Current Affairs 21 February 2026

Content

1. Public Urinal & Open Garbage Bin Violating Right to Life – Delhi High Court Judgment
2. Simultaneous Elections Are Essential to Become a Developed Nation by 2047
3. World Pangolin Day 2026 – Global Trafficking Crisis & Conservation Imperatives
4. Black-necked Crane: Sentinel of the High Cold Desert
5. PAC Pulls Up Government for Slow Implementation of SANKALP Scheme
6. International Mother Language Day 2026 – Gujarat’s High Bilingual & Trilingual Population

---

Public Urinal & Open Garbage Bin Violating Right to Life – Delhi High Court Judgment

---

Source : The Hindu

Why in News / Context

• The Delhi High Court (Feb 2026) directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) to demolish a public urinal and open garbage bin constructed adjacent to a residential house in Old Delhi.
• The Court held that their presence violated the petitioner’s Right to Life under Article 21, which includes the right to live with dignity in a clean and healthy environment.
• The order was passed in a petition challenging the civic body’s failure to maintain sanitary standards and environmental hygiene.

Relevance

GS 2 – Polity & Governance

• Article 21 expansion; role of High Courts under Article 226; municipal accountability.

GS 3 – Environment

• Solid Waste Management Rules 2016; urban environmental management; public health linkages.

GS 1 – Society

• Urbanization challenges; sanitation and quality of life.

Practice Question

• “Urban sanitation infrastructure must balance public utility with individual dignity.”Discuss in the context of constitutional environmental jurisprudence and municipal governance in India. (250 words)

Static Background

1.  Constitutional Framework

• Article 21: Interpreted expansively to include the right to a clean and healthy environment (Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar, 1991).
• Article 48A (DPSP): State shall protect and improve the environment.
• Article 51A(g): Fundamental duty of citizens to protect natural environment.
• 74th Constitutional Amendment (1992): Urban local bodies empowered to manage sanitation, solid waste, and public health (12th Schedule).

2. Judicial Precedents

• M.C. Mehta cases: Established environmental jurisprudence and strict liability principles.
• Municipal Council, Ratlam v. Vardhichand (1980): Supreme Court held municipalities cannot plead financial inability to avoid sanitation duties.
• Courts have consistently upheld that public nuisance affecting health amounts to violation of Article 21.

3. Legal & Policy Framework

• Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016: Mandate scientific waste disposal, segregation, and prevention of open dumping.
• Swachh Bharat Mission (Urban): Focuses on sanitation infrastructure and waste management.
• National Urban Sanitation Policy (2008): Emphasizes safe sanitation facilities without causing public nuisance.

Data & Facts

• According to CPCB (2023), India generates over 62 million tonnes of municipal solid waste annually, of which only about 75–80% is collected, and less than 30% is scientifically processed.
• Delhi alone generates nearly 11,000+ tonnes of waste per day, placing immense pressure on civic infrastructure.
• WHO estimates that poor sanitation contributes to over 432,000 diarrhoeal deaths annually worldwide, underscoring sanitation-health linkages.

Key Legal Reasoning of the Court

• The Court observed that installing a public urinal and garbage bin adjacent to a residence creates a public nuisance and environmental hazard.
• Such installations may cause stench, vector-borne diseases, and degradation of living conditions, infringing the right to live with dignity.
• Civic bodies cannot justify such placement solely on administrative convenience without assessing public health implications.
• The Court reaffirmed that environmental protection is not optional but part of constitutional governance obligations.

Governance & Administrative Dimensions

• Urban local bodies (ULBs) have statutory responsibility for solid waste management and sanitation planning.
• Poor urban planning and lack of spatial mapping often result in sanitation infrastructure causing localized hardship.
• The case reflects implementation gaps in scientific waste segregation and decentralized waste management systems.

Environmental & Public Health Dimension

• Open garbage bins attract stray animals, rodents, and insects, increasing risk of vector-borne diseases (dengue, malaria).
• Public urinals without proper maintenance contribute to groundwater contamination and odour pollution.
• Poor sanitation undermines SDG 3 (Good Health) and SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities).

Social Justice & Urban Equity

• Sanitation infrastructure is essential, but its placement must balance community access and residential dignity.
• Urban poor areas often face disproportionate exposure to waste dumping sites, raising environmental justice concerns.
• The judgment reinforces that public utility cannot override individual dignity and health rights.

Broader Implications

• Strengthens jurisprudence linking urban governance failures with fundamental rights violations.
• Encourages participatory urban planning and grievance redress mechanisms.
• Signals stricter judicial scrutiny of municipal compliance under environmental norms.

Way Forward

• Adoption of GIS-based urban sanitation planning to avoid residential proximity hazards.
• Strengthening door-to-door segregated waste collection to reduce need for open bins.
• Regular audit of sanitation facilities under Swachh Bharat Mission 2.0.
• Institutionalising community consultation before installation of public utilities.

---

‘Simultaneous elections are essential to become a developed nation by 2047’

---

Source : The Hindu

Why in News / Context

• The Constitution (129th Amendment) Bill, 2024 proposing simultaneous elections to the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies is under examination by a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC).
• The JPC Chairperson has argued that synchronized elections are essential for achieving Viksit Bharat @2047, citing economic, governance, and administrative considerations.
• Concerns raised include:
  • Possible excessive discretion to the Election Commission (EC) under proposed Section 82A(5).
  • Handling of no-confidence motions and mid-term collapses.
  • Questions regarding federalism and basic structure doctrine.

Relevance

GS 2 – Polity & Governance

• Constitutional amendment process
• Basic structure doctrine
• Federalism
• Electoral reforms

GS 3 – Economy

• Election expenditure impact on GDP
• Investment climate & governance stability

Practice Question

• “Simultaneous elections aim to enhance governance efficiency while preserving democratic accountability.”
  Examine the constitutional, federal, and administrative implications of synchronizing elections in India. (250 words)

Static Background

1. Historical Practice

• From 1951–1967, elections to the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies were largely held simultaneously.
• The cycle broke due to premature dissolution of Assemblies and Parliament in the late 1960s and 1970s.

2. Relevant Constitutional Provisions

• Article 83(2) – Lok Sabha term: 5 years (unless sooner dissolved).
• Article 172 – State Assembly term: 5 years (unless sooner dissolved).
• Article 356 – President’s Rule, affecting Assembly tenure.
• Articles 324 – Superintendence of elections vested in the Election Commission of India (ECI).

3. Legal Doctrine

• Basic Structure Doctrine (Kesavananda Bharati, 1973) – Parliament cannot alter federalism, democracy, or free and fair elections.
• Courts have upheld reasonable restrictions on no-confidence motions in Panchayati Raj institutions in the interest of stability.

Economic & Administrative Arguments

• A paper presented to the Ram Nath Kovind Committee estimated a recurring loss of about 1.6% of GDP (~₹7 lakh crore) due to frequent elections.
• Frequent elections require repeated deployment of government machinery, including school teachers for electoral rolls and polling duties, potentially affecting instructional time.
• India’s Budget increased from ₹18 lakh crore (2014) to approximately ₹55 lakh crore (2024–25); proponents argue that procurement of additional EVMs (₹10,000–15,000 crore estimate) is fiscally manageable.
• Sectors like tourism (e.g., contributing 43% of Uttarakhand’s revenue) may experience seasonal disruption during election periods.

Governance & Federal Concerns

1. Federal Structure

• Critics argue synchronization may impact State autonomy, a key feature of Indian federalism.
• Proponents argue the proposal does not alter federal distribution of powers but only aligns election timelines.

2. No-Confidence Motions & Stability

• Debate on applying a “remainder term principle” (used in Panchayati Raj) – fresh elections only for the remaining tenure.
• Proposal under discussion: possibly restricting no-confidence motions during the final year to prevent short-duration elections.
• Balancing democratic accountability with administrative continuity remains central.

3. Role of the Election Commission

• Proposed provision allows EC to recommend deferring Assembly elections based on its “opinion.”
• Concerns raised about ensuring that such opinion is guided by objective criteria, recorded reasons, and judicial review safeguards.

Democratic Accountability Dimension

• Elections are the primary mechanism of executive accountability to Parliament and to the public.
• Simultaneous elections may reduce election frequency but must preserve:
  • Right to dissent and no-confidence motions
  • Legislative oversight
  • Political competition
• Key question: How to balance democratic flexibility with governance stability?

Comparative Perspective

• Several democracies conduct elections at fixed intervals (e.g., fixed-term Parliaments).
• India’s parliamentary model allows dissolution before term completion, making synchronization structurally complex.

Key Issues Under Examination

1. Mechanism for handling mid-term government collapse.
2. Whether shorter transitional terms are constitutionally defensible.
3. Safeguards against excessive discretion to constitutional authorities.
4. Maintaining periodic accountability while reducing election frequency.

Potential Advantages

• Reduced administrative burden and cost of repeated elections.
• Greater policy continuity and investment certainty.
• Decreased frequency of Model Code of Conduct (MCC) disruptions.

Potential Challenges

• Risk of weakening federal flexibility.
• Constitutional amendments require two-thirds majority + ratification by at least half the States.
• Logistical scale: India has over 96 crore registered voters (2024).
• Need for harmonizing with Representation of the People Act, 1951 provisions (Sections 14 & 15).

Way Forward

• Clearly define objective standards for EC discretion.
• Codify remainder-term provisions with constitutional safeguards.
• Ensure no dilution of basic structure principles.
• Undertake broad inter-party consensus building.
• Pilot synchronization in limited cycles before full implementation.

---

World Pangolin Day 2026 – Global Trafficking Crisis & Conservation Imperatives

---

Source : Down to Earth

Why in News / Context

• A new CITES report (2026) titled “Conservation Status, Trade and Enforcement Efforts for Pangolins” reveals that 553,042 pangolins were seized globally between 2016–2024.
• The report documents 2,222 seizure incidents across 49 countries, involving at least 74 countries and 178 unique trade routes.
• The findings were highlighted on World Pangolin Day (February 21, 2026), underscoring ongoing illegal wildlife trade concerns.

Relevance

GS 3 – Environment

• Wildlife trafficking , CITES framework , Biodiversity conservation & SDG 15 , Transnational environmental crime

Practice Question

• “Despite strict international protection under CITES Appendix I, pangolins continue to face large-scale illegal trade.”Examine the scale of global trafficking, key challenges in enforcement, and measures needed to strengthen pangolin conservation, with reference to India. (250 words)

Static Background

Taxonomy & Species

• Pangolins are placental mammals covered in keratin scales, often called the “world’s most trafficked mammals”.
• There are 8 extant species globally:
  • 4 Asian species – Chinese (Manis pentadactyla), Sunda (M. javanica), Indian (M. crassicaudata), Philippine (M. culionensis).
  • 4 African species – White-bellied (M. tricuspis), Black-bellied (M. tetradactyla), Giant (M. gigantea), Temminck’s (M. temminckii).
• All 8 species were assessed in IUCN Red List (2019) as Threatened, facing high to extremely high extinction risk.

International Legal Protection

• Pangolins are listed under CITES Appendix I (since 2017), prohibiting international commercial trade.
• India protects pangolins under Schedule I of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, offering highest legal safeguards.

Key Data & Findings (CITES 2026 Report)

• 553,042 pangolins seized (2016–2024) across 2,222 seizures.
• 10 countries accounted for 96% of total seizures, indicating concentration of enforcement hotspots.
• At least 74 countries involved in illegal trade networks.
• 178 unique trade routes identified, highlighting transnational trafficking complexity.
• China and Vietnam emerged as major alleged destination markets.
• Nigeria, Mozambique, Cameroon, and Congo identified as major alleged source countries.
• 83% of trafficked quantities were not identified to species level, limiting conservation targeting.
• Only 59% of seizure incidents were identified to species level (improved from 40% in 2021 report).
• Manis tricuspis (White-bellied pangolin): highest quantity trafficked (~80,077 individuals estimated).
• Manis temminckii involved in highest number of seizure incidents.
• Since 2017: 709 arrests and 188 convictions reported, majority in African range states (Zimbabwe alone: 541 arrests).

India-Specific Context

• India hosts 2 species:
  • Indian Pangolin (M. crassicaudata) – widespread except Northeast.
  • Chinese Pangolin (M. pentadactyla) – Northern & Northeastern India.
• Odisha: Indian pangolin confirmed in 14 of 30 districts.
• Maharashtra (Chiplun taluka): recorded in 90 of 164 villages.
• Only 11 global seizures specifically identified Indian pangolin (approx. 193 individuals) – lower than African species but still concerning.
• India’s 2021 CITES submission classified both species as “Data Deficient”, reflecting outdated population estimates.
• India did not submit updated data in 2025 CITES reporting cycle, unlike 27 other Parties.

Key Drivers of Trafficking

• Demand for pangolin scales (traditional medicine) and meat.
• Scales account for 99% of confiscated parts.
• Habitat loss across Africa and Asia intensifies vulnerability.
• Weak species-level identification hampers targeted conservation strategies.

Governance & Enforcement Issues

• Inconsistent species identification (83% unidentified by quantity) affects monitoring precision.
• Domestic demand persists in multiple range states, including parts of South Asia and Africa.
• Some countries strengthened measures (e.g., China, Angola, Liberia, Singapore, U.S., Vietnam), but domestic markets remain partially regulated.
• Enforcement gaps and lenient penalties weaken deterrence.

Environmental & Ecological Significance

• Pangolins are ecosystem engineers, controlling ant and termite populations.
• Their decline may disrupt soil health and insect population balance.
• Loss of pangolins undermines biodiversity conservation targets under SDG 15 (Life on Land).

Key Concerns

• Trafficking networks are highly transnational (74 countries, 178 routes).
• Enforcement success (increased arrests) not proportionate to conviction rate (709 arrests vs 188 convictions).
• Lack of updated population assessments in several range states, including India.

Way Forward

• Strengthen species-level forensic identification capacity at borders.
• Improve wildlife crime databases and intelligence sharing through INTERPOL & WCO.
• Update national population estimates and ecological surveys in India.
• Enhance community-based conservation & livelihood alternatives in source regions.
• Promote behavioural change campaigns targeting demand reduction.

---

Black-necked Crane: Sentinel of the High Cold Desert

---

Source : Down to Earth

Why in News / Context

• On World Wetlands / Biodiversity awareness platforms (2026), renewed concern has emerged over the declining breeding success of the Black-necked Crane (Grus nigricollis) in Ladakh.
• Reports indicate sharp decline in breeding pairs in Hanle wetlands, where numbers reduced from 4 pairs to 1–2 pairs, often with repeated nesting failure.
• Rising threats include free-ranging dogs, wetland degradation, infrastructure expansion, tourism disturbance, and climate change.

Relevance

GS 3 – Environment

• Biodiversity conservation ,Wetland ecosystems ,Climate change impacts on Himalayas ,Wildlife Protection Act

GS 1 – Geography

• Trans-Himalayan cold desert ecosystem, Human–environment interaction

GS 2 – Governance

• International conventions (CITES, CMS), Community conservation models

Practice Question

• “The survival of high-altitude species like the Black-necked Crane depends on integrated wetland management and climate resilience.”
  Discuss the ecological importance of the species, major threats, and policy measures needed for its long-term conservation in India. (250 words)

Static Background

Taxonomy & Status

• Scientific name: Grus nigricollis.
• Height: approx. 1.4 metres, one of the tallest high-altitude cranes.
• Habitat: Breeds between 2,600–4,900 metres elevation in Tibetan and Trans-Himalayan wetlands.
• Global population: 13,000–15,000 individuals (IUCN estimate).
• IUCN Red List (2019): Near Threatened.

Legal Protection

• Listed under Schedule I of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 – highest protection in India.
• Included in CITES Appendix I & II – strict regulation of international trade.
• Protected under Convention on Migratory Species (CMS).

Indian Distribution

• Found in Ladakh (primary breeding ground) and parts of Arunachal Pradesh (wintering sites).
• Known locally as “cha thung-thung” (Ladakh) and “thungdung karma” (Arunachal Pradesh).
• Important sites: Hanle, Tsomoriri, Tsokar, Loma, Startsapuk Tso wetlands.

Key Ecological & Demographic Data

• Globally only 13,000–15,000 cranes survive, majority on Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.
• Hanle wetlands: decline from 4 breeding pairs to 1–2 pairs, often with unsuccessful breeding.
• Nearly 90% of Ladakh’s population depends on livestock, intensifying wetland grazing pressure.
• Climate warming in Himalayas is occurring at a rate higher than global average, threatening glacier-fed wetlands.

Ecological Significance

• Indicator species of high-altitude wetland health.
• Controls invertebrate populations; depends on sedges, grasses, and marsh invertebrates.
• High site fidelity – returns to same breeding site annually, making habitat loss particularly devastating.
• Functions as a flagship species for cold desert conservation.

Major Threats

Habitat Degradation

• Wetland shrinkage due to settlement expansion and agriculture.
• Infrastructure growth: electric poles, solar and wind farms fragment nesting sites.
• Grassland conversion from traditional pastures to cultivation.

Free-Ranging Dogs

• Dogs maintained by army units, herders, and settlements raid nests.
• High egg and chick predation causing repeated breeding failure.

Livestock Overgrazing

• Expansion of sheep, goat, and yak herds degrades fragile alpine wetlands.
• Reduces nesting cover and food availability.

Tourism Pressure

• Peak tourist season overlaps with breeding season.
• Disturbance near Tsomoriri and Tsokar lakes causes adults to abandon nests.

Climate Change

• Himalayan region warming faster than global average.
• Glacier retreat reduces water flow to marshes.
• Long-term shrinkage of wetlands threatens breeding habitat permanence.

Governance & Conservation Gaps

• Despite Schedule I protection, many key habitats lie outside Protected Areas.
• Limited regulation of tourism infrastructure in sensitive wetlands.
• Need for stronger enforcement of Community Conservation Areas (e.g., 108 sq km Pangchen Schoktsen Lakhar CCA).

Way Forward

• Declare critical wetlands as Eco-Sensitive Zones / Protected Areas.
• Implement scientific management of free-ranging dog populations.
• Regulate renewable energy and infrastructure siting in breeding habitats.
• Promote community-based conservation with pastoralists.
• Integrate Black-necked crane conservation into National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC) and wetland restoration programs.

---

PAC pulls up Government for slow implementation of SANKALP Scheme

---

Source : The Hindu

Why in News / Context

• The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) of Parliament has criticised the Government for “lackadaisical implementation” of the SANKALP scheme based on a CAG audit report.
• The PAC questioned the absence of a central monitoring mechanism, weak due diligence before loan approval, and slow financial utilisation.
• The issue was raised after examination of the CAG Report on Skill Development & Entrepreneurship highlighting delays and shortfalls.

Relevance

GS 2 – Governance

• Role of PAC & CAG, Parliamentary financial oversight, Centre–State coordination

GS 3 – Economy

• Skill development ecosystem, External funding & fiscal management, Employment generation

Practice Question

• “Parliamentary oversight mechanisms are crucial for ensuring effective implementation of public schemes.” Examine the issues raised in the implementation of the SANKALP scheme and suggest measures to strengthen financial accountability in skill development programmes. (250 words)

Static Background

What is SANKALP?

• SANKALP – Skill Acquisition and Knowledge Awareness for Livelihood Promotion.
• Launched in 2018 by the Ministry of Skill Development & Entrepreneurship (MSDE).
• Objective: Strengthen short-term skill training, improve institutional frameworks, enhance industry linkages, and promote inclusion of marginalised groups.

Financial Structure

• Supported by a World Bank loan of ₹3,300 crore.
• Additional leverage:
  • ₹660 crore (State share)
  • ₹495 crore (Industry share)
• Total estimated outlay: approximately ₹4,455 crore.
• Loan agreement signed in March 2023 (revised timeline).

Constitutional & Institutional Context

• Skill development is linked to Article 41 (Right to Work – DPSP).
• Falls under Concurrent List (Entry 25 – Education & Vocational Training).
• PAC functions under Article 151 (CAG audit oversight) and ensures financial accountability of executive to Parliament.

Key Audit Findings (CAG & PAC Observations)

• Only 44% of the sanctioned funds were disbursed during 2017–18 and 2023–24 (as of October 2023).
• Of ₹1,606.15 crore disbursed (86%) by the World Bank, only ₹850.71 crore was utilised by December 2023.
• CAG flagged delays in:
  • Financial progress
  • Physical implementation
  • Institutional reforms
• PAC raised concerns regarding:
  • Lack of central monitoring mechanism
  • Gaps in pre-loan due diligence
  • Slow execution pace across components

Governance & Accountability Dimension

• Reflects importance of parliamentary oversight (PAC) in ensuring fiscal discipline.
• Highlights issues in project management capacity within ministries.
• Raises questions on effective utilisation of externally aided projects (EAPs).
• Demonstrates need for stronger Outcome-Based Monitoring Frameworks (OBMF).

Economic & Development Dimension

• Skill development critical for addressing youth unemployment (~15% urban youth, PLFS 2023).
• Delays weaken India’s demographic dividend potential.
• Skill ecosystem linked to Make in India, PLI schemes, and industrial competitiveness.
• Underutilisation of funds reduces multiplier effect on employment generation.

Administrative Gaps Identified

• Absence of real-time centralised MIS (Management Information System).
• Weak coordination between Centre and States under Concurrent List framework.
• Insufficient industry participation despite targeted leverage of ₹495 crore.

Broader Implications

• Slow implementation may affect India’s commitments toward SDG 4 (Quality Education) and SDG 8 (Decent Work & Economic Growth).
• Impacts credibility of India in managing World Bank-funded programmes.
• Signals structural challenges in scaling national skilling reforms.

Way Forward

• Establish a central monitoring dashboard with periodic performance audits.
• Strengthen State Skill Development Missions (SSDMs) capacity.
• Link fund disbursement to measurable employment outcomes.
• Improve due diligence before signing external loan agreements.
• Increase industry engagement through Apprenticeship and Cluster-based models.

---

International Mother Language Day 2026 – Gujarat’s High Bilingual & Trilingual Population

---

Source : TOI

Why in News / Context

• On International Mother Language Day (21 February 2026), UNESCO’s theme “Youth voices on multilingual education” highlights the role of young people in preserving linguistic diversity.
• Census-based analysis shows Gujarat has significantly higher bilingual and trilingual population shares compared to national averages.
• Cultural organisations in Ahmedabad are promoting storytelling, dialect documentation, and digital preservation of regional Gujarati variants.

Relevance

GS 1 – Indian Society & Culture

• Linguistic diversity and regional identity.
• Impact of migration and diaspora on language patterns.

GS 2 – Education & Social Justice

• NEP 2020 and multilingual education.
• Protection of linguistic minorities.

Practice Question

• “Multilingualism strengthens both cultural identity and cognitive capital.”
  Discuss the significance of high bilingual and trilingual populations in states like Gujarat in the context of inclusive education and socio-economic development. (250 words)

Static Background

Constitutional Framework

• Article 29 & 30 – Protection of linguistic minorities.
• Article 350A – Instruction in mother tongue at primary stage for linguistic minorities.
• Eighth Schedule – Recognises 22 scheduled languages, including Gujarati.

International Context

• International Mother Language Day observed annually on February 21 since 1999 (UNESCO declaration).
• Promotes linguistic diversity, multilingual education, and cultural preservation.
• Linked to SDG 4 (Quality Education) and inclusive learning.

Key Data & Facts (Census 2011)

• Nationally:
  • 26% of Indians identified as bilingual.
  • 7% identified as trilingual.
• Gujarat:
  • 43% bilingual population (significantly above national average).
  • 14% trilingual population (double national average).
• Gujarat is a major linguistic state with significant diaspora presence across Africa, UK, USA, and Gulf countries.

Sociolinguistic Significance

• High bilingualism reflects:
  • Interaction between Gujarati, Hindi, and English.
  • Trade and migration-driven language adaptation.
  • Strong diaspora-led linguistic retention.
• Regional dialects include Kathiawadi, Surti, Charotari, Kutchhi, showing intra-state linguistic diversity.
• Language preservation through digital platforms supports intergenerational transmission.

Governance & Education Dimension

• Multilingualism aligns with NEP 2020, which promotes mother tongue/regional language instruction till Grade 5 (preferably Grade 8).
• Gujarat’s linguistic adaptability supports implementation of multilingual pedagogy models.
• High bilingualism may enhance cognitive development and employability outcomes.

Cultural & Economic Implications

• Gujarati diaspora strengthens global cultural networks and remittance economy.
• Multilingual skills contribute to Gujarat’s prominence in trade, entrepreneurship, and migration-based economies.
• Documentation of dialects preserves intangible cultural heritage.

Emerging Challenges

• Urbanisation may reduce intergenerational transmission of dialects.
• Increasing English dominance may marginalise local dialect variations.
• Census 2027 may reveal shifts in linguistic identification trends.

Way Forward

• Promote digital archiving of Gujarati dialects.
• Integrate community storytelling and youth-led language initiatives.
• Strengthen implementation of mother-tongue-based multilingual education (MTB-MLE).
• Encourage diaspora engagement in linguistic preservation.

---