Call Us Now

+91 9606900005 / 04

For Enquiry

legacyiasacademy@gmail.com

Editorials/Opinions Analysis For UPSC 03 November 2025

  1. The vision of Model Youth Gram Sabhas
  2. Cruising ahead


 Why in News ?

  • The Ministry of Panchayati Raj, in collaboration with the Ministries of Education and Tribal Affairs and the Aspirational Bharat Collaborative, launched the Model Youth Gram Sabha (MYGS) 2025.
  • Aim: To cultivate civic participation, local leadership, and awareness of Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) among students by simulating real Gram Sabha proceedings.

Relevance:

  • GS-2 (Governance & Polity): Local governance, participatory democracy, 73rd Amendment.
  • GS-1 (Society): Role of youth and civic engagement in nation-building.

Practice Question :

  • Discuss how the Model Youth Gram Sabha initiative can strengthen the democratic fabric of India by bridging the gap between constitutional ideals and civic practice.(150 Words)

Constitutional & Institutional Basis

  • Article 243A (73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992):
    Empowers the Gram Sabha to function as the foundational body of the Panchayati Raj System.
  • Definition: Comprises all registered voters of a village; deliberates on local budgets, plans, and governance priorities.
  • Significance:
    • Embodies direct democracy.
    • Ensures transparency, accountability, and citizen participation at the grassroots.

Gram Sabha – Cornerstone of Participatory Democracy

  • Role in Democratic Architecture:
    • Equivalent in importance to Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabha, but at the village level.
    • Represents the purest form of democracy—citizens directly deliberate on governance.
  • Current Challenge:
    • Low public participation; especially minimal youth engagement.
    • Poor visibility in educational curricula compared to global institutions like the Model United Nations (MUN) or Youth Parliament.

Why the Gram Sabha Isn’t Aspirational ?

  • Educational Gap:
    • School syllabi emphasize national and international governance structures, ignoring local self-governance.
  • Perception Problem:
    • Youths aspire to Parliament, not Panchayats; governance is seen as top-down.
  • Cultural Disconnect:
    • Civic education treats the Gram Sabha as an administrative formality, not a living democratic experience.

Model Youth Gram Sabha (MYGS), 2025 – Key Features

  • Objective:
    • To make Gram Sabha participation experiential and aspirational among students.
    • To instil democratic values and civic responsibility at an early age.
  • Structure & Simulation:
    • Students play roles of Sarpanch, ward members, health workers, engineers, etc.
    • Simulate budget discussions, policy resolutions, and village development planning.
    • Supported by teacher training and performance incentives (certificates, awards).
  • Phase 1 Implementation (2025):
    • Coverage: 1,000 schools across 28 States and 8 Union Territories.
    • Institutions:
      • 600+ Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas (JNVs)
      • 200 Eklavya Model Residential Schools (EMRSs)
      • Selected Zilla Parishad Schools (e.g., Maharashtra)
    • Teacher Training:
      • 126 Master Trainers
      • 1,238 Teachers trained (24 States/UTs).
  • Pilot Successes:
    • JNV Baghpat (U.P.) and EMRS Alwar (Rajasthan) conducted successful pilots.
    • JNV Sitapur (Bundi, Rajasthan) involved 300+ students in mock deliberations.

Planned Expansion (Phase 2)

  • Nationwide scale-up to include all state-run schools.
  • Integration into civics curricula and extracurricular clubs.
  • Collaboration with NCERT, NIOS, and State Education Boards for curricular embedding.

Pedagogical & Civic Significance

  • Experiential Learning: Converts textbook civics into lived democratic practice.
  • Leadership Incubation: Encourages youth leadership, teamwork, and critical debate.
  • Local Governance Awareness: Builds appreciation for Panchayati Raj Institutions.
  • Civic Values: Reinforces the constitutional ideals of participation, inclusion, and responsibility.

Broader Democratic Implications

  • Bridging the Governance Gap:
    • Connects citizens to governance at the most immediate level—village decision-making.
  • Institutional Continuity:
    • Youth familiar with Gram Sabha functions are more likely to engage in real ones later.
  • Towards Viksit Bharat @2047:
    • Strengthens bottom-up governance, key for achieving inclusive and sustainable development.
  • Complementary to Other Initiatives:
    • Aligns with National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 (experiential learning, civic education).
    • Supports Aspirational District Programme by nurturing local changemakers.

Challenges & Way Forward

  • Challenges:
    • Need for standardized curriculum integration.
    • Varying levels of teacher capacity across states.
    • Sustaining student enthusiasm beyond simulation.
  • Way Forward:
    • Institutionalize MYGS in school civics clubs.
    • Include evaluation metrics for civic participation.
    • Strengthen linkages with actual Gram Sabhas for field exposure.
    • Recognize student participation in national awards and scholarships.

Comparative Insight

  • Model United Nations (MUN) → Builds global awareness.
  • Model Youth Parliament → Builds national political literacy.
  • Model Youth Gram Sabha (MYGS) → Builds grassroots democratic consciousness.
    • Complements top-down democratic learning with bottom-up engagement.

Conclusion

  • The Gram Sabha is the soul of India’s democracy, yet under-recognized.
  • The Model Youth Gram Sabha revives this spirit by linking youth aspiration with local governance.
  • By nurturing civic pride, participatory values, and local leadership, it transforms democracy from a constitutional concept to a daily practice.
  • As future leaders emerge from classrooms that simulate real governance, the Gram Sabha could once again become the beating heart of Indian democracy.


Why in News ?

  • The India Maritime Week 2025, inaugurated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, underscored the government’s renewed focus on the strategic and economic importance of India’s shipping sector.
  • The event marked a shift from decades of neglect under liberalisation policies to viewing shipping as critical to national security, trade sovereignty, and industrial capacity.

Relevance:

  • GS-3 (Infrastructure, Economy, Maritime Transport) – Port-led development, Sagarmala, Atmanirbhar Bharat.
  • GS-2 (Governance) – Strategic autonomy and public sector role in critical infrastructure.

Practice Question :

  • Critically assess the impact of liberalization policies on India’s shipping sector and how recent policy interventions seek to restore strategic autonomy.(250 Words)

Background: Evolution and Decline of Indian Shipping

  • Pre-liberalisation (1950s–1980s):
    • India built strong public sector capabilities through the Shipping Corporation of India (SCI).
    • SCI was among the top global shipping companies, owning large fleets servicing India’s oil, coal, and trade sectors.
  • Post-liberalisation decline (1990s–2010s):
    • Under LPG reforms, government withdrew preferential treatment to SCI (e.g., first rights on oil transport).
    • Private sector entry did not compensate for shrinking public fleet capacity.
    • The government’s focus shifted toward training Indian seafarers for global employment, not domestic shipping growth.
    • Result: By 2020, India’s share in global shipping tonnage dropped below 1%, while dependence on foreign vessels surged.

COVID-19: A Strategic Wake-Up Call

  • The pandemic exposed India’s maritime vulnerability:
    • Over 90% of India’s trade by volume and 70% by value depends on shipping.
    • But most vessels were foreign-owned, leaving India with little leverage to ensure supply chain continuity.
  • The crisis highlighted shipping as not just an economic sector but a strategic asset, vital for energy security, defense logistics, and trade resilience.

Government’s Renewed Maritime Focus

  • Strategic Repositioning:
    • Shipping is now treated as “dual-purpose infrastructure” — economic + strategic.
    • SCI revival: Fleet expansion, fleet modernization, and new capital infusion after the aborted privatization plan.
  • Policy Orientation Shift:
    • From a purely market-liberal approach to strategic interventionism.
    • Aim: Develop self-reliant merchant shipping aligned with Atmanirbhar Bharat and Maritime India Vision 2030.

Major Announcements at India Maritime Week

  • Port-Centric Investments:
    • Lakhs of crores in investment commitments — mainly in port modernization and connectivity.
    • Government follows the Landlord Port Model:
      • Ports retain ownership; private operators handle terminals under revenue-sharing.
      • Enhances financial autonomy for reinvestment in capacity building.
  • New Transshipment Hubs:
    • Chennai Port and Kolkata Port developing a hub in the Andaman & Nicobar Islands to reduce reliance on Singapore/Colombo.
  • Sagarmala & Bharatmala Synergy:
    • Focus on port-road-rail integration, coastal cargo corridors, and logistics parks.
  • Human Capital Development:
    • Expansion of Indian seafarer training capacity to maintain India’s global leadership (Indian seafarers form ~10% of global maritime workforce).

Policy Initiatives for Shipping Industry

  • Flagging Incentive Scheme:
    • Encourages foreign companies to register ships in India via local subsidiaries.
    • Objective:
      • Ensure regulatory leverage during crises.
      • Support allied services — insurance, repair, logistics, bunkering.
  • Fleet Expansion Support:
    • New credit lines and tonnage tax reforms to enhance Indian ship ownership.
  • Shipbuilding Push:
    • Slow progress despite policy intent.
    • Government aims to promote domestic shipyards for building:
      • LNG carriers,
      • Green-fuel (ammonia/methanol) vessels,
      • Defence dual-use ships.

Structural Challenges

  • Low Merchant Fleet Share: India-owned fleet constitutes <2% of cargo handled in Indian ports.
  • Shipbuilding Weakness:
    • India ranks behind China, Japan, South Korea in global shipbuilding output.
    • Limited heavy industrial capacity and R&D for advanced propulsion systems.
  • Financing Constraints:
    • High capital costs and long project cycles deter private investment.
  • Policy Uncertainty:
    • Frequent regulatory changes, port user charges, and taxation issues limit competitiveness.

Strategic Importance of a Strong Shipping Sector

  • Trade Security: Control over transport of critical imports (oil, fertilizers, defense materials).
  • Economic Multiplier: Boosts allied industries — steel, engineering, insurance, logistics.
  • Energy Transition Leverage: Capability to build LNG and green-fuel vessels essential for future trade.
  • Geopolitical Stability: Maritime capacity enhances India’s position in Indo-Pacific strategic supply chains.

The Road Ahead: Policy Recommendations

  • Revive and modernize SCI with a diversified fleet mix.
  • Fiscal incentives for private shipbuilders (interest subvention, long-term contracts).
  • Green Shipping Initiative under National Hydrogen Mission for eco-friendly propulsion systems.
  • Maritime Cluster Development: Create integrated hubs combining shipbuilding, repair, logistics, and R&D.
  • Expand coastal shipping and inland waterways to decongest ports and reduce logistics costs (currently ~14% of GDP).

Conclusion

  • India’s maritime strategy is shifting from port-centric to fleet-centric development.
  • Without strong indigenous ship ownership and shipbuilding, India risks dependence in crises despite having world-class ports.
  • True maritime power will emerge when Indian yards can build and operate advanced green vessels, and India controls a self-reliant merchant fleet serving both commercial and strategic needs.

November 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
Categories