Context
- FGD (Flue Gas Desulphurisation) units are used to reduce sulphur dioxide (SO₂) emissions from coal-fired thermal power plants (TPPs).
- These were made mandatory in 2015 as part of stricter environmental norms.
- Despite repeated extensions, 92% of India’s 600 units still haven’t installed FGDs.
Relevance : GS 3(Environment an dEcology)
Committee Recommendation
- High-powered expert committee chaired by PSA Ajay Sood recommends FGDs are unnecessary for 80% of plants.
- Suggests FGDs be mandatory only in Category A plants:
- Within 10 km of NCR and cities with 1 million+ population.
- Out of 66 such plants, only 14 have FGDs installed.
Scientific Rationale Behind the Recommendation
- Ambient SO₂ levels across India are between 10–20 µg/m³, well below the national standard of 80 µg/m³.
- Indian coal is naturally low in sulphur content.
- Cities with FGDs and without FGDs show negligible difference in ambient SO₂ levels.
- SO₂ levels in general do not exceed permissible limits, hence do not justify nationwide FGD installation.
Operational & Economic Considerations
- High capital costs and few vendors for FGD installation.
- Potential rise in electricity tariffs if cost passed to consumers.
- COVID-19 disruptions cited as a reason for delays in FGD compliance.
- Historical deadline extensions by the Ministry of Power due to implementation hurdles.
Environmental Compliance
- Committee clarifies:
- TPPs must still meet standards for:
- Particulate Matter (PM) emissions.
- Freshwater consumption.
- SO₂ stack emission limits can be relaxed, as long as National Ambient Air Quality (NAAQ) standards are met.
- TPPs must still meet standards for:
- NAAQ standards, not stack norms, are the primary metric for protecting public health.
Institutions Involved
- Reports considered from:
- CSIR-NEERI
- National Institute of Advanced Studies
- IIT Delhi
- All supported the view that FGDs are not essential across all plants.
Policy Implications
- Marks a major reversal of India’s 2015 emission control policy.
- Likely cost savings for power producers, but raises concerns over long-term air quality safeguards.
- Reflects a shift towards region-specific environmental regulation rather than blanket norms.