Why in News
- Youth-led ‘Gen Z protests’ have erupted in Morocco and Madagascar, following earlier similar movements in Indonesia, Nepal, and the Philippines.
- These are social media–driven mass agitations centered around inequality, poor governance, and quality-of-life issues, reflecting a global pattern of youth disillusionment in developing economies.
Relevance
- GS 2: Governance, accountability, political participation, comparative politics.
- GS 1 (Society): Youth aspirations, social change, inequality.
Basic Context
- Gen Z refers to the generation born between mid-1990s and early 2010s, now in their 20s or early 30s.
- They are digitally connected, socially conscious, and politically assertive, often using online platforms like Discord, TikTok, and Facebook for mobilisation.
- These protests represent a new form of political participation, less reliant on formal organisations and more driven by networked activism.
Triggers and Contexts
1. Morocco
- Trigger: Death of a young woman during childbirth in a public hospital (Agadir, Sept 2024).
- Symbolism: Protesters contrasted poor healthcare with billions spent on FIFA World Cup 2030 infrastructure.
- Slogan: “Stadiums are here, but where are the hospitals?”
- Organisers: Collective called Gen Z 212 (country code for Morocco) using Discord for coordination.
- Socioeconomic context:
- Unemployment (15–24 yrs): 36%
- Per capita GDP (2024): USD 3,993 (global avg: > USD 13,000)
- >50% population under 35; frustration with inequality and elite privilege.
- Political backdrop: Constitutional monarchy; visible inequality between ruling elite and youth masses.
2. Madagascar
- Trigger: Government repression of youth protests (Sept 2024) leading to 20+ deaths.
- Escalation: Youth-led movement (Gen Z Madagascar) evolved into a wider anti-establishment uprising, leading to President Andry Rajoelina’s resignation.
- Organisation: Initially youth movements on Facebook & TikTok, later supported by civil society groups.
- Economic distress:
- Per capita income declined 45% since independence (1960–2020).
- Widespread poverty and public anger at elite capture of resources.
Common Threads Across Gen Z Movements
- Digital mobilisation: Social media as the main tool for organisation and message amplification.
- Economic frustration: Youth unemployment, inequality, and declining purchasing power.
- Perceived elite capture: Anger against “nepo kids” (nepotism, privilege, and dynastic elites) — seen in Nepal, the Philippines, and Indonesia.
- Quality-of-life concerns: Health, education, job security, and state accountability.
- Erosion of trust: Young citizens view traditional political structures as unresponsive and corrupt.
- Short-lived intensity: Movements gain traction rapidly but often fizzle out due to lack of long-term coalition building.
Structural Causes
- Economic:
- Shrinking industrial jobs due to automation and globalisation.
- Middle-income trap in developing economies.
- Inflation and cost-of-living crisis post-pandemic.
- Social:
- Rising educational aspirations unmet by job opportunities.
- Social media exposure magnifies global comparisons and resentment.
- Political:
- Weak democratic accountability; dominance of entrenched elites.
- Repressive state responses erode legitimacy further.
Global Dimensions
- Similar Gen Z uprisings seen in:
- Indonesia (2020–21): Labour law reforms.
- Nepal (2023): Corruption and nepotism.
- Philippines: Inequality and political dynasty protests.
- Reflects a transnational generational shift in political participation, often leaderless but connected online.
Scholarly Insight
- As per Dr. Janjira Sombatpoonsiri (German Institute for Global & Area Studies):
- These movements stem from a “crisis of expectations” — youth promised prosperity through education but facing structural stagnation.
- Social media enables rapid mobilisation but weak organisational endurance, limiting tangible outcomes.
Implications
- Governance Challenge: States must address youth aspirations through inclusive growth and service delivery.
- Political Reforms: Need for democratic responsiveness and youth engagement.
- Security Dimension: Online radicalisation or unrest risk if grievances persist.
- Developmental Focus: Investment in education-to-employment linkages, digital literacy, and job creation.