Static Quiz 13 August 2025 (Polity)
Quiz-summary
0 of 5 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Information
Static Quiz 13 August 2025 (Polity) For UPSC Exam
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 5 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Answered
- Review
- Question 1 of 5
1. Question
Consider the following statements about the Kesavananda Bharati judgment (1973):
1. It was delivered by a 13-judge bench.
2. It established the “Basic Structure Doctrine.”
3. It held that Parliament has unlimited power to amend the Constitution.
How many of the above statements are correct?CorrectCorrect answer: (b)
Explanation: Statements 1 and 2 are correct; statement 3 is incorrect since Kesavananda limited Parliament’s amending power by introducing the Basic Structure Doctrine.IncorrectCorrect answer: (b)
Explanation: Statements 1 and 2 are correct; statement 3 is incorrect since Kesavananda limited Parliament’s amending power by introducing the Basic Structure Doctrine. - Question 2 of 5
2. Question
Which of the following judgments explicitly held that the right to privacy is a fundamental right under Article 21?
1. Gobind v. State of Madhya Pradesh (1975)
2. Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India (2017)
3. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)
Select the correct combination:CorrectCorrect answer: (b)
Explanation: Only the Puttaswamy judgment (2017) conclusively held privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21.IncorrectCorrect answer: (b)
Explanation: Only the Puttaswamy judgment (2017) conclusively held privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21. - Question 3 of 5
3. Question
Consider the following features of the S.R. Bommai case (1994):
1. It limited the scope of Article 356.
2. It upheld the absolute power of the President to dismiss state governments.
3. It reinforced federalism as a basic feature of the Constitution.
Which of the above statements are correct?CorrectCorrect answer: (a)
Explanation: Statements 1 and 3 are correct; the case curtailed misuse of Article 356 and reinforced federalism. Statement 2 is incorrect.IncorrectCorrect answer: (a)
Explanation: Statements 1 and 3 are correct; the case curtailed misuse of Article 356 and reinforced federalism. Statement 2 is incorrect. - Question 4 of 5
4. Question
Match the landmark judgments with their primary focus:
Judgement Focus Area
A. Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan 1. Environmental Protection
B. MC Mehta v. Union of India 2. Sexual Harassment at Workplace
C. Minerva Mills v. Union of India 3. Basic Structure Doctrine and Amendment LimitsChoose the correct match:
CorrectCorrect answer: (a)
Explanation: Vishaka laid down guidelines on sexual harassment; MC Mehta cases focused on environment; Minerva Mills reaffirmed basic structure doctrine.IncorrectCorrect answer: (a)
Explanation: Vishaka laid down guidelines on sexual harassment; MC Mehta cases focused on environment; Minerva Mills reaffirmed basic structure doctrine. - Question 5 of 5
5. Question
Consider the following statements about the I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu (2007) judgment:
1. It held that laws placed under the Ninth Schedule after 1973 are immune from judicial review.
2. It introduced the ‘basic structure’ test for Ninth Schedule laws inserted after 1973.
3. It struck down all laws under the Ninth Schedule as unconstitutional.
How many of these statements are correct?CorrectCorrect answer: (b)
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect as post-1973 Ninth Schedule laws are subject to judicial review if violating basic structure. Statement 3 is incorrect.IncorrectCorrect answer: (b)
Explanation: Statement 2 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect as post-1973 Ninth Schedule laws are subject to judicial review if violating basic structure. Statement 3 is incorrect.