Why in News ?
- A new Nature Sustainability (2025) study revealed that India’s five megacities — Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, Bengaluru, and Chennai — are sinking due to excessive groundwater extraction.
- The study used satellite radar data (2015–2023) to map urban land subsidence, impacting over 13 million buildings and 80 million residents.
Relevance
- GS 1: Urbanisation, geomorphological processes (subsidence).
- GS 3: Environmental degradation, water resource management, disaster risk reduction.
- GS 2: Governance — institutional response through CGWA, Jal Shakti Mission, and Smart Cities.
Key Findings
- Total subsiding area: 878 sq. km of urban land.
- Population exposed: 1.9 million people at >4 mm/year subsidence rate.
- Max subsidence rates:
- Delhi – 51.0 mm/yr
- Chennai – 31.7 mm/yr
- Mumbai – 26.1 mm/yr
- Kolkata – 16.4 mm/yr
- Bengaluru – 6.7 mm/yr
 
City-wise Analysis
Delhi (NCT)
- Hotspots: Bijwasan, Faridabad, Ghaziabad.
- Cause: Compaction of alluvial deposits due to unregulated groundwater withdrawal.
- Local uplift: Detected near Dwarka (+15.1 mm/yr) due to rainwater harvesting and aquifer recharge policies post-2011.
Chennai
- Hotspots: Adyar floodplains (K K Nagar, Tondiarpet, Valasaravakkam, Kodambakkam).
- Cause: Compaction of Holocene alluvium (sandy clay, silt, sand) and intensive groundwater extraction.
- Impact: Highest projected structural risk among cities by 2075.
Mumbai
- Subsidence low overall, except in high-density informal settlements (e.g., Dharavi).
- Cause: Uneven land compaction due to localized extraction and structural load.
Kolkata
- Cause: Compaction of Pleistocene–Holocene sediments; subsidence along riverine and deltaic areas.
- Risk: Increasing vulnerability due to soft sediment structure.
Bengaluru
- Lowest subsidence due to igneous and metamorphic rock base (gneiss, granite).
- Warning: Recent surge in groundwater extraction (2022–2023) may increase risk.
Structural Risk Projections
| Year | Delhi | Chennai | Mumbai | Bengaluru | Kolkata | Total (very high risk buildings) | 
| 2025 | 2,264 | 32 | 110 | — | — | — | 
| 2055 | 3,169 | 958 | 255 | — | — | — | 
| 2075 | 11,457 | 8,284 | 3,477 | 112 | 199 | 23,529 | 
Underlying Causes
- Over-extraction of groundwater via millions of unregulated borewells.
- Urban load stress from vertical construction increasing soil compaction.
- Lack of recharge infrastructure and inefficient stormwater management.
- Climate variability: Declining rainfall recharge and increasing urban heat.
Broader Implications
- Infrastructure risk: Cracking foundations, damaged pipelines, and transport networks.
- Hydrological risk: Land sinking worsens flooding, especially during monsoons.
- Seismic risk: Uneven compaction increases earthquake vulnerability.
- Economic cost: Rising insurance risk and maintenance expenditure in megacities.
Positive Example
- Dwarka (Delhi):
- Local uplift due to aquifer recharge and rainwater harvesting between 2012–2015.
- Demonstrates success of policy-driven groundwater restoration.
 
Way Forward – Mitigation & Adaptation
- Regulatory measures:
- Enforce groundwater extraction caps under CGWA guidelines.
- Mandate recharge pits and rainwater harvesting for large buildings.
 
- Urban hydrology reform:
- Integrate surface water management with stormwater networks.
- Develop artificial recharge zones near floodplains.
 
- Nature-based solutions:
- Promote re-vegetation and soil conservation to stabilise land.
 
- Monitoring & Technology:
- Expand InSAR satellite surveillance for urban subsidence tracking.
 
- Public awareness:
- Integrate groundwater literacy in urban planning and civic education.
 
 
				

