Call Us Now

+91 9606900005 / 04

For Enquiry

legacyiasacademy@gmail.com

Analysing Indian States’ macro-fiscal health

Context

  • Economic Trajectory:
    • 2010s: Many States prospered through reforms, improved tax collection, and booming growth, some reporting revenue surpluses.
    • Pandemic Impact: Shrinking tax revenues and soaring emergency expenditures pushed almost all States back into fiscal stress.
  • Significance: States control budgets larger than many countries, spending more than the Union government on health, welfare, and infrastructure, highlighting the importance of fiscal prudence.

Relevance:

  • GS-2 (Governance): Fiscal federalism, intergovernmental transfers, state accountability.
  • GS-3 (Economy & Public Finance): Revenue generation, borrowing, debt management, welfare spending, fiscal prudence.

Revenue Generation & Vertical Imbalance

  • Internal Revenue Dependence:
    • Maharashtra: 70% of receipts generated internally (2022–23).
    • Arunachal Pradesh: Only 9% internally, relying on Union transfers.
    • Uttar Pradesh: 42% internally, despite reporting a ₹37,000 crore surplus.
  • Sources of Volatile Revenue:
    • Kerala: Lottery industry – ₹12,000 crore.
    • Odisha: 90% of non-tax revenue from mining royalties.
    • Telangana: Land sales – ₹9,800 crore.
  • Issue: Overreliance on volatile and one-time revenue sources masks true fiscal stability.

Borrowing & Debt Patterns

  • Borrowing Trends (201617 → 2022–23):
    • Rajasthan: ₹43,889 crore → ₹1,60,565 crore (debt ~40% GSDP).
    • Tamil Nadu: ₹66,143 crore → ₹1,01,062 crore (~33% GSDP).
    • Telangana: ₹44,819 crore → ₹1,26,884 crore (~28% GSDP).
    • Uttar Pradesh: ₹67,685 crore → ₹66,847 crore (~31% GSDP, slightly reduced).
    • Tripura & Uttarakhand: Borrowings low but debt >30% GSDP.
  • Pandemic Spike: Borrowings increased universally during COVID; post-pandemic strategies diverged:
    • Increase: Andhra Pradesh, Rajasthan, Telangana.
    • Reduce/Cut: Karnataka, Kerala, Maharashtra.
    • Maintain/Moderate: Odisha, UP, Tripura.

 

The Welfare Paradox

  • Surplus ≠ Development:
    • Many States with reported surpluses rely heavily on central transfers, off-budget loans, and delayed GST compensation.
    • Surpluses may be accounting gains, not necessarily developmental gains.
  • Deferred Costs & Fiscal Stress:
    • UP & Andhra Pradesh: Free power and farm waivers financed via special purpose vehicles and guarantees.
    • Punjab: Chronic debt issues.
    • Kerala: Dependency on volatile lottery revenues.
  • Fiscal Illusion: Corporate tax cuts, GST cesses, and rebranded social spending mask the true burden on State finances.

Policy & Governance Implications

  • Need for Fiscal Prudence:
    • Prioritise capital expenditure for growth while keeping routine costs in check.
  • Adaptive Revenue Planning:
    • Reduce dependence on volatile sources like land sales, lotteries, and mining royalties.
  • Welfare-State Management:
    • Balance social spending with fiscal sustainability; ensure direct developmental outcomes rather than politically symbolic transfers.
  • Vertical Fiscal Imbalance:
    • Poorer States reliant on Union transfers; rich States maintain autonomy.
    • Calls for reform in GST compensation mechanisms and intergovernmental fiscal transfers.

September 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
Categories