Wildlife Conservation — CITES, MIKE & TRAFFIC UPSC

Wildlife Conservation | CITES | MIKE | TRAFFIC | CAWT | UPSC Notes | Legacy IAS Bangalore
UPSC Prelims + Mains · Wildlife Conservation · Current Affairs

Wildlife Conservation:
Regulating Trade in Wildlife

CITES · Three Appendices · COP19 Panama 2022 · MIKE · TRAFFIC · CAWT · India’s WPA Laws — made interesting & easy

1

CITES — Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species

The world’s passport control for wildlife

💡 Think of CITES as Customs Control for Wildlife

Just as a country’s customs department checks what goods enter and leave the country, CITES acts as the world’s customs control for wildlife. A tiger skin, an elephant ivory carving, a rare orchid, a sea turtle — all require specific CITES permits to cross international borders. Some are completely banned. Some need careful documentation. Without CITES, every airport, seaport, and border crossing would be a wildlife trafficking highway. With CITES, 184 countries agree to show their wildlife “passports.”

Key Facts
  • Full name: Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora
  • Drafted because of: A 1963 resolution by IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature)
  • Adopted: 3 March 1973, Washington D.C., USA
  • In force: 1 July 1975
  • Parties: 184 member countries
  • Secretariat: Geneva, Switzerland (administered by UNEP)
  • India joined CITES: 1976
  • Governing body: Conference of Parties (COP) — meets every 2–3 years
  • Regulates trade in: ~36,000 species of plants and animals
  • World Wildlife Day: 3 March — the date CITES was signed

🔑 What CITES Does — Core Functions

  • Regulates international trade — NOT domestic trade. CITES governs what crosses borders, not what happens inside a country.
  • Controls all imports, exports, re-exports, and introductions from the sea of listed species via a licensing system.
  • Listing species — countries can propose to add, move, or remove species from Appendices at each COP.
  • Monitoring trade — maintains a global database of wildlife trade transactions (12+ million records).
  • Each member country designates a Management Authority (issues permits) and a Scientific Authority (advises on species impacts).
  • CITES is legally binding on member countries but does NOT replace national laws — countries must pass their own legislation to implement it.
  • CITES does NOT deal with habitat destruction or climate change — only trade regulation.
💡 Why Wildlife Trade Needs Regulating

Wildlife trade is the world’s fourth largest illegal trade — after drugs, humans, and arms. Estimated at $23 billion annually. It drives species to extinction: tigers for traditional medicine, elephants for ivory, rhinos for horns, sharks for fins, rare orchids for collectors, hardwood for furniture. CITES intervenes by making legal trade traceable and banning commercial trade for the most threatened species. But enforcement remains a major challenge — each year, hundreds of thousands of CITES-listed species are illegally traded.

📌 UPSC Angle

Key facts always tested: CITES adopted 3 March 1973 (signed Washington D.C.) | In force 1 July 1975 | Secretariat Geneva | Administered by UNEP | India joined 1976 | World Wildlife Day = 3 March. Note: CITES Secretariat = Geneva (NOT Montreal like CBD). This distinction is frequently tested alongside CBD (Montreal). CITES = wildlife trade regulation. CBD = broader biodiversity conservation. They work together but are different treaties.

2

The Three CITES Appendices

Red, amber, yellow — traffic lights for wildlife trade

💡 Appendices = A Traffic Light System for Wildlife Trade

Appendix I = RED (STOP) — Most endangered. Commercial trade completely banned. Only non-commercial exceptions with strict permits. Think: tigers, elephants, rhinos, great apes. Appendix II = AMBER (CAUTION) — Not yet endangered but could be. Trade allowed with permits and monitoring. Think: lions, hippos, sharks. Appendix III = YELLOW (CAUTION in ONE COUNTRY) — Protected in one country, which asks for international help. Trade regulated through certificates of origin.

I

Appendix I

🚫 Commercial trade BANNED

Species threatened with extinction. CITES prohibits all commercial international trade. Trade permitted only for non-commercial purposes (scientific research, education) — with both import AND export permits.

  • ~1,082 species listed
  • Indian species: Tiger, Snow Leopard, Asiatic Lion, Indian Elephant, Indian Rhinoceros, Gharial, Dugong, Great Indian Bustard, Red Panda, Sloth Bear, Saltwater Crocodile
  • Global: Gorillas, Giant Panda, Sea Turtles (most species), Blue Whale
II

Appendix II

⚠️ Trade regulated with permits

Not necessarily threatened now, but trade must be controlled to prevent endangerment. Trade allowed WITH export permit. Importer does NOT need a permit (unlike Appendix I).

  • Most CITES species (~35,000) are here
  • Indian species: Leopard, Lion (African), Hippopotamus, Mahogany, Agarwood, Indian Star Tortoise, Tokay Gecko, many shark and ray species
  • Added at COP19: 104 shark/ray species, Jeypore Ground Gecko (India-endemic), Dalbergia sissoo (Shisham)
III

Appendix III

🟡 One country seeks help

Species protected in at least one CITES member country, which asks other parties for assistance in controlling international trade. Each Party can unilaterally add species to Appendix III.

  • ~170 species listed
  • Requires a certificate of origin for international trade
  • Examples: Two-toed Sloth (Honduras), Walrus (Canada), Cape Seahorse (South Africa)
  • Changes to Appendix III follow a different (simpler) procedure than I and II
FeatureAppendix IAppendix IIAppendix III
Status of speciesThreatened with extinctionMay become threatened if trade unregulatedProtected in at least one country
Commercial tradeBANNEDAllowed with export permitAllowed with certificate of origin
Permits neededBoth import + export permitsExport permit onlyCertificate of origin from listing country
How addedBy vote of COPBy vote of COPUnilaterally by any Party
Number of species~1,082~35,000+~170
India equivalenceWPA Schedule IWPA Schedules III & IVVariable

⭐ Indian Species — Which Appendix?

  • Appendix I (trade banned): Tiger 🐅 · Snow Leopard · Asiatic Lion · Indian Elephant 🐘 · One-Horned Rhinoceros · Gharial · Dugong · Great Indian Bustard · Olive Ridley Turtle · Gangetic Dolphin
  • Appendix II (trade regulated): Indian Star Tortoise (uplisted at COP18) · Tokay Gecko · Wedgefish · Smooth-coated Otter · Small-clawed Otter · Shisham/Dalbergia sissoo · Agarwood (Aquilaria)
  • Indian Ivory rule: Asian Elephants in Appendix I since 1975 (at the very first listing). Commercial ivory trade banned globally in 1989 (African elephants moved to Appendix I).
3

COP19 — The 19th Conference of Parties 2022

Panama City, November 2022 — also called the World Wildlife Conference
🔴 COP19 at a Glance
  • Location: Panama City, Panama
  • Dates: 14–25 November 2022
  • Alternative name: “World Wildlife Conference”
  • Scale: 52 proposals affecting trade regulations for sharks, reptiles, hippos, songbirds, rhinos, 200+ tree species, orchids, elephants, turtles, and more
  • India’s participation: Submitted 3 proposals for stricter protection of native species — all 3 largely successful
COP19 Key Outcomes — India-Specific
🐢
India Proposal — Adopted

Red-Crowned Roofed Turtle (Batagur kachuga)

India’s proposal for this critically endangered freshwater turtle earned strong support. All 12 turtle proposals at COP19 were adopted — turtles are among the world’s most threatened vertebrate groups. India’s Operation Turtshield (anti-wildlife crime) was appreciated.

🦎
India Proposal — Adopted

Jeypore Ground Gecko (Cyrtodactylus jeyporensis)

This reptile, endemic to India’s Eastern Ghats (found in southern Odisha and northern AP), added to Appendix II. First described in 1878, rediscovered only in 2010–11. A rare endemic receiving international protection.

🐢
India Proposal — Adopted

Leith’s Softshell Turtle

India’s proposal for stricter protection. Critically endangered freshwater turtle found in India’s major river systems (Ganga, Indus, Krishna). Added to higher protection schedule.

🪵
India Relief — Adopted

Dalbergia sissoo (Shisham/Indian Rosewood) Relief

India’s Shisham is Appendix II (since COP17 2016 when all Dalbergia species were listed). At COP19: Dalbergia sissoo items under 10 kg per piece can be exported in a single consignment without CITES permits. Major relief for Indian handicraft and furniture exporters worth ~₹1,000 crore annual trade.

COP19 Key Outcomes — Global
🦈
Global — Major Win

104 Shark and Ray Species — Appendix II

The biggest listing at COP19 in terms of numbers. Hammerhead sharks, Guitarfish, Requiem sharks (including the Blue Shark), and three Indo-Pacific sea cucumber species added to Appendix II. Major win for ocean biodiversity.

🦛
Global — Uplisted

Hippopotamus — Stricter Listing

Hippos received stricter trade regulation. Hippo teeth (ivory-like) are increasingly traded as elephant ivory substitutes after the elephant ivory ban. All hippo populations received stronger protection.

🦠
Global — Policy Decision

Zoonotic Disease Guidelines

COP19 adopted draft decisions on reducing risks of future zoonotic diseases linked to wildlife trade — directly responding to COVID-19 (a zoonotic disease). Multi-sectoral strategy under One Health framework — WHO, FAO, CBD, CITES collaboration.

🎶
Global — Species Listing

Songbirds — South & Southeast Asia

White Rumped Shama (found from Southern India to Indonesia) added to Appendix II. Straw-headed Bulbul moved from Appendix II to Appendix I. Songbird trade for caged bird market is a major wildlife trade issue.

💡 India and the Ivory Question at COP19

India has been a vocal opponent of the international ivory trade for over 30 years — consistently voting against any proposal to reopen the ivory trade. At COP19, Zambia proposed to downlist its elephants to Appendix II (which would have allowed ivory sales from stockpiles). India took an unusual stance — it abstained rather than voting against. This was India’s first departure from its traditional anti-ivory position since joining CITES in 1976, and generated significant attention. The proposal to reopen ivory trade was ultimately rejected, and elephants remained in Appendix I.

📌 UPSC Angle — COP19

COP19 outcomes tested in UPSC: Panama City, Nov 2022 = “World Wildlife Conference” = 104 sharks + rays added to Appendix II (biggest listing by number). India angle: Jeypore Ground Gecko (Eastern Ghats endemic) added to Appendix II. Dalbergia sissoo relief for handicraft exporters. India’s turtle proposals all adopted. Zoonotic disease guidelines post-COVID. COP20 is expected in 2025 — the next major CITES COP.

4

MIKE — Monitoring the Illegal Killing of Elephants

CITES’s elephant crime tracking system
🐘

MIKE — Monitoring the Illegal Killing of Elephants

Under CITES | Established COP10, 1997 (Harare) | Covers Africa + Asia | India has 10 MIKE sites

What is MIKE? MIKE is a site-based monitoring system established by the CITES Standing Committee at COP10 (1997, Harare, Zimbabwe) to monitor trends, levels, and causes of elephant mortality at protected area sites in Africa and Asia. It provides the data needed for elephant range states and CITES parties to make appropriate management and enforcement decisions.

  • Started in Africa: 2001 | Started in South Asia: 2003
  • Coverage: 32 elephant range countries in Africa + 13 in Asia (including India)
  • India: 10 MIKE sites — highest number in Asia. Sites in Assam, Odisha, Karnataka (Mysore), Nilgiri, Corbett, etc.
  • Key metric — PIKE: Proportion of Illegally Killed Elephants — the percentage of all dead elephants found that were illegally killed. PIKE = 0 means all deaths are natural; PIKE = 1 means all deaths are poaching. A PIKE above 0.5 indicates a population in decline.
  • Data collection: When forest rangers find an elephant carcass, they record: sex, age, ivory status, decomposition stage, cause of death. This feeds into MIKE’s database.
  • MIKE Asia implementation: Since 2017, IUCN implements the MIKE Asia programme (South Asia + Southeast Asia) funded by European Union.
  • Funding: Entirely donor-funded. EU is the largest donor. Also: US Fish and Wildlife Service, Japan, UK, China.
  • MIKE data at COP: MIKE reports are presented at every CITES Standing Committee meeting and COP — directly informing decisions on elephant listing and ivory trade.
India’s 10 MIKE Sites

Shivalik Elephant Reserve

Uttarakhand / HP / UP hills

Corbett (Ramganga)

Uttarakhand — Jim Corbett

Rajaji

Uttarakhand — Ganga plains

Kaziranga

Assam — most biodiverse

Chirang-Ripu

Assam — Bodo territory

Kameng-Sonitpur

Assam-Arunachal corridor

Nilgiri

TN-Kerala-Karnataka — largest BR

Anamalai

TN — high elephant density

Periyar

Kerala — famous tiger reserve too

Mysore

Karnataka — Nagarhole-Bandipur

📌 UPSC Angle

MIKE is tested through statement-based questions. Key facts: MIKE = under CITES | Established 1997 (COP10, Harare) | Asia programme started 2003 | India = 10 sites (highest in Asia) | Key metric = PIKE (Proportion of Illegally Killed Elephants). MIKE informs ivory trade decisions at every CITES COP. Funded by EU primarily. Since 2017, IUCN implements MIKE in Asia.

5

TRAFFIC — The Wildlife Trade Monitoring Network

The world’s intelligence agency for wildlife trade
🔍

TRAFFIC — Trade Records Analysis of Flora and Fauna in Commerce

Joint Programme of WWF + IUCN | Founded 1976 | Cambridge, UK headquarters | Works globally

What is TRAFFIC? TRAFFIC is the world’s leading NGO working on wildlife trade — researching patterns of wildlife trade, identifying illegal trade networks, and advising governments and CITES on conservation policy. It is a joint programme of WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature) and IUCN. Founded in 1976, headquartered in Cambridge, UK.

  • Full name: Trade Records Analysis of Flora and Fauna in Commerce
  • Nature: An NGO — NOT part of CITES Secretariat, NOT a government body. Works as a complementary partner to CITES.
  • Core work: Research, monitoring, and intelligence on wildlife trade patterns — both legal and illegal. Identifies which species are being traded, in what quantities, through which routes.
  • CITES partner: TRAFFIC provides technical expertise and data to inform CITES listing decisions and enforcement. Before each COP, TRAFFIC publishes trade analyses for species under review.
  • ICCWC: TRAFFIC is a member of the International Consortium on Combating Wildlife Crime (ICCWC) — alongside CITES, INTERPOL, UNODC, and the World Bank.
  • India work: TRAFFIC has done extensive research on tiger, elephant, rhino, shahtoosh (shahtush wool from Tibetan Antelope), and sea cucumber trade in India. Works with WCCB and state forest departments.
  • Key publication: TRAFFIC publishes the “Wildlife Trade” reports and maintains one of the world’s largest databases of wildlife trade records.
  • Demand reduction: Works on behaviour change campaigns to reduce demand for illegal wildlife products — especially in China, Vietnam, and other major consumer markets.
📌 UPSC Angle

TRAFFIC appeared in a direct UPSC question: “Which of the following is TRAFFIC’s mission?” — Answer: Monitoring wildlife trade so it doesn’t threaten species’ conservation. Key facts: TRAFFIC = joint programme of WWF + IUCN | Founded 1976 | Cambridge, UK | NGO (not part of CITES Secretariat) | Monitors wildlife trade | ICCWC member. It was confused in UPSC 2019 with Wetlands International’s mission — know both separately.

6

CAWT — Coalition Against Wildlife Trafficking

The political coalition to end wildlife crime
🤝

Coalition Against Wildlife Trafficking (CAWT)

Voluntary Coalition | Governments + NGOs + Corporations | US State Department-initiated

What is CAWT? CAWT is a voluntary, public-private partnership dedicated to combating illegal wildlife trafficking globally. It focuses on garnering political will, public awareness, and resources for fighting wildlife crime — going beyond the treaty-based work of CITES to create a broader anti-trafficking coalition.

  • Nature: A voluntary coalition — NOT a binding international treaty. Members join voluntarily and commit to anti-trafficking goals.
  • Initiated by: The US State Department — a reflection of the US’s commitment to combating wildlife trafficking even though the US has not ratified CITES (though it has now joined CITES).
  • Membership: Diverse — governments, NGOs, and corporations. Key US-based members include Conservation International, Save the Tiger Fund, Smithsonian Institution, TRAFFIC International, WildAid, Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), and the American Forest & Paper Association.
  • Open membership: Any government, NGO, or corporation committed to fighting wildlife trafficking can join.
  • Three focus areas:
    1. Political will: Encouraging governments to treat wildlife crime as a serious transnational crime (alongside drugs and arms trafficking).
    2. Public awareness: Education campaigns about the impacts of illegal wildlife trade on biodiversity and human health.
    3. Demand reduction: Reducing consumer demand for illegal wildlife products — particularly in high-demand markets (China, Vietnam, USA, EU).
  • Why needed: CITES can regulate trade but cannot directly address the criminal networks. CAWT mobilises law enforcement agencies, judicial systems, and public opinion against wildlife trafficking.
  • ICCWC: Works alongside the International Consortium on Combating Wildlife Crime (ICCWC) which includes CITES Secretariat, INTERPOL, UNODC (UN Office on Drugs and Crime), World Bank, and World Customs Organization.
7

Policies and Laws in India for CITES Implementation

How India translates global wildlife treaty into domestic law
🎯 Key Principle

CITES is legally binding but does NOT automatically become national law. Each member country must pass its own legislation to implement CITES provisions. India implements CITES primarily through the Wildlife Protection Act 1972 (WPA) — amended in 1991 to expressly incorporate CITES provisions — and several other laws and agencies.

📖

Wildlife Protection Act 1972 (WPA) — as amended 1991

India’s primary wildlife law. The 1991 amendment specifically incorporated CITES trade controls and penalties. Schedule I = highest protection = broadly equivalent to CITES Appendix I (commercial trade banned, highest penalties). Schedule II-IV = lesser protection. All import/export of wildlife and wildlife products require permission under WPA.

🏛️

Wild Life Crime Control Bureau (WCCB)

Established 2007 under the 2006 amendment to WPA. India’s nodal agency for wildlife crime. Assists management of CITES in India. Coordinates wildlife law enforcement across states. Deputy Directors of WCCB are Assistant Management Authorities for CITES. Stationed at major international airports and seaports.

🌿

Management Authority (for CITES in India)

Additional Director General (Wildlife), MoEFCC is India’s national CITES Management Authority. Issues CITES import/export permits. Coordinates with Scientific Authorities on species assessments before permits are granted.

🔬

Scientific Authorities

Zoological Survey of India (ZSI) — for fauna (animals). Botanical Survey of India (BSI) — for flora (plants). They advise the Management Authority on whether trade will be detrimental to species survival. Their “non-detriment finding” is required before any export permit is issued for Appendix II species.

🚢

Customs Act 1962

Enforces import/export controls at ports, airports, and border crossings. Customs officers check CITES permits at entry/exit points. WPA + Customs Act together create the enforcement mechanism for CITES at India’s borders.

📦

Foreign Trade Policy (FTP)

Announced periodically by Ministry of Commerce. Lists wildlife and wildlife products that are prohibited or permitted for import/export. Decided in consultation with the Management Authority. Implemented through Customs Act 1962.

WPA Schedules vs CITES Appendices
WPA ScheduleProtection LevelEquivalent CITES AppendixExamples
Schedule IHighest — most endangered. Penalties = up to 7 years imprisonment + ₹25,000 fine. No reduction/remission.Broadly equivalent to Appendix ITiger, Elephant, Lion, Rhino, Gharial, Great Indian Bustard, Gangetic Dolphin, Sea Turtles
Schedule IIHigh protection. Penalties = 3–7 years + fine.No direct equivalent — some Appendix II speciesHyena, Jackal, Porcupine, many raptors
Schedules III & IVModerate protection. Lower penalties.Some Appendix II and III speciesBarking Deer, Nilgai, Wild Boar, Flying Squirrel
Schedule VVermin — may be hunted with permissionNo CITES equivalentRats, mice, crows, fruit bats (crow and fruit bats removed later)
Schedule VIPlants — trade in specified plants prohibited without permissionSome Appendix II plant speciesBeddome’s Cycas, Blue Vanda orchid, Pitcher plant, Red Vanda
💡 India’s Special Ivory Law

India’s WPA 1972 disallows all trade in all kinds of ivory — including African elephant ivory. This is one of the world’s strictest ivory laws. India was instrumental in getting the international ivory trade ban in 1989 (when all African elephant populations were moved to Appendix I). India has consistently opposed any reopening of the ivory trade at CITES COPs — until its partial abstention at COP19 (2022) on the Zambia proposal.

⭐ India’s CITES Framework — Quick Reference

  • India joined CITES: 1976
  • Primary law: Wildlife Protection Act 1972 (amended 1991)
  • Management Authority: ADG (Wildlife), MoEFCC
  • Wildlife crime agency: WCCB (established 2007 under WPA 2006 amendment)
  • Scientific Authorities: ZSI (fauna) + BSI (flora)
  • Enforcement: Customs Act 1962 at ports/airports
  • WPA Schedule I = ~CITES Appendix I (trade banned, highest protection)
  • India’s ivory law = strictly prohibits ALL ivory trade (including African) = one of world’s strongest
  • MIKE sites in India: 10 — highest in Asia

Quick Comparison — CITES, MIKE, TRAFFIC, CAWT

All 4 wildlife trade organisations at a glance
FeatureCITESMIKETRAFFICCAWT
Full nameConvention on International Trade in Endangered SpeciesMonitoring the Illegal Killing of ElephantsTrade Records Analysis of Flora and Fauna in CommerceCoalition Against Wildlife Trafficking
NatureBinding international treatyCITES programme (site-based monitoring system)NGO (joint WWF + IUCN programme)Voluntary public-private coalition
Established1973 (in force 1975)1997 (COP10, Harare)19762005 (US State Dept. initiative)
HeadquartersGeneva, SwitzerlandUnder CITES Secretariat (Geneva)Cambridge, UKWashington D.C., USA
Parent/Administered byUNEPCITESWWF + IUCNUS State Department (initiator)
FocusRegulating international wildlife tradeMonitoring elephant poaching dataResearching & monitoring wildlife trade (legal + illegal)Political will + public awareness against trafficking
India connectionIndia member since 1976; WPA 1972 implements CITES10 MIKE sites in India (highest in Asia)Works with WCCB; research on tiger, elephant, rhino tradeIndia can join as a partner government
Key metric/outputAppendix listings; COP decisionsPIKE (Proportion of Illegally Killed Elephants)Wildlife trade databases; pre-COP analysesAnti-trafficking campaigns; demand reduction

🧪 Practice MCQs — Test Yourself
Practice
Q1. Consider the following statements about CITES: 1. CITES was adopted in 1973 in Washington D.C. and came into force in 1975. 2. The CITES Secretariat is located in Montreal, Canada. 3. Under CITES, Appendix I species cannot be traded commercially. 4. India joined CITES in 1976. Which of the above are CORRECT?
✅ Answer: (c) — 1, 3 and 4 only
1 ✅: CITES adopted 3 March 1973, Washington D.C. In force 1 July 1975. 2 ❌ Wrong: CITES Secretariat is in Geneva, Switzerland — NOT Montreal. Montreal is the CBD Secretariat. This is the most commonly tested UPSC distinction: CITES = Geneva; CBD = Montreal. Both administered by UNEP, but different cities. 3 ✅: Appendix I species — commercial trade is banned. Only non-commercial trade (scientific research, education) allowed with strict import + export permits. 4 ✅: India joined CITES in 1976 — one year after it came into force.
Practice
Q2. Under CITES, an Appendix II listing means: Which of the following is the MOST ACCURATE description?
✅ Answer: (b)
Appendix II = species not necessarily threatened NOW, but if trade is not controlled they COULD become threatened. Trade is allowed — but requires an export permit to ensure trade is sustainable and non-detrimental. The exporting country’s Scientific Authority must issue a “non-detriment finding.” Most CITES species (~35,000) are in Appendix II. Option (a) = Appendix I. Option (c) = Appendix III. Option (d) = WPA Schedule V (vermin) — no CITES equivalent. At COP19, 104 sharks/rays were added to Appendix II — they were being heavily traded without regulation.
Current AffairsCOP19 2022
Q3. At CITES COP19 held in Panama City (November 2022), which of the following is CORRECT regarding India?
✅ Answer: (c)
Option (c) ✅ Correct: (1) India got relief for Dalbergia sissoo — items under 10 kg per piece can now be exported without CITES permits in a single consignment, helping Indian handicraft exporters. (2) Jeypore Ground Gecko (Eastern Ghats endemic, Cyrtodactylus jeyporensis) was added to Appendix II — successfully. Option (a) ❌: India would NEVER propose downlisting elephants — elephants stay in Appendix I. Option (b) ❌: Jeypore Ground Gecko was added to Appendix II (not Appendix I) — Appendix I would ban all trade. Option (d) ❌: India ABSTAINED on the ivory trade vote (unusual) — did NOT vote in favour. Zambia’s ivory proposal was rejected.
Practice
Q4. Consider the following about TRAFFIC: 1. TRAFFIC stands for Trade Records Analysis of Flora and Fauna in Commerce. 2. It is a joint programme of WWF and IUCN. 3. TRAFFIC is the secretariat of CITES. 4. TRAFFIC is headquartered in Cambridge, UK. Which of the above are CORRECT?
✅ Answer: (c) — 1, 2 and 4 only
1 ✅: Full name = Trade Records Analysis of Flora and Fauna in Commerce. 2 ✅: Joint programme of WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature) and IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature). 3 ❌ Wrong: TRAFFIC is NOT the CITES Secretariat. CITES Secretariat is administered by UNEP and located in Geneva. TRAFFIC is a separate, independent NGO that works as a partner and advisory body to CITES — NOT its secretariat. 4 ✅: Headquartered in Cambridge, United Kingdom. Founded in 1976.
Practice
Q5. The MIKE (Monitoring the Illegal Killing of Elephants) programme was established at which CITES COP?
✅ Answer: (c) COP10, Harare, Zimbabwe, 1997
MIKE was established by the CITES Standing Committee at COP10 (1997) in Harare, Zimbabwe through Resolution Conf. 10.10. Implementation started in Africa in 2001 and in South Asia in 2003. India has 10 MIKE sites — the highest number in Asia. Key metric: PIKE = Proportion of Illegally Killed Elephants. Funded primarily by the EU. Since 2017, IUCN implements the MIKE Asia programme.
Practice
Q6. In India, which body is designated as the Management Authority for CITES — responsible for issuing import/export permits?
✅ Answer: (c) Additional Director General (Wildlife), MoEFCC
The Additional Director General (Wildlife) of MoEFCC is India’s national CITES Management Authority — responsible for issuing CITES import/export permits. WCCB Deputy Directors are Assistant Management Authorities — they assist at ports and airports. ZSI is the Scientific Authority for fauna (gives non-detriment findings for Appendix II species export permits) — BSI does the same for plants. NTCA manages tiger reserves but is not the CITES Management Authority. Customs Act 1962 enforces these at borders.
Practice
Q7. Consider the following pairs — Organisation : Nature : 1. CITES — Binding international treaty 2. MIKE — NGO (joint IUCN + WWF programme) 3. TRAFFIC — Wildlife trade monitoring NGO 4. CAWT — Voluntary public-private coalition Which pairs are CORRECTLY matched?
✅ Answer: (c) — 1, 3 and 4 only
1 ✅ Correct: CITES = binding international treaty. Member countries are legally obligated to follow its provisions. 2 ❌ Wrong: MIKE is NOT an NGO — it is a CITES programme, established by the CITES Secretariat and implemented by CITES at protected area sites. The description (joint IUCN + WWF) belongs to TRAFFIC, not MIKE. (Note: IUCN implements MIKE in Asia since 2017, but MIKE itself remains a CITES programme.) 3 ✅ Correct: TRAFFIC = NGO, joint programme of WWF + IUCN. 4 ✅ Correct: CAWT = voluntary public-private coalition — governments, NGOs, and corporations joined voluntarily.
📜 UPSC Prelims PYQs — Official Past Questions
PYQUPSC 2019
Consider the following statements: 1. Wetlands International is a bureau under the UNEP. 2. The mission of TRAFFIC is to ensure that trade in wild plants and animals does not pose a threat to the conservation of nature. Which of the above is/are correct?
✅ Official Answer: (d) Neither 1 nor 2
Wait — this answer needs careful analysis: Statement 1 ❌: Wetlands International is NOT a bureau under UNEP — it is an independent NGO. Statement 2: TRAFFIC’s mission IS “to ensure that trade in wild plants and animals does not threaten the conservation of nature” — which sounds like it should be ✅. However, UPSC’s official answer is (d) — suggesting the phrasing may slightly differ from TRAFFIC’s exact mission. TRAFFIC’s precise mission is ensuring wildlife trade is NOT a threat to conservation. The way Statement 2 is phrased is essentially correct — but UPSC marked it as incorrect, possibly because the exact phrasing differs. Most standard sources agree TRAFFIC’s mission is as stated in Statement 2. When in doubt in exams: know both statements clearly.
PYQUPSC 2015
‘Project Elephant’ was launched by the Government of India in 1992 with a view to: 1. Protecting elephants from poaching 2. Resolving the human-elephant conflict 3. Establishing elephant corridors 4. Training elephants for tourism purposes Select the correct answer:
✅ Official Answer: (c) 1, 2 and 3 only
Project Elephant was launched in February 1992 by MoEFCC as a Centrally Sponsored Scheme. Objectives: 1 ✅ Protect elephants from poaching and illegal trade of ivory. 2 ✅ Resolve human-elephant conflict — a major conservation challenge in elephant ranges. 3 ✅ Identify and establish elephant corridors to allow movement between habitats. 4 ❌ Training elephants for tourism was NOT an objective of Project Elephant — that would be counter to conservation goals. MIKE programme monitors illegal killing; Project Elephant provides policy framework and financial support for elephant conservation in India.
PYQUPSC 2017
Which of the following are the objectives of ‘National Mission for a Green India’? 1. Protecting and restoring forest/non-forest ecosystems 2. Enhancing ecosystem services 3. Increasing forest/tree cover on 5 million hectares of land 4. Increasing annual income of forest-dependent communities Select the correct answer:
✅ Official Answer: (d) All four
Relevant because National Mission for Green India (GIM) is India’s forest restoration programme — directly linked to wildlife habitat and biodiversity conservation. All four objectives are correct for GIM: 1 ✅ Protect and restore 5 million ha of forest/non-forest ecosystems. 2 ✅ Enhance ecosystem services — carbon, water, biodiversity. 3 ✅ Increase forest cover on 5 million ha (including increase quality/density) and improve quality on another 5 million ha = total 10 million ha. 4 ✅ Increase annual income of forest-dependent communities by approximately 3,000 crore/year by 2020. GIM is one of India’s 8 National Missions under the National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC).
PYQUPSC 2014
Consider the following: 1. Sea Turtles 2. Dolphins 3. Otters 4. Dugongs Which of the above is/are protected under Schedule I of the Wildlife Protection Act 1972?
✅ Official Answer: (d) All four
All four species are protected under Schedule I of WPA 1972 — the highest protection category: Sea Turtles (Olive Ridley, Leatherback, etc.) = Schedule I. Also in CITES Appendix I. Dolphins (including Gangetic/River Dolphins — Platanista gangetica) = Schedule I. Gangetic Dolphin is India’s National Aquatic Animal. Otters (Smooth-coated otter, Small-clawed otter) = Schedule I. Also in CITES Appendix II (India proposed uplisting at COP18). Dugongs = Schedule I. Also in CITES Appendix I. Found in India’s Gulf of Mannar — critically dependent on seagrass. All receive maximum legal protection in India.
PYQUPSC 2022
With reference to ‘Global Environment Facility’, which one of the following statements is/are correct? 1. It is the financial mechanism for CBD, UNFCCC, UNCCD and Stockholm Convention. 2. GEF is administered by UNEP. 3. GEF provides grants to developing countries for environmental projects.
✅ Official Answer: (c) 1 and 3 only
GEF is directly related to wildlife and biodiversity finance — it manages the GBFF (Global Biodiversity Framework Fund). 1 ✅: GEF is the financial mechanism for CBD, UNFCCC, UNCCD, Stockholm Convention (POPs), and Minamata Convention on Mercury — all five. 2 ❌ Wrong: GEF is NOT administered by UNEP. GEF is administered by the World Bank — which serves as the GEF Trustee. While UNEP is one of GEF’s implementing agencies, the overall administration is World Bank. 3 ✅: GEF provides grants and concessional financing to developing countries for environmental protection projects — including biodiversity, climate, land degradation, and chemicals.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Both offer the highest protection, but they operate at different levels: CITES Appendix I = international level — prohibits commercial trade of the species across national borders globally. India’s WPA Schedule I = domestic level — provides the highest protection within India’s borders regardless of whether the species is traded internationally. They are complementary but separate: CITES Appendix I says “don’t trade this species internationally.” WPA Schedule I says “don’t harm, hunt, or trade this species inside India at all.” For species like tigers, rhinos, and elephants — they are in BOTH Appendix I (no international trade) AND Schedule I (no domestic exploitation either). An Appendix II species may still be in WPA Schedule I if India considers it highly threatened domestically.
Both are administered under UNEP’s umbrella but were negotiated and established in different cities and eras. CITES was adopted in 1973 in Washington D.C. and its Secretariat was subsequently established in Geneva, Switzerland — where many UN bodies are located (WHO, WTO, UNHCR). CBD came later (1992) and its Secretariat was established in Montreal, Canada. This is a classic UPSC trick question: CITES ≠ Montreal. CBD ≠ Geneva. Remember: CITES = Geneva (adopted 1973). CBD = Montreal (adopted 1992). Both are administered by UNEP but in different cities. Conversely, the Ramsar Convention Secretariat is in Gland, Switzerland (near Geneva but different from CITES Geneva offices).
PIKE stands for Proportion of Illegally Killed Elephants — it is the key metric used by the MIKE programme. PIKE = (number of illegally killed elephants found) ÷ (total number of elephant carcasses encountered). If PIKE = 0.5, it means half of all dead elephants found were illegally killed. If PIKE > 0.5, it indicates that poaching deaths exceed natural deaths — meaning the population is in decline. In 2012, PIKE in Africa was 0.72 (crisis level). By 2014 it dropped to 0.48 (births exceeding deaths). PIKE data directly informs CITES decisions on ivory trade — high PIKE = evidence of unsustainable poaching = argument against reopening ivory trade. India’s MIKE sites use PIKE as their primary monitoring indicator too.
Yes — Dalbergia sissoo (North Indian Rosewood/Shisham) is indeed a common tree in India and is NOT threatened. But it got caught in a CITES net at COP17 (Johannesburg, 2016) when all species in the genus Dalbergia were listed in Appendix II — because many Dalbergia species (like Indian Rosewood, Brazilian Rosewood) are highly valued luxury timber trees that are endangered. The problem: international customs officials can’t easily distinguish between different Dalbergia species once the wood is processed into furniture or handicrafts. So to prevent Dalbergia listings from being bypassed by mislabelling, all species were listed together. This created a major problem for Indian handicraft and furniture exporters who use Shisham legally and sustainably. At COP19 (2022), India got relief: items under 10 kg per piece can now be exported without individual CITES permits — a practical concession that helps India’s artisan industry without undermining conservation.
The Wildlife Crime Control Bureau (WCCB) is India’s nodal agency for combating wildlife crime, established in 2007 under the Wildlife Protection Act (through the 2006 amendment). It functions under MoEFCC. Key functions: (1) Collect and collate intelligence on wildlife crimes. (2) Coordinate with state police, forest departments, customs, and CBI on wildlife crime cases. (3) Assist management of CITES in India — WCCB Deputy Directors are Assistant Management Authorities for CITES. (4) Maintain a wildlife crime database. (5) Train law enforcement officials in wildlife crime investigation. (6) Post officers at major international airports and seaports to check CITES permit compliance. (7) India’s interface with INTERPOL and other international agencies (ICCWC) on wildlife trafficking. WCCB works alongside ZSI (scientific authority for fauna) and BSI (scientific authority for flora) to implement CITES domestically.
Legacy IAS — UPSC Civil Services Coaching, Bangalore  |  Content prepared exclusively for UPSC aspirants. CITES data updated to COP19 (November 2022). All facts double-checked against CITES official sources, PIB, and UPSC PYQ analysis.

Book a Free Demo Class

April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
Categories

Get free Counselling and ₹25,000 Discount

Fill the form – Our experts will call you within 30 mins.