Call Us Now

+91 9606900005 / 04

For Enquiry

legacyiasacademy@gmail.com

The right to repair movement in India

Repairability Index (RI): What is it?

  • RI assigns a score to consumer electronics and appliances based on ease of repair.
  • Evaluation criteria include:
    • Availability of spare parts
    • Cost of repair
    • Access to software updates
    • Availability of repair information

Planned Obsolescence and Manufacturing Trends

  • Older appliances were more durable than modern ones.
  • Planned obsolescence implies manufacturers intentionally reduce product lifespan to push newer models.
  • Another key reason: cost-cutting in manufacturing due to:
    • Increased metal prices (e.g., copper)
    • India’s dependence on metal imports
  • Leads to leaner engineering, making devices less repair-friendly.

 Larger Context: Circular Economy & Durable Wealth

  • Promoting repairability supports:
    • E-waste reduction
    • Circular economy: parts re-used in the value chain
    • Reduced dependency on virgin (newly mined) metals
  • Older appliances are viewed as “durable wealth” (last longer, cost-effective over time).
  • With slower improvements in computing power, longer-lasting devices make more ecological and economic sense.

Right to Repair: Global vs Indian Context

  • Global Meaning: Empowers consumers to repair via:
    • Third-party services
    • Access to repair parts and manuals
  • India’s Approach:
    • Non-confrontational
    • DoCA’s Right to Repair Portal lists authorised repair centres and repair manuals
    • Aligns more with manufacturers’ interests than consumer empowerment
  • U.S. Approach:
    • Stronger consumer activism
    • Pushback against monopolies on repair (e.g., Apple, Taylor Co.)

Tensions Between Consumers and Manufacturers

  • Manufacturers resist right to repair due to:
    • Repair revenue becoming a major income stream
    • Fears of losing control over repair ecosystems
  • Example: McDonalds ice cream machines can only be repaired by Taylor Co.
  • Indian RI committee mostly included industry representatives, raising concerns over bias
  • However, inclusion of advocates like Pushpa Girimaji signals some consumer representation

Way Forward & Implications

  • Government aims to implement RI without stifling innovation or ease of doing business
  • RI may pressure brands to:
    • Design more repairable and durable products
    • Increase transparency for consumers
  • A step towards bridging the gap between consumer rights and corporate interests

May 2025
MTWTFSS
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 
Categories