Static Quiz 18 June 2025 (Polity)
Quiz-summary
0 of 5 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Information
Static Quiz 18 June 2025 (Polity) For UPSC Exam
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 5 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Answered
- Review
- Question 1 of 5
1. Question
Which of the following provisions is not justiciable under the Indian Constitution?
CorrectAnswer: (d) Promotion of international peace and security
Explanation:
• Article 51 (Directive Principles) talks about promoting international peace, which is non-justiciable.
• Options (a), (b), and (c) refer to Fundamental Rights (Articles 14, 25, 24 respectively), which are enforceable by courts.IncorrectAnswer: (d) Promotion of international peace and security
Explanation:
• Article 51 (Directive Principles) talks about promoting international peace, which is non-justiciable.
• Options (a), (b), and (c) refer to Fundamental Rights (Articles 14, 25, 24 respectively), which are enforceable by courts. - Question 2 of 5
2. Question
Consider the following statements:
1. The Constitution explicitly mentions that India is a “socialist” state.
2. The term “socialist” was inserted by the 44th Constitutional Amendment.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?CorrectAnswer: (a) 1 only
Explanation:
• The word “socialist” is explicitly mentioned in the Preamble.
• It was inserted by the 42nd Amendment, not the 44th, so statement 2 is incorrect.IncorrectAnswer: (a) 1 only
Explanation:
• The word “socialist” is explicitly mentioned in the Preamble.
• It was inserted by the 42nd Amendment, not the 44th, so statement 2 is incorrect. - Question 3 of 5
3. Question
Consider the following statements regarding Article 32 of the Indian Constitution:
1. It is considered the ‘heart and soul’ of the Constitution by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar.
2. It empowers the High Courts to issue writs for enforcement of Fundamental Rights.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?CorrectAnswer: (a) 1 only
Explanation:
• Article 32 provides the right to move the Supreme Court for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights.
• High Courts derive this power under Article 226, not Article 32.IncorrectAnswer: (a) 1 only
Explanation:
• Article 32 provides the right to move the Supreme Court for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights.
• High Courts derive this power under Article 226, not Article 32. - Question 4 of 5
4. Question
Which of the following is/are true about the Fundamental Duties?
1. They are enforceable by law through appropriate legislation.
2. They were incorporated on the recommendation of the Swaran Singh Committee.
Select the correct answer using the code below:CorrectAnswer: (c) Both 1 and 2
Explanation:
• The Swaran Singh Committee recommended the inclusion of Fundamental Duties.
• Though not directly enforceable, they can be enforced through laws made by Parliament (e.g., Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971).IncorrectAnswer: (c) Both 1 and 2
Explanation:
• The Swaran Singh Committee recommended the inclusion of Fundamental Duties.
• Though not directly enforceable, they can be enforced through laws made by Parliament (e.g., Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971). - Question 5 of 5
5. Question
Which of the following statements about the Ninth Schedule of the Constitution is correct?
CorrectAnswer: (c) It was introduced to protect land reform laws
Explanation:
• Introduced by First Constitutional Amendment Act, 1951, to shield agrarian reforms from being invalidated due to violation of Fundamental Rights.
• Judicial review is now permitted even for Ninth Schedule laws if they violate basic structure (as ruled in I.R. Coelho case, 2007).
•IncorrectAnswer: (c) It was introduced to protect land reform laws
Explanation:
• Introduced by First Constitutional Amendment Act, 1951, to shield agrarian reforms from being invalidated due to violation of Fundamental Rights.
• Judicial review is now permitted even for Ninth Schedule laws if they violate basic structure (as ruled in I.R. Coelho case, 2007).
•
