Current Affairs 10 July 2025

Content :

1. 12 killed as key bridge collapses in Vadodara
2. ASI allows retired T.N. archaeologist to prepare report on Keeladi excavations
3. How can cat bonds plan for a natural disaster?
4. How did Himachal achieve a high rank on the NAS?
5. India’s Inequality Debate
6. IAF Jaguar Jet Crash

12 killed as key bridge collapses in Vadodara

The Incident

• Date & Location: Early morning, July 10, 2025 — Gambhira river bridge near Padra town, Vadodara district, Gujarat.
• Casualties: At least 12 dead, 9 rescued, 5 hospitalized.
• Collapse Type: A 15-meter-long concrete slab between two piers gave way.
• Vehicles Involved: Trucks, vans, and private vehicles tumbled into Mahisagar river.

Relevance : GS 3(Disaster Management)

Bridge Profile

• Structure Age: ~40 years old, linking Central Gujarat with the Saurashtra region.
• Type: RCC bridge — likely designed with pre-liberalisation specifications, outdated by modern stress norms.
• Function: Major economic and passenger artery; collapse disrupts movement of agricultural and industrial goods.

Probable Causes

• Structural Fatigue: Age-related concrete degradation and poor pier maintenance.
• Monsoon Impact: Heavy rains may have compromised soil or base structures.
• Lack of Audit: No recent comprehensive structural health monitoring reported.

Broader Governance Context

1. Systemic Neglect of Infrastructure Audits

• CAG & Parliamentary Committees have repeatedly flagged:
  • Lack of periodic audits for aging bridges.
  • Incomplete implementation of Bridge Management Systems (BMS) by States.

2. Absence of Preventive Maintenance Culture

• Focus remains on post-tragedy repair, compensation, and political blame games.
• No public database on load capacity, usage frequency, structural stress for old bridges.

3. Urban-Rural Infrastructure Divide

• Most such collapses occur in semi-urban/rural areas due to:
  • Lower prioritisation.
  • Infrequent inspection cycles.
  • Absence of real-time monitoring sensors.

Comparative Insight: Recent Bridge Collapses

Pattern: India sees approx.10–15 major bridge failures annually, many preventable through timely inspection.

Policy & Administrative Fallout

• Expected Probes:
  • PWD/State Infrastructure Department likely to face inquiry.
  • Probable FIRs against bridge maintenance contractors.

• Governance Signals:
  • Trust deficit in public infrastructure.
  • Pressure on Gujarat government amid upcoming fiscal planning for the 2026 Census preparation phase.

Way Forward: A Governance-Driven Infrastructure Agenda

• Bridge Safety Audit Mandate: Annual certified audits for all bridges 20+ years old.
• Digital BMS Expansion: Geo-tag, track, and monitor bridges via sensors & satellite imaging.
• Independent Safety Authority: Bridge safety oversight body independent of State PWDs.
• Transparent Public Dashboard: Real-time update on bridge health for citizen awareness.
• Preventive Budgeting: Earmark minimum 1% of GSDP annually for infra-retrofitting.

ASI allows retired T.N. archaeologist to prepare report on Keeladi excavations

What is Keeladi and Why It Matters

• Location: Keeladi, Sivaganga district, Tamil Nadu.
• Findings: Urban settlement traces, brick structures, script inscriptions, pottery, and industrial remains.
• Significance: Indicates a Sangam-era urban civilisation (circa 6th century BCE – 3rd century CE), suggesting:
  • Continuity of Tamil culture
  • Urban centres along the Vaigai river valley
  • Advanced trade, literacy, and planned habitation pre-dating many north Indian sites.

Relevance : GS 1(Culture ,Heritage,History )

Timeline of Excavations

Institutional Conflict

• 2017: ASI transferred Ramakrishna to Assam post-phase II, despite breakthrough findings.
• Sriraman Phase (III): Claimed lack of continuity with prior phases → criticized for downplaying significance.
• 2024–25: ASI permitted Sriraman to complete pending reports for Phase III (Keeladi) and Kodumanal.
• Meanwhile: ASI asked Ramakrishna to revise his original reports — he refused, defending his conclusions as sound and peer-worthy.

 Keeladi vs Kodumanal

• Kodumanal: Located in Erode district — known for bead-making industry, iron tools, and trade links with the Roman Empire.
• Sriraman also excavated one season here; report pending.

Current Progress

• 10 Phases completed at Keeladi (State-led).
• Hundreds of antiquities recovered.
• Material stored in Chennai, facilitating ongoing study and report writing.

Governance Challenges

• Conflict of Interpretations: Differences in archaeological conclusions reflecting possible ideological or bureaucratic interference.
• Central vs State Dynamics: Shift of excavation control from ASI to Tamil Nadu State Archaeology Dept. led to more sustained exploration.
• Report Delays: Highlights need for a time-bound reporting framework in Indian archaeology.

Implications for Indian Cultural History

• Counters Aryan-centric narratives: Keeladi suggests Dravidian urbanism existed independently and early.
• Sangam Age Reimagined: Reinforces historicity of Sangam literature describing trade, urban governance, literacy, and culture.
• Decentralised Heritage Management: Tamil Nadu’s persistence led to deeper exploration, setting an example for other States.

How can cat bonds plan for a natural disaster?

What are Cat Bonds?

• Definition: A hybrid insurance-cum-debt financial instrument that transforms disaster insurance into tradable securities.
• Purpose: Transfers pre-defined natural disaster risk (e.g., earthquakes, cyclones) from sovereigns to global investors.
• Issued via: Financial intermediaries like the World Bank, Asian Development Bank, or reinsurers.
• Payout Trigger: Based on objective disaster parameters (magnitude, location) — parametric triggers.

Relevance : GS 3(Economy, Disaster Management, and Environment )

How Do Cat Bonds Work?

High returns, high risk: If no disaster occurs, investors earn attractive interest. If disaster hits, they lose some/all principal.

Why Investors Buy Cat Bonds

• Portfolio Diversification: Cat risk curves are independent of market risk (low correlation).
• High Returns: Coupon rates vary (1–2% for earthquakes; higher for hurricanes/cyclones).
• $180 Billion+ issued globally so far; $50 Billion currently outstanding.
• Favored by: Large pension funds, seeking low-correlation assets for risk hedging.

Why India Should Lead in Cat Bonds

• Disaster-Prone Profile:
  • India faces recurring floods, cyclones, earthquakes, and forest fires.
  • Example: ₹1.8 lakh crore spent on disaster relief over the past decade (approx).

• Under-penetration of insurance:
  • Individual homes, livelihoods mostly uninsured → leads to financial vulnerability post-disaster.

Fiscal Prudence:

• Annual Mitigation Budget: ₹1.8 billion allocated since FY21–22 for capacity building.
• Cat Bonds reduce strain on public finances post-disaster → predictable budgeting.

A South Asian Regional Cat Bond – The Big Idea

• India as Lead Sponsor: Leverage its credit rating, financial depth, and disaster mitigation record.
• Risk Pooling Benefits:
  • Shared risk lowers individual premiums.
  • Leverages region’s hazard diversity (earthquakes in Nepal/Bhutan, tsunamis in Bay of Bengal, cyclones in Bangladesh & India).
• Geo-economic Gain: Enhances India’s role as a disaster-resilient regional leader in South Asia.

Design Flaws: Challenges to Watch

• Trigger Mismatch Risk:
  • Example: Earthquake bond designed for 6.6M threshold may not pay out for 6.5M quake that causes major damage.
• Perception Risk:
  • If no disaster occurs, questions may arise on high upfront costs.
• Solution: Transparent cost-benefit comparisons with historical relief expenditure.

Policy Recommendations

• Pilot a Cat Bond: Start with one high-impact hazard (e.g., floods in Assam or coastal cyclones).
• Use World Bank/ADB as Issuer: Tap into established credibility and global investor networks.
• Layer with Mitigation: Include DRR commitments (e.g., early warning systems) to lower premiums.
• Build Awareness: Educate policymakers and state disaster management authorities (SDMAs) on financial risk transfer tools.

How did Himachal achieve a high rank on the NAS?

What is the NAS?

• Conducted by: Ministry of Education (every 3 years)
• Coverage: Classes 3, 5, 8, and 10 in govt & aided schools.
• Subjects Tested: Language, Mathematics, Environmental Science, Science, Social Science.
• Purpose: Diagnostic tool to assess learning outcomes across States.

Relevance : GS 2(Education , Governance)

Why Himachal’s Jump is Significant

• 2021 Rank: 21st
• 2025 Rank: Top 5
• Improvement: Massive 16-rank leap in 4 years — biggest positive swing among all States.
• Context: Reversal of a two-decade decline in public schooling quality post-liberalisation.

Reform Strategies Behind the Success

• Structural Rationalisation:
  • Over 1,000 under-enrolled schools merged to optimise teacher deployment and infrastructure.
  • Unified school system under a single education directorate (pre-primary to Class 12).

• Accountability & Ownership:
  • Class 12 focus reintroduced to boost end-stage learning outcomes.
  • Greater autonomy in school-level decision-making.
  • Teachers and high-performing students sent for exposure visits (national & international).

• Cluster-based School Management:
  • Promoted peer learning, resource sharing, and community participation.
  • Fostered local identity and emotional connection with schools.

• Political Will:
  • Administration showed strong public commitment to education reform, reversing a legacy of neglect.

What NAS Captures — and Misses

Test scores ≠ Education quality. Himachal’s real achievement lies in restoring public trust in government schooling, not just academic scores.

Broader Socio-educational Context

• Historical Strengths: Legacy of Y.S. Parmar’s village-centric education model post-Independence.
• Decline Phase: Contractual hiring, poor facilities → private school boom even in remote areas.
• Demographic Challenge: Declining fertility rate (NFHS-5) demanded resource consolidation, not expansion.

Way Forward

• Regularise teacher recruitment to ensure stability and motivation.
• Expand beyond NAS: Introduce holistic assessments focusing on creativity, emotional intelligence, critical thinking.
• Equity Focus: Ensure remote, rural, and SC/ST students are not left behind in resource allocation or digital access.
• Sustain Community Engagement: Strengthen parent-teacher forums and local governance in school management.

India’s Inequality Debate: 10 Critical Analytical Insights

Inequality and the Gini Debate

• In July 2025, the Government of India cited a World Bank brief ranking India as the 4th most equal country globally, based on the consumption-based Gini index (Gini: 0.29).
• However, this ranking masks the ground reality, as income and wealth inequalities in India are among the highest globally, as per the World Inequality Database.
• As of 2023:
  • Top 1% earned 22.6% of national income and held 40.1% of total wealth.
  • Bottom 50% earned 14.6% of income and held only 6.4% of wealth.
• The Gini index based on consumption does not capture asset inequality, capital income, or structural disadvantages — leading to misleading claims of equality.
• This raises critical questions about the validity of India’s equality claims, the limitations of survey-based data, and the need for multidimensional inequality metrics.

Relevance : GS 3(Indian Economy ,Inequality , Gini Co-efficient)

Claim vs Reality: Gini Index Interpretation

• World Bank’s Brief (2024) ranked India as the 4th most equal country based on consumption-based Gini index.
  • India’s Gini index (consumption) was estimated at 0.29, implying low inequality.
  • Issue: This metric ignores income and wealth inequality, which are significantly higher.

Income Inequality is Rising Sharply

• As of 2023:
  • Top 1% income share: 22.6%
  • Top 10% income share: 57.7%
  • Bottom 50% share: just 14.6%
  • Reflects a threefold gap between top 1% and bottom 50% in income control.
  • Source: World Inequality Database

Wealth Inequality is Even More Stark

• In 2023:
  • Top 1% own 40.1% of total personal wealth.
  • Top 10%: 65%
  • Bottom 50%: only 6.4%
  • Indicates extreme concentration of wealth.
  • Historical trend: Wealth inequality has been consistently rising since the 1990s.

Limitations of Consumption-Based Gini

• It underestimates inequality because:
  • Consumption is smoother across households (poor borrow; rich save).
  • Surveys underreport elite consumption.
  • Rural-urban price differences and housing costs are not well-adjusted.
  • Gini fails to capture wealth hoarding, capital gains, inheritance effects.

Survey Quality Issues Distort Findings

• NSSO and NSO surveys suffer from:
  • Non-response bias
  • Under-sampling of top-income households
  • Outdated consumption baskets
  • This results in misleading aggregate equality metrics.

India’s Claim Omits Income/Wealth Data

• World Bank brief did not include income or wealth Gini (India does not officially publish them).
  • Other global rankings using income or wealth inequality place India far lower in equality metrics.

Taxation System Does Not Correct Inequality

• Pre- and post-tax income share of top 10% shows little difference.
  • Indicates that India’s taxation is not redistributive enough.
  • Direct taxes and wealth taxes are limited; subsidies don’t offset wealth concentration.

Bigger Picture Missed: Structural Inequality

• Gini does not account for:Caste-based or gender inequalityEducational or health access gapsIntergenerational mobility blockages
  • These structural issues exacerbate long-term inequality, especially among marginalised communities.

Global Comparisons are Misleading

• Nordic countries (e.g., Denmark) rank equal on both consumption and income metrics.
  • India’s claim of equality collapses when judged on income, asset ownership, or human capital indicators.
  • Suggests cherry-picking one metric to portray a broad narrative.

Policy Implications

• Need for triangulation: Combine consumption, income, and wealth data to assess inequality holistically.
• Revise tax structures to be more progressive.
• Improve data transparency: India must release periodic income and wealth Gini estimates.
• Strengthen social safety nets, asset redistribution schemes, and education/health access to reduce long-term disparities.

IAF Jaguar Jet Crash

The Crash: Key Facts

• Incident: A Jaguar fighter aircraft of the Indian Air Force crashed near Churu, Rajasthan on July 9, 2025, during a routine training sortie.
• Fatalities: Both pilots — Wing Commander R. Takle and Flight Lieutenant A. Dixit — lost their lives.
• Pattern: This is the third Jaguar crash since March 2025, highlighting a disturbing frequency.

Relevance : GS 3(Disaster Management , Defence)

Technical & Operational Concerns

• Aging Fleet: Jaguars were inducted into IAF in 1979; many are now over 40 years old.
• Previous Incidents:
  • March 2024: Jaguar crash post-takeoff from Ambala, pilot ejected safely.
  • March 2025: Pilot died during a similar crash in Rajasthan.
• Combat Capabilities: Designed for deep penetration strikes and low-altitude flying — operationally challenging roles that stress older airframes.

Why It Matters

• Obsolescence Risk: The Jaguar fleet is no longer being upgraded; IAF has discontinued the DARIN-III upgrade midway.
• Crash Trend: Out of 160 Jaguars inducted, fewer than 100 remain. Of these, many are at end-of-life.
• Survivability Issues: Unlike Su-30MKIs and Rafales, Jaguars lack modern ejection systems and sensors, reducing pilot survival chances.

Replacement & Modernization Imperatives

• Future Roadmap:
  • Jaguars to be replaced by HAL Tejas Mk1A, Su-30MKI upgrades, and Rafales under ongoing modernization.
  • HAL’s Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) is a long-term solution — first flight expected by 2030.
• Gap Risks: Decommissioning Jaguars without rapid replenishment could create operational gaps in deep-strike capabilities.

Macro Picture: India’s Combat Aircraft Fleet

Strategic Implications

• Training & Safety Protocols: Routine sorties turning fatal signal need for enhanced flight safety audits and stress testing of aging jets.
• Global Perception: Frequent crashes may dent IAF’s image in international military aviation, especially in light of export ambitions (e.g., Tejas).
• Pilot Morale & Safety: High-risk training in outdated platforms could impact combat readiness and morale of younger IAF personnel.