Daily Static Quiz Prelims Practice 2027
- AThe annexation of Awadh by Lord Dalhousie under the Doctrine of Lapse.
- BThe introduction of the General Service Enlistment Act requiring sepoys to serve overseas.
- CThe introduction of the new Enfield rifle cartridges greased with cow and pig fat, requiring sepoys to bite them before loading.
- DThe abolition of the Mughal titular sovereignty over Delhi announced by the East India Company.
Option (c) is correct — the immediate trigger was the cartridge controversy: greased Enfield rifle cartridges, believed to use cow and pig fat, deeply offended Hindu and Muslim sepoys' religious sentiments, since loading required biting off the cartridge tip. Mangal Pandey's revolt at Barrackpore (March 1857) and the subsequent Meerut mutiny (10 May 1857) both stemmed directly from this issue. Option (a) is wrong — Awadh's annexation (1856) was a significant underlying grievance but not the immediate trigger at Meerut. Option (b) is wrong — the General Service Enlistment Act (1856) angered sepoys over caste and overseas travel taboos, but wasn't the specific Meerut flashpoint. Option (d) is wrong — no such formal abolition announcement preceded the revolt; Bahadur Shah Zafar was instead declared the revolt's symbolic leader once fighting began.
- 1. Nana Saheb — Kanpur
- 2. Rani Lakshmibai — Jhansi
- 3. Kunwar Singh — Arrah, Bihar
- 4. Begum Hazrat Mahal — Delhi
- AOnly one
- BOnly three
- COnly two
- DAll four
Pairs 1, 2 and 3 are correctly matched. Nana Saheb led the revolt at Kanpur, seeking to restore Peshwa rule. Rani Lakshmibai led the defence of Jhansi against Sir Hugh Rose's forces. Kunwar Singh, an elderly zamindar, led the uprising in Arrah, Bihar. Pair 4 is incorrect — Begum Hazrat Mahal was the leader at Lucknow (Awadh), not Delhi; the Delhi centre was instead associated with the aged Mughal Emperor Bahadur Shah Zafar, who was declared the nominal leader of the revolt.
- AThe Government of India Act, 1858 transferred power from the East India Company to the British Crown, and the Governor-General also became known as the Viceroy.
- BThe revolt led to the immediate grant of self-governance to Indian princely states through the Doctrine of Lapse being formally reinstated.
- CThe policy of annexation was intensified after 1858, with the British Crown adopting an aggressive expansionist stance toward princely states.
- DThe proportion of European soldiers in the Indian Army was reduced significantly to rebuild trust with Indian sepoys.
Option (a) is correct — the Government of India Act, 1858, ended Company rule, transferring administration directly to the Crown, with the Governor-General now additionally styled Viceroy (Lord Canning being the first). Option (b) is wrong — princely states were not granted self-governance; instead, the Doctrine of Lapse was abandoned, and existing rulers were guaranteed their territories with rights to adopt heirs. Option (c) is wrong — annexationist policy was reversed, not intensified, as the Crown sought princely loyalty rather than absorption. Option (d) is wrong — the European-to-Indian soldier ratio in the army was actually increased significantly post-1857, precisely to prevent recurrence of a similar uprising.
Reason (R): The revolt was confined exclusively to soldiers of the Bengal Army and did not receive any support from civilian populations, taluqdars, or displaced rulers.
- ABoth A and R are correct, and R is the correct explanation of A.
- BBoth A and R are correct, but R is not the correct explanation of A.
- CA is correct, but R is incorrect.
- DA is incorrect, but R is correct.
A is correct — there is genuine, long-standing historiographical debate, with V.D. Savarkar terming it the "First War of Indian Independence" while colonial historians like it framed as a limited "Sepoy Mutiny." R is incorrect — the revolt drew substantial civilian participation, including taluqdars in Awadh, displaced rulers like Nana Saheb and Rani Lakshmibai, peasants, and artisans, spreading well beyond the Bengal Army sepoys alone, precisely the evidence cited by those arguing for the "War of Independence" characterisation.
- AThe economic causes were limited to high land revenue rates and did not involve the destruction of Indian handicraft industries.
- BThe Doctrine of Lapse, applied by Lord Dalhousie, led to the annexation of several princely states including Satara, Jhansi, and Nagpur on grounds of absence of a natural heir.
- CThe revolt had no religious dimension, as the cartridge issue was purely a matter of military discipline unrelated to religious sentiment.
- DSepoys were entirely satisfied with their pay and promotion prospects, and military grievances played no role in the revolt.
Option (b) is correct — the Doctrine of Lapse, applied by Governor-General Dalhousie, annexed Satara (1848), Jhansi (1854), and Nagpur (1854), among others, denying adopted heirs the right to inherit in absence of a natural heir, generating deep resentment among princely families. Option (a) is wrong — economic causes were broader, including the systematic destruction of Indian handicrafts due to British trade policy and cheap machine-made imports. Option (c) is wrong — the greased cartridge controversy was fundamentally a religious grievance touching core Hindu and Muslim beliefs. Option (d) is wrong — sepoys faced genuine grievances over pay, discriminatory promotion (racial ceiling on ranks), and the overseas service requirement under the General Service Enlistment Act.


