Is the Indian economy perfectly balanced?

Home » Is the Indian economy perfectly balanced?

Definition: An economic condition that is “just right” – moderate GDP growth, low inflation, and favourable monetary conditions.
Origin of term: Derived from the “Goldilocks and the Three Bears” fairy tale — not too hot (overheating economy), not too cold (recession), but balanced.
Implication: Sustains economic expansion without triggering high inflation or requiring restrictive monetary policy.

Relevance : GS 3(Indian Economy)

Finance Ministry claim:
- Moderate inflation, strong GDP growth, and stable interest rates in 2024-25.
- GDP growth at 7.6% (FY2024).
- India’s GDP size: $3.6 trillion (end of FY2024).
Analysts’ assessment:
- Termed it a quarterly ‘mini-Goldilocks moment’.
- Factors: Peaking interest rates, strong corporate earnings, growth momentum into 2025.

A. Inflation – Headline vs. Reality

CPI (General):
- Fell from 4.8% (May 2024) to 2.82% (May 2025) – appears within RBI’s comfort zone.
CFPI (Food inflation):
- Persistently higher than general CPI, e.g.:
  - Oct 2024: CPI 6.21%, CFPI 10.87%.
  - Aug 2024: CPI 3.65%, CFPI 5.66%.
Impact:
- Food ~50% of household consumption for lower-income groups.
- Volatile food inflation disrupts household budgeting, savings, and nutrition quality.
Core inflation relevance:
- Excludes volatile food & fuel; better captures persistent cost pressures (housing, education, transport).
Net takeaway: Low headline inflation masks high volatility in essentials that hit poorer households hardest.

B. Real Wages vs. Nominal Wages

Nominal wage growth ≠ actual purchasing power gain.
- 2023: Nominal salary hike 9.2%, real wage growth only 2.5%.
- 2020: Real wage growth -0.4%, despite nominal growth 4.4%.
- 2025 projection: Real wage growth 4% vs. nominal 8.8%.
Why it matters:
- Inflation erodes much of the nominal gains.
- For households, 9% salary hike with 7% inflation = only 2% extra purchasing capacity.
ILO & economists’ warning: Stagnant real wages = weak consumption demand → slows broad-based recovery.
Result: Growing disconnect between GDP growth and household financial well-being.

C. Income Inequality

Gini coefficient (taxable income):
- AY13: 0.489 → AY16: 0.435 → AY23 (forecast): 0.402.
- Apparent decline, but formal sector data underrepresents inequality in the informal economy.
Post-pandemic trend:
- “K-shaped” recovery – affluent & select industries thrive; lower-income groups stagnate.
Wealth concentration:
- Surge in billionaires alongside stagnant wages for lower tiers.
Socioeconomic effects:
- Risk of reduced social cohesion, constrained access to health & education, and weaker inclusive growth.

D. Fiscal Constraints

Fiscal deficit path: 6.4% (2022-23) → target 4.4% (2025-26).
Revenue deficit: 4% → target 1.5%.
Primary deficit: 3% → target 0.8%.
Challenges:
- Absolute deficit levels still high.
- Public debt-to-GDP: ~81% (2022-23), well above FRBM target of 60%.
Implications:
- Large debt-servicing burden reduces space for social/infrastructure spending.
- Risk of “crowding out” private investment due to heavy govt. borrowing.

Strengths:
- High GDP growth (7.6%), easing interest rates, declining headline CPI.
- Positive short-term investor sentiment.
Weaknesses:
- Persistent food price volatility.
- Weak real wage growth constraining demand.
- Inequality in income & wealth distribution.
- High fiscal deficit & debt burden.
Structural Risk:
- Growth benefits concentrated in upper-income groups & select industries.
- Potential long-term drag on inclusive and sustainable growth.

Goldilocks label risks masking structural vulnerabilities.
True economic health depends on:
- Sustained real income growth across all segments.
- Reduction in inequality (both income & opportunity).
- Stabilised essential goods prices.
- Fiscal consolidation without sacrificing public investment.