Final Marks
All 958 Recommended
The complete official list — every candidate, every score, fully searchable. Category analysis, PT distribution charts, and what the numbers mean for CSE 2026.
The Union Public Service Commission has published the detailed marks of all 958 recommended candidates from the Civil Services (Main) Examination 2025. The document lists written total, Personality Test marks, and final aggregate for every candidate — the three numbers that determine rank, category placement, and service allocation.
This page presents that data in full, with charts and analysis built from the complete dataset. Every figure in the tables and charts below is drawn directly from the official UPSC document.
Top 25 Recommended Candidates — CSE 2025
Final Score Distribution — All 958 Candidates
How scores are spread across the complete recommended list
Exact counts extracted from all 958 entries. These figures sum to 958. An additional 42 candidates carry a PwBD designation.
42 candidates carry a PwBD designation (PwBD-1 through PwBD-5), spread across multiple vertical categories. PwBD selection operates through horizontal reservation — separate merit lists per disability category are maintained.
Personality Test Distribution — All 958 Candidates
Where PT scores cluster across the complete recommended list
Tejaswini Singh (Rank 62) scored 782 in written — low enough to rank ~150–180 — yet her PT of 225 elevated her to Rank 62. A 30-mark PT improvement in the competitive 950–999 band can shift rank by 20–40 positions. The interview is a 275-mark examination, not a formality.
Key Observations from CSE 2025 Marks Data
The 1000+ Club
Exactly 103 candidates crossed 1000 marks. Breaking this threshold typically requires a written total above 800 combined with a PT score of 190 or more.
Score Compression in the 950–999 Band
471 out of 958 candidates — nearly half — scored between 950 and 999. Within this band, single-digit differences separate candidates by dozens of ranks. Consistency across all Mains papers matters more than peak performance in any one subject.
Category-wise Cutoff Patterns
SC candidates were recommended from approximately 906 onwards (non-PwBD). ST candidates from around 902. EWS candidates appear throughout at scores comparable to general category. OBC candidates feature at Ranks 2, 4, 14 and throughout the top 50.
Written Marks Are Not the Only Differentiator
Multiple candidates with written totals under 790 finished in the top 100 on PT strength. Equally, candidates with written scores above 840 ranked outside the top 50 when PT scores fell below 165.
Every candidate from the official document. Search by name or roll number, filter by category or score band, sort any column.
What CSE 2025 Tells CSE 2026 Aspirants
- →The general category cutoff for recommendation was approximately 906 (non-PwBD). For SC ~906, ST ~902. These shift by 10–20 marks year to year.
- →The 950–999 band holds 471 candidates — 49% of the entire list. A 10-mark improvement in Mains or PT here shifts rank by 15–25 positions.
- →103 candidates crossed 1000. This signals top-service eligibility and requires consistent Mains performance with PT comfortably above 185.
- →185 candidates scored 200+ in PT — the top 19% of the PT distribution. A decisive advantage between ranks 50 and 200.
- →OBC and General candidates each constitute roughly a third of the list. Top-level competition is broad-based.
- →The lowest non-PwBD score is 906. Everything above that, within your category, is the competitive range you are preparing for.
Frequently Asked Questions
Conclusion
The CSE 2025 marks list is a precise, publicly available dataset. Every number in it carries meaning — about score compression, category competition, PT weight, and the marks needed for selection at different service levels. Engage with it as a calibration tool for CSE 2026 preparation.
PREPARING FOR CSE 2026?
Legacy IAS offers mentorship-led preparation with personalised guidance on Mains answer writing, optional strategy, and Personality Test development.
Explore Mentorship Programme
