Call Us Now

+91 9606900005 / 04

For Enquiry

legacyiasacademy@gmail.com

Thousands of forest rights titles ‘vanish’ in Chhattisgarh records

Basics: Understanding Forest Rights

  • Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006: Recognizes the rights of forest-dwelling Scheduled Tribes (FDSTs) and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) over forest land and resources.
  • Types of Rights under FRA:
    • Individual Forest Rights (IFR): Land rights to individual tribal/OTFD families for habitation or self-cultivation (up to 4 hectares).
    • Community Forest Rights (CFR): Collective rights of a community over common forest resources for livelihood, grazing, fishing, NTFP (non-timber forest produce), etc.
    • Community Forest Resource Rights (CFRR): Specific right of Gram Sabhas to manage, protect, and conserve traditional forest resources.

Relevance : GS 3(Environment and Ecology – Tribal Rights)

The Issue Reported

  • Thousands of forest rights titles (IFR + CFRR) have disappeared” from official records in the State Tribal Welfare Department.
  • This happened over the last 17 months (based on RTI findings).
  • Earlier, higher distribution figures were revised downward, with officials citing miscommunication and reporting errors.
  • Current official data (as of May, via RTI):
    • 4.82 lakh IFR titles distributed.
    • 4,396 CFRR titles distributed.
    • Across 30 districts of the state.

Possible Reasons for Data Discrepancy

  • Administrative lapses: Poor record management or clerical mistakes.
  • Political/Statistical adjustments: Inflated figures earlier for achievements; later “correction” to avoid audit issues.
  • Weak monitoring: No centralized digital system to track title distribution.
  • RTI revelations: Only citizen-led transparency has highlighted inconsistencies.

Implications of Missing Titles

  • For Tribals/OTFDs:
    • Loss of secure land tenure and livelihoods.
    • Threat of eviction without formal rights.
    • Erosion of trust in government schemes.
  • For Governance:
    • Raises credibility concerns over FRA implementation.
    • Shows weak coordination between Tribal Welfare Department, Revenue, and Forest Departments.
  • For Conservation:
    • Without CFRR recognition, Gram Sabhas cannot legally manage forests → weakening decentralized forest governance.

Broader Context

  • National FRA Status (as per MoTA data, 2023):
    • ~46.35 lakh titles distributed across India.
    • But less than 50% of total potential recognized.
  • Common Problems in FRA implementation:
    • High rejection rates of claims without proper reasons.
    • Poor awareness among beneficiaries.
    • Forest Department resistance to giving up control.
    • Lack of updated land records and satellite mapping.

Way Forward

  • Digital record-keeping: Create a state-wide FRA dashboard with district-wise data.
  • Independent audit: Verify missing/altered numbers through CAG or third-party agencies.
  • Empower Gram Sabhas: Strengthen their role in claim verification and record maintenance.
  • Capacity building: Train revenue and tribal welfare officials on FRA provisions.
  • Transparency measures: Mandate periodic public disclosure of FRA implementation status.

August 2025
MTWTFSS
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
Categories