Brain-Stem Death (BSD)

WHY IN NEWS ?

• Renewed debate on legal ambiguities in Brain-Stem Death (BSD) certification under the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994.
• India’s deceased organ donation rate remains critically low:
  • India (2023): 0.77 donors per million
  • Spain (2023): 49.38 donors per million
• ~5 lakh Indians die annually while waiting for organ transplants.
• Demand rising to:
  • Expand the donor pool
  • Remove legal-bureaucratic bottlenecks
  • Clarify death certification & consent protocols

Relevance :

GS Paper III – Health Sector & Human Resource Development

• Public health system capacity: ICU infrastructure & trained transplant coordinators
• Organ donation as a resource optimisation strategy in healthcare
• Demand–supply gap in transplants and mortality burden
• Health system efficiency and end-of-life care management
• Medical technology, ventilator dependence and ICU rationing

WHAT IS ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION LAW IN INDIA?

• Governed by:
  • Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994
• Covers two types of transplants:

(A) Deceased Donor Transplant

• Organs retrieved from a person with certified Brain-Stem Death (BSD).
• Heart may still beat with ventilator support.
• Law legally recognises BSD as death.

(B) Living Donor Transplant

• Organ removed from a healthy living person.
• Needs legal sanction because:
  • Doctors are otherwise prohibited from removing healthy organs.

WHAT IS BRAIN-STEM DEATH (BSD)?

• Defined under the 1994 Act as:
  • “Permanent and irreversible cessation of all functions of the brain-stem.”
• Brain-stem controls:
  • Breathing
  • Consciousness
  • Vital reflexes
• BSD = irreversible biological death, even if heart is artificially supported.

WHY INDIA’S ORGAN TRANSPLANT PERFORMANCE IS POOR

• Extreme shortage of:
  • ICU infrastructure
  • BSD-certified hospitals
  • Trained transplant coordinators
• Major bottlenecks:
  • Legal confusion
  • Bureaucratic controls
  • Family consent delays
  • Low public awareness
• Result:
  • Massive organ-demand vs supply gap

KEY LEGAL CONFUSIONS AROUND BSD

Q1. Is BSD legally equivalent to cardiac death?

Yes, under the 1994 Act:

• “Deceased person” includes:
  • Death by brain-stem death
  • Death by cardio-pulmonary failure
• Core legal phrase:
  • “Permanent disappearance of all evidence of life”
• Therefore:
  • BSD has full legal recognition as death

Q2. Should life support continue if family refuses organ donation?

• Law:
  • Only defines death
  • Does not dictate post-death hospital actions
• Ethical-legal position:
  • If no consent:
    • Life support may be continued on family request
    • But death certificate time is final
  • If consent exists:
    • Life support must continue temporarily to preserve organs

Q3. Are two death certificates required?

• Current practice:
  • BSD certificate issued first
  • Fresh death certificate issued after organ harvest
• Legal position:
  • Unnecessary duplication
  • BSD certificate alone is sufficient for legal death registration

LINK WITH DEATH REGISTRATION LAW

• Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969
• Definition of death:
  • “Permanent disappearance of all evidence of life.”
• Same core definition as 1994 Act.
• Form 4 (Death Registration Form):
  • Separates:
    • Cause of death
    • Mode of death (heart failure, respiratory failure, etc.)
• BSD is interpreted as:
  • Respiratory failure due to brain-stem damage
• Conclusion:
  • No new amendment needed to register BSD legally.

MAJOR LEGAL CONTRADICTION NEEDING AMENDMENT

Section 14(1) of 1994 Act:

• BSD certification & organ retrieval allowed only in registered hospitals.

Rule 5(1) & 5(2):

• BSD certification mandatory in every hospital with ICU, including:
  • Non-transplant hospitals

Provision	What it Allows
Section 14	Only registered hospitals
Rule 5	All ICU hospitals

Resulting Contradiction:

This legally blocks universal BSD identification.

CRITICAL NEED FOR LEGISLATIVE AMENDMENT

Reform Required:

• Allow BSD certification and organ retrieval in all ICU-equipped hospitals.
• Restrict actual transplant surgery to:
  • Registered transplant centres only.

Why Essential:

• BSD commonly occurs in:
  • Trauma
  • Stroke
  • Brain haemorrhage cases
• Most such deaths occur in:
  • District hospitals
  • Medical colleges
• Current law artificially shrinks the donor pool.

BUREAUCRATIC BOTTLENECKS IN BSD CERTIFICATION

Problem 1: Doctor Approval by Appropriate Authority (AA)

• Form 10 requires:
  • 2 of the 4 certifying doctors to be AA-approved
• Issues:
  • No special qualification criteria
  • Cumbersome approval process
  • Doctors reluctant to apply
• Effect:
  • BSD certification gets delayed or avoided
• Reform Needed:
  • Allow any registered specialist medical practitioner to certify BSD.

Problem 2: No “Time of Death” in Form 10

• A death certificate without time = legally incomplete
• Kerala Government (2020) solved this by:
  • Defining time of death as:
    • “Time when arterial pCO₂ reaches target value in second apnoea test”
• Other States still lack this clarity.
• Result:
  • Legal uncertainty in death registration.

CONSENT PROCESS: LEGAL SEQUENCING

When should consent be sought?

• As per law:
  • First → BSD must be diagnosed & certified
  • Then only → Family approached for consent

Legal tools:

• Form 8 (Declaration & Consent Form):
  • Starts with:
    • “Has been declared brain-stem dead/dead…”
  • Confirms:
    • Authorisation for organ removal after BSD certification

Consent before BSD certification is legally incorrect.

POLICY IMPORTANCE OF CLEAR BSD LAW

• Addresses three national priorities:
  • Public health → Organ availability
  • Medical ethics → End-of-life clarity
  • Resource efficiency → ICU & ventilator optimisation
• Prevents:
  • Indefinite ventilator occupation
  • Medico-legal hesitation
  • Family-doctor conflict

---