Call Us Now

+91 9606900005 / 04

For Enquiry

legacyiasacademy@gmail.com

Human-Wildlife Conflict in Chandrapur

Introduction

  • Human-wildlife conflict (HWC) refers to interactions between humans and wildlife that result in negative impacts on livelihoods, safety, or animal conservation.
  • The Chandrapur tiger attacks (2024–25) highlight the intensifying nature of such conflicts amid rising tiger populations and shrinking natural habitats.

Relevance : GS 3(Environment and Ecology)

Dimensions of the Conflict

1. Ecological Dimension

  • Shrinking habitats and fragmented corridors due to mining, roads, and agriculture.
  • Breach of carrying capacity in tiger reserves (e.g., Tadoba has ~3X optimal density).
  • Depletion of prey base forces predators to seek cattle or humans.

2. Socio-Economic Dimension

  • Local dependence on forest for firewood, fodder, and non-timber forest produce.
  • Death or injury causes income shock and mental trauma.
  • Cultural tolerance in regions like Chandrapur: Tiger viewed as a deity, death accepted as fate.

3. Governance & Policy Dimension

  • Poor conflict-prevention infrastructure (fencing, trenching).
  • Delayed or inadequate compensation under state schemes.
  • CAMPA funds underutilised for mitigation, mostly spent on afforestation.

4. Legal Framework Limitations

  • Wildlife Protection Act (1972) prioritises species protection over human safety.
  • No statutory conflict-management body exists.
  • Tourism models often ignore ecological stress and proximity to human settlements.

5. Technological & Administrative Interventions

  • Chandrapur Forest Division: 982 camera traps, AI alerts, 181 Rapid Response Teams.
  • Drones used for night-time surveillance.
  • Awareness campaigns in villages; forest patrolling during peak conflict months.

6. Ethical and Cultural Dimension

  • Cultural acceptance vs. policy expectations – villagers worship tigers but seek protection.
  • Raises debate: Ecocentric vs. Anthropocentric approaches to conservation.

Case Studies

Chandrapur, Maharashtra (2024–25)

  • Over 25 deaths in 5 months.
  • Tiger density far exceeds sustainable levels.
  • Forest dept. launched awareness drives, patrolling, and AI tracking.

Sundarbans, West Bengal

  • Use of traditional mask method on the back of head to reduce tiger attacks.
  • Rising sea levels and cyclones (e.g., Amphan) increased tiger movement inland.

Pilibhit Tiger Reserve, Uttar Pradesh

  • Won TX2 Award for doubling tigers while minimizing conflict via village relocation and buffer development.

Wayanad, Kerala

  • Farmer protests demanding declaration of wild boar as vermin to protect crops.

Way Forward

  • Institutional Reforms: Set up Human-Wildlife Conflict Management Authority under MoEFCC.
  • Decentralised Response: Empower Gram Panchayats and Forest Rights Committees for quick mitigation.
  • Community Incentives: Eco-tourism revenue sharing; insurance for crops/livestock.
  • Data-Driven Tracking: AI-based early warning systems + real-time alerts.
  • Compensation Reforms: Timely and adequate monetary relief via DBT.
  • Corridor Restoration: Link fragmented habitats and avoid infrastructure through wildlife zones.

Useful Data Points

  • 35% of world’s tigers in India; only 3% of global tiger habitat.
  • 1,000+ human deaths due to wildlife (2018–2022) – MoEFCC.
  • Over 60% of Indias forests are inhabited by forest-dependent people – FSI.

July 2025
MTWTFSS
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031 
Categories