PIB Summaries 01 September 2026

Legacy IAS Academy · Daily PIB Analysis

PIB Analysis — 1 September 2026

3 syllabus-mapped government releases, analysed · scheme anatomy, context and critique · a UPSC-pattern Mains question with every topic
Press Information Bureau Government of India
In-Depth PIB Analysis3 Items
Core TopicImportantConcise
Science & TechnologyGeneral Studies Paper III
01

C-DOT Unveils 14 Indigenous Quantum Products — QKD & Post-Quantum Cryptography for India's Communication Networks

GS-III · S&T — Quantum Technology, Cybersecurity, Indigenisation Prelims + Mains PIB · Ministry of Communications (DoT) · 31 Aug 2026

India's premier telecom R&D body, C-DOT, has unveiled a portfolio of 14 indigenously developed quantum products spanning Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) hardware and Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) software — a milestone for Atmanirbhar Bharat in strategic communications security.

◈ Background & Context

Quantum computers, when mature, will be capable of breaking current public-key encryption schemes (RSA, ECC) that secure everything from banking to defence communications.

This threat — sometimes called "harvest now, decrypt later" — makes the transition to quantum-safe cryptography urgent even before large-scale quantum computers exist.

  • Quantum Key Distribution (QKD): Uses quantum mechanical properties of photons to distribute encryption keys in a manner that is theoretically unbreakable — any eavesdropping disturbs the quantum state and is immediately detectable.
  • Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC): Mathematical algorithms (not quantum hardware) designed to resist attacks by quantum computers; standardised by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in 2024 after an 8-year global evaluation.
  • C-DOT (Centre for Development of Telematics), under the Department of Telecommunications (DoT), was established in 1984; it is India's primary telecom R&D institution and holds hundreds of patents including foundational ones in 4G/5G indigenisation.
  • India's National Quantum Mission (NQM), approved in 2023 with an outlay of ₹6,003.65 crore over 2023–31, mandates indigenous development of quantum hardware, software, and cybersecurity solutions.
▤ Scheme at a Glance — C-DOT Quantum Product Series
  • Developing body: C-DOT (Centre for Development of Telematics), DoT, Ministry of Communications
  • Total products unveiled: 14 indigenous quantum products (on C-DOT's 43rd Foundation Day, 31 Aug 2026)
  • Two technology pillars: Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) | Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC)
  • Standards basis: NIST PQC algorithms (globally standardised 2024) + proprietary algorithms for defence variants
  • Approving / oversight authority: Department of Telecommunications (DoT) under Ministry of Communications
  • Target sectors: Enterprise networks, telecom operators, optical backbone, strategic/defence communications, wireless links, IoT
  • Stated goal: Securing India's communication infrastructure against quantum-era cybersecurity threats
The 14 Products — What They Do

The suite covers five categories: QKD hardware systems, PQC-based encryptors (at different network layers and throughput grades), quantum communication sub-components, endpoint devices, and access infrastructure.

  • QKD Systems — Q-AKSHAY CD & MD: Fibre-based quantum key distribution units. CD uses Coherent One-Way (COW) and Differential Phase Shift (DPS) protocols in a compact 1U form factor. MD uses the Measurement Device Independent (MDI) protocol — a more secure variant that eliminates vulnerabilities in the detector side of QKD systems.
  • Critical sub-modules — C-SPD & C-RD: A Single-Photon Detector (the core sensing element of any QKD receiver) and a wideband RF Driver for modulators — both developed indigenously, reducing dependence on imported quantum optics components.
  • PQC Encryptors (Layer 3, enterprise grade) — Q-SETU (80 Mbps) & Q-MAHASETU (40 Gbps): Protect IP-layer communications; Q-MAHASETU targets large enterprise and carrier deployments.
  • Defence-grade PQC Encryptors — Q-VIKRAM & Q-PARAKRAM (1 Gbps, Layer 2/3): Built for sensitive and strategic communications; Q-PARAKRAM additionally incorporates proprietary (non-public) algorithms alongside NIST standards.
  • High-speed optical encryptor — Q-AMOGH (200 Gbps, Layer 1): Designed for backbone optical fibre links — the highest throughput in the suite.
  • Communication endpoint devices — Q-DARSHAN (video IP phone) & Q-VACHAN (inline node): Bring quantum-safe security to voice and video endpoints; Q-VACHAN can upgrade existing IP phones without hardware replacement.
  • Enterprise & wireless — Q-RAQSHAK & Q-VAAYU: Enterprise network protection and wireless point-to-point link security, respectively.
  • Access node — Q-VAJRA1000: Supports GPON and wireless radios; enables quantum-safe upgrades to legacy access networks without replacing the underlying infrastructure.
Figure 1 — C-DOT Quantum Product Series on display at the 43rd Foundation Day, New Delhi (31 August 2026)
C-DOT Quantum Product Series display wall showing all 14 products
The 14-product wall spans QKD hardware, PQC encryptors at four throughput grades, sub-components, endpoint devices, and access infrastructure — all indigenously developed. Image: PIB / Ministry of Communications, 31 Aug 2026; reproduced for educational use.
How QKD and PQC Differ — and Why Both Are Needed
Figure 2 — QKD vs. PQC: Two Complementary Approaches to Quantum-Safe Security
Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) Hardware-based · Physics-layer security Alice (Sender) Bob (Receiver) Quantum channel (photons) Eve ✗ Detection guaranteed ✔ Information-theoretically secure ✔ Any tap disturbs quantum state ✘ Requires dedicated fibre/hardware ✘ Distance limited (~100 km per hop) Products: Q-AKSHAY CD/MD, C-SPD, C-RD Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) Software-based · Math-layer security Sender (encrypted) Receiver (decrypted) Existing internet / fibre Hard math problems (lattices, hash functions, codes) ✔ Works on existing networks ✔ Software upgrade path ✔ Scalable; no distance limit ✘ Security rests on mathematical hardness assumptions Products: Q-SETU, Q-MAHASETU, Q-VIKRAM, Q-AMOGH…
QKD achieves physics-guaranteed security but requires dedicated hardware; PQC runs on existing infrastructure using mathematically hard problems. C-DOT's portfolio covers both, enabling a layered defence strategy.
Significance — Why This Matters for India
  • Atmanirbhar Bharat in critical tech: Quantum communication hardware has historically been imported from the US, Europe, and China. Indigenous production reduces a significant strategic vulnerability — especially for defence-grade encryptors.
  • The "harvest now, decrypt later" threat: Adversaries can intercept and store encrypted traffic today and decrypt it once a quantum computer becomes available. Government projects the 10–15 year window as the action horizon; C-DOT's products are designed to secure government and enterprise networks well within that period.
  • Complement to National Quantum Mission: NQM (2023–31, ₹6,003.65 cr) set targets including a 50-qubit quantum computer and a 2,000-km quantum communication network. C-DOT's product series directly feeds the communication security pillar of this mission.
  • Export potential: NIST-compliant PQC products can be marketed to friendly nations — particularly those building out digital public infrastructure with Indian technical assistance (cf. India's DPI diplomacy).
Critical View & Implementation Challenges
  • QKD distance limitation: Fibre-based QKD degrades over ~100 km without quantum repeaters, which do not yet exist commercially. Long-haul secure communication still requires trusted intermediate nodes — a potential security weakness that the MDI protocol (Q-AKSHAY MD) partially addresses.
  • From lab to field: C-DOT has a strong record of R&D but a mixed record in commercial-scale manufacturing. Whether these 14 products move from prototypes to deployed infrastructure depends on procurement decisions by government departments and telecom operators — this has historically been the bottleneck.
  • Ecosystem dependency: Key sub-components (single-photon sources, certain laser components) remain import-dependent. C-DOT's indigenous C-SPD is a step forward, but full supply chain security requires deeper indigenisation.
  • Awareness gap: Most enterprises and state governments are unaware of the quantum threat timeline. Without a mandated migration plan, the products risk remaining niche defence solutions rather than securing the broader critical infrastructure.
Key Institutions & Terms (Prelims Hooks)
  • C-DOT: Centre for Development of Telematics, est. 1984 under DoT; autonomous telecom R&D body
  • DoT: Department of Telecommunications, Ministry of Communications
  • NIST PQC Standards: Standardised in 2024 — CRYSTALS-Kyber (key encapsulation), CRYSTALS-Dilithium & FALCON (digital signatures), SPHINCS+ (hash-based signature)
  • National Quantum Mission (NQM): Approved 2023; ₹6,003.65 cr; nodal body — Department of Science & Technology (DST)
  • QKD protocols used by C-DOT: COW (Coherent One Way), DPS (Differential Phase Shift), MDI (Measurement Device Independent)
  • BB84: The foundational QKD protocol (1984, Bennett & Brassard) — the conceptual ancestor of all QKD systems
  • Seebeck effect / thermoelectric — not applicable here; see Item 3
✎ Mains Practice Question

India's communication networks face a converging threat from quantum computing that classical encryption cannot address. Critically examine the significance of C-DOT's 14-product Quantum Series in this context. What are the key barriers to transitioning India's critical infrastructure to quantum-safe communications? 15 marks · 250 words

02

Century-Old Thermoelectric Limit Surpassed: JNCASR–IISc Team Demonstrates Near-Liquid-Level Seebeck Coefficients in a Crystalline Solid

GS-III · S&T — Materials Science, Thermoelectrics, Quantum Sensing Prelims + Mains PIB · Ministry of Science & Technology (DST) · 31 Aug 2026

A team from JNCASR (Bengaluru), IISc (Bengaluru), and the University of Sydney has shattered a decades-old physical barrier: they have made a fully crystalline solid semiconductor behave thermoelectrically like a liquid electrolyte — enabling voltage generation from tiny temperature differences nearly a thousand times beyond what textbook physics predicted for solids.

◈ Background & Context — The Seebeck Effect

The Seebeck effect, discovered in 1821 by Thomas Johann Seebeck, describes the conversion of a temperature difference directly into an electrical voltage at a junction of two dissimilar materials.

Hot electrons (or ions) drift from the hot end to the cold end, creating a voltage proportional to the temperature difference. The proportionality constant is the Seebeck coefficient (measured in volts per Kelvin).

  • Why it matters practically: Thermoelectric generators convert waste heat to electricity (used in deep-space probes, industrial waste heat recovery, wearables). Thermoelectric sensors are used in thermocouples, infrared detectors, and precision temperature measurement.
  • The historical ceiling in solids: For crystalline (solid) semiconductors, the Seebeck coefficient had been bounded at a few hundred microvolts per Kelvin (µV/K). Metals are even lower — tens of µV/K. The millivolts-per-Kelvin (mV/K) range was considered achievable only in liquid systems (ionic gels, electrolytes) where charged ions — not electrons — carry the heat.
  • JNCASR (Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research), Bengaluru: an autonomous institute of DST; a premier Indian research centre in materials science, condensed matter physics, and chemistry. IISc (Indian Institute of Science), Bengaluru: India's top research university for science and engineering.
What the Researchers Did — The Experiment
  • Material: Scandium Nitride (ScN) — a refractory transition-metal nitride. Thin films (~200 nm thick) grown on magnesium oxide substrates using ultrahigh-vacuum magnetron sputtering — a physical vapour deposition technique that deposits atoms one layer at a time under near-perfect vacuum.
  • Key innovation — Heavily Doped, Highly Compensated (HDHC) architecture: The team doped ScN with magnesium to create nearly equal numbers of positive (Mg) and negative (O) dopant atoms randomly distributed through the crystal. This "compensation" — having positive and negative impurities nearly cancel each other — is the critical design choice.
  • Why HDHC works: In a compensated semiconductor, electrons near the Fermi level experience strong, random scattering from the competing dopants. This dramatically changes the energy-dependence of electron transport — producing an anomalously large Seebeck coefficient through a mechanism the team describes as a "solid-state analog of electrolyte-like thermopower."
  • Measured result: Seebeck coefficient exceeding −124.6 mV/K near room temperature — roughly 1,000× larger than typical inorganic semiconductors and ~100× beyond the previously known ceiling for crystalline solids. This surpasses even liquid ionic gels and hydrogels.
  • Thinner = stronger: The effect grew even larger as the film thickness was reduced, suggesting further optimisation headroom.
Figure 3 — Electronic Band Diagram of Heavily Doped, Highly Compensated ScN (HDHC) Exhibiting Thermopower Exceeding the Boltzmann Limit
Schematic of electronic band diagram of heavily doped, highly compensated ScN showing thermopower exceeding the Boltzmann limit
The band structure schematic shows the disorder-engineered landscape of HDHC ScN, where competing positive and negative dopants create the anomalous scattering environment responsible for the record Seebeck coefficient. Image: JNCASR / DST / published in Science; reproduced for educational use.
Applications — What This Unlocks
  • Ultrasensitive temperature sensors: The enormous voltage response to tiny temperature differences means a detector can resolve temperature changes far smaller than current solid-state sensors allow.
  • Single-photon detection at room temperature: The team built a prototype photon sensor (HDHC ScN film + two chromium contacts); illuminating one contact with a laser generated a Seebeck response of −102.4 mV/K — potentially sufficient for single-photon-level detection near room temperature with further development. Current single-photon detectors require deep cryogenic cooling.
  • Bolometric and thermal imaging devices: High-resolution heat-flux detection; applications in medical thermography, materials inspection, night-vision.
  • Quantum technology interface: Cryogenic thermoelectric single-photon detectors are a critical component for quantum communication networks — this discovery could simplify that technology chain.
  • IoT sensors & waste heat recovery: Low-temperature thermoelectric generators could harvest body heat or industrial waste heat more efficiently.
Critical View & Caveats
  • Lab-to-product gap: The result is in ~200 nm thin films grown under ultrahigh vacuum — a process far too slow and expensive for bulk manufacturing. Scaling this to practical devices is a significant materials engineering challenge.
  • Figure of merit (ZT): Thermoelectric efficiency is governed by ZT = S²σ/κ (Seebeck coefficient squared × electrical conductivity / thermal conductivity). A record Seebeck coefficient alone does not guarantee a high ZT — the electrical and thermal conductivity of HDHC ScN in this configuration have not been reported to be simultaneously optimised.
  • Publication and IP: Published in Science (top-tier peer-reviewed journal); Indian patent application filed — ensuring India captures IP before the work is freely adoptable globally.
✎ Mains Practice Question

Indian researchers have demonstrated a Seebeck coefficient in a crystalline solid nearly a thousand times beyond the accepted limit for such materials. Explain the scientific principle involved and discuss the potential transformative applications of this discovery for quantum sensing and sustainable energy. What challenges remain before laboratory results can be translated into deployable technology? 10 marks · 150 words

International RelationsGeneral Studies Paper II
03

NPCI International & Uzbekistan's NIPC Partner to Enable UPI Payments via UZQR — India's Digital Payments Network Extends to Central Asia

GS-II · IR — Digital Diplomacy, Bilateral Ties (India–Uzbekistan) GS-III · Economy — Digital Payments, DPI, FinTech Prelims + Mains PIB · Ministry of Finance (NPCI International) · 31 Aug 2026

NPCI International Payments Ltd. (NIPL) has signed a commercial agreement with Uzbekistan's National Interbank Processing Centre JSC (NIPC) — the operator of the national HUMO payment system — allowing Indian travellers to pay Uzbek merchants by scanning the UZQR code using any UPI app, marking UPI's first footprint in Central Asia.

◈ Background & Context

UPI (Unified Payments Interface), launched by NPCI in 2016, has become the world's largest real-time retail payment system by transaction volume.

India has been systematically internationalising UPI as part of its Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) diplomacy — positioning UPI as an alternative to card networks (Visa, Mastercard) for cross-border person-to-merchant (P2M) payments.

  • NPCI (National Payments Corporation of India): Umbrella body for retail payment systems in India; a non-profit promoted by RBI and Indian banks under the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007.
  • NPCI International (NIPL): Wholly-owned subsidiary of NPCI, incorporated in 2020 specifically to deploy and monetise Indian payment technologies globally.
  • HUMO: Uzbekistan's national payment network and interoperable QR payment system; regulated by the Central Bank of Uzbekistan (CBU).
  • UZQR: Uzbekistan's mandated Unified National QR code — all merchants accepting digital payments must display it, making it near-universal for acceptance.
  • India–Uzbekistan bilateral context: The agreement was signed during the PM's bilateral visit to Uzbekistan, underlining the deliberate use of payment diplomacy alongside state visits. Uzbekistan is a key partner in India's Connect Central Asia policy; home to a significant Indian student and business community.
  • Regulatory approvals: The agreement follows formal clearances from both the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the Central Bank of Uzbekistan (CBU) — CBU has formally designated HUMO as NIPL's authorised partner for cross-border merchant acceptance.
Figure 4 — Uzbekistan: Location, Neighbours, and Capital
Map of Uzbekistan showing neighbouring countries Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Afghanistan and the Aral Sea
Uzbekistan is a doubly landlocked country in Central Asia, bordered by Kazakhstan (N), Kyrgyzstan (NE), Tajikistan (SE), Afghanistan (S), and Turkmenistan (W). The Aral Sea — once the world's fourth-largest lake, now largely dry — lies on its north-western border. Capital: Tashkent. Map: BBC / public domain; reproduced with credit for educational use.
▤ At a Glance — NIPL–NIPC Agreement
  • Parties: NPCI International Payments Ltd. (NIPL, India) ↔ National Interbank Processing Centre JSC (NIPC, Uzbekistan)
  • Signed: 30 August 2026 (during PM Modi's bilateral visit to Uzbekistan)
  • Payment flow: Indian UPI user scans UZQR → transaction processed through HUMO network → settled between Indian bank and Uzbek merchant
  • Payment type enabled: Person-to-Merchant (P2M) only — not P2P remittances in this initial phase
  • Regulatory sanctioned by: Reserve Bank of India (RBI) + Central Bank of Uzbekistan (CBU)
  • Stated goal: Eliminate foreign exchange markup friction for Indian travellers; reduce dependence on international card networks and cash
  • UPI's global footprint (as of Aug 2026): 11 countries — Singapore, UAE, France, Mauritius, Nepal, Bhutan, Qatar, Sri Lanka, Cambodia, Greece, and now Uzbekistan
UPI's International Expansion — A Quick Geography
Figure 5 — UPI's International Footprint (Countries Where Indian Travellers Can Pay via UPI, 2026)
South Asia Nepal Bhutan Sri Lanka SE & E Asia Singapore Cambodia Middle East UAE Qatar Africa / I.O. Mauritius Europe & Central Asia France Greece Uzbekistan ★ (New, Aug 2026) UPI Accepted in 11 Countries First Central Asian nation: Uzbekistan
UPI's international acceptance network now spans 11 countries across South Asia, Southeast Asia, the Middle East, Africa, Europe, and — for the first time — Central Asia (Uzbekistan).
Why This Matters — Strategic & Economic Significance
  • DPI as diplomatic tool: Each UPI international expansion is simultaneously a financial inclusion initiative and a geopolitical statement — India is offering an alternative payment rails architecture to countries that may wish to reduce dependence on dollar-denominated card networks.
  • Central Asia entry point: Uzbekistan is India's largest trade partner in Central Asia and a transit hub for the International North–South Transport Corridor (INSTC). A digital payments bridge complements trade and connectivity goals.
  • Indian diaspora benefits: Significant Indian student, business, and labour communities in Uzbekistan (and neighbouring Central Asian states) are the immediate beneficiaries — eliminating card foreign exchange markups (typically 2–4%) and cash risks.
  • Competition with Chinese payment systems: China's Alipay and WeChat Pay already have Central Asian footholds. UPI's entry into Uzbekistan opens a competitive front in the digital payments geopolitics of the region.
Critical View
  • P2M only at launch: The current agreement covers merchant payments, not remittances (P2P). Remittances — a far larger financial flow between Indian workers and home — remain outside this framework and would require a separate agreement.
  • Currency settlement: Cross-border UPI transactions require a settlement mechanism between the rupee and the Uzbek soum. Details of the settlement currency and hedging arrangements are not yet public — this will be a key determinant of cost-effectiveness at scale.
  • NIPL's monetisation model: NIPL earns through licensing and transaction fees from international deployments. As UPI volumes grow globally, ensuring Indian banks and merchants also benefit (not just foreign payment operators) is a regulatory design challenge.
✎ Mains Practice Question

India's internationalisation of UPI has been described as "payment diplomacy." Analyse the strategic, economic, and geopolitical dimensions of UPI's expansion into Central Asia, with particular reference to the India–Uzbekistan agreement. What are the challenges and opportunities for India in positioning its Digital Public Infrastructure as a global alternative to legacy payment networks? 15 marks · 250 words

Legacy IAS Academy · Daily PIB Analysis 1 September 2026 · Press Information Bureau

Book a Free Demo Class

September 2026
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
Categories

Get free Counselling and ₹25,000 Discount

Fill the form – Our experts will call you within 30 mins.