Call Us Now

+91 9606900005 / 04

For Enquiry

legacyiasacademy@gmail.com

what unites ‘Gen Z’ protests across countries

Why in News

  • Youth-led Gen Z protests have erupted in Morocco and Madagascar, following earlier similar movements in Indonesia, Nepal, and the Philippines.
  • These are social mediadriven mass agitations centered around inequality, poor governance, and quality-of-life issues, reflecting a global pattern of youth disillusionment in developing economies.

Relevance

  • GS 2: Governance, accountability, political participation, comparative politics.
  • GS 1 (Society): Youth aspirations, social change, inequality.

Basic Context

  • Gen Z refers to the generation born between mid-1990s and early 2010s, now in their 20s or early 30s.
  • They are digitally connected, socially conscious, and politically assertive, often using online platforms like Discord, TikTok, and Facebook for mobilisation.
  • These protests represent a new form of political participation, less reliant on formal organisations and more driven by networked activism.

Triggers and Contexts

1. Morocco

  • Trigger: Death of a young woman during childbirth in a public hospital (Agadir, Sept 2024).
  • Symbolism: Protesters contrasted poor healthcare with billions spent on FIFA World Cup 2030 infrastructure.
    • Slogan: Stadiums are here, but where are the hospitals?
  • Organisers: Collective called Gen Z 212 (country code for Morocco) using Discord for coordination.
  • Socioeconomic context:
    • Unemployment (1524 yrs): 36%
    • Per capita GDP (2024): USD 3,993 (global avg: > USD 13,000)
    • >50% population under 35; frustration with inequality and elite privilege.
  • Political backdrop: Constitutional monarchy; visible inequality between ruling elite and youth masses.

2. Madagascar

  • Trigger: Government repression of youth protests (Sept 2024) leading to 20+ deaths.
  • Escalation: Youth-led movement (Gen Z Madagascar) evolved into a wider anti-establishment uprising, leading to President Andry Rajoelinas resignation.
  • Organisation: Initially youth movements on Facebook & TikTok, later supported by civil society groups.
  • Economic distress:
    • Per capita income declined 45% since independence (1960–2020).
    • Widespread poverty and public anger at elite capture of resources.

Common Threads Across Gen Z Movements

  • Digital mobilisation: Social media as the main tool for organisation and message amplification.
  • Economic frustration: Youth unemployment, inequality, and declining purchasing power.
  • Perceived elite capture: Anger against nepo kids (nepotism, privilege, and dynastic elites) — seen in Nepal, the Philippines, and Indonesia.
  • Quality-of-life concerns: Health, education, job security, and state accountability.
  • Erosion of trust: Young citizens view traditional political structures as unresponsive and corrupt.
  • Short-lived intensity: Movements gain traction rapidly but often fizzle out due to lack of long-term coalition building.

Structural Causes

  1. Economic:
    1. Shrinking industrial jobs due to automation and globalisation.
    2. Middle-income trap in developing economies.
    3. Inflation and cost-of-living crisis post-pandemic.
  2. Social:
    1. Rising educational aspirations unmet by job opportunities.
    2. Social media exposure magnifies global comparisons and resentment.
  3. Political:
    1. Weak democratic accountability; dominance of entrenched elites.
    2. Repressive state responses erode legitimacy further.

Global Dimensions

  • Similar Gen Z uprisings seen in:
    • Indonesia (2020–21): Labour law reforms.
    • Nepal (2023): Corruption and nepotism.
    • Philippines: Inequality and political dynasty protests.
  • Reflects a transnational generational shift in political participation, often leaderless but connected online.

Scholarly Insight

  • As per Dr. Janjira Sombatpoonsiri (German Institute for Global & Area Studies):
    • These movements stem from a crisis of expectations — youth promised prosperity through education but facing structural stagnation.
    • Social media enables rapid mobilisation but weak organisational endurance, limiting tangible outcomes.

Implications

  • Governance Challenge: States must address youth aspirations through inclusive growth and service delivery.
  • Political Reforms: Need for democratic responsiveness and youth engagement.
  • Security Dimension: Online radicalisation or unrest risk if grievances persist.
  • Developmental Focus: Investment in education-to-employment linkages, digital literacy, and job creation.

October 2025
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
Categories