Editorials/Opinions Analysis For UPSC 23 January 2026

  1. Himalayan Infrastructure, Climate Extremes and Governance Failure
  2. BRICS Summit 2026 — India’s Opportunity to Lead the Global South on Climate Resilience


Climate Disasters and Contested Infrastructure Decisions
  • In 2025, India experienced nearly 331 days of climate-related extremes, resulting in over 4,000 deaths, with Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand facing the highest human and economic losses from floods, landslides and avalanches.

Relevance

  • GS Paper 1 (Geography):
    Himalayan geomorphology, Main Central Thrust (MCT), landslides, cloudbursts, glacial processes, humanenvironment interaction, climate change impacts on mountain ecosystems.
  • GS Paper 3 (Environment & Disaster Management):
    Climate change as risk multiplier, disaster vulnerability of Himalayas, infrastructure-led ecological degradation, Environmental Impact Assessment dilution, sustainable development vs connectivity.

Practice Question

  • Climate change acts as a risk multiplier, but unsafe land use converts climate stress into disasters.Examine this statement with reference to recent Himalayan infrastructure projects.(250 Words)
Intensification of Climate Extremes
  • Recurrent cloudbursts, flash floods, avalanches and land subsidence across Dharali, Harsil, Uttarkashi, Chamoli, Kullu, Mandi and Kishtwar indicate a structural shift from episodic disasters to a near-permanent climate-risk regime.
Scientific Evidence of Accelerated Warming
  • Recent studies show high-altitude Himalayan regions warming nearly 50% faster than the global average since 1950, increasing glacial melt, rainfall volatility, and frequency of compound disasters.
Forest Diversion and Tree Felling
  • On 12 November, Uttarakhand Forest Department approved diversion of 43 hectares of forest land, including felling of nearly 7,000 deodar (devdar) trees, for the Char Dham road-widening project, with 10 hectares earmarked for muck dumping.
Flawed Engineering Standards
  • The project relies on the DL-PS (double-lane with paved shoulder) norm mandating a 12-metre paved width, despite expert warnings that such standards are unsuitable for fragile Himalayan slopes.
Tectonic Sensitivity
  • The project area lies north of the Main Central Thrust (MCT), a tectonically active zone where large infrastructure is explicitly discouraged due to high landslide and seismic susceptibility.
Glacial Instability
  • The region is fed by the Gangotri glacier, among the world’s fastest receding glaciers, sustaining unstable, moraine-laden hanging glaciers, one of which contributed directly to the Dharali avalancheflash flood disaster.
Natural Disaster Mitigation Functions
  • Deodar forests possess deep root systems that stabilise slopes, reduce landslides, act as barriers against avalanches and debris flows, and protect downstream settlements from sudden hydrological shocks.
Riverine and Microclimatic Regulation
  • Located within the Bhagirathi Eco-Sensitive Zone (4,000 sq km, notified in 2012), these forests regulate Ganga water quality, maintain cooler microclimates, and stabilise dissolved oxygen levels in snowmelt-fed streams.
Microbial and Chemical Regulation
  • Deodar leaf litter releases terpenoids, phenolic compounds and essential oils, inhibiting harmful bacteria while promoting beneficial microbial communities, sustaining a biologically active and self-regulating river ecosystem.
Judicial Position
  • The Supreme Court of India has explicitly discouraged felling of old-growth deodar forests, recognising their irreplaceable ecological and disaster-mitigation functions.
Ecological Fallacy of Tree Translocation
  • Proposals to “translocate” centuries-old deodars ignore ecological realities; uprooting destroys site-specific functions that cannot be recreated elsewhere, making translocation ecologically equivalent to felling.
Environmental Governance Lapses
  • The project bypassed a comprehensive Environmental Impact Assessment through fragmentation, adopted incorrect road-width standards, and allowed vertical hill-cutting on fragile slopes.
Measurable Consequences
  • Along nearly 700 km of widened roads, more than 800 active landslide zones have emerged, frequently blocking strategic border routes and undermining the claim of an “all-weather road”.
Violation of Geological Principles
  • Slopes were cut beyond the natural angle of repose, permanently destabilising terrain; later proposals such as fibreglass bolts and wire mesh cannot correct this foundational design flaw.
Cost of Post-Facto Reinforcement
  • Retrofitting measures proposed eight years after construction began reflect reactive governance, increasing fiscal costs while failing to restore lost ecological and geological stability.
Contradiction with National Climate Policy
  • Current actions violate the mandate of the National Mission for Sustaining the Himalayan Ecosystem, approved in 2014 to monitor glaciers, mitigate hazards and guide sustainable Himalayan development.
Repeated Regulatory Warnings Ignored
  • Unsafe land use—wide highways, deep tunnelling without adequate surveys, and large hydropower projects—has been repeatedly flagged by the National Green Tribunal, yet continues unchecked.
 From Floods to Future Scarcity
  • Accelerated glacial melt triggers a short-term water peak phase marked by catastrophic floods, inevitably followed by long-term water scarcity and drought once glaciers retreat fully.
Compounding Human Pressures
  • Unregulated tourism, rising vehicular traffic, lack of carrying-capacity assessments and weak solid-waste management amplify climate risks, exposing deep governance and planning failures.
Reframing Development in the Himalayas
  • Disaster resilience must precede connectivity; regulating road width, protecting old-growth forests, and aligning infrastructure with geological and climate science is an ecological, economic and national security necessity.
Central Takeaway
  • The Himalayan crisis demonstrates that unsafe land use converts climate stress into human catastrophe, reaffirming the axiom that without the Himalayas, there is no India.
Basic Concept
  • Char Dham Yatra refers to a Hindu pilgrimage circuit in Uttarakhand, believed to have been systematised by Adi Shankaracharya (8th century CE) to promote spiritual unity in the Himalayas.
  • It is distinct from the All-India Char Dham (Badrinath, Dwarka, Puri, Rameswaram).
Four Dhams (Uttarakhand Char Dham)
  • Yamunotri
    • Source of River Yamuna
    • Associated with Goddess Yamuna
    • Located in Garhwal Himalayas, Uttarkashi district
  • Gangotri
    • Source of River Ganga (Bhagirathi)
    • Near Gaumukh Glacier
    • Uttarkashi district
  • Kedarnath
    • One of the 12 Jyotirlingas of Lord Shiva
    • Located near Mandakini River
    • Rudraprayag district
  • Badrinath
    • Dedicated to Lord Vishnu
    • Located on the banks of Alaknanda River
    • Chamoli district


India to Host the Next BRICS Summit
  • India will host the BRICS Summit in 2026, leveraging experience from the G-20 Summit (2023), at a time when multilateral climate cooperation is under strain and the Global South faces rising climate vulnerabilities.

Relevance

  • GS Paper 2 (International Relations):
    BRICS as a multilateral platform, Global South leadership, Indias multi-alignment strategy, climate diplomacy, managing India–US–China equations.
  • GS Paper 3 (Environment & Economy):
    Climate finance, adaptation and resilience, impact of unilateral trade measures like CBAM, role of Bretton Woods institutions, sustainable development pathways.

Practice Question

  • Explain how BRICS can function as a stabilising force in global climate governance amid weakening Western climate leadership.(250 Words)
Polarised Global Order and Climate Pushback
  • In an increasingly polarised world, the return of Donald Trump has weakened collaborative multilateralism, with climate change labelled a “hoax” and renewed emphasis on fossil fuels.
Retreat of Traditional Climate Champions
  • The U.S. announced withdrawal from 66 international organisations, including the India-led International Solar Alliance, and stayed away from COP30 (Belém, 2025), while Europe faces climate fatigue and security pressures.
Strategic Space for BRICS
  • With Western climate leadership weakening, BRICS can emerge as a stabilising coalition to sustain momentum on sustainability, resilience, and equitable development for developing countries.
Managing Geopolitical Sensitivities
  • BRICS is perceived by the U.S. as anti-American and anti-dollar, requiring India to balance BRICS leadership with strong India–U.S. ties, trade negotiations, and sanctions sensitivities, especially on Russian oil imports.
Shared Vulnerabilities Across BRICS
  • BRICS countries face diverse but converging climate risks: permafrost thaw (Russia), Amazon stress (Brazil), Himalayan instability (India, China), and coastal and riverine flooding across Africa and West Asia.
Continuity from BASIC to Expanded BRICS
  • At the UNFCCC, the BASIC grouping has defended developing country interests, but an expanded BRICS offers greater negotiating heft on adaptation, equity, and development space.
Stewardship of the Climate Process
  • Several BRICS members have led post-Paris climate negotiations: Brazil, Egypt, and UAE presided over COPs after COVID-19, helping preserve global climate momentum amid geopolitical disruption.
Countering Unilateral Climate Trade Measures
  • BRICS can collectively respond to unilateral instruments like the EUs Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), ensuring climate action does not become a disguised trade barrier against developing economies.
Rio 2025 Breakthrough
  • The July 2025 BRICS Summit in Rio de Janeiro adopted the BRICS LeadersFramework Declaration on Climate Finance, reinforcing long-standing Global South demands for predictable, adequate, and concessional climate finance.
Need to Engage Bretton Woods Institutions
  • Effective climate finance requires engagement with the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, not just reliance on the New Development Bank.
Shrinking Private Climate Finance
  • U.S. climate scepticism is reflected in reduced corporate commitments, pullback from ESG norms, and declining interest in green bonds, making public multilateral finance even more critical.
Demographic and Economic Scale
  • Expanded BRICS (including Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, and UAE) represents ~50% of global population, ~40% of global GDP, and ~26% of global trade, giving it substantial agenda-setting capacity.
Global South Representation
  • BRICS increasingly mirrors the aspirations of the Global South, enhancing legitimacy to push for resilience, equity, and development-oriented climate pathways.
Aligning Climate Leadership with National Interest
  • A BRICS focus on climate resilience and inclusive green growth aligns with India’s domestic priorities and reinforces the global leadership narrative of Narendra Modi.
Geopolitical Balancing
  • Indian leadership within BRICS can check Chinas attempts to monopolise green leadership, while reinforcing India’s multi-alignment strategy showcased during the G-20 Delhi Summit.
Continuity with Future Climate Processes
  • A resilience-focused BRICS agenda would resonate with Ethiopia, host of COP32 (2027), helping maintain developing-country coherence across successive global climate forums.
Core Takeaway
  • The BRICS Summit 2026 offers India a rare convergence of diplomacy, climate leadership, and Global South advocacy, where advancing resilience is not ideological but a strategic, economic, and developmental imperative.a
Basic Profile
  • BRICS: Grouping of major emerging economies for political coordination, economic cooperation, and Global South representation.
  • First formal BRIC Summit: 2009 (Yekaterinburg, Russia)
  • Sadded (South Africa): 2010 → BRICS
  • Nature: Informal multilateral forum (not a treaty-based organisation).
Members (as of 2026 – Expanded BRICS)
  • Founding Members: Brazil, Russia, India, China
  • Joined in 2010: South Africa
  • New Members (from 2024 onwards):
    • Egypt
    • Ethiopia
    • Iran
    • United Arab Emirates
    • Indonesia

Total Members (2026): 10


January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
Categories