumbai 13 days late.
Proactive planning: "Not waiting for a crisis" — advance, district-specific contingency planning is a welcome shift, but execution and timely advisories are key.
Irrigation gap: The concentration of risk in low-irrigation districts underlines the need for long-term water security.
- Strengthen irrigation, micro-irrigation and watershed management in rain-fed districts.
- Promote climate-resilient and short-duration crops and timely agro-advisories.
- Link MGNREGA works to durable water-storage assets (links to SDG 2, SDG 6, SDG 13).
El Niño / monsoon Kharif crops ICAR contingency plans MGNREGA
MCQ: Monsoon & Agriculture
Consider the following statements:
- El Niño conditions are generally associated with a weaker southwest monsoon.
- Kharif crops are sown with the onset of the southwest monsoon.
- ICAR prepares district-level agriculture contingency plans.
- 1 and 2 only
- 2 and 3 only
- 1 and 3 only
- 1, 2 and 3
AI Hallucination & Creativity
Context
A Science feature explores why large language models "hallucinate" — producing plausible but factually wrong answers — and argues this may be intrinsically linked to their creativity, with implications for how we deploy AI.
Background & Key Facts
- What hallucination is: a model produces an answer that sounds plausible but is factually wrong (inventing citations, misstating numbers, fabricating cases) — dangerous in medicine, law and finance.
- How LLMs work: they predict the next word from statistical patterns, not by retrieving facts from a database. A setting called "temperature" governs how adventurous the choices are.
- The shared dial: a 2025 study found creativity and hallucination tend to increase together as models explore lower-probability options — "the model that dares to write something new is the same model that dares to make something up."
- Theoretical limit: drawing on Turing and Gödel, researchers argue no computable model can be universally correct — hallucination reflects the limits of computation itself; models are rewarded for confident guessing over honest "I don't know."
Accuracy vs imagination: If both draw from the same well, "a machine perfectly scrubbed of error might also be a machine scrubbed of surprise."
Verification, not ban: Like humans (who use experiments, journalism and argument to discipline imagination), AI may need better institutions of verification rather than a ban on hallucination.
- Build verification layers, fact-checking and human oversight around AI outputs.
- Tune models for accuracy in high-stakes domains (medicine, law) while preserving creativity where useful.
- Promote AI literacy and responsible deployment (links to SDG 9).
Large language models AI hallucination Turing / Gödel limits Responsible AI
MCQ: AI & LLMs
In the context of large language models, 'hallucination' refers to:
- The model crashing due to overload
- The model producing plausible-sounding but factually incorrect output
- The model refusing to answer
- The model copying training data verbatim
Hormuz Evacuation & the Iran Deal's Limits
Context
The IMO announced a plan — with Iran, Oman, the U.S. and others — to evacuate all ships and 11,000 seafarers stranded in the Persian Gulf. India's MEA said the June 17 MoU has helped energy and fertilizer flows. But Iran denied agreeing to IAEA inspections at bombed nuclear sites, and said Hormuz "will never return" to pre-war free passage.
Background & Key Facts
- IMO plan: two routes (along the Omani and Iranian coasts) replacing the unsafe central traffic-separation scheme (mines); these handle 20–30 ships/day vs ~130 pre-war; ships use a waiting area in international waters and contact the relevant coastal state.
- India's flows: since June 17, 11 India-bound vessels transited Hormuz (three Indian-flagged crude tankers, an LPG carrier, a crude tanker and six bulk carriers with fertilizer); ~10 Indian-flagged vessels remain in the Gulf.
- Sticking points: Iran says the IAEA cannot inspect bombed sites (Fordow, Natanz, Isfahan) and there's no such decision; the U.S. (Trump/Vance) claims Iran agreed to inspections "long into the future" — a clear discrepancy as the 60-day final-deal window runs.
Relief, but fragile: Maritime flows have improved, easing India's energy/fertilizer supply, but Iran's stance on inspections and Hormuz signals the deal's durability is far from assured.
India's exposure: The episode reinforces the case for diversified routes (Chabahar, INSTC) and strategic reserves.
- Support safe evacuation and a verifiable, durable settlement with IAEA access.
- India should keep hedging via diversified sourcing, reserves and alternative corridors.
- Strengthen maritime de-confliction and seafarer protection (links to SDG 7, SDG 16).
IMO Strait of Hormuz IAEA Fordow / Natanz / Isfahan
MCQ: IMO & Hormuz
Consider the following statements:
- The International Maritime Organization is a specialised agency of the United Nations.
- The Strait of Hormuz connects the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman.
- The IAEA is responsible for verifying compliance with nuclear safeguards.
- 1 and 2 only
- 2 and 3 only
- 1 and 3 only
- 1, 2 and 3
SIR & the Risk to Food Security
Context
The Supreme Court asked petitioners to approach the Calcutta High Court over a West Bengal order (June 4) that allegedly links the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls to access to subsidised ration and nutrition — potentially affecting 35–60 lakh people. Separately, Karnataka's CEO sought biometric-attendance exemptions for SIR Booth Level Officers.
Background & Key Facts
- The petition: the Paschim Banga Khet Majoor Samity argued food-security benefits (PDS, Annapurna Yojana) must not depend on unrelated SIR outcomes; the June 4 order reportedly directs deletion of beneficiaries based on SIR classifications.
- Legal framework: the PDS operates under the National Food Security Act, 2013, intended to secure essential food grains for vulnerable households.
- The concern: linking electoral status to food entitlement could exclude people without a hearing, an "emerging pattern" across States; the Court said it must first determine if the cause of action truly emanates from SIR.
- Karnataka: the CEO sought to exempt BLOs from daily biometric attendance during door-to-door SIR visits (from June 30); the Congress government plans a panel on its SIR objections.
Rights at stake: Tying food security to electoral verification risks denying entitlements to the vulnerable without due process — testing the State's welfare character.
Federal friction: SIR has become a flashpoint between the EC, Centre and Opposition-ruled States, raising questions of process and fairness.
- Keep food-security entitlements (NFSA) independent of unrelated electoral exercises.
- Ensure due process, hearings and grievance redress before any deletion.
- Conduct SIR transparently with adequate safeguards against arbitrary exclusion (links to SDG 2, SDG 16).
Special Intensive Revision National Food Security Act, 2013 PDS / Annapurna Yojana Booth Level Officer
MCQ: Food Security & Elections
Consider the following statements:
- The Public Distribution System operates under the National Food Security Act, 2013.
- Booth Level Officers are involved in the revision of electoral rolls.
- The Special Intensive Revision is conducted by the Election Commission.
- 1 and 2 only
- 2 and 3 only
- 1 and 3 only
- 1, 2 and 3
Power Sector Reform & DISCOM Finances
Context
Two pieces examined power-sector reform: Tata Power's bid for distribution licences in Karnataka (areas served by State ESCOMs) reopens the debate on competition in distribution, while Tamil Nadu's White Paper revealed deep losses in its power utilities.
Background & Key Facts
- Karnataka: "competition for a market" (defined territory) differs from "competition within a market" (multiple suppliers in a served area). Risk: an entrant cherry-picks profitable urban consumers while costly rural/irrigation obligations stay with the State — "privatising revenue while socialising cost."
- Cross-subsidy: State utilities use surplus from higher-paying consumers to subsidise others; Section 42 of the Electricity Act covers open access, cross-subsidy and stranded-cost recovery — needing a clear inter-licensee surcharge mechanism.
- Tamil Nadu: 78 SPSUs (2.55 lakh employees); accumulated debt of select majors ~₹3.18 lakh crore (March 2026). The DISCOM's woes stem from not raising tariffs regularly (only twice in ~a decade for domestic consumers), free electricity, and costly power purchases.
- TANGEDCO split (2024): into generation (TNPGCL), distribution (TNPDCL) and green energy (TNGECL).
Obligations must travel with competition: Private participation isn't the problem; the question is whether new entrants carry the same universal-service obligations as the public system.
Tariff populism: TN shows how not raising user charges regularly erodes utility finances, leaving no surplus for capital investment and piling up debt.
- Design a principled cross-subsidy/surcharge framework and a neutral shared-network model.
- Ensure transparent maps, geography and obligations before licensing competition.
- Pursue fiscal prudence and rational, regular tariff revisions (links to SDG 7, SDG 9).
Electricity Act (Section 42) Cross-subsidy / open access DISCOM / ESCOM ACS–ARR gap
MCQ: Power Sector
Consider the following statements:
- 'Open access' allows large consumers to source electricity from suppliers other than the local distribution licensee.
- 'Cross-subsidy' in electricity tariffs means higher-paying consumers subsidise others.
- The 'ACS–ARR gap' refers to the difference between the average cost of supply and the average revenue realised.
- 1 and 2 only
- 2 and 3 only
- 1 and 3 only
- 1, 2 and 3
India–China: Reviving Dialogue Mechanisms
Context
In talks with NSA Ajit Doval in New Delhi, China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi called for both sides to "accelerate the resumption of dialogue mechanisms" in trade, finance and other fields, and to keep the boundary issue "in its appropriate position."
Background & Key Facts
- Stalled dialogues: India and China have nearly 50 government-to-government dialogue mechanisms, most of which remain stalled; even direct flights took months of negotiation to resume.
- Normalisation: both sides noted progress toward normalisation; Doval is to visit Beijing for Special Representatives talks. Wang said relations have "emerged from their low point" and that "China and India are partners, not rivals."
- Leaders' guidance: the Modi–Xi meetings in Kazan (Oct 2024) and Tianjin (Aug 2025) "pointed the way forward."
Cautious thaw: Normalisation is real but "in fits and starts"; China's framing (keeping the boundary issue "in its appropriate position") signals it wants to compartmentalise the border from broader ties.
India's calculus: Stable, predictable relations help trust-building, but India must guard core interests on the boundary and trade imbalance.
- Revive dialogue mechanisms while maintaining firmness on border and sovereignty.
- Address the trade imbalance and de-risk critical supply chains.
- Use Special Representatives and multilateral platforms for stable engagement (links to SDG 16, SDG 17).
Special Representatives mechanism India–China boundary BRICS Kazan / Tianjin summits
MCQ: India–China
Consider the following statements:
- The Special Representatives mechanism deals with the India–China boundary question.
- Both India and China are members of BRICS.
- Wang Yi is China's Foreign Minister.
- 1 and 2 only
- 2 and 3 only
- 1 and 3 only
- 1, 2 and 3
The Defection Endgame: Two TMCs at the EC
Context
The Trinamool split reached the Election Commission: the Mamata Banerjee-led TMC and the rebel faction (which appointed Arup Roy chairperson) both submitted lists of office-bearers to the EC, each claiming to be the party — with the Mamata camp issuing show-cause notices to the rebels.
Background & Key Facts
- Competing structures: the Mamata list keeps her as chairperson with Abhishek Banerjee as general secretary; the rebel list names Arup Roy chairperson and Ritabrata Banerjee (LoP) among general secretaries.
- EC's role: disputes over a party's name and symbol are decided by the Election Commission (under the Symbols Order); both camps say they have apprised the EC.
- Context: the rebellion followed TMC's 2026 Assembly defeat; the matter is also in court.
Who is the 'real' party? The dispute tests how the EC adjudicates rival claims to a party's identity, name and symbol — distinct from the Tenth Schedule disqualification question.
Institutional load: The episode adds to a week of defection drama, stressing both the EC's and the Speaker's adjudicatory roles.
- Time-bound, transparent EC adjudication of rival party claims.
- Clear judicial guidance on the interface between defection, mergers and party-identity disputes.
- Strengthen intra-party democracy and accountability (links to SDG 16).
Election Symbols Order Election Commission Tenth Schedule Party splits
MCQ: Party Disputes
Disputes over the allotment of a political party's symbol in case of a split are decided by:
- The Supreme Court
- The Election Commission of India
- The Lok Sabha Speaker
- The President
Polity · IR · S&T — Quick Roundup
George Kurian Resigns; CUET-UG Results (GS2 — Polity/Governance)
- George Kurian resigned as Union Minister of State (his resignation accepted under Article 75(2)) after his Rajya Sabha term ended and he wasn't renominated — setting off Cabinet-reshuffle speculation.
- CUET-UG results were declared within 16 days (the test had a re-test on June 6–7 over technical glitches); registrations rose ~15% and female candidates ~20%.
Padma Awards & Starmer Transition (GS1/GS2)
- President Murmu presented the second set of Padma awards; awardees included Vijay Amritraj, Mammootty, Rohit Sharma, Alka Yagnik and (posthumously) Satish Shah.
- U.K. PM Keir Starmer pledged an "orderly" transition; Andy Burnham is the frontrunner to succeed him before September.
Gaza Genocide Report; Japan PM Visit (GS2 — IR)
- A UN Independent Commission of Inquiry said Israel deliberately targeted Palestinian children as part of "genocide" in Gaza — a finding Israel rejected as "defamatory."
- Japanese PM Sanae Takaichi's planned Guwahati leg was cancelled; her first official India visit will be Delhi-only due to a tight schedule.
Science: Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS (GS3 — S&T)
- Scientists found the interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS — only the third interstellar object ever spotted — formed ~12 billion years ago in a much colder environment, with a composition unlike anything in our solar system, based on JWST isotope measurements.
Health & Monsoon Briefs (GS2/GS3)
- An expert argued India's four decades of diabetes work (region-specific, integrated, tech-enabled "total diabetes care") could guide other low- and middle-income countries.
- The southwest monsoon reached Mumbai 13 days late; Sri Lanka set up a military-led unit to monitor a dengue surge.
Article 75(2) CUET-UG / NTA Padma awards 3I/ATLAS (interstellar object) UN Commission of Inquiry
MCQ: Mixed Current Affairs
Consider the following statements:
- A Union Minister's resignation is tendered to and accepted by the President under Article 75.
- 3I/ATLAS is an interstellar object observed passing through the solar system.
- CUET-UG is conducted by the National Testing Agency.
- 1 and 2 only
- 2 and 3 only
- 1 and 3 only
- 1, 2 and 3
📝 Quick Prelims Revision — MCQ Bank
Q1 — FCRA
The Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act is administered by which ministry?
- Ministry of External Affairs
- Ministry of Home Affairs
- Ministry of Finance
- Ministry of Corporate Affairs
Q2 — IT Act
Which section of the IT Act, 2000 empowers the government to block public access to information?
- Section 66A
- Section 69A
- Section 79
- Section 43A
Q3 — Climate Policy
The 'PAT' scheme is associated with:
- Public food distribution
- Energy efficiency in industries
- Agricultural credit
- Coastal regulation
Q4 — Food Security
The Public Distribution System in India operates under which law?
- The Essential Commodities Act, 1955
- The National Food Security Act, 2013
- The Right to Information Act, 2005
- The MGNREGA, 2005
Q5 — Power Sector
'Open access' in the electricity sector primarily allows:
- Free electricity to all consumers
- Large consumers to buy power from suppliers other than the local distribution licensee
- Unlimited power exports
- Automatic tariff increases
❓ FAQs
Frequently asked exam-oriented questions — 24 June 2026 edition
What changes have the latest FCRA Rules introduced for NGOs?
Why is the Telegram ban legally significant?
Why does the op-ed criticise the focus on 'wellness' in public health policy?
Why are 111 districts of 'primary concern' for El Niño?
Why might competition in power distribution be problematic if poorly designed?
Take the Next Step
Qualify Prelims? Start Mains Prep with Legacy IAS
Expert faculty, structured GS & Optional guidance, and Bangalore's most trusted UPSC coaching — all under one roof.
Jayanagar, Bengaluru · Classroom & Online · legacyias.com
Analysis based on The Hindu, Bengaluru City Edition, 24 June 2026. Prepared for academic use. Static background and frameworks added for exam preparation; original article text has been paraphrased, not reproduced.


