How Tamil, Sanskrit, Prakrit names ended up on walls of Egyptian tombs

Why in news ?

New academic findings

• Recent publication of the 30-inscription corpus strengthens evidence of early India–Egypt links, moving beyond speculative trade theories to direct epigraphic proof of Indian presence in Egypt.
• It feeds into broader debates on ancient globalisation, showing mobility across the Red Sea and Indian Ocean two millennia ago, comparable to Roman–Indian trade evidenced by Muziris finds.

Basics and historical context

What are these inscriptions

• Graffiti-style inscriptions in Tamil-Brahmi, Prakrit and Sanskrit found in Egypt’s Valley of the Kings (c. 300 BCE–200 CE), showing visiting foreigners carved names, origins, and devotional messages, like ancient travel records.
• Unlike royal hieroglyphs, these are informal visitor inscriptions, similar to pilgrimage graffiti at Indian Buddhist sites like Sanchi, where travellers recorded names, places, and religious sentiments.

Who deciphered them ?

• A 2024–25 study by Charlotte Schmid (EFEO, Paris) documented 30 Indian-language inscriptions, using epigraphy and comparative linguistics to identify Tamil-Brahmi scripts and Indo-Aryan linguistic features.
• Cross-referencing letter forms with Sangam-era Tamil-Brahmi (3rd BCE onward) helped date inscriptions, as shapes of “ra,” “na,” and vowel markers match early South Indian cave inscriptions.

What the names show ?

• Names like “Korran,” “Kopan,” and “Saman” resemble Tamil and Prakrit naming traditions; for example, “Korran” parallels Sangam titles for chieftains and warriors in Chera–Pandya regions.
• Some inscriptions include place-based identifiers, implying travellers linked identity to homeland, similar to donative inscriptions in India stating “so-and-so from Karur or Madurai.”

Trade and connectivity dimension

Indian Ocean trade networks

• Between 1st BCE–2nd CE, Indo-Roman trade flourished; Roman coins found in Tamil Nadu and the Periplus of the Erythraean Sea describe Indian merchants sailing to Egyptian Red Sea ports like Berenike.
• These inscriptions suggest some traders or pilgrims travelled onward to the Nile valley, showing routes were not just maritime but linked to inland cultural landmarks.

Cultural cosmopolitanism

• Ancient port cities like Alexandria and Berenike were multicultural hubs; archaeological finds include Indian beads and pepper, supporting textual evidence of Indo-Mediterranean exchange.
• Multilingualism was common among merchant groups; Prakrit and Tamil functioning as trade languages parallels use of Aramaic or Greek across West Asian trade corridors.

Social and cultural insights

Travel motivations

• Not all travellers were merchants; some inscriptions resemble pilgrimage-style declarations, suggesting curiosity, ritual travel, or status display, similar to elites visiting sacred or famous sites.
• Valley of the Kings was a famed site even in antiquity; Greek and Latin graffiti there show it functioned as an early tourist destination by 1st millennium BCE–CE.

Identity expression

• Writing one’s name in native script abroad signals strong cultural identity; comparable to Indian merchant guild inscriptions in Southeast Asia asserting community presence.
• Scripts acted as cultural markers; Tamil-Brahmi use abroad indicates literacy among sections of early South Indian trading communities.

Historiographical significance

Rethinking isolationist views

• Findings challenge older views that ancient Indian societies were regionally confined, instead supporting models of long-distance mobility and interaction across Afro-Eurasia.
• They complement evidence like Indian cotton in Egypt and Roman gold in South India, forming a multi-source case for deep connectivity.

Limits of evidence

• Small sample size (≈30 inscriptions) means presence, not population scale; like Roman coins in India, they indicate contact but not large migration.
• Epigraphy shows who left marks, not entire communities; absence of evidence elsewhere doesn’t negate wider interaction networks.

---