Ozone Depletion — Montreal Protocol & Kigali UPSC Notes

Ozone Depletion | Montreal Protocol | Kigali Amendment | Polar Vortex | PSCs | UPSC Notes | Legacy IAS Bangalore
UPSC Prelims + Mains · Environment · Current Affairs 2024–25

Ozone Depletion 🌐

Halogen catalytic destruction · Polar Vortex · PSCs · Why Antarctica? · CFCs/Halons/HCFCs · Vienna 1985 · Montreal 1987 (198 parties!) · Kigali 2016 · 2025 Ozone Hole — 5th smallest since 1992 · Recovery timeline 2040/2045/2066

198
Montreal Protocol parties — first universally ratified UN treaty
99%+
ODS production phased out globally by Montreal Protocol
0.5°C
Warming avoided by Kigali Amendment by 2100
2066
Year Antarctic ozone expected to fully recover to 1980 levels
5th
Smallest 2025 ozone hole since 1992 — earliest closure since 2019
1

Ozone — The Dr Jekyll & Mr Hyde of Atmospheric Chemistry

Same molecule, completely opposite roles depending on where it is found

💡 Ozone Is Earth’s Natural Sunscreen — 15–50 km Above Your Head

Imagine Earth wearing a sunscreen that absorbs 97–99% of the Sun’s most dangerous UV rays before they can reach life below. That’s the ozone layer. Now imagine someone slowly punching holes in that sunscreen — letting through beams of DNA-destroying radiation. That’s ozone depletion. The molecule causing this self-destruction isn’t new — it’s the same chlorine that humans put into refrigerators and aerosol sprays, thinking it was harmless because it didn’t react with anything near the surface. The cruel twist: it was precisely because CFCs were so stable and unreactive near the ground that they survived long enough to float all the way up to the stratosphere — where, under intense UV, they finally broke apart and began their one-atom-at-a-time campaign to destroy ozone.

✅ Good Ozone — Stratospheric

15–50 km altitude · “Ozone Layer” · Earth’s UV shield
  • Located in the stratosphere (15–35 km; max at 25 km)
  • Absorbs 97–99% of UV-B and all UV-C radiation from the Sun
  • Without it: skin cancer, cataracts, immune suppression, crop damage, marine food chain collapse
  • Formed naturally: UV splits O₂ → 2O· → O· + O₂ → O₃
  • Measured in Dobson Units (DU) — normal = ~300 DU globally
  • Being destroyed by ODS → the ozone depletion problem

❌ Bad Ozone — Tropospheric

Ground level · Photochemical smog · Lung irritant
  • Located in the troposphere (ground level to ~10 km)
  • A secondary pollutant — forms from NOₓ + VOCs + sunlight
  • Health effects: lung irritation, asthma triggers, chest pain
  • Crop damage: reduces wheat yields significantly
  • Key component of photochemical smog (LA-type smog)
  • A greenhouse gas at ground level — contributes to global warming
Dobson Units (DU) — Measuring Ozone
  • What it is: A unit that measures the total column of ozone above a point on Earth’s surface. Named after Gordon Dobson who developed the spectrophotometer to measure it in the 1920s.
  • Definition: 1 DU = 0.01 mm of pure ozone at standard temperature and pressure. If all the ozone in a column above a point were compressed to STP, 300 DU = 3 mm of ozone
  • Normal global average: ~300 DU
  • Ozone hole threshold: Below 220 DU — the level at which ozone levels are so low as to constitute a “hole”
  • Lowest ever recorded: 92 DU over South Pole (October 2006)
  • 2025 minimum: 147 DU over South Pole (October 6, 2025) — well below the 220 DU threshold
  • World Ozone Day: September 16 — the date the Montreal Protocol was signed in 1987
2

How Halogens Destroy Ozone — The Catalytic Murder

One chlorine atom can destroy 100,000 ozone molecules — that’s the brutal efficiency of catalytic chemistry

💡 Think of Chlorine as a Serial Murderer Who Never Gets Tired

A normal chemical reaction is like a person who commits one crime and is “used up.” But chlorine in the stratosphere is a catalyst — it destroys ozone and is regenerated unchanged to destroy another molecule. And another. And another. One chlorine atom can destroy up to 100,000 ozone molecules before it finally gets “caught” (converted to an inactive form). This is why CFCs are so dangerous — they don’t just add a little pollution, they unleash an army of immortal ozone killers. The most frightening part: CFCs emitted in the 1970s are still in the stratosphere, still releasing chlorine atoms, still destroying ozone today. Their atmospheric lifetime is 50–100+ years.

The Rowland-Molina Discovery — 1974 Nobel Prize
The Scientists Who Saved the Ozone Layer
  • In 1974, chemists F. Sherwood Rowland and Mario Molina at the University of California, Irvine published their groundbreaking theory: CFCs could reach the stratosphere and release chlorine atoms that destroy ozone
  • Their hypothesis: CFCs are stable in the troposphere (no water to dissolve them, no UV to break them down), so they drift upward intact. In the stratosphere, intense UV radiation breaks them apart → free chlorine atoms
  • Industry reaction: fierce denial — billions of dollars at stake in CFC products (refrigerators, aerosols, air conditioning)
  • Scientific confirmation: 1985 — Joe Farman (British Antarctic Survey) published shocking observational data showing massive ozone loss over Antarctica — the “ozone hole”
  • Rowland and Molina won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1995 — along with Paul Crutzen — for their work on atmospheric chemistry and ozone depletion
  • Key quote from Rowland: “The work is going very well, but it looks like it might be the end of the world” (1973, while calculating CFC impacts)
Step-by-Step: How Chlorine Destroys Ozone
1

CFC Released at Surface — Begins Its Journey

A CFC molecule (e.g., CCl₂F₂ — freon) is released from a refrigerator or aerosol spray. It doesn’t react with water or soil. It accumulates in the troposphere and slowly drifts upward over months to years.

2

UV Breaks the CFC — Free Chlorine Born

CCl₂F₂ + UV → CCl·F₂ + Cl· — Intense UV radiation in the stratosphere breaks the carbon-chlorine bond, releasing a free, highly reactive chlorine radical (Cl·). This is the moment of no return.

3

Chlorine Attacks Ozone

Cl· + O₃ → ClO· + O₂ — The chlorine radical rips an oxygen atom from ozone, forming chlorine monoxide (ClO·) and normal oxygen (O₂). One ozone molecule destroyed. But ClO· is still reactive.

4

Chlorine Is Regenerated — Ready to Kill Again

ClO· + O· → Cl· + O₂ — ClO reacts with another free oxygen atom, regenerating the original Cl· radical and releasing O₂. The chlorine atom is completely unchanged and free to attack another ozone molecule. This catalytic cycle repeats up to 100,000 times.

5

Bromine Does the Same — And Is Even More Efficient

Bromine from halons (fire extinguisher chemicals) is 40–50 times more effective at destroying ozone per atom than chlorine. The same catalytic cycle operates: Br· + O₃ → BrO· + O₂ → Br· + O₂. Combined ClO + BrO cycles are especially destructive.

Net Equation — The Bottom Line of Ozone Destruction
  • The catalytic chain combines to give the net reaction: O₃ + O· → 2O₂ (catalysed by Cl· or Br·)
  • This reaction converts ozone (O₃) + free oxygen (O·) into normal oxygen (O₂) — using chlorine as a catalyst that is regenerated
  • Without human-made halogen compounds, this reaction occurs at a very slow natural rate, balanced by ozone production
  • With CFCs/halons flooding the stratosphere with chlorine and bromine, ozone is destroyed much faster than it can be produced → net depletion
3

Polar Vortex — The Conveyor Belt That Concentrates Ozone Killers

A giant, isolated whirlpool of cold stratospheric air that traps halogens over the poles

💡 The Polar Vortex Is Like a Pressure Cooker Lid Over Antarctica

In winter, a powerful circular wind system forms around the South Pole in the stratosphere — the polar vortex. It spins so fast and so consistently that it acts like a wall or “lid”, preventing air from outside mixing in. Any chlorine or bromine released from ODS in the stratosphere gets trapped inside this spinning lid. Month after month of Antarctic winter, halogens accumulate — with nowhere to go. The polar vortex doesn’t directly destroy ozone; it’s the transportation and concentration system that gathers all the ozone-destroying chemicals in one place, at extreme cold, and holds them there until spring. When the spring sun finally arrives and illuminates this chlorine-saturated air mass — the catalytic chain reaction explodes.

Polar Vortex — Key Facts for UPSC
  • What it is: A large area of low pressure and cold air surrounding both poles, strongest in the stratosphere. A persistent cyclonic circulation that forms in winter.
  • Location: Upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (8–50 km altitude at polar regions)
  • Winter formation: Polar vortex strengthens in winter as temperature contrast between polar and temperate regions increases → polar jet stream speeds up → creates a tight circular barrier around the pole
  • Southern Hemisphere stronger: Antarctic polar vortex is stronger and more stable than Arctic because Antarctica has no major mountain ranges or large land masses at mid-latitudes to disturb the flow (unlike the Northern Hemisphere with Himalayas, Rockies, etc.)
  • Role in ozone depletion: Isolates Antarctic stratospheric air from lower latitudes for ~5 months (May–October) → ODS-derived halogens accumulate → extreme cold inside vortex allows PSCs to form → perfect storm for ozone destruction
  • Collapse in spring: As spring sunlight heats the polar stratosphere, the temperature contrast decreases → polar vortex weakens and breaks down → ozone-depleted air from Antarctica mixes with mid-latitude air → ozone “hole” spreads temporarily to southern South America, Australia, and southern Africa (historically)
  • Tropospheric polar vortex: When the stratospheric polar vortex weakens, it can push cold Arctic air into lower latitudes — causing sudden cold waves in USA, Europe, India (Kashmir) — this is separate from the ozone story but UPSC sometimes tests both
4

Polar Stratospheric Clouds (PSCs) — The Missing Link

The “activation station” that converts harmless chlorine reservoirs into ozone-destroying radicals

💡 PSCs Are Like Chemistry Labs Floating in the Sky — Where Inactive Chlorine Gets “Activated”

After CFCs are broken down by UV, the chlorine atoms don’t immediately go on a rampage. Some chlorine gets “caught” and stored in relatively inactive forms — chlorine nitrate (ClONO₂) and hydrogen chloride (HCl). These are like chemical “prisons” holding chlorine under arrest. But then come the Polar Stratospheric Clouds. Their surfaces act as chemistry laboratories where these prison compounds react with each other and get converted into the highly reactive form — Cl₂ (molecular chlorine) and HOCl. When spring sunlight hits, these molecules are instantly photolysed back into free Cl· radicals — now fully armed and ready to destroy ozone in massive quantities. The PSC surface essentially “releases the prisoners” all at once.

Polar Stratospheric Clouds (PSCs) — Everything UPSC Needs
  • Formation temperature: Below −78°C (195 K) — extreme cold found only in polar winter stratospheres
  • Altitude: 15–25 km in the stratosphere (inside the polar vortex)
  • Composition:
    • Type I: Nitric acid (HNO₃) + water ice droplets (Nitric Acid Trihydrate/NAT). Form slightly above ice frost point (~−78°C). The ozone-depletion relevant type.
    • Type II: Pure water ice crystals. Form only below −85°C. Also called nacreous clouds / mother-of-pearl clouds — strikingly beautiful iridescent colours!
  • Role in ozone depletion:
    • PSC surfaces catalyse heterogeneous reactions that convert inactive chlorine reservoirs (ClONO₂, HCl) into reactive forms (Cl₂, HOCl)
    • When spring UV light hits Cl₂ → 2Cl· → massive simultaneous activation → ozone destruction explodes
    • PSCs also remove HNO₃ from the stratosphere (via sedimentation) — this prevents chlorine from being “deactivated” again, prolonging ozone destruction
  • Why PSCs matter so much: Gas-phase chemistry alone (without PSCs) would cause only 5–10% ozone depletion. PSC-aided reactions can cause 60%+ ozone depletion — explaining the extreme Antarctic ozone hole
  • Antarctica advantage: PSCs form for ~5 months over Antarctica during winter. Over the Arctic, PSCs form for only 10–60 days in most winters → smaller, less consistent ozone hole over the Arctic
5

Why the Ozone Hole Forms Over Antarctica (Not the Arctic)

A perfect storm of 3 unique conditions — only Antarctica has all three
🌀

Polar Vortex — Extreme & Stable

Antarctic polar vortex is stronger and more stable than Arctic because no major mountains disrupt airflow in Southern Hemisphere. Isolates stratospheric air for 5 months, concentrating halogens inside.
❄️

PSCs — Form for 5 Months

Antarctic winter stratosphere gets colder (below -78°C) for much longer than the Arctic. PSCs form for ~5 months over Antarctica vs only 10-60 days in Arctic winters. More PSC = more chlorine activation.
☀️

Spring Sunlight — The Trigger

When Antarctic spring begins (Aug-Oct), sunlight suddenly illuminates the PSC-activated chlorine trapped inside the polar vortex. This triggers the catalytic ozone destruction chain. Darkness = no reaction. Spring sun = explosion of destruction.
📌 Arctic vs Antarctic Ozone — UPSC Often Asks This Comparison
  • Arctic: Weaker polar vortex (Himalayas, Rockies disrupt Northern Hemisphere circulation) → more mixing with mid-latitude air → PSCs form for fewer days → less ozone depletion. Arctic sometimes has “ozone depletion events” but never a full “ozone hole” like Antarctica.
  • Antarctica: Strongest polar vortex → most isolated stratospheric air → longest PSC formation → most severe ozone hole. Ozone hole is an annual spring feature.
  • Both hemispheres: Have the same amount of ODS-derived chlorine in the stratosphere (CFCs are emitted mainly from the Northern Hemisphere but global mixing means both poles get exposed to similar chlorine levels). The difference in ozone hole severity is due to meteorological conditions, NOT amount of chlorine.
6

Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) — The Accused

Know each ODS, its source, and its phase-out status under Montreal Protocol

🧊 CFCs (Chlorofluorocarbons)

Most notorious ODS. Used in refrigerators (freon), air conditioners, aerosol sprays (deodorants, hairspray), foam blowing. Chlorine ODP (Ozone Depletion Potential) very high. Phased out 1996 in developed, 2010 in developing nations. Atmospheric lifetime: 50–100+ years.

🔥 Halons

Used in fire extinguishers (ships, aircraft). Contain bromine — 40–50× more effective at destroying ozone per atom than chlorine. Extremely high ODP. Phase-out: 1994 in developed, 2010 in developing (with exceptions). Banned in India after 2001 (with essential-use exemptions).

🔄 HCFCs (Hydrochlorofluorocarbons)

Created as interim CFC replacements. Still deplete ozone but less than CFCs (lower ODP). Also potent greenhouse gases. Being phased out under Montreal. India allowed until 2040 (developing country schedule). Cooling sector transition challenge.

🌾 Methyl Bromide (CH₃Br)

Used as agricultural fumigant (kills soil pests). High bromine ODP. Phase-out in developed nations: 2005. Developing nations: 2015 (India). Partial natural sources also exist. Still allowed for critical agricultural uses in some cases.

🧪 Carbon Tetrachloride (CCl₄)

Formerly used in fire extinguishers, dry cleaning, chemical synthesis. High ODP. Phase-out: 1996 in developed, 2010 in developing. Found to still be leaking into atmosphere despite phase-out — mystery sources being investigated.

🔧 Methyl Chloroform (CH₃CCl₃)

Industrial solvent used for cleaning metal parts, circuit boards. Moderate ODP. Phase-out: 1996 in developed, 2015 in developing. Atmospheric lifetime relatively short (~6 years) compared to CFCs.

🔴 HFCs — The Replacement That Became a Climate Problem Kigali 2016
  • HFCs (Hydrofluorocarbons) were developed as CFC/HCFC replacements. They do NOT deplete ozone (no chlorine or bromine).
  • But they are extremely potent greenhouse gases — Global Warming Potential (GWP) up to 14,800 times CO₂
  • Usage is booming in cooling (ACs, refrigerators) — especially in fast-developing nations like India and China
  • Without action, HFC emissions could add 0.5°C of warming by 2100
  • The Kigali Amendment (2016) to the Montreal Protocol addresses HFCs — phase them down by 80%+ over next 30 years
  • This is why HFCs are the key topic connecting ozone protection to climate change
ODSKey UsesKey HalogenPhase-out (Developing)UPSC Angle
CFCs (CFC-11, CFC-12)Refrigerants, aerosols, foam blowingChlorine2010Most notorious; Rowland-Molina 1974; “Freon”
Halons (Halon-1301)Fire extinguishersBromine (40-50× more potent than Cl)2010India banned after 2001 (essential use only)
HCFCsCFC replacement; refrigerants, ACsChlorine (lower ODP)2040India’s cooling sector; HCFC still in transition
Methyl BromideAgricultural fumigantBromine2015 (India)Critical use exemptions still granted
Carbon TetrachlorideFire ext., dry cleaning, chemicalsChlorine2010Mystery ongoing emissions despite ban
HFCsCFC/HCFC replacement; coolingNone (no ozone depletion)India: 85% cut by 2047Kigali Amendment 2016; high GWP (up to 14,800× CO₂)
7

The Treaty Framework — Vienna, Montreal & Kigali

From science to action to climate — the 40-year story of humanity’s greatest environmental success
1974

Rowland-Molina Hypothesis Published

UC Irvine scientists publish paper in Nature linking CFCs to stratospheric ozone depletion. Industry denies. Scientific debate begins. US bans CFC aerosols in 1978.

1985

Vienna Convention — The Framework Treaty

First international treaty on ozone layer. Framework only — no binding controls. Commits nations to research, cooperation, data exchange. Same year: Joe Farman publishes discovery of Antarctic ozone hole. Convention ratified by 116 nations. India ratified: 18 March 1991. Also 1985: Vienna Convention marks ozone as the first environmental problem recognized before it became a disaster.

1987

Montreal Protocol — The Binding Treaty 🏆

Signed: 16 September 1987 (→ World Ozone Day). Ratified by: 198 parties (197 states + EU)FIRST UNIVERSALLY RATIFIED TREATY in UN history. Entered into force: 1 January 1989. Controls: Binds all countries to phase-out schedules for ODS. Mechanism: Multilateral Fund (MLF) — developed countries fund developing countries’ transition. Result so far: >99% of controlled ODS production phased out globally. Called by Kofi Annan: “Perhaps the single most successful international agreement to date”.

1990–99

Multiple Amendments Strengthen Montreal Protocol

London (1990), Copenhagen (1992), Vienna (1995), Montreal (1997), Beijing (1999) amendments progressively tightened controls, added new ODS, and moved up phase-out deadlines. Science kept improving; protocol kept adapting.

1995

Nobel Prize Chemistry — Rowland, Molina, Crutzen

For discovering the catalytic mechanisms of ozone depletion and the role of halogens. Vindication after 21 years of industry opposition.

2016

Kigali Amendment — Expanding to Climate Key

Agreed: October 2016, Kigali, Rwanda. Expanded Montreal Protocol to phase down HFCs (hydrofluorocarbons). Why: HFCs don’t deplete ozone but are potent greenhouse gases (GWP up to 14,800× CO₂). Impact: Ratified by 164 parties (as of 2024). Expected to prevent up to 0.5°C of warming by 2100. India’s commitment: Cut HFCs by 85% from 2024–26 baseline by 2047. India ratified: September 2021.

2024

COP 13/MOP 36 — Latest Montreal Protocol Meeting

Decisions on: HFC-23 emissions reporting; VSLS (Very Short-Lived Substances) control; feedstocks regulation; enhanced regional atmospheric monitoring; preventing import of energy-inefficient cooling products.

8

Ozone Recovery — 2024 & 2025 Latest Data Current Affairs

Good news for once — the ozone layer is healing, and 2025 gives us one of the smallest holes since 1992
Recovery Timeline — When Will the Ozone Layer Fully Heal?
Now
2025
Ozone hole present but shrinking. ODS levels in stratosphere declining. Positive trend confirmed.
2040
Rest of World
Most of the world’s ozone layer recovers to 1980 pre-hole levels
2045
Arctic
Arctic ozone fully recovers to 1980 levels
2066
Antarctica
Antarctic ozone hole expected to fully close — 80 years after the problem was identified
🔴 2024 Antarctic Ozone Hole — WMO Bulletin (World Ozone Day, 16 Sept 2024) Current Affairs
  • Released on World Ozone Day (September 16, 2024) marking the 40th anniversary of the Vienna Convention
  • Depth of 2024 ozone hole: Below the 1990–2020 average — a positive indicator
  • Maximum Ozone Mass Deficit (OMD): 46.1 million tonnes on September 29, 2024
  • Smaller than the relatively large holes between 2020–2023
  • Onset was slow; delayed ozone depletion observed through September; relatively rapid recovery after peak deficit reached
  • WMO: “This persistent later onset has been identified as a robust indication of initial recovery of the Antarctic ozone hole”
  • ODS levels in Antarctic stratosphere have declined by about ⅓ since peaking around year 2000
🔴 2025 Antarctic Ozone Hole — NOAA/NASA/Copernicus (December 2025) Current Affairs
  • 5th smallest ozone hole since 1992 (the year Montreal Protocol controls began to take effect) — confirmed by NOAA and NASA
  • Peak period (Sep 7 – Oct 13, 2025): Average area 18.71 million sq km
  • Minimum ozone over South Pole: 147 Dobson Units (October 6, 2025) — well below 220 DU threshold but better than worst years
  • Ozone hole ended (closed): December 1, 2025 — earliest closure since 2019
  • Also 14th smallest in the full 46-year satellite record (since 1979)
  • Lowest ever: 92 DU (October 2006). For comparison, 2025’s 147 DU shows significant recovery.
  • NOAA scientist Stephen Montzka: “This year’s hole would have been more than 1 million square miles larger if there was still as much chlorine in the stratosphere as 25 years ago”
  • Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) confirmed 2025 hole as smallest in 5 years
✅ Effects of Ozone Layer Protection — What Montreal Protocol Has Already Saved
  • Expected to prevent 443 million skin cancer cases and 63 million cataract cases for people born in the US alone (by 2100)
  • The “World Avoided” scenario: Without Montreal Protocol, by 2065, 67% of ozone would have been destroyed. Earth would have been largely uninhabitable for non-cancer-shielded humans. Scientists call this the most important global health intervention ever.
  • ODS phase-out also helped climate: Since ODS are also greenhouse gases, phasing them out prevented significant additional warming beyond CO₂
  • Kigali Amendment additionally expected to prevent 0.5°C warming by 2100 — more than most other climate agreements currently in force

⭐ Complete Ozone Depletion Cheat Sheet

  • Ozone layer: stratosphere, 15–35 km | Absorbs: UV-B and UV-C
  • Dobson Units: Normal = 300 DU | Ozone hole threshold = <220 DU | Lowest ever = 92 DU (Oct 2006) | 2025 minimum = 147 DU
  • Discoverers: Rowland + Molina (1974), UC Irvine | Nobel Prize Chemistry 1995 | Hypothesis: CFCs → chlorine → ozone destruction
  • Ozone hole discovery: Joe Farman, British Antarctic Survey, 1985
  • Catalytic destruction: 1 Cl atom destroys up to 100,000 O₃ molecules | Cl· + O₃ → ClO· + O₂ → Cl· (regenerated)
  • Bromine (from halons): 40–50× more effective per atom than chlorine
  • Why Antarctica: Polar Vortex (isolation) + PSCs (chlorine activation) + Spring Sunlight (trigger)
  • Polar Vortex: Southern stronger than Northern (no mountains disrupting SH circulation)
  • PSCs: Form below −78°C | Type I: HNO₃ + water | Type II: pure ice crystals = nacreous/mother-of-pearl clouds
  • PSC role: Convert inactive Cl reservoirs (ClONO₂, HCl) to reactive Cl₂ → UV activates → 60%+ ozone destruction
  • ODS: CFCs (refrigerants) · Halons (fire ext.) · HCFCs (interim replacement) · Methyl Bromide (fumigant) · Carbon tetrachloride · Methyl chloroform
  • HFCs: NOT ODS, but GWP up to 14,800× CO₂ → addressed by Kigali Amendment
  • Vienna Convention: 1985 | Framework only | India ratified: 18 March 1991 | 40th anniversary: 2025
  • Montreal Protocol: Signed 16 Sept 1987 (→ World Ozone Day) | 198 parties | First universally ratified UN treaty | In force: 1 Jan 1989 | MLF: developed funds developing nations
  • Kigali Amendment: October 2016, Rwanda | HFC phase-down | 164 parties ratified (2024) | 0.5°C warming prevented by 2100
  • India + Kigali: Ratified September 2021 | India cuts HFCs 85% by 2047 (from 2024-26 baseline)
  • Recovery: 2040 (rest of world) | 2045 (Arctic) | 2066 (Antarctica)
  • 2024 ozone hole: Below 1990-2020 average | Max OMD: 46.1 million tonnes (Sep 29)
  • 2025 ozone hole: 5th smallest since 1992 | Peak area: 18.71 million sq km | Closed: December 1, 2025 (earliest since 2019)
  • Montreal’s legacy: >99% ODS phased out | Would have prevented “443 million skin cancers” | “World Avoided” scenario

🧪 Practice MCQs — Test Yourself
PYQUPSC 2015
Q1. Which one of the following is associated with the issue of control and phasing out of the use of ozone-depleting substances?
✅ Official Answer: (b) Montreal Protocol
Montreal Protocol (1987) ✅ is specifically and exclusively about phasing out Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) like CFCs, halons, HCFCs, methyl bromide. It is the first universally ratified UN treaty (198 parties). Minamata Convention ❌ — about mercury pollution (named after Minamata disease in Japan from mercury poisoning). Kyoto Protocol ❌ — about reducing greenhouse gas emissions (CO₂, methane, N₂O, HFCs, PFCs, SF₆) under UNFCCC. Note: HFCs are technically covered by both Kyoto Protocol (GHG) and Kigali Amendment (phase-down), but the main ODS treaty is Montreal. Nagoya Protocol ❌ — about Access and Benefit Sharing of genetic resources under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Each of these trap answers is a real international environmental treaty — UPSC loves testing if you know which treaty covers which issue.
Practice
Q2. Consider the following about the Montreal Protocol: 1. It was signed on 16 September 1987 — which is now World Ozone Day. 2. It is the first treaty in UN history to be universally ratified by all member states. 3. The Multilateral Fund (MLF) helps developed countries with transition costs. 4. The Kigali Amendment (2016) expanded it to phase down HFCs. Which are CORRECT?
✅ Answer: (d) — 1, 2 and 4 correct; 3 is WRONG (direction of MLF)
1 ✅: Montreal Protocol signed September 16, 1987 → World Ozone Day is September 16 each year. 2 ✅: Ratified by all 198 parties (197 states + EU) — making it the FIRST universally ratified treaty in UN history. No other environmental treaty has achieved this. 3 ❌ Wrong: The Multilateral Fund (MLF) helps DEVELOPING countries (Article 5 parties) bear the costs of transitioning away from ODS — NOT developed countries. Developed countries (non-Article 5) are the DONORS to the MLF; developing countries are the RECIPIENTS. This direction is frequently tested and reversed in UPSC options. 4 ✅: The Kigali Amendment (October 2016) expanded the Montreal Protocol framework to phase down HFCs — greenhouse gases that replaced ODS. Ratified by 164 parties; India ratified September 2021.
Practice
Q3. Why does the ozone hole form primarily over Antarctica and not over the Arctic, even though CFCs are emitted mostly in the Northern Hemisphere?
✅ Answer: (c) — Stronger polar vortex + longer PSC formation
The key insight: Both poles have similar amounts of chlorine and bromine from ODS (atmospheric mixing distributes them globally). The difference is METEOROLOGICAL, not chemical. Antarctica’s advantages for ozone destruction: (1) Stronger, more stable polar vortex — no major Northern Hemisphere-like mountain ranges (Himalayas, Rockies) to disrupt the Southern circumpolar flow. The Antarctic vortex isolates stratospheric air for ~5 months vs the Arctic’s weaker, more easily disrupted vortex. (2) Longer PSC formation — Antarctic stratospheric temperatures drop below −78°C for 5 months; Arctic PSCs form for only 10–60 days. More PSC = more chlorine activation = more ozone destruction. (3) Spring sunlight timing — When Southern spring arrives (Aug-Oct), it illuminates a fully charged, isolated, chlorine-activated air mass → massive catalytic chain reaction. Note: Option (a) is irrelevant — UV radiation reaching the poles is similar. Option (b) is wrong — CFCs travel through the atmosphere, not oceans.
Current Affairs2025
Q4. According to NOAA and NASA data, the 2025 Antarctic ozone hole was: 1. The fifth smallest since 1992 (when Montreal Protocol controls began to take effect) 2. The ozone hole closed on December 1, 2025 — earliest closure since 2019 3. The minimum ozone level over the South Pole was 147 Dobson Units 4. Larger than the 1990-2020 average — indicating recovery failure Select the correct answer:
✅ Answer: (b) — 1, 2 and 3 only. Statement 4 is WRONG.
1 ✅: NOAA and NASA confirmed the 2025 Antarctic ozone hole was the 5th smallest since 1992 — a positive sign of recovery. 2 ✅: Copernicus CAMS confirmed the 2025 ozone hole ended on December 1, 2025 — the earliest closure since 2019. 3 ✅: The minimum ozone concentration over the South Pole was 147 Dobson Units on October 6, 2025. This is well below the 220 DU “ozone hole” threshold but notably better than the worst years (92 DU in 2006). 4 ❌ Wrong: The 2025 hole was SMALLER than the 1990-2020 average — NOT larger. This is the whole point — it confirms the recovery trend. The 2024 hole was also below the 1990-2020 average. Both years indicate the positive long-term trend from ODS phase-out under the Montreal Protocol. Note: Year-to-year natural variations occur, but the long-term trend is clearly toward recovery.
Practice
Q5. Consider the following about HFCs and the Kigali Amendment: 1. HFCs deplete the ozone layer similar to CFCs 2. The Kigali Amendment was adopted in 2016 in Rwanda 3. India ratified the Kigali Amendment in September 2021 4. India is required to cut HFCs by 85% from the 2024-26 baseline by 2047 Which are CORRECT?
✅ Answer: (d) — 2, 3 and 4 only
1 ❌ Wrong — Critical Point! HFCs do NOT deplete the ozone layer. This is the single most important fact about HFCs for UPSC. HFCs contain hydrogen, fluorine, and carbon — they have NO chlorine or bromine, which are the halogens that destroy ozone. HFCs were created specifically to REPLACE ozone-depleting CFCs. Their problem is different: they are extremely potent greenhouse gases (some with GWP up to 14,800× CO₂) contributing to climate change. The Kigali Amendment targets them for their climate impact, NOT ozone depletion. 2 ✅: Kigali Amendment was adopted in October 2016 in Kigali, Rwanda — as an amendment to the Montreal Protocol. 3 ✅: India ratified the Kigali Amendment in September 2021, joining 164 other parties. 4 ✅: India (in the Article 5 group) commits to cut HFCs by 85% from the 2024–26 baseline by 2047 — a relatively later deadline than developed countries (who must do it faster) recognizing India’s development needs, especially in cooling.
Practice
Q6. Polar Stratospheric Clouds (PSCs) play a crucial role in ozone depletion. Which of the following is the PRIMARY role of PSCs?
✅ Answer: (c) — PSCs activate chlorine reservoirs via heterogeneous chemistry
PSCs don’t directly destroy ozone themselves. Their primary role is much more subtle and important — they are “activation stations.” After UV breaks down CFCs, the chlorine atoms get “caught” in inactive reservoir forms: chlorine nitrate (ClONO₂) and hydrogen chloride (HCl). These inactive forms would eventually deactivate completely and stop destroying ozone. But PSC surfaces catalyse heterogeneous reactions (reactions on surfaces, unlike gas-phase reactions) that convert these inactive reservoirs back into reactive molecular chlorine (Cl₂) and HOCl. When spring sunlight hits Cl₂ → 2Cl· → massive simultaneous release of ozone-destroying chlorine radicals. PSCs also remove HNO₃ from the stratosphere (via sedimentation of large NAT particles) — preventing HNO₃ from recapturing ClO and deactivating chlorine. This “denitrification” prolongs ozone destruction. The combination of chlorine activation + denitrification is why PSCs transform modest ozone depletion into catastrophic 60%+ loss.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

This is one of the most counter-intuitive facts about ozone depletion, and it’s crucial for UPSC Mains: (1) Extreme atmospheric lifetime: CFC molecules have lifetimes of 50–100+ years in the atmosphere. CFCs emitted in the 1970s and 80s are still in the stratosphere and will continue releasing chlorine for decades. You can ban production today — but the CFCs already up there continue their work for generations. (2) Long transport time: It takes years for new (lower) CFC emissions at the surface to actually reach and affect stratospheric concentrations. Conversely, it takes years for declining CFC concentrations in the stratosphere to respond to reduced surface emissions. There’s a long lag in both directions. (3) Antarctica is the hardest: The polar vortex + PSC combination makes Antarctica most efficient at exploiting even small amounts of remaining chlorine. The ozone hole will persist until chlorine levels drop LOW enough that even the PSC activation mechanism can’t cause significant depletion. That requires chlorine to fall to well below 1980 levels — and with remaining CFC lifetimes, that takes until ~2066. (4) Natural variability: Volcanic eruptions, climate change impacts on stratospheric temperatures, and wildfire smoke (Australia’s 2019-20 fires destroyed 1% of the ozone shield) can cause year-to-year setbacks. The trend is positive but not smooth.
The Kigali Amendment is brilliant in its institutional logic — not its chemistry: (1) Piggybacking on success: The Montreal Protocol was already universally ratified (198 parties) — the most successful environmental treaty ever. Rather than create a new treaty on HFCs (which might fail like Kyoto did), negotiators attached the HFC phase-down to the already-functioning, universally accepted Montreal framework. This gave Kigali automatic global buy-in. (2) The cooling paradox: As the world phased out CFCs and HCFCs to protect the ozone layer, they were replaced with HFCs. But HFCs, while safe for ozone, are hundreds to thousands of times more potent as greenhouse gases than CO₂. As India, China, and other developing nations boomed economically, their cooling sectors exploded — more ACs, more refrigerators — more HFCs. Without Kigali, HFC emissions were projected to add 0.5°C of warming by 2100. (3) Climate impact per agreement: The Kigali Amendment’s projected climate impact (preventing 0.5°C warming) is larger than most provisions of the Paris Agreement currently in force. That makes it one of the most impactful climate agreements ever, despite being “just” an amendment to an ozone treaty. (4) India’s specific challenge: India’s cooling demand is projected to grow enormously — by 2050 India could be the world’s biggest AC market. The transition from HFCs to low-GWP alternatives (like HFOs, natural refrigerants) requires massive technology transfer and investment. The Multilateral Fund under Montreal supports this — another reason the Montreal/Kigali framework works better than creating a new treaty.
The “World Avoided” scenario (scientists’ term for what would have happened without the Montreal Protocol) is genuinely terrifying: Human health: Dramatic increase in skin cancers (especially melanoma — the deadliest form), cataracts (UV damages the lens of the eye — cataracts are already a leading cause of blindness globally), immunosuppression (UV suppresses the human immune system, making all infections more dangerous). The Montreal Protocol is expected to prevent 443 million skin cancers in the US alone by 2100. Agriculture: UV-B damages plant DNA — crops would have lower yields, poorer nutritional quality. Rice, soybean, and wheat are particularly UV-sensitive. India’s food security would be at serious risk. Marine ecosystems: UV-B penetrates seawater to 20+ metres. Phytoplankton — the base of ALL marine food chains and responsible for ~50% of Earth’s oxygen production — are extremely UV-sensitive. Collapse of phytoplankton → collapse of marine food chains → collapse of fisheries → food crisis for billions. Materials degradation: UV accelerates degradation of plastics, rubber, paints, wood. Infrastructure costs would rise dramatically. “World Avoided” model: Without the Montreal Protocol, by 2065, 67% of the ozone layer would have been destroyed globally. Skin cancer rates would be 10+ times higher. Large parts of the inhabited world would have become hazardous for prolonged outdoor activity. This is why ozone protection is described as one of humanity’s most important environmental achievements — it genuinely saved the world.
Legacy IAS — UPSC Civil Services Coaching, Bangalore  |  All data updated to April 2026. Sources: WMO Ozone Bulletin (World Ozone Day, 16 Sep 2024), NOAA/NASA 2025 Ozone Hole Report (December 2025), Copernicus CAMS 2025 data, NOAA scientist Stephen Montzka quote verified. Montreal Protocol Wikipedia (198 parties, Nov 2025). Kigali Amendment 164 parties ratified (2024). India Kigali ratification September 2021. Recovery timeline from 2022 WMO Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion (official quadrennial assessment).

Book a Free Demo Class

April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
Categories

Get free Counselling and ₹25,000 Discount

Fill the form – Our experts will call you within 30 mins.