Nationalism in India
In India and many other colonies, the growth of modern nationalism is intimately connected to the anti-colonial movement. People began discovering their unity in the process of their struggle with colonialism. The sense of being oppressed under colonialism provided a shared bond that tied many different groups together.
But each class and group felt the effects of colonialism differently, their experiences were varied, and their notions of freedom were not always the same. The Congress under Mahatma Gandhi tried to forge these groups together within one movement. But the unity did not emerge without conflict.
This chapter picks up the story from the 1920s and studies the Non-Cooperation and Civil Disobedience Movements. It explores how the Congress sought to develop the national movement, how different social groups participated, and how nationalism captured the imagination of people.
2.1 Impact of First World War on India
| Defence Expenditure | Huge increase financed by war loans and increasing taxes; customs duties raised; income tax introduced |
|---|---|
| Rising Prices | Prices doubled between 1913 and 1918 — extreme hardship for common people |
| Forced Recruitment | Villages called upon to supply soldiers; forced recruitment in rural areas caused widespread anger |
| Crop Failure | 1918-19 and 1920-21: crops failed in many parts; acute food shortages + influenza epidemic |
| Human Toll | According to census of 1921: 12 to 13 million people perished as a result of famines and the epidemic |
2.2 The Idea of Satyagraha
Mahatma Gandhi returned to India in January 1915 from South Africa, where he had successfully fought the racist regime with a novel method of mass agitation he called satyagraha.
- Emphasised the power of truth and the need to search for truth
- If the cause was true, physical force was NOT necessary to fight the oppressor
- A satyagrahi could win the battle through non-violence, by appealing to the conscience of the oppressor
- People — including oppressors — had to be persuaded to see the truth, not forced through violence
- “Satyagraha is pure soul-force. Truth is the very substance of the soul.”
- “Non-violence is the supreme dharma.”
- Gandhi believed this dharma of non-violence could unite all Indians
- Satyagraha is NOT passive resistance — it calls for intense activity
Early Satyagraha Movements by Gandhi
| Champaran, Bihar (1917) | Inspired peasants to struggle against the oppressive plantation system |
|---|---|
| Ahmedabad (1918) | Organised satyagraha movement amongst cotton mill workers |
| Kheda, Gujarat (1918) | Supported peasants affected by crop failure and plague epidemic who could not pay revenue; demanded revenue collection be relaxed |
2.3 The Rowlatt Act (1919)
- Hurriedly passed through Imperial Legislative Council despite united opposition of Indian members
- Gave government enormous powers to repress political activities
- Allowed detention of political prisoners without trial for two years
- Gandhi wanted non-violent civil disobedience; called a hartal on 6 April 1919
- Rallies organised, workers went on strike in railway workshops, shops closed down
- British administration decided to clamp down; local leaders picked up from Amritsar; Gandhi barred from entering Delhi
- 10 April: police in Amritsar fired upon peaceful procession → widespread attacks on banks, post offices, railway stations
- Martial law imposed; General Dyer took command
Jallianwalla Bagh Massacre — 13 April 1919
- Large crowd gathered in enclosed ground of Jallianwalla Bagh
- Some came to protest against repressive measures; others for annual Baisakhi fair
- Many villagers were unaware of martial law that had been imposed
- Dyer entered, blocked exit points, and opened fire on the crowd — killing hundreds
- His object: “to produce a moral effect” — to create terror and awe in satyagrahis
- News spread → strikes, clashes with police, attacks on government buildings across north India
- British repression: satyagrahis forced to rub noses on ground, crawl on streets, do salaam to all sahibs
- People flogged; villages around Gujranwala in Punjab bombed
- Gandhi called off the movement on seeing violence spread
2.4 The Khilafat Issue and Non-Cooperation
- First World War ended with defeat of Ottoman Turkey
- Rumours of harsh peace treaty on the Ottoman emperor — the spiritual head of Islamic world (Khalifa)
- A Khilafat Committee formed in Bombay in March 1919
- Young Muslim leaders — brothers Muhammad Ali and Shaukat Ali — discussed with Gandhi about united mass action
- Gandhi saw this as opportunity to bring Muslims under umbrella of unified national movement
- At the Calcutta session of Congress (September 1920), Gandhi convinced leaders to start a non-cooperation movement in support of Khilafat and for swaraj
2.5 Why Non-Cooperation?
In his famous book Hind Swaraj (1909), Gandhi declared that British rule was established in India with the cooperation of Indians, and had survived only because of this cooperation. If Indians refused to cooperate, British rule in India would collapse within a year, and swaraj would come.
- Surrender of titles that the government awarded
- Boycott of: civil services, army, police, courts, legislative councils, schools, and foreign goods
- If government used repression → full civil disobedience campaign would be launched
Many within Congress were concerned — reluctant to boycott council elections (November 1920) and feared movement might lead to popular violence. After intense tussle, at the Congress session at Nagpur in December 1920, a compromise was worked out and the Non-Cooperation programme was adopted.
The Non-Cooperation-Khilafat Movement began in January 1921. Various social groups participated, each with its own specific aspiration. All responded to the call of Swaraj, but the term meant different things to different people.
3.1 The Movement in the Towns
- Started with middle-class participation in cities
- Thousands of students left government-controlled schools and colleges
- Headmasters and teachers resigned; lawyers gave up their legal practices
- Council elections boycotted in most provinces except Madras — where the Justice Party (party of non-Brahmans) felt entering council was a way to gain power usually only available to Brahmans
- Foreign goods boycotted, liquor shops picketed, foreign cloth burnt in huge bonfires
- Import of foreign cloth halved between 1921 and 1922 (Rs 102 crore to Rs 57 crore)
- In many places merchants and traders refused to trade in foreign goods
- Production of Indian textile mills and handlooms went up
- Khadi cloth was often more expensive than mass-produced mill cloth — poor people could not afford to buy it
- Boycott of British institutions required alternative Indian institutions to be set up — these were slow to come up
- Students and teachers began trickling back to government schools; lawyers returned to government courts
3.2 Rebellion in the Countryside
Awadh Peasant Movement
- Led by Baba Ramchandra — a sanyasi who had earlier been to Fiji as an indentured labourer
- Movement was against talukdars and landlords who demanded exorbitantly high rents and a variety of other cesses
- Peasants had to do begar (forced unpaid labour) at landlords’ farms
- No security of tenure — regularly evicted so they could acquire no right over leased land
- Demands: reduction of revenue, abolition of begar, social boycott of oppressive landlords
- Nai-dhobi bandhs organised by panchayats to deprive landlords of services of barbers and washermen
- In June 1920, Jawaharlal Nehru went around villages in Awadh; by October 1920, Oudh Kisan Sabha set up headed by Nehru, Baba Ramchandra and others; over 300 branches within a month
- In 1921 as movement spread: houses of talukdars and merchants attacked, bazaars looted, grain hoards taken over
- Local leaders told peasants that Gandhi had declared no taxes were to be paid and land was to be redistributed
“They behaved as brave men, calm and unruffled in the face of danger… For a moment my blood was up, non-violence was almost forgotten — but for a moment only. The thought of the great leader, who by God’s goodness has been sent to lead us to victory, came to me… I spoke to them in all humility on non-violence — I needed the lesson more than they — and they heeded me and peacefully dispersed.” — Jawaharlal Nehru, quoted in Sarvapalli Gopal, Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography
In 1928, Vallabhbhai Patel led the peasant movement in Bardoli, a taluka in Gujarat, against enhancement of land revenue. Known as the Bardoli Satyagraha, this movement was a success under his able leadership. It was widely publicised and generated immense sympathy in many parts of India.
Tribal Peasants — Gudem Hills, Andhra Pradesh
- Militant guerrilla movement spread in early 1920s in Gudem Hills
- Colonial government had closed large forest areas — preventing people from grazing cattle, collecting fuelwood and fruits
- When government began forcing them to contribute begar for road building, hill people revolted
- Leader: Alluri Sitaram Raju — claimed he could make correct astrological predictions, heal people, survive bullet shots; rebels proclaimed him an incarnation of God
- Raju talked of greatness of Gandhi, said he was inspired by Non-Cooperation Movement; persuaded people to wear khadi and give up drinking
- BUT asserted India could be liberated only by use of force, not non-violence
- Gudem rebels attacked police stations, attempted to kill British officials, carried on guerrilla warfare
- Raju was captured and executed in 1924; over time became a folk hero
3.3 Swaraj in the Plantations
- For plantation workers in Assam, freedom meant the right to move freely in and out of the confined space
- Under the Inland Emigration Act of 1859, plantation workers were not permitted to leave the tea gardens without permission — and permission was rarely given
- When they heard of the Non-Cooperation Movement, thousands defied the authorities, left the plantations and headed home
- They believed “Gandhi Raj was coming” and everyone would be given land in their own villages
- Never reached their destination — stranded on the way by a railway and steamer strike; caught by police and brutally beaten up
- Chauri Chaura incident: At Chauri Chaura in Gorakhpur, a peaceful demonstration turned into violent clash with police — a police station was set on fire and policemen were killed
- Gandhi felt the movement was turning violent in many places
- Satyagrahis needed to be properly trained before they would be ready for mass struggles
- Gandhi called off the movement in February 1922
Internal Congress Debate after Non-Cooperation
| Swaraj Party (C.R. Das & Motilal Nehru) | Formed within Congress; argued for return to council politics; felt important to oppose British policies within the councils |
|---|---|
| Radical Leaders (Nehru & Bose) | Pressed for more radical mass agitation and for full independence |
Two Factors Shaping Indian Politics in Late 1920s
- Worldwide economic depression: Agricultural prices began to fall from 1926 and collapsed after 1930; peasants found it difficult to sell harvests and pay revenue; by 1930 countryside was in turmoil
- Simon Commission: New Tory government in Britain constituted a Statutory Commission under Sir John Simon to look into the constitutional system in India and suggest changes. The commission did not have a single Indian member — all were British
- Greeted with slogan “Go back Simon”
- All parties, including Congress and Muslim League, participated in demonstrations
- Lala Lajpat Rai was assaulted by British police during a peaceful demonstration against the Simon Commission. He succumbed to injuries inflicted on him during the demonstration
- Viceroy Lord Irwin announced in October 1929 a vague offer of ‘dominion status’ for India — did not satisfy the Congress leaders
- Under the presidency of Jawaharlal Nehru
- Formalised the demand of ‘Purna Swaraj’ or full independence for India
- Declared that 26 January 1930 would be celebrated as the Independence Day
- People were to take a pledge to struggle for complete independence
- Celebrations attracted very little attention — Gandhi had to find a way to relate abstract idea of freedom to concrete everyday life issues
“We believe that it is the inalienable right of the Indian people, as of any other people, to have freedom and to enjoy the fruits of their toil… The British Government in India has not only deprived the Indian people of their freedom but has based itself on the exploitation of the masses, and has ruined India economically, politically, culturally, and spiritually. We believe, therefore, that India must sever the British connection and attain Purna Swaraj or Complete Independence.”
4.1 The Salt March and the Civil Disobedience Movement
- Some were of general interest; others were specific demands of different classes, from industrialists to peasants
- The most stirring: demand to abolish the salt tax
- Salt was consumed by rich and poor alike — one of the most essential items of food
- The tax on salt and government monopoly over its production revealed the most oppressive face of British rule
- If demands not fulfilled by 11 March, Congress would launch a civil disobedience campaign
- Irwin was unwilling to negotiate
| Started from | Gandhiji’s ashram in Sabarmati |
|---|---|
| Destination | Gujarati coastal town of Dandi |
| Distance | Over 240 miles |
| Duration | 24 days — about 10 miles a day |
| Volunteers | Started with 78 trusted volunteers; thousands joined on the way |
| Date of violation | 6 April — reached Dandi; ceremonially violated the law by manufacturing salt by boiling sea water |
| Significance | Marked the beginning of the Civil Disobedience Movement |
Civil Disobedience Movement — Spread and Repression
- Thousands broke the salt law, manufactured salt, demonstrated in front of government salt factories
- Foreign cloth boycotted; liquor shops picketed
- Peasants refused to pay revenue and chaukidari taxes
- Village officials resigned
- Forest people violated forest laws — going into Reserved Forests to collect wood and graze cattle
- Government began arresting Congress leaders one by one
- When Abdul Ghaffar Khan (devout disciple of Gandhi) was arrested in April 1930, angry crowds demonstrated in streets of Peshawar, facing armoured cars and police firing — many killed
- When Gandhi himself was arrested, industrial workers in Sholapur attacked police posts, municipal buildings, lawcourts, railway stations
- About 100,000 people arrested
- Gandhi consented to participate in a Round Table Conference in London (Congress had boycotted the first one)
- Government agreed to release political prisoners
- In December 1931, Gandhi went to London but negotiations broke down and he returned disappointed
- Back in India, government began new cycle of repression; Ghaffar Khan and Nehru jailed; Congress declared illegal
- Gandhi relaunched the Civil Disobedience Movement but by 1934 it lost its momentum
- Many nationalists thought the struggle against British could NOT be won through non-violence
- In 1928, HSRA was founded at Ferozeshah Kotla ground, Delhi
- Leaders: Bhagat Singh, Jatin Das and Ajoy Ghosh
- In April 1929, Bhagat Singh and Batukeswar Dutta threw a bomb in the Legislative Assembly
- Same year: attempt to blow up the train Lord Irwin was travelling in
- Bhagat Singh was 23 when he was tried and executed by the colonial government
- During his trial, stated he did not wish to glorify ‘the cult of the bomb and pistol’ but wanted a revolution in society
- “Revolution is the inalienable right of mankind. Freedom is the imprescriptible birthright of all. The labourer is the real sustainer of society… Inquilab Zindabad!”
| Rich Peasants (Patidars of Gujarat, Jats of UP) | Producers of commercial crops, very hard hit by trade depression and falling prices. Cash income disappeared → impossible to pay revenue. Fight for swaraj = struggle against high revenues. Deeply disappointed when movement called off in 1931 without revenue rates being revised → many refused to participate when movement restarted in 1932. |
|---|---|
| Poor Peasants & Small Tenants | Wanted unpaid rent to landlord to be remitted. Joined radical movements led by Socialists and Communists. Congress was reluctant to support ‘no rent’ campaigns → relationship between poor peasants and Congress remained uncertain. |
| Business Classes | Formed Indian Industrial and Commercial Congress (1920) and FICCI (1927). Led by Purshottamdas Thakurdas and G.D. Birla. Supported Civil Disobedience Movement when first launched; gave financial assistance; refused to buy/sell imported goods. Saw swaraj as end of colonial restrictions on business. After failure of Round Table Conference, no longer uniformly enthusiastic. |
| Industrial Working Classes | Did NOT participate in large numbers, except in Nagpur region. As industrialists came closer to Congress, workers stayed aloof. Some workers did participate selectively. Strikes by railway workers in 1930 and dockworkers in 1932. In 1930, thousands of workers in Chotanagpur tin mines wore Gandhi caps and participated. Congress was reluctant to include workers’ demands — feared this would alienate industrialists. |
| Women | Large-scale participation during Civil Disobedience Movement. During salt march, thousands came out of their homes. Participated in protest marches, manufactured salt, picketed foreign cloth and liquor shops. Many went to jail. In urban areas — from high-caste families; in rural areas — from rich peasant households. Began to see service to the nation as a sacred duty of women. However, Congress was keen only on their symbolic presence — reluctant to allow women to hold any position of authority. |
6.1 Dalits and the Movement
- Dalits (the nation’s ‘untouchables’) had from around the 1930s begun calling themselves dalit or oppressed
- For long the Congress had ignored the dalits for fear of offending the sanatanis (conservative high-caste Hindus)
- Gandhi declared swaraj would not come for a hundred years if untouchability was not eliminated
- He called the ‘untouchables’ harijan (children of God)
- Organised satyagraha to secure them entry into temples and access to public wells, tanks, roads and schools
- He himself cleaned toilets to dignify the work of the bhangi (sweepers)
- Dalit leaders were keen on a different political solution: demanding reserved seats in educational institutions and a separate electorate that would choose dalit members for legislative councils
- Dalit participation in Civil Disobedience Movement was limited, particularly in Maharashtra and Nagpur region where their organisation was quite strong
- Dr B.R. Ambedkar organised dalits into the Depressed Classes Association in 1930
- At the second Round Table Conference, Ambedkar demanded separate electorates for dalits
- When British government conceded, Gandhi began a fast unto death
- Gandhi believed separate electorates would slow down the process of their integration into society
- Ambedkar ultimately accepted Gandhi’s position
- Result: Poona Pact of September 1932
- Gave Depressed Classes (later known as Schedule Castes) reserved seats in provincial and central legislative councils, but they were to be voted in by the general electorate
- Dalit movement continued to be apprehensive of Congress-led national movement
6.2 Muslims and the Movement
- Many Muslim political organisations were lukewarm in their response to the Civil Disobedience Movement
- After decline of Non-Cooperation-Khilafat Movement, a large section of Muslims felt alienated from the Congress
- From mid-1920s Congress came to be more visibly associated with openly Hindu religious nationalist groups like the Hindu Mahasabha
- Relations between Hindus and Muslims worsened; communal clashes and riots in various cities
- Congress and Muslim League made efforts to renegotiate alliance — in 1927 it appeared such unity could be forged
- Muhammad Ali Jinnah was willing to give up demand for separate electorates if Muslims were assured reserved seats in the Central Assembly and proportional representation in Muslim-dominated provinces (Bengal and Punjab)
- All hope disappeared at the All Parties Conference in 1928 when M.R. Jayakar of Hindu Mahasabha strongly opposed efforts at compromise
In 1930, Sir Muhammad Iqbal, as president of the Muslim League, reiterated the importance of separate electorates for Muslims as an important safeguard for their minority political interests. His statement is supposed to have provided the intellectual justification for the Pakistan demand that came up in subsequent years. He argued that the units of Indian society are not territorial as in European countries, and that the “Muslim demand for the creation of a Muslim India within India is, therefore, perfectly justified.”
Nationalism spreads when people begin to believe that they are all part of the same nation. This sense of collective belonging came partly through the experience of united struggles. But there were also a variety of cultural processes through which nationalism captured people’s imagination.
7.1 Bharat Mata
- Identity of India came to be visually associated with the image of Bharat Mata
- Image was first created by Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay
- In the 1870s he wrote ‘Vande Mataram’ as a hymn to the motherland
- Later included in his novel Anandamath and widely sung during the Swadeshi movement in Bengal
- Moved by the Swadeshi movement, Abanindranath Tagore painted his famous image of Bharat Mata (1905)
- In the painting, Bharat Mata is portrayed as an ascetic figure — calm, composed, divine and spiritual
- The mala in one hand emphasises her ascetic quality
- She is shown as dispensing learning, food and clothing
- Devotion to this mother figure came to be seen as evidence of one’s nationalism
7.2 Revival of Indian Folklore
- In late-nineteenth-century India, nationalists began recording folk tales sung by bards and toured villages to gather folk songs and legends
- These tales, they believed, gave a true picture of traditional culture that had been corrupted and damaged by outside forces
- Essential to preserve folk tradition to discover national identity and restore pride in one’s past
- In Bengal, Rabindranath Tagore began collecting ballads, nursery rhymes and myths, and led the movement for folk revival
- In Madras, Natesa Sastri published a massive four-volume collection of Tamil folk tales — ‘The Folklore of Southern India’
- He believed: folklore was national literature — ‘the most trustworthy manifestation of people’s real thoughts and characteristics’
7.3 Nationalist Flags and Symbols
| Swadeshi Movement Flag (Bengal) | Tricolour (red, green and yellow); eight lotuses representing eight provinces of British India; crescent moon representing Hindus and Muslims |
|---|---|
| Swaraj Flag (1921, designed by Gandhi) | Tricolour (red, green and white); spinning wheel in the centre representing Gandhian ideal of self-help; carrying the flag during marches became a symbol of defiance |
7.4 Reinterpretation of History
- By end of 19th century, many Indians began feeling that Indian history had to be thought about differently to instill pride in the nation
- Indians began looking into the past to discover India’s great achievements in ancient times: art and architecture, science and mathematics, religion and culture, law and philosophy, crafts and trade
- These nationalist histories urged readers to take pride in India’s great achievements in the past and struggle to change the miserable conditions under British rule
- Problem: When the past being glorified was Hindu, when images celebrated were drawn from Hindu iconography, then people of other communities felt left out
“In earlier times, foreign travellers in India marvelled at the courage, truthfulness and modesty of the people of the Arya vamsa; now they remark mainly on the absence of those qualities. In those days Hindus would set out on conquest and hoist their flags in Tartar, China and other countries; now a few soldiers from a tiny island far away are lording it over the land of India.”
- Failure of the Cripps Mission and effects of World War II created widespread discontentment in India
- Led Gandhi to launch a movement calling for complete withdrawal of the British from India
- Congress Working Committee, meeting in Wardha on 14 July 1942, passed the historic ‘Quit India’ resolution demanding immediate transfer of power to Indians
- On 8 August 1942 in Bombay, All India Congress Committee endorsed the resolution calling for a non-violent mass struggle on the widest possible scale
- It was on this occasion that Gandhi delivered the famous ‘Do or Die’ speech
- The call for ‘Quit India’ almost brought the state machinery to a standstill in large parts of the country
- People observed hartals; demonstrations and processions accompanied by national songs and slogans
- Truly a mass movement — brought thousands of ordinary people: students, workers and peasants
- Active participation of leaders: Jayprakash Narayan, Aruna Asaf Ali and Ram Manohar Lohia
- Many women: Matangini Hazra (Bengal), Kanaklata Barua (Assam), Rama Devi (Odisha)
- British responded with much force; yet it took more than a year to suppress the movement
1. Many in the crowd had come to attend the annual Baisakhi fair
2. General Dyer blocked the exit points before opening fire
3. His stated object was ‘to produce a moral effect’
4. Villages around Gujranwala in Punjab were bombed in the aftermath
Which of the above are correct?
1. The Congress Working Committee passed the Quit India resolution on 14 July 1942 at Wardha
2. Gandhi delivered the famous ‘Do or Die’ speech on 8 August 1942 in Bombay
3. Leaders who participated included Jayprakash Narayan, Aruna Asaf Ali and Ram Manohar Lohia
4. It took more than a year for the British to suppress the movement
Which are correct?
📚 Content sourced from NCERT Class 10 History — India and the Contemporary World II, Chapter 2 (Reprint 2026–27)
Compiled for academic preparation by Legacy IAS, Bangalore · UPSC & State PCS Coaching
© NCERT — Not to be republished commercially. For academic/study use only.


