Daily UPSC Analysis
The Hindu — UPSC News Analysis
📅 Thursday, March 26, 2026 | Bengaluru Edition
Curated analysis of policy-relevant news for UPSC Prelims & Mains — GS I, II, III, IV & Essay
GS II – IR & Governance
GS III – Environment & Economy
GS I – Society
GS II – Polity
Prelims MCQs
Mains Questions
Prepared by Legacy IAS | UPSC Civil Services Coaching, Bengaluru | www.legacyias.com
📋 Table of Contents
1
Iran Dismisses U.S. Peace Bid — Sets Own Terms
GS II – International Relations | GS III – Internal Security
2
India Raises Climate Ambition — 60% Non-Fossil by 2035
GS III – Environment & Energy | GS II – International Bodies
3
Transgender Persons Amendment Bill 2026 Passed
GS II – Governance & Rights | GS I – Society
4
UDAN Scheme Revamped — Subsidy Extended to 5 Years
GS III – Infrastructure & Economy
5
India Buys Iranian LPG Amid Strait of Hormuz Crisis
GS III – Energy Security | GS II – IR
6
Centre Defends Stand — Pakistan’s Role in West Asia Mediation
GS II – India’s Foreign Policy
7
Vande Mataram Advisory — Not a ‘Threat to Conform’: SC
GS II – Polity & Judiciary | GS IV – Ethics
8
RBI Mandated to Target 4% Inflation Till 2031
GS III – Indian Economy & Monetary Policy
🌐 GS II – International Relations | GS III – Internal Security & Energy
Iran Dismisses U.S. Peace Bid — Sets Its Own Terms to End West Asia War
🔹 A. Issue in Brief
- Iran rejected a U.S. ceasefire proposal (which offered sanctions relief in exchange for abandoning its nuclear programme and reopening the Strait of Hormuz.
- Iran laid down five conditions: halt to aggression, mechanisms to prevent future attacks, war reparations, ceasefire on all fronts, and recognition of sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz.
- The conflict began on February 28, 2026 with the U.S.-Israel assassination of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and other leaders.
📚 B. Static Background
- Strait of Hormuz: A critical chokepoint through which nearly 20% of the world’s oil passes. Iran claims sovereignty under international law; the world views it as an international waterway.
- JCPOA (2015): Iran nuclear deal that placed limits on Iran’s nuclear activity in exchange for sanctions relief. U.S. withdrew in 2018 under Trump.
- UN Charter Article 2(4): Prohibits use of force against territorial integrity of any state.
- UNCLOS: Governs navigation rights through international straits.
- India’s stakes: ~1 crore Indians in West Asia; 60% crude oil imports from the region; LPG supply chain disrupted.
🧠 C. Key Dimensions
Iran–US Conflict: Key Dimensions
⚡ Energy SecurityStrait of Hormuz closed; India’s LPG crisis; crude shortfall
☢️ Nuclear ProliferationIran’s nuclear ambitions; JCPOA collapse; regional arms race risk
🌍 Geopolitical RealignmentPakistan as mediator; Russia–Iran axis; U.S. troop deployment
💰 Global EconomyOil price surge; petrochemical disruption; India’s import bill spike
🇮🇳 India’s PositionStrategic balance; Modi–Iran talks; 2 ships through Hormuz
⚖️ International LawUN Charter; reparations; sovereignty over straits
| Iran’s 5 Conditions | U.S. Offer | India’s Concern |
|---|---|---|
| Complete halt to aggression | Ceasefire in exchange for abandoning nuclear programme | Energy supply disruption |
| Mechanisms to prevent future attacks | Sanctions relief | ~1 crore Indians in West Asia |
| War damages & reparations | Reopening of Strait of Hormuz | India–Israel tech partnership at risk |
| Ceasefire on all fronts (Gaza, Lebanon) | Diplomatic engagement | Russia oil fallback; Iran LPG purchase |
| Sovereignty over Strait of Hormuz | No mention of nuclear programme continuation | Strategic balance between U.S. and Iran |
⚠️ D. Critical Analysis
- India’s silence dilemma: With nearly 1 crore Indians in West Asia and 60% crude dependence, India is caught between its U.S. partnership and Iran energy ties. “Strategic silence” risks diplomatic irrelevance.
- Pakistan’s re-emergence: Pakistan’s role as U.S.–Iran mediator (per AP reports) signals a revival of its “indispensability” in global diplomacy — a setback for India’s goal of isolating Pakistan.
- Energy vulnerability: India’s LPG supply cycle extended from 20 to 45 days. India’s 74-day strategic petroleum reserve provides short-term buffer but structural vulnerability remains.
- International Law challenge: Iran’s claim of sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz contradicts UNCLOS provisions on international navigation. Could set dangerous precedent.
- Global order erosion: U.S.’s unilateral military actions without UN Security Council sanction undermines multilateral order — mirrors India’s concerns about rules-based international order.
✅ E. Way Forward
🕊️ ImmediateIndia should leverage PM Modi’s Iran contacts to push for Hormuz reopening for Indian ships; multilateral diplomatic engagement through SCO, NAM platforms.
⚡ Energy SecurityAccelerate renewables; diversify crude sources (Latin America, Africa); fast-track strategic reserves expansion beyond 90 days.
🌐 Diplomatic RepositioningIndia must articulate a clear West Asia doctrine — balancing Israel, Iran, Gulf states simultaneously. “Multi-alignment” should be active, not passive.
📜 Long-TermPush for JCPOA revival through P5+1; advocate UN-mediated negotiations; press for international guarantee of free navigation through Hormuz.
🎯 F. Exam Orientation
Prelims Pointers
- Strait of Hormuz — between Iran & Oman; connects Persian Gulf to Arabian Sea; ~20% world oil passes through it
- JCPOA — Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (2015); P5+1 + Iran; U.S. withdrew in 2018
- UNCLOS Article 38 — Right of transit passage through international straits
- India’s SPR — Strategic Petroleum Reserve of 74 days maintained
- India-Iran relations — Chabahar Port; oil trade; diaspora; cultural links
- 82nd Airborne Division — U.S. Army’s emergency rapid-response force
Mains Question (15 Marks / 250 words — GS II)
“The West Asia conflict has exposed the limitations of India’s ‘strategic autonomy’ doctrine. Critically examine India’s foreign policy response to the Iran-U.S. conflict in the context of its energy security, diaspora interests, and broader geopolitical alignments.”
Mains Question (10 Marks / 150 words — GS III)
“Discuss the implications of the closure of the Strait of Hormuz on India’s energy security. What structural reforms does India need to reduce its West Asian energy dependence?”
🎯 Probable UPSC Prelims MCQ
Q. Which of the following statements about the Strait of Hormuz is/are correct?
1. It connects the Persian Gulf with the Arabian Sea.
2. It is governed exclusively by Iran under international law.
3. Approximately one-fifth of the world’s oil passes through it.
Select the correct answer using the codes below:
1. It connects the Persian Gulf with the Arabian Sea.
2. It is governed exclusively by Iran under international law.
3. Approximately one-fifth of the world’s oil passes through it.
Select the correct answer using the codes below:
- (a) 1 and 2 only
- (b) 1 and 3 only
- (c) 2 and 3 only
- (d) 1, 2, and 3
✅ Answer: (b) 1 and 3 only
Explanation: The Strait of Hormuz connects the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman (Arabian Sea). UNCLOS governs transit passage rights, not exclusive Iranian sovereignty. About 20% of the world’s oil passes through it.
Explanation: The Strait of Hormuz connects the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman (Arabian Sea). UNCLOS governs transit passage rights, not exclusive Iranian sovereignty. About 20% of the world’s oil passes through it.
🌿 GS III – Environment & Ecology | GS II – International Agreements
India Raises Climate Ambition: 60% Non-Fossil Fuel Power Goal by 2035
🔹 A. Issue in Brief
- India updated its Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) for 2035: 60% installed electric capacity from non-fossil sources, 47% reduction in emissions intensity per GDP unit (from 2005 baseline), and carbon sink of 3.5–4 billion tonnes.
- India was one of the last G-20 countries (along with Argentina) to submit its 2035 NDC, meeting its Paris Agreement obligation.
- Currently, ~52% of India’s installed capacity is non-fossil, though only 25% of actual power generated is from non-fossil sources.
📚 B. Static Background
- Paris Agreement (2015): Legally binding international treaty. Countries submit NDCs — voluntary national pledges to reduce emissions.
- NDC: Nationally Determined Contribution — each country’s self-set climate target under UNFCCC.
- UNFCCC: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change — the parent treaty (1992, Rio Earth Summit).
- India’s 2030 NDC (2022): 50% non-fossil installed capacity; 44% emissions intensity reduction; 2.5–3 billion tonne carbon sink.
- CoP30 (2025): Held in Belém, Brazil — India committed to announcing NDC by year-end.
- Carbon sink: Forests, oceans that absorb CO₂. India’s forest cover = 24.6% of geographic area (goal is 33%).
🧠 C. Key Dimensions
| Parameter | 2030 NDC (Existing) | 2035 NDC (New) |
|---|---|---|
| Non-fossil installed capacity | 50% | 60% |
| Emissions intensity reduction | 44% (from 2005) | 47% |
| Carbon sink target | 2.5–3 billion tonnes CO₂eq | 3.5–4 billion tonnes |
| Current status (non-fossil capacity) | ~52% installed; only 25% actual generation | |
| Carbon sink achieved (2005–2019) | 1.97 billion tonnes CO₂eq | |
🔄 India’s Climate Policy Journey
Rio Earth Summit 1992
UNFCCC adopted
UNFCCC adopted
→
Kyoto Protocol 1997
Binding targets for developed nations
Binding targets for developed nations
→
Copenhagen 2009
India commits to emission intensity reduction
India commits to emission intensity reduction
→
Paris Agreement 2015
NDC framework; CBDR principle
NDC framework; CBDR principle
→
India 2030 NDC 2022
50% non-fossil; 44% intensity cut
50% non-fossil; 44% intensity cut
→
India 2035 NDC 2026
60% non-fossil; 47% intensity cut
60% non-fossil; 47% intensity cut
⚠️ D. Critical Analysis
- Capacity ≠ Generation gap: India has 52% non-fossil installed capacity but only 25% actual generation — a critical distinction. Solar and wind are intermittent. Without storage solutions, the generation gap persists.
- West Asia crisis as accelerator: The Hormuz blockade has forced India to invest in renewables out of necessity — strategic compulsion rather than ethical commitment. This may not lead to durable long-term policy.
- Forest cover shortfall: India needs 33% forest cover for carbon sink targets; current cover is only 24.6%. Increasing carbon sink to 4 billion tonnes requires aggressive afforestation — but land availability is constrained.
- CBDR principle: India rightly argues that developed nations must bear historical responsibility. However, India’s own growing emissions (3rd largest globally) require more ambitious domestic action.
- Critical mineral dependency: Renewables transition requires lithium, cobalt, rare earths — China processes 60–90% of these. India risks trading oil dependency for mineral dependency.
- Just Transition concerns: Coal-dependent states (Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Odisha) and coal workers face socioeconomic disruption without adequate planning.
✅ E. Way Forward
🔋 Storage SolutionsInvest in battery storage (BESS), pumped hydro to bridge capacity-generation gap. PM-KUSUM and Green Hydrogen Mission must be scaled.
⛏️ Critical MineralsIndia’s Critical Mineral Mission must fast-track mining and processing. Bilateral agreements with Australia, Chile for lithium and cobalt.
🌳 AfforestationVan Mahotsav, compensatory afforestation under CAMPA must be strengthened. Agroforestry models can help reach 33% forest cover.
👷 Just TransitionCoal transition fund; skill reskilling for coal workers; SDG-aligned development in coal-dependent districts. Link with PM Gati Shakti.
🌍 SDG Linkage: SDG 7 (Affordable & Clean Energy), SDG 13 (Climate Action), SDG 15 (Life on Land — forest cover)
🎯 F. Exam Orientation
Prelims Pointers
- NDC — Nationally Determined Contribution; submitted under Paris Agreement to UNFCCC
- Paris Agreement — 2015; aims to limit warming to 1.5°C; NDCs revised every 5 years
- CBDR — Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities (principle under UNFCCC)
- Carbon sink — Reservoirs that absorb more CO₂ than they release; forests, oceans
- CoP30 — Held in Belém, Brazil, November 2025
- India’s installed non-fossil capacity — Currently ~52% but only 25% actual generation
- Critical Mineral Mission — India’s policy for securing supply of lithium, cobalt etc.
Mains Question (15 Marks / 250 words — GS III)
“India’s new 2035 NDC pledges 60% non-fossil fuel capacity but masks a critical gap between installed capacity and actual generation. Analyse the structural and geopolitical challenges in India’s energy transition and suggest a comprehensive roadmap.”
🎯 Probable UPSC Prelims MCQ
Q. With reference to India’s Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC), consider the following statements:
1. NDCs are binding commitments under the Paris Agreement.
2. India’s 2035 NDC targets 60% installed electric capacity from non-fossil sources.
3. The principle of Common But Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDR) allows developing nations to set less ambitious NDCs.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
1. NDCs are binding commitments under the Paris Agreement.
2. India’s 2035 NDC targets 60% installed electric capacity from non-fossil sources.
3. The principle of Common But Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDR) allows developing nations to set less ambitious NDCs.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
- (a) 1 and 2 only
- (b) 2 only
- (c) 2 and 3 only
- (d) 1, 2, and 3
✅ Answer: (c) 2 and 3 only
Explanation: NDCs are voluntary (not legally binding) pledges under the Paris Agreement. Statement 2 is correct per the 2026 NDC announcement. CBDR acknowledges differential responsibilities based on historical emissions and development levels.
Explanation: NDCs are voluntary (not legally binding) pledges under the Paris Agreement. Statement 2 is correct per the 2026 NDC announcement. CBDR acknowledges differential responsibilities based on historical emissions and development levels.
⚖️ GS II – Governance, Rights & Social Justice | GS I – Society
Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill, 2026 — Passed Amid Uproar
🔹 A. Issue in Brief
- The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill, 2026 was passed by Rajya Sabha on March 25, 2026 (after Lok Sabha on March 24), amid Opposition walkouts.
- Key changes: Removes the right to self-perceived gender identity; introduces a medical board requirement for gender certification; narrows the definition of “transgender person” to specific socio-cultural identities.
- A Supreme Court-constituted Advisory Committee had urged the government not to proceed with the Bill, calling it contrary to the 2014 NALSA judgment.
📚 B. Static Background
- NALSA v. Union of India (2014): Landmark SC judgment recognising transgender persons as a “third gender”; upheld right to self-identification under Articles 14, 19, and 21.
- Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019: First legislation; created National Council for Transgender Persons; defined rights but was criticized for District Magistrate certification process.
- Article 14: Right to equality; Article 19: Freedom of expression (includes gender expression); Article 21: Right to life and personal liberty (includes bodily autonomy).
- Yogyakarta Principles: International principles on application of international human rights law to sexual orientation and gender identity.
- WHO & UN definitions: Intersex is defined as innate biological variations — distinct from transgender identity.
🧠 C. Key Dimensions
| Aspect | 2019 Act | 2026 Amendment | Concern |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender Identity | Self-perceived identity recognised | Removed; medical board required | Violates NALSA judgment & Article 21 |
| Definition | Broader — includes gender non-conforming | Narrowed to kinner, hijra, aravani, intersex etc. | Excludes many transgender persons |
| Certification | District Magistrate process | Chief Medical Officer-headed Authority | Medicalisation of identity |
| Exploitation | Addressed broadly | New Section 18: 5–14 yr imprisonment | Leaves hijra jamath system intact |
| Civil Rights | No provision for marriage/adoption | Still silent on civil and marriage rights | Perpetuates exclusion from family law |
⚠️ D. Critical Analysis
- NALSA violation: SC’s 2014 judgment explicitly recognised right to self-identify gender without requirement of surgery or medical opinion. The 2026 Bill directly contradicts this.
- Intersex–transgender conflation: The Bill bundles intersex persons (biological spectrum) within the “transgender” category — violating WHO and UN definitions. These require separate legal frameworks.
- Medicalisation of identity: Requiring a medical board for gender certification treats gender identity as a medical condition — contrary to progressive global standards (WHO removed “gender identity disorder” from its disease classification in 2018).
- Colonial hijra structure: The jamath-gharana system — which can be exploitative — is left untouched while new punishments target external exploiters. Internal hierarchies get legal legitimacy by default.
- No intersectionality: SC/ST transgender persons, disabled transgender persons receive no targeted protections.
- Data deficit: Government has no reliable data on transgender/intersex population — legislating without evidence base is problematic.
- Only 32,000 out of ~5 lakh transgender persons have obtained certificates under the 2019 Act — implementation was already poor before the 2026 amendment.
✅ E. Way Forward
⚖️ Constitutional ComplianceRestore self-identification right as per NALSA (2014). Legislation must align with SC’s constitutional interpretation of Articles 14, 19, 21.
🔬 Separate Intersex LawEnact separate legislation for intersex persons as recommended by UN CRPD (2019). Ban non-consensual “normalising” surgeries on intersex infants.
📊 Data & ResearchConduct a separate Census count for GIESC communities. Commission longitudinal research before further policy changes.
🏛️ Civil RightsAmend personal laws or enact a Civil Union law to grant transgender persons marriage, adoption, inheritance, and succession rights.
🌐 Global Best Practice: Argentina’s Gender Identity Law (2012) allows self-identification without medical or judicial intervention — widely regarded as the global gold standard.
🎯 F. Exam Orientation
- NALSA v. Union of India (2014) — Recognised third gender; right to self-identification
- Article 21 — Includes right to gender identity, bodily autonomy
- Transgender Act 2019 — First legislation for transgender rights in India
- National Council for Transgender Persons — Statutory body under 2019 Act
- Intersex — Biological variation in sex characteristics (1–2% globally); ≠ transgender
- Yogyakarta Principles — International HR principles on SOGIESC rights
- GIESC — Gender Identity/Expression and Sex Characteristics
Mains Question (15 Marks / 250 words — GS II)
“The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill, 2026 has been criticised for violating the spirit of the NALSA judgment. Critically examine the Bill’s provisions in light of constitutional rights and global best practices on gender identity.”
🎯 Probable UPSC Prelims MCQ
Q. The landmark Supreme Court judgment in “NALSA v. Union of India (2014)” is associated with which of the following?
1. Recognition of transgender persons as a “third gender”.
2. Right to self-perceived gender identity under Articles 14, 19 and 21.
3. Mandatory medical board certification for gender recognition.
Select the correct answer:
1. Recognition of transgender persons as a “third gender”.
2. Right to self-perceived gender identity under Articles 14, 19 and 21.
3. Mandatory medical board certification for gender recognition.
Select the correct answer:
- (a) 1 only
- (b) 1 and 2 only
- (c) 2 and 3 only
- (d) 1, 2, and 3
✅ Answer: (b) 1 and 2 only
Explanation: NALSA (2014) recognised third gender and upheld self-identification rights. Mandatory medical board certification was NOT part of the NALSA judgment — in fact, it contradicts the judgment’s spirit. This requirement was introduced by the 2026 Amendment Bill.
Explanation: NALSA (2014) recognised third gender and upheld self-identification rights. Mandatory medical board certification was NOT part of the NALSA judgment — in fact, it contradicts the judgment’s spirit. This requirement was introduced by the 2026 Amendment Bill.
✈️ GS III – Infrastructure, Transport & Economy
UDAN Scheme Revamped: Subsidy Extended to 5 Years, Shifted to Exchequer Funding
🔹 A. Issue in Brief
- The Union Cabinet approved the modified UDAN (Ude Desh ka Aam Nagrik) scheme with a total outlay of ₹28,840 crore.
- Key changes: Subsidy period extended from 3 to 5 years; funding shifted from airfare levy (RCS levy) to direct exchequer funding.
- A CAG report found only 7–10% of UDAN routes remained viable after subsidy ended. Of 663 routes launched since 2017, 327 were discontinued.
📚 B. Static Background
- UDAN Scheme: Launched in 2016 under the National Civil Aviation Policy (NCAP). Aims to make air travel affordable for common citizens and connect Tier-2/3 cities.
- RCS (Regional Connectivity Scheme): The mechanism under which UDAN operates.
- Funding (old model): RCS levy embedded in non-UDAN airfares; airlines also received VGF (Viability Gap Funding).
- CAG Report finding: Only 7–10% of routes were viable post-subsidy — indicating poor route selection and market assessment.
- As of Feb 2026: 327 of 663 routes discontinued; 15 of 95 revived airports back in disuse.
🧠 C. Key Dimensions
| Feature | Old UDAN | Modified UDAN |
|---|---|---|
| Subsidy period | 3 years | 5 years |
| Funding source | RCS levy (airfare) | Direct exchequer |
| Total outlay | Varied | ₹28,840 crore |
| Subsidy for airlines (routes) | ₹ from levy | ₹10,043 crore over 10 years |
| Route viability (CAG finding) | 7–10% viable post-subsidy | Expected to improve with longer support |
| Airports under scheme | 95 revived (15 now defunct) | Renewed focus on viable airports |
⚠️ D. Critical Analysis
- 90–93% route failure rate: Extending subsidy from 3 to 5 years addresses symptoms, not root causes — poor demand assessment, thin passenger base in Tier-3 cities, and inadequate airport infrastructure.
- Fiscal burden shift: Moving from levy-based to exchequer-funded subsidy means taxpayers fund the scheme directly — increases transparency but also fiscal burden.
- Last-mile connectivity: Without surface transport integration (buses, taxis) to/from Tier-2/3 airports, air connectivity alone won’t boost economic activity.
- Private airlines’ reluctance: Airlines prefer high-traffic routes for profitability. Without strong demand signals, even 5-year subsidies may not retain airlines after the period ends.
- Airport infrastructure gaps: 15 airports revived under UDAN have again fallen into disuse — indicating infrastructure was revived without matching demand.
✅ E. Way Forward
📊 Demand AssessmentConduct rigorous demand studies before launching routes. Use AI-based passenger flow modelling. Prioritise routes with existing surface transport links.
🔗 Multi-modal IntegrationLink UDAN airports with PM Gati Shakti National Master Plan — bus/rail connectivity to airports must precede air route launch.
🏗️ Viable InfrastructureFocus on 15 most strategically important airports rather than spreading resources thin across 95. Airport Asset Monetisation under NMP can help.
📈 Market-Based RoutesIntroduce dynamic subsidy (higher for initial years, tapering off) linked to actual passenger numbers rather than flat 5-year support.
🎯 F. Exam Orientation
- UDAN — Ude Desh ka Aam Nagrik; launched 2016 under NCAP (National Civil Aviation Policy)
- RCS — Regional Connectivity Scheme; the mechanism under UDAN
- VGF — Viability Gap Funding; government subsidy to make projects commercially viable
- CAG — Comptroller and Auditor General; constitutional body under Article 148
- UDAN route statistics — 663 routes launched; 327 discontinued as of Feb 2026
- AAI — Airports Authority of India; manages UDAN airports
Mains Question (10 Marks / 150 words — GS III)
“Despite significant outlay, the UDAN scheme has seen over 49% of its routes discontinued. Examine the structural challenges in regional air connectivity in India and suggest measures to make the scheme more effective and sustainable.”
🎯 Probable UPSC Prelims MCQ
Q. The UDAN scheme was launched under which of the following policy frameworks?
- (a) National Transport Policy, 2019
- (b) National Civil Aviation Policy, 2016
- (c) National Infrastructure Pipeline, 2019
- (d) PM Gati Shakti National Master Plan, 2021
✅ Answer: (b) National Civil Aviation Policy, 2016
Explanation: UDAN (Ude Desh ka Aam Nagrik) was launched in 2016 as part of India’s National Civil Aviation Policy (NCAP) to connect Tier-2 and Tier-3 cities through subsidised regional air connectivity.
Explanation: UDAN (Ude Desh ka Aam Nagrik) was launched in 2016 as part of India’s National Civil Aviation Policy (NCAP) to connect Tier-2 and Tier-3 cities through subsidised regional air connectivity.
⚡ GS III – Energy Security | GS II – India’s Foreign Policy & IR
India Said to Have Bought Iranian LPG After U.S. Eased Sanctions — Amid West Asia Energy Crisis
🔹 A. Issue in Brief
- India reportedly purchased its first cargo of Iranian LPG in years after the U.S. temporarily eased sanctions on Iranian oil/fuels — via sanctioned tanker Aurora heading to Mangalore port.
- The cargo is to be shared among IOC, BPCL, and HPCL (three state oil companies); payment in Indian Rupees.
- India is battling its worst gas crisis in decades, with LPG supply cycle extending from 20 to 45 days due to Hormuz closure.
📚 B. Static Background
- Iran sanctions history: India shunned Iranian energy in 2019 under U.S. pressure (secondary sanctions). Previously, India was Iran’s second-largest oil customer.
- Chabahar Port: India has a strategic interest in Iran for connectivity to Afghanistan and Central Asia. Exempted from U.S. sanctions.
- India’s LPG import dependence: India consumed 33.15 million metric tonnes of LPG in the previous year — the world’s second-largest LPG importer.
- Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR): India maintains 74 days of strategic oil reserves. Underground caverns at Vishakhapatnam, Mangalore, Padur.
- Essential Commodities Act: Invoked by government to fast-track piped natural gas infrastructure expansion.
🧠 C. Key Dimensions
India’s Energy Security Crisis — West Asia Dimension
🛢️ Oil Import60% crude from West Asia; Hormuz closure → force majeure declared
🍳 LPG CrisisWorld’s 2nd largest importer; supply cycle: 20→45 days
🇮🇷 Iran LPGFirst purchase since 2019; sanctions waiver; Rupee payment
🇷🇺 Russian OilContinued fallback; no complete stop even during sanctions pressure
🌊 Paradip Port4 tankers with 7 mn barrels crude docking — Angola, Nigeria, Russia
⚡ Energy TransitionHormuz crisis accelerating renewables push; Green Hydrogen Mission
⚠️ D. Critical Analysis
- Sanctions risk: Purchasing Iranian LPG via sanctioned tanker (Aurora) risks triggering U.S. secondary sanctions — which could affect India’s access to USD-based financial systems.
- Demand-supply mismatch: India’s domestic LPG production covers only a fraction of its need. Over-dependence on imports without diversification creates structural fragility.
- Rupee payment mechanism: Payment in Indian Rupees avoids dollar-based sanctions exposure but requires Iran to use those Rupees for imports from India — a complex barter arrangement.
- Renewable transition gap: Electric induction cooking is emerging as an LPG substitute, but requires massive electricity grid expansion and consumer education.
- Industry vs. household: Government cutting LPG supplies to industries to protect households — correct prioritisation but highlights the narrow margin of supply.
- Official denial: India’s shipping ministry official denied Iranian cargo purchase — this diplomatic ambiguity is intentional but creates credibility risks.
✅ E. Way Forward
🔗 Source DiversificationIncrease LPG/crude imports from non-West Asian sources: USA, Russia, Latin America (Venezuela, Brazil), West Africa. Long-term contracts needed.
🏭 Domestic ProductionExpand ONGC’s domestic oil and gas production. Fast-track exploration in Bay of Bengal, Andaman basin, and deep-water blocks.
⚡ Demand-Side SolutionsPromote electric cooking, PNG (Piped Natural Gas) expansion under Essential Commodities Act notification, biogas/CBG (Compressed Biogas) for rural areas.
🛡️ Strategic ReserveExpand SPR capacity to 90+ days. Explore floating SPR (ship-based). Create dedicated LPG emergency reserves.
🎯 F. Exam Orientation
- India LPG consumption — 33.15 million metric tonnes/year; world’s 2nd largest importer
- SPR locations — Visakhapatnam, Mangalore, Padur (74 days reserve)
- India–Iran sanctions history — India stopped Iranian oil imports in 2019 under U.S. pressure
- IOC, BPCL, HPCL — Three public sector oil companies; share Iranian LPG cargo
- Paradip Port — Located in Odisha; major crude oil import terminal
- Essential Commodities Act — Invoked for piped gas infrastructure expansion
- LSEG — London Stock Exchange Group; provides trade flow data
Mains Question (15 Marks / 250 words — GS III)
“The West Asia conflict has brought India’s energy vulnerability into sharp focus. Critically examine India’s energy security architecture and suggest a multi-pronged strategy to achieve energy independence without compromising economic growth.”
🎯 Probable UPSC Prelims MCQ
Q. India’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) is stored at underground caverns at which of the following locations?
1. Visakhapatnam 2. Mangalore 3. Padur 4. Paradip
1. Visakhapatnam 2. Mangalore 3. Padur 4. Paradip
- (a) 1, 2, and 3 only
- (b) 2, 3, and 4 only
- (c) 1, 3, and 4 only
- (d) 1, 2, 3, and 4
✅ Answer: (a) 1, 2, and 3 only
Explanation: India’s SPR is maintained at underground caverns in Visakhapatnam (Andhra Pradesh), Mangalore, and Padur (Karnataka). Paradip in Odisha is a major port for oil discharge but is NOT an SPR facility.
Explanation: India’s SPR is maintained at underground caverns in Visakhapatnam (Andhra Pradesh), Mangalore, and Padur (Karnataka). Paradip in Odisha is a major port for oil discharge but is NOT an SPR facility.
🌐 GS II – India’s Foreign Policy & Bilateral Relations
India Defends Balanced Stand; Jaishankar Calls Pakistan a ‘Dalal’ in West Asia Mediation Row
🔹 A. Issue in Brief
- EAM S. Jaishankar addressed an all-party meeting on West Asia developments, defending India’s “balanced position” while responding to Opposition questions about Pakistan’s role as mediator between U.S. and Iran.
- Jaishankar traced Pakistan’s “brokerage” (dalali) role to 1981 and stated India maintains communication with all sides due to its unique strategic position.
- PM Modi’s Iran talks helped two Indian ships navigate through Hormuz; 18 more were awaiting clearance.
📚 B. Static Background
- India’s West Asia policy: Multi-alignment — balance between Israel (tech partner), Gulf states (energy, diaspora), Iran (energy, Chabahar).
- Pakistan’s historic mediatory roles: 1971 (U.S.–China backchannel via Pakistan); 2004 (U.S.–Taliban talks); 1981 (U.S.–Iran backchannel).
- India’s diaspora in West Asia: ~1 crore Indians; largest source of remittances to India.
- India–Israel relations: Key tech and defence partner; India abstains on many UN resolutions critical of Israel.
- India–Iran relations: Chabahar Port; cultural ties; historical people-to-people connections.
🧠 C. Key Dimensions
| Stakeholder | India’s Interest | Challenge |
|---|---|---|
| USA | Largest trading partner; defence ties; tech transfers | Pressure to align against Iran; sanctions risk |
| Israel | Key technology & defence partner | Optics of supporting Israel damages Gulf/Iran ties |
| Iran | Chabahar; oil/LPG; Central Asia connectivity | U.S. sanctions; risk of antagonising Washington |
| Gulf States (KSA, UAE) | ~1 crore diaspora; remittances; energy | Gulf instability affects Indians; LPG disruption |
| Pakistan | Seek to isolate; counter its diplomatic revival | Pakistan re-emerging as mediator undermines India’s narrative |
⚠️ D. Critical Analysis
- “Strategic silence” criticism: India’s balanced approach can appear as silence on a major global crisis, potentially reducing its credibility as a “Vishwabandhu” (friend of the world) — a self-proclaimed identity.
- Pakistan’s diplomatic revival: Pakistan serving as U.S.–Iran mediator signals its continued geopolitical relevance despite internal economic and political crises — a setback for India’s efforts to isolate Pakistan globally.
- Multi-alignment tested: India’s policy of maintaining ties with all sides works when conflicts are low-intensity. A full-scale U.S.–Iran war forces India to make harder choices.
- Russian oil precedent: Jaishankar noted India never completely stopped Russian oil imports despite Western pressure — this same framework justifies Iranian LPG purchase.
- Remittances at risk: With 1 crore Indians in the region, a prolonged conflict threatens not just energy supplies but India’s largest remittance corridor (~$36–40 billion annually).
✅ E. Way Forward
🕊️ Active MediationIndia should move from “strategic silence” to active mediation — leverage its unique position trusted by all sides. Host Track-II diplomacy.
🛡️ Diaspora ProtectionActivate Pravasi Bharatiya Sahayata Kendras in Gulf; emergency evacuation plans; expand Vande Bharat-type evacuation protocols.
🌐 Coalition BuildingUse SCO, G20 Presidency legacy, and BRICS to build a multilateral voice for de-escalation. India can lead the Global South narrative.
📢 Proactive CommunicationIndia must articulate its West Asia doctrine publicly — not just through parliamentary statements — to prevent being seen as passive or indifferent.
🎯 F. Exam Orientation
- Multi-alignment — India’s foreign policy of maintaining ties with multiple power blocs without formal alliances
- Chabahar Port — Iranian port developed by India; exempted from U.S. sanctions; connects to Afghanistan & Central Asia
- India diaspora in West Asia — ~1 crore; largest source of remittances to India
- All-party meeting — Chaired by Defence Minister; EAM briefed on West Asia situation
- India–US trade — USA is India’s largest trading partner
Mains Question (15 Marks / 250 words — GS II)
“India’s ‘multi-alignment’ foreign policy faces its most severe test in the ongoing West Asia conflict. Critically evaluate India’s foreign policy response, its strengths and limitations, and suggest a more proactive Indian engagement framework.”
🎯 Probable UPSC Prelims MCQ
Q. Which of the following statements about India’s Chabahar Port project is/are correct?
1. Chabahar Port is located in Iran on the Gulf of Oman.
2. It provides India an alternative route to Afghanistan bypassing Pakistan.
3. The port has been exempted from all U.S. sanctions against Iran.
Select the correct answer:
1. Chabahar Port is located in Iran on the Gulf of Oman.
2. It provides India an alternative route to Afghanistan bypassing Pakistan.
3. The port has been exempted from all U.S. sanctions against Iran.
Select the correct answer:
- (a) 1 only
- (b) 1 and 2 only
- (c) 2 and 3 only
- (d) 1, 2, and 3
✅ Answer: (b) 1 and 2 only
Explanation: Chabahar is on Iran’s Gulf of Oman coast and provides India access to Afghanistan and Central Asia bypassing Pakistan. While the U.S. has previously granted waivers for Chabahar, it has not been universally “exempted from all sanctions” — the exemption has been case-specific and conditional.
Explanation: Chabahar is on Iran’s Gulf of Oman coast and provides India access to Afghanistan and Central Asia bypassing Pakistan. While the U.S. has previously granted waivers for Chabahar, it has not been universally “exempted from all sanctions” — the exemption has been case-specific and conditional.
⚖️ GS II – Indian Polity, Constitution & Judiciary | GS IV – Ethics
Vande Mataram Advisory “Not a Threat to Conform”: Supreme Court
🔹 A. Issue in Brief
- The Supreme Court dismissed a petition challenging the Union Home Ministry’s January 28 advisory on playing the National Song (Vande Mataram) at public/ceremonial occasions as “premature.”
- The court held the advisory is not a “threat to conform” and does not violate constitutional freedoms, as it prescribes protocol (not mandatory penalties).
- Key constitutional distinction: National Anthem (Jana Gana Mana) — mandatory under Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971; National Song (Vande Mataram) — advisory only.
📚 B. Static Background
- National Anthem: Jana Gana Mana — adopted January 24, 1950 by Constituent Assembly.
- National Song: Vande Mataram — composed by Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay; given equal status with National Anthem on January 24, 1950 by President Rajendra Prasad.
- Article 51A(a): Fundamental Duty — to abide by the Constitution and respect national flag and national anthem. (Note: National Song NOT explicitly mentioned.)
- Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971: Makes disrespect to National Anthem/Flag a punishable offence.
- Bijoe Emmanuel case (1986): SC held that refusing to sing national anthem (on religious grounds) does not violate law if one stands respectfully.
- Freedom of conscience: Article 19(1)(a) and Article 25 — freedom to hold beliefs; cannot be forced to participate in expression against conscience.
🧠 C. Key Dimensions
| Aspect | National Anthem (Jana Gana Mana) | National Song (Vande Mataram) |
|---|---|---|
| Status | National Anthem — Constitutional recognition | National Song — equal status by Presidential declaration |
| Constitutional Mention | Article 51A mentions “National Anthem” | Not explicitly mentioned in Article 51A |
| Legal Mandate | Mandatory — Prevention of Insults Act | Advisory only — no penal provision for non-singing |
| Duration | 52 seconds | 3 minutes (full); per advisory played BEFORE anthem |
| SC Position | Disrespect punishable; but singing cannot be forced | Advisory does not compel; “may” language used |
⚠️ D. Critical Analysis
- Social coercion vs. legal compulsion: Even if no legal penalty exists, peer pressure and social ostracism for not singing Vande Mataram can amount to de facto compulsion — particularly for religious minorities who object on theological grounds.
- Anthem–Song sequencing: The advisory places Vande Mataram (3 minutes) before Jana Gana Mana (52 seconds), arguably reducing the Constitutional National Anthem to a postscript.
- Art 25 vs. cultural nationalism: Freedom of conscience (Article 25) protects individuals from being compelled to express beliefs they don’t hold — including through song.
- Precedent concern: Court’s “wait and watch” approach (come back if discriminated against) places the burden on potential victims rather than preventing harm proactively.
- Conflation of government with nation: Using patriotic symbols to project government loyalty blurs the line between state and government — a recurring constitutional tension.
✅ E. Way Forward
- Government should clarify that the advisory uses “may” — not “must” — and publicise this distinction to prevent social coercion.
- Clear guidelines on what constitutes “respectful” non-participation (as in Bijoe Emmanuel) should be issued alongside the advisory.
- Any future legislation attempting to make Vande Mataram singing mandatory would require careful constitutional scrutiny under Articles 19, 21, and 25.
- Ethical dimension (GS IV): Patriotism cannot be legislated — it must emerge from genuine civic pride. Compelled patriotism undermines the very democratic values it seeks to celebrate.
🎯 F. Exam Orientation
- Vande Mataram — National Song; composed by Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay; equal status given Jan 24, 1950
- Jana Gana Mana — National Anthem; adopted Jan 24, 1950; composed by Rabindranath Tagore
- Article 51A — Fundamental Duties (42nd Amendment, 1976); 51A(a) mentions National Anthem, not National Song
- Bijoe Emmanuel v. State of Kerala (1986) — SC: cannot force singing of national anthem; respectful standing sufficient
- Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971 — Governs disrespect to Anthem and Flag
Mains Question (10 Marks / 150 words — GS II)
“Examine the constitutional distinction between India’s National Anthem and National Song. In light of the recent Vande Mataram advisory, discuss the tension between cultural nationalism and individual freedom of conscience under the Indian Constitution.”
🎯 Probable UPSC Prelims MCQ
Q. Which of the following is correct regarding India’s National Song “Vande Mataram”?
1. It was composed by Rabindranath Tagore.
2. Article 51A of the Constitution specifically mentions the duty to respect the National Song.
3. Vande Mataram was given equal status with the National Anthem on January 24, 1950.
Select the correct answer:
1. It was composed by Rabindranath Tagore.
2. Article 51A of the Constitution specifically mentions the duty to respect the National Song.
3. Vande Mataram was given equal status with the National Anthem on January 24, 1950.
Select the correct answer:
- (a) 3 only
- (b) 1 and 3 only
- (c) 2 and 3 only
- (d) 1, 2, and 3
✅ Answer: (a) 3 only
Explanation: Vande Mataram was composed by Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay (not Tagore). Article 51A mentions the National Anthem, not the National Song specifically. President Rajendra Prasad declared Vande Mataram equal in status to Jana Gana Mana on January 24, 1950.
Explanation: Vande Mataram was composed by Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay (not Tagore). Article 51A mentions the National Anthem, not the National Song specifically. President Rajendra Prasad declared Vande Mataram equal in status to Jana Gana Mana on January 24, 1950.
💰 GS III – Indian Economy, Monetary Policy & RBI
Centre Asks RBI to Target 4% Retail Inflation Till 2031 — Inflation Targeting Framework Retained
🔹 A. Issue in Brief
- The Union Government renewed the RBI’s inflation targeting mandate for another 5 years (April 1, 2026 – March 31, 2031): 4% CPI inflation with +/- 2% tolerance band (upper: 6%, lower: 2%).
- This is the second renewal of the mandate (first set in 2016; renewed in 2021).
- The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) — a 6-member body — is responsible for achieving this target.
📚 B. Static Background
- Inflation Targeting Framework: Adopted in India in 2016 via amendments to the RBI Act, 1934.
- MPC composition: 6 members — 3 from RBI (Governor chairs; Deputy Governor; 1 RBI official) + 3 external members appointed by Government. Decisions by majority; Governor has casting vote.
- CPI: Consumer Price Index — measures retail inflation. Used as the target benchmark (not WPI).
- Flexible Inflation Targeting (FIT): Allows tolerance band (+/- 2%) recognising that supply-side shocks may temporarily push inflation outside target.
- RBI Act, Section 45ZA: Empowers government to set inflation target in consultation with RBI.
🧠 C. Key Dimensions
| Parameter | 2016–2021 (1st Mandate) | 2021–2026 (2nd Mandate) | 2026–2031 (3rd Mandate) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Target | 4% CPI | 4% CPI | 4% CPI |
| Upper tolerance | 6% | 6% | 6% |
| Lower tolerance | 2% | 2% | 2% |
| Change from previous | New framework | Retained | Retained again |
| MPC first meeting | October 2016 | — | — |
⚠️ West Asia Context: With crude oil disruption causing inflationary pressures, the RBI faces a twin challenge — contain inflation (rate hikes) vs. support growth (rate cuts). This mandate renewal provides continuity in policy framework during crisis.
⚠️ D. Critical Analysis
- Supply-side inflation challenge: The West Asia conflict is causing cost-push inflation (oil, LPG prices rising). Monetary policy tools (rate hikes) are less effective against supply-side shocks — they reduce demand but can’t fix supply disruptions.
- RBI’s independence vs. government pressure: Government sets the inflation target “in consultation with RBI” — but ultimately the target is government-determined, raising concerns about central bank autonomy.
- Growth vs. inflation tradeoff: High interest rates (to fight inflation) slow investment and growth. In a crisis year, India needs both price stability and growth stimulus — a difficult balance.
- Food inflation as outlier: Food & beverages constitute ~45% of CPI basket. Agricultural supply shocks frequently push India’s CPI above 6% — beyond RBI’s conventional tools.
- MPC accountability: If inflation breaches 6% for 3 consecutive quarters, MPC must explain to government in writing — an accountability mechanism that has been tested multiple times.
✅ E. Way Forward
🏛️ Institutional StrengtheningEnhance MPC’s operational independence. Consider increasing external member representation. Strengthen accountability through public hearings.
🌾 Food InflationAddress agricultural supply-side issues (buffer stocks, PDS efficiency, cold chain logistics) — monetary policy alone cannot solve food inflation.
💡 Dual Mandate ConsiderationIndia could explore a “dual mandate” (inflation + growth) similar to the U.S. Federal Reserve — though this would require legislative change to RBI Act.
📊 Core vs. HeadlineRBI should communicate more clearly on “core inflation” (ex-food, fuel) trends vs. headline CPI — to guide market expectations better during supply-side crises.
🎯 F. Exam Orientation
- Inflation Targeting — Adopted in India in 2016; target: 4% CPI with +/-2% tolerance
- MPC — Monetary Policy Committee; 6 members; 3 from RBI + 3 government-appointed externals
- CPI vs. WPI — CPI (Consumer Price Index) = retail inflation; WPI (Wholesale Price Index) = wholesale inflation. RBI targets CPI.
- RBI Act Section 45ZA — Government sets inflation target in consultation with RBI
- MPC accountability — Must submit written explanation if CPI breaches 6% for 3 consecutive quarters
- Flexible Inflation Targeting (FIT) — Allows deviation from 4% due to supply shocks within the +/-2% band
Mains Question (10 Marks / 150 words — GS III)
“The Flexible Inflation Targeting framework adopted by India in 2016 has been renewed for a third consecutive term. Critically evaluate its effectiveness in controlling inflation while supporting economic growth, particularly in the context of external supply shocks.”
🎯 Probable UPSC Prelims MCQ
Q. With reference to the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) of the Reserve Bank of India, consider the following statements:
1. The MPC has six members, of whom three are from the RBI.
2. The Governor of RBI has a casting vote in case of a tie.
3. The Government sets the inflation target independently without consulting the RBI.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
1. The MPC has six members, of whom three are from the RBI.
2. The Governor of RBI has a casting vote in case of a tie.
3. The Government sets the inflation target independently without consulting the RBI.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
- (a) 1 and 2 only
- (b) 2 and 3 only
- (c) 1 and 3 only
- (d) 1, 2, and 3
✅ Answer: (a) 1 and 2 only
Explanation: MPC has 6 members — 3 from RBI (including Governor who chairs and has casting vote) + 3 external members appointed by Government. Statement 3 is incorrect: under RBI Act Section 45ZA, the government sets the inflation target “in consultation with the Reserve Bank” — not independently.
Explanation: MPC has 6 members — 3 from RBI (including Governor who chairs and has casting vote) + 3 external members appointed by Government. Statement 3 is incorrect: under RBI Act Section 45ZA, the government sets the inflation target “in consultation with the Reserve Bank” — not independently.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions (UPSC-Oriented)
SEO-optimised FAQs to help UPSC aspirants understand today’s key topics
The Strait of Hormuz is a critical global oil chokepoint through which approximately 20% of the world’s oil passes. For India specifically, it is vital because India imports nearly 60% of its crude oil from West Asian countries, most of which is shipped through the Strait. A closure of the Strait — as is currently happening due to the U.S.-Israel-Iran war — forces Indian refineries to declare force majeure, disrupts LPG supply chains, and extends supply cycles. India maintains a 74-day Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) as a buffer, but prolonged disruption would severely impact India’s economy, inflation, and industrial output. This makes diversifying energy sources and accelerating the renewable transition a strategic imperative for India.
India’s 2035 NDC (Nationally Determined Contribution) submitted to UNFCCC under the Paris Agreement includes: (1) 60% of installed electric capacity from non-fossil sources by 2035 (up from 50% by 2030); (2) Reduce emissions intensity per unit of GDP by 47% from 2005 levels (up from 44%); (3) Create a carbon sink of 3.5–4 billion tonnes of CO₂ equivalent (up from 2.5–3 billion tonnes). Currently, India has achieved approximately 52% non-fossil installed capacity, but only 25% of actual electricity generation is from non-fossil sources — a critical gap. India was among the last G-20 nations to submit its 2035 NDC, alongside Argentina.
The Supreme Court’s 2014 NALSA v. Union of India judgment was a landmark ruling that recognised transgender persons as a “third gender” and upheld their right to self-perceived gender identity without requirement of surgery or medical certification. The 2026 Amendment Bill directly contradicts this by: (1) Removing the right to self-perceived gender identity from Section 4(2) of the 2019 Act; (2) Replacing the District Magistrate process with a medical board headed by a Chief Medical Officer; (3) Making medical board certification mandatory for obtaining transgender identity cards. A Supreme Court-constituted Advisory Committee headed by former Delhi HC judge Justice Asha Menon sent a resolution to the Government calling the Bill a “great shock” that would amount to a “tremendous setback” to transgender rights, specifically because it violates the NALSA verdict.
UDAN (Ude Desh ka Aam Nagrik) was launched in 2016 under India’s National Civil Aviation Policy (NCAP) to connect Tier-2 and Tier-3 cities through affordable regional air connectivity. Airlines operating on designated routes received Viability Gap Funding (VGF) subsidies for a fixed period. However, as per CAG reports and data presented in Parliament, only 7–10% of UDAN routes remained commercially viable after the subsidy ended, because many routes had insufficient passenger demand and poor last-mile connectivity. Of 663 routes launched since 2017, 327 have been discontinued; 15 of 95 revived airports are also back in disuse. The modified UDAN scheme extends the subsidy period from 3 to 5 years and shifts funding from an airfare levy to direct government exchequer funding.
India adopted the Flexible Inflation Targeting (FIT) framework in 2016 through amendments to the RBI Act, 1934. Under Section 45ZA of the RBI Act, the central government sets the inflation target “in consultation with the Reserve Bank.” The current target is 4% Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation with a tolerance band of +/- 2% (i.e., upper limit 6%, lower limit 2%). The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) — a 6-member body comprising 3 RBI members (including the Governor who chairs and has a casting vote) and 3 external government-appointed members — is responsible for achieving this target through monetary policy decisions. The mandate has now been renewed for a third term (2026–2031) with the same targets unchanged.
Pakistan serving as a mediator between the U.S. and Iran in the West Asia conflict is significant for India for several reasons: (1) Diplomatic revival: It signals Pakistan’s continued geopolitical relevance despite its internal political and economic crises — countering India’s long-standing strategy of diplomatically isolating Pakistan. (2) Historical precedent: EAM Jaishankar noted Pakistan has played this mediatory “brokerage” role since 1981 (U.S.-Iran), 2004 (U.S.-Taliban), reinforcing Pakistan’s strategic value to Washington. (3) India’s counter-narrative: India has consistently argued Pakistan should be seen as a state sponsor of terror; its diplomatic role in a major global conflict undermines that narrative. (4) Regional positioning: An active Pakistan in West Asia reduces India’s unique positioning as a “trusted interlocutor” with all parties in the region.
India’s National Anthem is “Jana Gana Mana,” composed by Rabindranath Tagore, and was officially adopted on January 24, 1950. The National Song is “Vande Mataram,” composed by Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay, which was given equal status with the National Anthem on the same date by President Rajendra Prasad. Key constitutional distinctions: Article 51A (Fundamental Duties, 42nd Amendment 1976) mentions the duty to abide by the Constitution and respect the National Flag and National Anthem — but does NOT specifically mention the National Song. The Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971 governs the National Anthem and Flag. The Supreme Court has ruled (Bijoe Emmanuel, 1986) that individuals cannot be forced to sing the National Anthem if they respectfully stand. The government’s January 2026 advisory on Vande Mataram uses the word “may” — making it advisory, not mandatory.
The Hindu – UPSC News Analysis | March 26, 2026
Prepared by Legacy IAS — UPSC Civil Services Coaching, Bengaluru
For UPSC Prelims & Mains | GS I, II, III, IV | Essay | Interview Preparation
© 2026 Legacy IAS. All rights reserved. Content based on The Hindu newspaper, Bengaluru Edition.


