Call Us Now

+91 9606900005 / 04

For Enquiry

legacyiasacademy@gmail.com

Aravalli Hills Despite Forest Survey Warning

Why is it in News?  

  • Supreme Court (20 Nov 2024) accepted a Union Environment Ministry panel’s recommendation to define Aravalli Hills as only those landforms with 100 m or more elevation + local relief.
  • This new definition excludes over 90% of Aravalli landforms, allowing potential mining and construction.
  • Forest Survey of India (FSI) internal analysis had warned the government that such a definition would be ecologically disastrous — this “red flag” was ignored.
  • New data show only 1,048 of 12,081 Aravalli hills in Rajasthan (8.7%) are ≥100 m, meaning 91.3% lose protection.

 Relevance

GS1 – Geography

  • Geomorphology of ancient fold mountains.
  • Desertification & land degradation.

GS2 – Governance

  • Environmental decision-making.
  • Regulatory bodies (MoEFCC, SC committees).

GS3 – Environment & Conservation

  • Air pollution (PM2.5, PM10).
  • Wildlife corridors.
  • Forest governance & definitions (critical).
  • Mining regulation and ecological risk.

Aravali Range

  • One of the oldest fold mountains (Precambrian).
  • Length: ~700 km (Gujarat–Rajasthan–Haryana–Delhi).
  • Natural barrier to dust storms from Thar Desert into NCR.
  • Key wildlife corridors (Sariska–Ranthambore, Kumbhalgarh, etc.)
  • Major groundwater recharge zone for semi-arid regions of Haryana & Rajasthan.

The “100m cut-off”

  • Hills counted as Aravalli only if:
    • Height ≥100 metres, AND
    • Local relief ≥100 metres, AND
    • Considered with slopes + adjacent land

Implication: Anything <100 m elevation = not Aravalli, even if geomorphologically part of the range.

FSI’s red flag  

  • FSI analysis (reviewed by Indian Express):
    • Only 1,048 of 12,081 hills in 15 Rajasthan districts exceed 100 m.
    • Thus >90% Aravalli hills lose protection under the new definition.
  • FSI emphasized importance of lower hills:
    • Block coarse dust and slow down easterly dust flow into NCR.
    • Act as buffers against desertification.
    • Maintain ecological connectivity.
  • The ministry ignored these warnings in submissions to SC.

Why this matters for NCR Pollution ?

  • Upper Aravallis obstruct fine pollutants (PM2.5).
  • Lower Aravallis obstruct heavier dust particles.
  • Together they create a barrier protecting Delhi from dust inflow.
  • Removing protection accelerates:
    • Dust-laden winds into NCR
    • Temperature rise and heat-island effects
    • Loss of wildlife corridors
    • Groundwater depletion

What was the earlier yardstick(FSI – 2010 onwards)

FSI used a 3-degree slope method to identify Aravallis.

  • A 2024 technical committee revised this:
    • Slope ≥4.57°
    • Height ≥30 m
  • This older method covered ~40% of Aravallis, far more than the new definition.

Govt’s Submission

  • The ministry submitted:
    • Only hills ≥100 m count as Aravalli.
    • Confused height with slope, creating a subjective & improper definition.
    • Ignored FSI’s scientific warnings.

SC nevertheless accepted the panel’s recommendations.

Environmental Impacts

  • Mining intensification (legal + illegal).
  • Real estate expansion, especially in Gurgaon–Faridabad–Aravali belt.
  • Accelerated desertification of NCR and Haryana.
  • Decline in groundwater aquifers (Aravallis as recharge zones).
  • Collapse of wildlife corridors (leopards, hyenas, ungulates).
  • Increased PM10/PM2.5 loads in NCR.

November 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
Categories