Static Quiz 14 August 2025 (Polity)
Quiz-summary
0 of 5 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Information
Static Quiz 14 August 2025 (Polity) For UPSC Exam
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 5 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Answered
- Review
- Question 1 of 5
1. Question
Which of the following Supreme Court judgments pertain to Fundamental Rights under Article 21?
1. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
2. Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India
3. ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla
Select the correct option:CorrectCorrect answer: (a)
Explanation: Both Maneka Gandhi and Puttaswamy deal with Article 21 rights. ADM Jabalpur related to suspension of rights under Emergency.IncorrectCorrect answer: (a)
Explanation: Both Maneka Gandhi and Puttaswamy deal with Article 21 rights. ADM Jabalpur related to suspension of rights under Emergency. - Question 2 of 5
2. Question
Identify the correct pairs of judgments and the right/principle involved:
Judgment Principle/Right
A. Navtej Singh Johar 1. Decriminalization of homosexuality
B. Indira Sawhney 2. Reservation for OBCs
C. Kesavananda Bharati 3. Basic Structure Doctrine of ConstitutionChoose the correct combination:
CorrectCorrect answer: (a)
Explanation: Navtej Singh Johar decriminalized homosexuality; Indira Sawhney dealt with OBC reservation; Kesavananda Bharati is related to Basic Structure Doctrine of ConstitutionIncorrectCorrect answer: (a)
Explanation: Navtej Singh Johar decriminalized homosexuality; Indira Sawhney dealt with OBC reservation; Kesavananda Bharati is related to Basic Structure Doctrine of Constitution - Question 3 of 5
3. Question
In the context of the Shayara Bano (2017) judgment:
1. Triple Talaq (instant talaq) was declared unconstitutional.
2. Polygamy was declared unconstitutional.
3. The ruling was based on violation of Article 14 and Article 21.
How many statements are correct?CorrectCorrect answer: (b)
Explanation: Instant triple talaq was declared unconstitutional; polygamy was not declared unconstitutional; the ruling cited violation of equality and personal liberty.IncorrectCorrect answer: (b)
Explanation: Instant triple talaq was declared unconstitutional; polygamy was not declared unconstitutional; the ruling cited violation of equality and personal liberty. - Question 4 of 5
4. Question
Which of the following judgments involve interpretation of the “reasonable restrictions” clause under Article 19(2)?
1. Ananda Bazar Patrika v. Union of India
2. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India
3. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
Select the correct combination:CorrectCorrect answer: (a)
Explanation: Ananda Bazar and Shreya Singhal focused on reasonable restrictions on freedom of speech; Kesavananda Bharati dealt with amending power, not Article 19.IncorrectCorrect answer: (a)
Explanation: Ananda Bazar and Shreya Singhal focused on reasonable restrictions on freedom of speech; Kesavananda Bharati dealt with amending power, not Article 19. - Question 5 of 5
5. Question
Consider the following statements about Article 356 and the Supreme Court’s interpretation:
1. Article 356 can be invoked without any judicial scrutiny.
2. S.R. Bommai laid down that the power under Article 356 is subject to judicial review.
3. The judgment promotes federalism by restricting misuse of Article 356.
How many are correct?CorrectCorrect answer: (c)
Explanation: Statements 2 and 3 are correct; statement 1 is incorrect.IncorrectCorrect answer: (c)
Explanation: Statements 2 and 3 are correct; statement 1 is incorrect.