Call Us Now

+91 9606900005 / 04

For Enquiry

legacyiasacademy@gmail.com

Securities Market Code Bill 2025

Why is it in News?

  • Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman tabled the Securities Market Code Bill, 2025 in the Lok Sabha.
  • Referred to the Standing Committee on Finance.
  • Implements a reform announced in Union Budget 2021–22 to modernise India’s securities market regulation.

Relevance

GS III – Economy

  • Capital markets and financial regulation
  • Investor protection and market efficiency
  • Ease of doing business

GS II – Polity & Governance

  • Regulatory institutions (SEBI)
  • Parliamentary oversight and delegated legislation
  • Separation of powers concerns

What is the Securities Market Code Bill, 2025? 

  • consolidation and rationalisation law for securities markets.
  • Seeks to unify three major legislations:
    • Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956
    • SEBI Act, 1992
    • Depositories Act, 1996
  • Objective:
    • Provide a single, coherent regulatory framework
    • Enhance investor protection
    • Enable capital mobilisation at scale
    • Reduce regulatory fragmentation

Rationale for the Bill

  • Existing framework:
    • Multiple overlapping laws
    • Procedural complexity
    • Inconsistent enforcement provisions
  • Global context:
    • Need for agile capital markets
    • Alignment with modern regulatory best practices
  • Policy logic:
    • Ease of doing business + effective deterrence

Key Provisions of the Bill

1. Consolidation of Securities Laws

  • Replaces three separate Acts with one unified Code.
  • Benefits:
    • Legal clarity
    • Reduced compliance duplication
    • Faster adjudication and enforcement

2. Expansion of SEBI Board

  • SEBI strength increased:
    • From 9 members → 15 members
  • Composition:
    • Chairperson
    • 2 Central Government nominees (ex-officio)
    • 1 RBI nominee (ex-officio)
    • 11 other members
      • At least 5 whole-time members
  • Current situation:
    • Only 3 whole-time members
  • Objective:
    • Strengthen institutional capacity
    • Improve sectoral expertise and oversight

3. Conflict of Interest Disclosure

  • Mandatory disclosure of:
    • Direct or indirect interests by SEBI Board members.
  • Intended outcome:
    • Institutional integrity
    • Transparency in decision-making
    • Reduced regulatory capture risk

4. Decriminalisation of Minor Violations

  • Shifts minor, procedural, technical” violations:
    • From criminal prosecution → civil penalties
  • Criminal liability retained only for serious market abuse:
    • Insider trading
    • Trading on material non-public information
  • Rationale:
    • Faster enforcement
    • Reduced compliance burden
    • Business-friendly regulatory environment

5. Civil Penalties Framework

  • Introduces civil penalties for:
    • Unlawful gains or losses
  • Aligns punishment with:
    • Proportionality principle
    • Economic harm caused

6. Limitation on Inspections

  • No inspection allowed if:
    • 8 years have passed since the date of contravention.
  • Purpose:
    • Legal certainty
    • Protection from indefinite regulatory exposure
  • Concern:
    • Potential weakening of long-term enforcement in complex frauds

Expert Assessment

  • Legal experts view changes as:
    • “Minor, procedural, and technical”
    • Aimed at balancing:
      • Speedy adjudication
      • Effective deterrence

Political & Constitutional Concerns Raised

Oppositions Objections

  • Raised by:
    • DMK MP Arun Nehru
    • Congress MP Manish Tewari
  • Argument:
    • Excessive powers concentrated in SEBI
    • Violates the principle of separation of powers
    • Risk of over-centralised regulatory authority

Governments Response

  • Finance Minister:
    • Defended referral to Standing Committee
    • Opened scope for parliamentary scrutiny and refinement

Critical Analysis

Strengths

  • Simplifies securities regulation.
  • Improves regulatory efficiency.
  • Reduces fear of criminalisation for genuine compliance lapses.
  • Strengthens SEBI’s institutional capacity.

Concerns

  • Over-centralisation of power in SEBI.
  • Eight-year inspection bar may:
    • Hinder investigation of long-running market manipulation.
  • Increased SEBI strength without:
    • Parallel accountability mechanisms.

Broader Significance

Economic

  • Supports:
    • Capital market deepening
    • Startup and MSME fund-raising
    • Long-term infrastructure financing

Governance

  • Reflects shift from:
    • Punitive regulation → trust-based compliance
  • Tests balance between:
    • Regulatory autonomy
    • Parliamentary oversight

December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
Categories