Static Quiz 02 July 2025 (Polity)
Quiz-summary
0 of 5 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Information
Static Quiz 02 July 2025 (Polity) For UPSC Exam
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 5 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Answered
- Review
- Question 1 of 5
1. Question
The Supreme Court’s decision in Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India expanded the scope of:
CorrectCorrect answer : (c)
Explanation:
In the Maneka Gandhi case (1978), the Supreme Court ruled that laws under Article 21 must be just, fair, and reasonable, expanding its scope with the “due process” doctrine.IncorrectCorrect answer : (c)
Explanation:
In the Maneka Gandhi case (1978), the Supreme Court ruled that laws under Article 21 must be just, fair, and reasonable, expanding its scope with the “due process” doctrine. - Question 2 of 5
2. Question
Arrange the following landmark cases chronologically:
1. A.K. Gopalan Case
2. Golaknath Case
3. Kesavananda Bharati Case
4. Maneka Gandhi CaseCorrectCorrect answer :(a)
Explanation:
Chronological order:
1. A.K. Gopalan (1950)
2. Golaknath (1967)
3. Kesavananda Bharati (1973)
4. Maneka Gandhi (1978)IncorrectCorrect answer :(a)
Explanation:
Chronological order:
1. A.K. Gopalan (1950)
2. Golaknath (1967)
3. Kesavananda Bharati (1973)
4. Maneka Gandhi (1978) - Question 3 of 5
3. Question
Which case first introduced the Basic Structure Doctrine?
CorrectCorrect answer :(c)
Explanation:
The landmark Kesavananda Bharati case (1973) introduced the Basic Structure Doctrine, restricting Parliament’s power to amend core constitutional features.IncorrectCorrect answer :(c)
Explanation:
The landmark Kesavananda Bharati case (1973) introduced the Basic Structure Doctrine, restricting Parliament’s power to amend core constitutional features. - Question 4 of 5
4. Question
Which case led to the right to education being read into Article 21 before the 86th amendment?
CorrectCorrect answer :(a)
Explanation:
Unnikrishnan v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1993) recognized education as a part of Article 21. This led to the insertion of Article 21A by the 86th Amendment in 2002.IncorrectCorrect answer :(a)
Explanation:
Unnikrishnan v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1993) recognized education as a part of Article 21. This led to the insertion of Article 21A by the 86th Amendment in 2002. - Question 5 of 5
5. Question
The principle of “procedure established by law” was reinterpreted as “due process of law” in which of the following cases?
CorrectCorrect answer : (c)
Explanation:
Maneka Gandhi interpreted Article 21 to require just, fair and reasonable law, introducing a concept similar to “due process”, which previously was not recognized.IncorrectCorrect answer : (c)
Explanation:
Maneka Gandhi interpreted Article 21 to require just, fair and reasonable law, introducing a concept similar to “due process”, which previously was not recognized.
