Admission Open for Regular  Online and Ofline Batches – Enroll Now & Save ₹25,000 – Limited Seats

Book Free Demo Class

The Hindu UPSC News Analysis For 18 May 2026

The Hindu – UPSC News Analysis | May 18, 2026 | Legacy IAS
UPSC Mains & Prelims · Daily Analysis

The Hindu
UPSC News Analysis

Structured insights for Civil Services aspirants — GS I · II · III · IV · Essay

📰 Monday, May 18, 2026 — Bengaluru City Edition
📌 8 Articles Analysed 🎯 GS-I · II · III · IV ❓ MCQs Included 📝 Model Mains Questions
Prepared by Legacy IAS · UPSC Civil Services Coaching, Bengaluru
For educational use only. Value-added analysis of publicly reported news.
GS-II · Polity · Judiciary · Constitutional Law

SC Judges Ordinance — Strength Raised from 33 to 37 Under Article 123; Pendency Crisis

President promulgates ordinance; 93,000 case backlog; SC (Number of Judges) Act 1956 amended; total sanctioned strength 34→38 incl. CJI

🔹 A. Issue in Brief
  • President Droupadi Murmu promulgated the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Ordinance, 2026 under Article 123 of the Constitution, increasing the number of SC judges (excluding CJI) from 33 to 37. Total sanctioned strength (including CJI) rises from 34 to 38.
  • The SC currently has a backlog of over 93,000 cases — the pendency crisis has worsened since COVID-19 when e-filing of cases surged. The move aims to partially address this systemic crisis.
  • The ordinance amends Section 2 of the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Act, 1956, which was last amended in 2019 (raising strength from 30 to 33). The ordinance will be placed before Parliament when it convenes — it lapses if Parliament doesn’t act within 6 weeks of reassembly.
🔹 B. Static Background
  • Article 123 — Ordinance-making power of the President: President can promulgate ordinances when Parliament is not in session AND President is satisfied circumstances exist requiring immediate action. Ordinances have the same force as Acts of Parliament. They lapse if: (a) Parliament disapproves by resolution; (b) 6 weeks expire after reassembly without Parliamentary action; or (c) President withdraws them. Key limitation: Cannot circumvent Parliament’s authority — must be placed before both Houses when Parliament convenes.
  • Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Act, 1956: Originally prescribed 7 judges (excluding CJI) + CJI = 8. Progressively increased: 1960 (10+1), 1977 (17+1), 1986 (25+1), 2009 (30+1), 2019 (33+1). The 2026 ordinance raises it to 37+1 = 38.
  • Article 124(1): Establishes the Supreme Court; “consisting of a Chief Justice of India and, until Parliament by law prescribes a larger number, of not more than seven other judges.” The number of judges (beyond CJI) must be prescribed by Parliament by law — the ordinance provides this until Parliament acts.
  • Pendency crisis: India’s judicial pendency: ~93,000 cases in SC; ~60 lakh in High Courts; ~4.3 crore in district/subordinate courts. SC has 34 sanctioned strength but frequently operates with 2-3 vacancies; only 28 judges at present due to 2 vacancies + upcoming retirements.
  • Collegium system: SC judges appointed by President on recommendation of the Supreme Court Collegium (CJI + 4 senior-most judges); the system has been criticised for opacity and delays in filling vacancies.
  • Framers’ limitation on SC judge strength: The original framers of the Constitution believed the CJI + 7 judges was the “primary” composition — Parliament could increase it by law. The progressive increases reflect growing constitutional and commercial litigation load, PILs, and writ jurisdiction.
🔹 C. SC Judge Strength — Historical Progression
YearSC Judges (excl. CJI)Total (incl. CJI)Legislative Instrument
1950 (Original)78Article 124(1) + SC Judges Act 1956
19601011SC (Number of Judges) Amendment Act 1960
19771718Amendment Act 1977
19862526Amendment Act 1986
20093031Amendment Act 2009
20193334Amendment Act 2019
2026 (Ordinance)3738Presidential Ordinance under Article 123
🔹 D. Critical Analysis
Ordinance route — bypassing Parliament: Using an ordinance to increase SC strength (rather than a Bill in Parliament) is legally valid under Article 123. However, it raises a normative concern — the composition of the highest court should ideally be determined through full parliamentary debate. The “immediate circumstances” justification is weak as the pendency crisis has been known for years. The ordinance route suggests political urgency (possibly to appoint specific judges before upcoming retirements).
More judges ≠ faster justice automatically: Adding 4 judges increases strength by ~12% — but pendency (93,000 cases) reflects structural issues: inadequate physical infrastructure (courtrooms, chambers), insufficient support staff, adjournment culture, and a case filing rate that exceeds disposal rate. Mere numerical increase cannot address these without systemic reforms to court administration.
Judicial appointment backlog — the real bottleneck: The SC currently has 2 vacancies (Justice Gavai retired November 2025, Justice Bindal April 2026), with 3 more retirements in 2026. Even at 37 sanctioned strength, the Collegium recommendation → President appointment process is slow. The Law Commission and various expert bodies have recommended setting a timeline for judicial appointments to prevent prolonged vacancies.
Long-term reform needs: The All India Judicial Services (AIJS) proposal — a common national recruitment for district judges — remains unimplemented. The Law Commission 230th Report (2009) recommended increasing SC’s judge strength and reorganisation into a Constitutional Court + Cassation Benches to reduce SC’s workload. These structural reforms are more important than numerical increases.
🔹 E. Way Forward
  • National Court Management Systems (NCMS): Implement NCMS across all courts — standardised data collection on pendency, litigant tracking, case management; enables evidence-based judicial administration.
  • SC reorganisation (Law Commission Report 230): Divide SC into a 5-judge Constitutional Court (for fundamental rights and constitutional questions) and Cassation Benches (for regular appeals in 4 regional locations) — reduces SC’s workload structurally.
  • ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution): Expand Lok Adalats, Mediation Centres, Online Dispute Resolution — divert commercial and civil disputes from courts; Mediation Act 2023 provides the framework.
  • Link with Article 39A (equal justice and free legal aid), SDG 16 (access to justice — effective, accountable, inclusive institutions).
🔹 F. Exam Orientation
📌 Prelims Pointers
  • Article 123: President’s ordinance-making power when Parliament is not in session; ordinance has same force as Act of Parliament; must be placed before both Houses within 6 weeks of reassembly; lapses if both Houses disapprove or 6 weeks pass without action or President withdraws.
  • Article 124(1): Establishes SC — CJI + not more than 7 other judges “until Parliament prescribes a larger number”; Parliament can increase by law.
  • SC (Number of Judges) Act, 1956: Currently amended to 37 (excluding CJI) = 38 total; last parliamentary amendment was 2019 (30→33 excluding CJI).
  • SC pendency: ~93,000 cases; COVID-19 accelerated e-filing → increased filing rate without proportionate judge increase.
  • Collegium system: CJI + 4 senior-most judges recommend SC appointments; no constitutional provision — evolved through SC judgments (SP Gupta 1981, SCAORA 1993, Third Judges Case 1998).
  • Law Commission 230th Report (2009): Recommended SC reorganisation into Constitutional Court + Cassation Benches; also recommended increasing judge strength.
📝 Model Mains Question (GS-II · 15 Marks)

“The promulgation of an ordinance to increase Supreme Court judge strength to 37 is a necessary but insufficient response to India’s judicial pendency crisis. Critically examine the limitations of this measure and suggest structural reforms for judicial administration.”

Hint: Article 123 ordinance power, Article 124(1), SC (Number of Judges) Act 1956 history, pendency crisis (93,000 SC cases, 4.3 cr subordinate courts), more judges vs. structural reform (NCMS, ADR, Mediation Act 2023, Law Commission 230 reorganisation), AIJS, Collegium system delays, Article 39A, SDG 16. ~250 words.
🎯 Probable UPSC Prelims MCQ
Q. Consider the following about Presidential Ordinances under Article 123 of the Indian Constitution:
1. The President can promulgate an ordinance only when both Houses of Parliament are not in session.
2. An ordinance has the same force and effect as an Act of Parliament.
3. An ordinance automatically lapses after six weeks from the date of reassembly of Parliament, unless Parliament passes a resolution approving it.
4. The President can withdraw an ordinance at any time after its promulgation.
Which of the above are correct?
  • (a) 1, 2 and 4 only
  • (b) 2, 3 and 4 only ✓
  • (c) 1, 2, 3 and 4
  • (d) 1 and 4 only
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect — the President can promulgate an ordinance when Parliament is not in session, which includes any recess, not necessarily when BOTH Houses are not in session — even one House being in recess while the other is prorogued suffices. More precisely, it must be when Parliament “is not in session.” Statement 3 is also nuanced — an ordinance lapses after 6 weeks if NOT approved (not if approved); it can also lapse if both Houses pass resolutions disapproving it. Statements 2 (same force as Act), 3 (6-week lapse), and 4 (President can withdraw) are correct. Answer: (b).
GS-III · Health · International Organisations

Ebola Outbreak Congo — WHO Declares PHEIC; Bundibugyo Strain; No Approved Therapeutics

300+ suspected cases, 88 deaths; Kinshasa case suggests wider spread; PHEIC criteria; no vaccines/therapeutics for Bundibugyo

🔹 A. Issue in Brief
  • The WHO declared the Ebola outbreak in Congo’s eastern Ituri province (also spreading to Uganda) a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) — after 300+ suspected cases and 88 deaths. A lab-confirmed case in Kinshasa (Congo’s capital, ~1,000 km from epicentre) suggests possible wider spread.
  • The outbreak is caused by the Bundibugyo virus — a rare variant of Ebola with no approved therapeutics or vaccines, unlike the more common Zaire strain (for which vaccines like Ervebo exist). This makes containment significantly more challenging.
  • WHO declared PHEIC (the highest international health alert) while stating the outbreak does not meet “pandemic emergency” criteria like COVID-19; advised no closure of international borders.
🔹 B. Static Background
  • PHEIC (Public Health Emergency of International Concern): Highest alert level under the International Health Regulations (IHR) 2005; declared by WHO Director-General on recommendation of an Emergency Committee; requires: (a) the event is serious and unusual/unexpected; (b) it has risk of international spread; (c) it may require coordinated international response. PHEICs declared: SARS 2002-03 (retrospectively), H1N1 2009, Polio 2014, Ebola West Africa 2014-16, Zika 2016, Ebola DRC 2019, COVID-19 2020, Mpox 2022, Mpox 2024.
  • Ebola Virus Disease (EVD): Caused by members of the genus Ebolavirus (filoviruses); 5 species: Zaire, Sudan, Bundibugyo, Taï Forest, Reston; Bundibugyo first discovered in Uganda (2007-08); case fatality rate 25-50%; transmission through contact with bodily fluids of infected humans or animals.
  • International Health Regulations (IHR) 2005: Legally binding international agreement; 196 States Parties (more than WHO member states); creates obligations for countries to detect, assess, notify, and respond to public health events; 24/7 reporting of PHEICs to WHO; WHO can recommend travel/trade measures.
  • Congo’s Ebola history: DRC has had 17 previous Ebola outbreaks — most Zaire strain. The largest was the 2018-2020 outbreak (North Kivu/Ituri), with 3,481 cases and 2,299 deaths; first to use RVSV-ZEBOV vaccine (Ervebo). Bundibugyo outbreaks: 2007 Uganda (149 cases, 37 deaths) and 2012 DRC (57 cases, 29 deaths).
🔹 C. PHEIC Criteria — Bundibugyo 2026
PHEIC CriterionStatus in Bundibugyo 2026
Serious and unusual/unexpected event✅ Yes — rare Bundibugyo strain; no approved vaccines/therapeutics; 88 deaths in 300+ cases
Risk of international spread✅ Yes — case in Kinshasa (1,000 km from epicentre); Uganda (neighbouring country) also affected
Requires coordinated international response✅ Yes — no approved countermeasures require R&D coordination; cross-border response
Meets “pandemic emergency” criteria (like COVID)❌ No — limited geographic spread; no efficient human-to-human respiratory transmission
Border closure recommended❌ No — WHO advised against closing international borders
🔹 D. Critical Analysis
Bundibugyo strain — the countermeasure gap: The 2018-2020 DRC Ebola outbreak (Zaire strain) was eventually controlled partly through ring vaccination with Ervebo (rVSV-ZEBOV-GP vaccine). For the Bundibugyo strain, there is no approved vaccine or therapeutic — meaning this outbreak must be controlled through contact tracing, isolation, supportive care, and infection prevention alone. This is a significant disadvantage and underscores the need for platform-based vaccine technologies (like mRNA) that can rapidly adapt to new strains.
Kinshasa case — urban Ebola risk: Previous Ebola outbreaks have been contained in relatively remote areas. A confirmed case in Kinshasa (population ~17 million, DRC’s capital with major international airport) represents the most concerning development — urban Ebola has historically been harder to contain due to higher mobility, larger contact networks, and overwhelmed health infrastructure. This is why WHO declared PHEIC despite the overall case count (300+) being much lower than typical PHEIC thresholds.
India’s preparedness: India’s International Health Regulations capacity (assessed under IHR Monitoring and Evaluation Framework) has improved since COVID-19 — ICMR has established BSL-4 (Biosafety Level 4) laboratories, and the National Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) maintains surveillance networks. However, the Bundibugyo strain’s novelty (no approved diagnostics/therapeutics) means India needs to ensure its ports of entry are conducting enhanced surveillance of travellers from Congo/Uganda.
🔹 E. Way Forward & Prelims Pointers
📌 Prelims Pointers
  • PHEIC: Public Health Emergency of International Concern; declared under IHR 2005; highest WHO health alert; requires coordinated international response; border closure NOT automatic.
  • IHR 2005: International Health Regulations; legally binding on 196 States Parties; 24/7 notification obligation; WHO can recommend travel/trade measures but not mandatory.
  • Ebola Bundibugyo: Rare Ebolavirus species; first identified Uganda 2007; no approved vaccines/therapeutics (unlike Zaire strain — Ervebo vaccine approved); case fatality rate ~25%.
  • Previous PHEICs: H1N1 influenza (2009), Polio (2014), Ebola West Africa (2014-16), Zika (2016), Ebola DRC (2019-20), COVID-19 (2020-23), Mpox (2022, 2024), Ebola Bundibugyo DRC-Uganda (2026).
  • Ebola transmission: Bodily fluids (blood, vomit, semen, sweat) of infected individuals or animals; NOT airborne transmission; no risk from casual contact; high risk for healthcare workers without PPE.
  • NCDC: National Centre for Disease Control; under Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; central institute for disease surveillance and outbreak investigation in India.
📝 Model Mains Question (GS-III · 10 Marks)

“The WHO declaration of the Ebola Bundibugyo outbreak as a PHEIC highlights the persistent gaps in global health security architecture. Examine the significance of the PHEIC mechanism under IHR 2005 and the specific challenges posed by this outbreak.”

Hint: IHR 2005 (PHEIC criteria, 196 States Parties, border closure NOT mandatory), Bundibugyo strain (no vaccines/therapeutics vs. Zaire strain Ervebo), Kinshasa urban risk, DRC Ebola history (17 outbreaks), India’s preparedness (BSL-4 labs, NCDC, IHR capacity), platform vaccines (mRNA for rapid adaptation), SDG 3.3 (epidemic diseases). ~150 words.
🎯 Probable UPSC Prelims MCQ
Q. With reference to the Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) under the International Health Regulations (IHR) 2005, which of the following are correct?
1. PHEIC is declared by the WHO Director-General.
2. Declaration of a PHEIC automatically requires all member states to close their international borders.
3. IHR 2005 is legally binding on all WHO member states.
4. The Ebola outbreak in West Africa in 2014-16 was declared a PHEIC.
  • (a) 1 and 4 only
  • (b) 1, 3 and 4 only
  • (c) 1, 3 and 4 only ✓
  • (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4
Explanation: Statement 2 is incorrect — PHEIC declaration does NOT automatically require border closure; WHO specifically advises against unnecessary travel and trade restrictions (and in this Bundibugyo 2026 case explicitly advised against border closure). IHR 2005 is binding on 196 States Parties (note: this includes non-WHO members too — more than WHO’s 194 member states). Statements 1 (DG declares), 3 (legally binding), and 4 (Ebola W. Africa 2014-16 was PHEIC) are correct. Answer: (c).
GS-II · Governance · Administrative Processes

Census 2027 — Houselisting Exercise, Phase I Delays & Data Collection Challenges

Karnataka deadline extended to May 22; 51.86 lakh census houses in GBA; locked houses & resident unavailability challenges

🔹 A. Issue in Brief
  • The houselisting and house census exercise under Phase I of the National Census 2027 (originally scheduled to conclude May 15) has been extended to May 22 across Karnataka. The exercise covers 51.86 lakh census houses within the Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA) limits.
  • As of May 15 (original deadline), only 47.61 lakh dwellings had been covered — leaving ~4.25 lakh houses uncovered. Challenges: locked houses, residents unavailable during survey, enumerators simultaneously handling other official duties, data entry delays on the census portal.
  • The houselisting exercise records only housing conditions, basic amenities, and household-related details — not population data. It is the preparatory phase for the full population enumeration (which comes later in Census 2027).
🔹 B. Static Background
  • Census of India: Conducted decennially (every 10 years) under the Census Act, 1948; last census was 2011 (postponed twice — originally due 2021); 2027 census will use digital enumeration on tablets for the first time at full scale.
  • Two-phase structure of Census: (1) Houselisting and Housing Census (Phase I) — records details of physical houses, facilities (drinking water, sanitation, electricity), and assets; does NOT count people; (2) Population Enumeration (Phase II) — counts individuals, records age, gender, literacy, economic activity, religion, mother tongue.
  • NPR (National Population Register): Created alongside Census — mandatory under Citizenship Act, 1955 and Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rules, 2003; collects demographic and biometric data of all “usual residents”; linked to AADHAR; controversial since 2020 due to NRC fears.
  • Office of the Registrar General of India (RGI): Under Ministry of Home Affairs; conducts the Census; also maintains Vital Statistics, sample registration system, and NPR.
  • Houselisting significance: Provides data for planning — housing shortage estimates, basic amenities coverage, rural-urban infrastructure assessment; used for PMAY (Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana) planning, Jal Jeevan Mission coverage, Swachh Bharat Mission toilet coverage etc.
🔹 D. Critical Analysis
Decade-long data gap — policy consequences: The last Census was 2011 — this means India has been making crucial policy decisions (PMAY allocations, SC/ST reservation estimates, constituency delimitation, welfare scheme targeting) based on 15-year-old data. The COVID-19 postponement (from 2021) created a dangerous data vacuum — poverty estimates, migration data, urbanisation rates, and religious demography are all outdated, undermining evidence-based policymaking.
Digital census — a first: The 2027 Census will be the first to use mobile app-based digital enumeration at full national scale. The Centralized Data Collection App (developed by RGI/NIC) allows real-time data entry and validation — reducing the manual data processing delays that plagued previous censuses. However, the houselisting deadline extension reveals that even the preparatory phase faces operational challenges with enumerators juggling multiple duties.
NPR-NRC controversy impact: The association of Census/NPR exercises with the NRC (National Register of Citizens) controversy — particularly given the West Bengal SIR experience — has made some communities wary of data collection exercises. This may contribute to residents being “unavailable” when enumerators visit, complicating the houselisting process in certain areas.
🔹 F. Exam Orientation
📌 Prelims Pointers
  • Census Act, 1948: Mandates decennial census; conducted by Office of the Registrar General of India (RGI) under Ministry of Home Affairs; last census 2011; 2021 census postponed (COVID), now scheduled for 2027.
  • Two phases: (1) Houselisting and Housing Census — records housing data, amenities, assets; (2) Population Enumeration — counts individuals, collects demographic data.
  • NPR (National Population Register): Usual residents register under Citizenship Act 1955; biometric data; created alongside Census; controversial since 2020.
  • RGI (Registrar General of India): Under MHA; conducts Census, SRS (Sample Registration System), maintains NPR; head is the Census Commissioner of India.
  • Delimitation Commission: Redraws Lok Sabha and State Assembly constituencies using Census data; cannot be held without current Census data — another reason 2021 Census postponement has cascading policy impacts.
📝 Model Mains Question (GS-II · 10 Marks)

“India’s decade-long delay in conducting a fresh census has created a significant data deficit that affects evidence-based policymaking across multiple domains. Examine the significance of the Census for governance and the consequences of the 2021 postponement.”

Hint: Census Act 1948, RGI, two phases, uses of census data (PMAY, Jal Jeevan, delimitation, welfare targeting, SC/ST data), 15-year data gap impacts, digital census (2027 mobile app), NPR controversy, policy implications (outdated poverty/migration data). ~150 words.
🎯 Probable UPSC Prelims MCQ
Q. Consider the following about the Census of India:
1. Census is conducted under the Census Act, 1948 by the Office of the Registrar General of India under the Ministry of Home Affairs.
2. The houselisting and housing census (Phase I) records population counts of individuals.
3. The National Population Register (NPR) is created alongside the Population Enumeration phase of the Census.
4. India’s last successfully completed national census was conducted in 2011.
Which of the above are correct?
  • (a) 1 and 4 only
  • (b) 1 and 4 only ✓
  • (c) 1, 3 and 4 only
  • (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4
Explanation: Statement 2 is incorrect — Phase I (Houselisting and Housing Census) records data about HOUSES (amenities, conditions, assets) — NOT population counts; population counts are done in Phase II. Statement 3 is incorrect — NPR is updated alongside the Houselisting phase, not the Population Enumeration phase. Statements 1 and 4 are correct. Answer: (a) 1 and 4 only.
GS-II · International Relations · GS-I · Geography · Arctic

India-Norway/Nordic Summit — Arctic Geopolitics, Energy Partnerships & India’s Northward Turn

3rd Nordic-India Summit Oslo; 43-year gap since bilateral visit; Arctic Council observer since 2013; Himadri, IndARC; LNG, green energy

🔹 A. Issue in Brief
  • PM Modi visited Oslo on May 18-19 for the 3rd Nordic-India Summit — the first bilateral visit by an Indian PM to Norway in 43 years. The five Nordic countries (Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Iceland) are increasingly important strategic partners for India in energy, technology, critical minerals, maritime security, and Arctic engagement.
  • Trade, energy (Norway’s LNG — 15-year deal with Equinor; Norwegian pension fund investments in India), conflicts (Ukraine, Iran, Gaza), and Arctic geopolitics were on the agenda. Three government-to-government MoUs (health, digital infrastructure, space) and 18+ business MoUs (energy sector) expected.
  • Former Ambassador Ajai Malhotra’s analysis argues India’s Nordic engagement has fundamentally transformed — from climate/innovation focus to a strategic partnership with Arctic geopolitical depth — driven by Arctic’s emergence as a theatre of competition over shipping routes, energy resources, critical minerals, and infrastructure.
🔹 B. Static Background — India and the Arctic
  • Arctic Council: Intergovernmental forum for Arctic States; 8 members (Canada, Denmark/Greenland, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Russia, Sweden, USA); India is an observer since 2013; observers can participate in meetings but cannot vote. Russia is now the sole non-NATO Arctic Council member (Finland and Sweden joined NATO in 2023-24).
  • India’s Arctic research infrastructure: Himadri station — India’s Arctic research base at Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard (Norway); operated since 2008; studies climate change, geology, atmospheric science. IndARC — India’s moored underwater observatory in Kongsfjorden (Svalbard); deployed 2014; first mooring system by a non-Arctic nation. Gruvebadet atmospheric laboratory — in Ny-Ålesund; studies Arctic haze, greenhouse gases.
  • India’s Arctic Policy (2022): Released March 2022; 6 pillars: Science and Research, Climate and Environmental Protection, Economic and Human Development Cooperation, Transportation and Connectivity, Governance and International Cooperation, National Capacity Building.
  • Northern Sea Route (NSR): Along Russia’s Arctic coast; becoming navigable as Arctic ice melts (warming 3x faster than global average); could reduce shipping time between Europe and Asia by ~40% compared to Suez Canal route; strategic implications for India’s trade and energy connectivity.
  • Chennai-Vladivostok Maritime Corridor: India-Russia maritime route; if extended to Murmansk and onward to Nordic countries, could create a trans-Arctic link — India-Japan-Russia-Northern Europe connectivity.
🔹 C. India-Nordic Strategic Partnership — Key Dimensions
🌍 India-Nordic Partnership 2026 — Key Areas
⚡ Energy
  • Norway LNG — 15-yr Equinor deal
  • Offshore wind co-development
  • Green hydrogen partnerships
  • Norway pension fund investments
🏔️ Arctic Cooperation
  • Arctic Council observer (2013)
  • Himadri station (Svalbard)
  • IndARC observatory
  • Climate-monsoon linkage research
⛏️ Critical Minerals
  • Norway deep-sea mining
  • Sweden rare earths, iron ore
  • Denmark-Greenland minerals
  • Supply chain diversification (vs. China dominance)
🔬 Technology
  • Telecom, semiconductors (Sweden)
  • Batteries and EV tech
  • AI and advanced materials
  • Maritime digitisation (Norway)
🔹 D. Critical Analysis
Arctic climate-India monsoon linkage: The editorial’s most important scientific insight for UPSC — Arctic ice loss in the Barents-Kara Sea has been scientifically linked to variability in India’s summer monsoon. As the Arctic warms (3x global average), altered polar jet stream patterns affect the monsoon circulation. This creates a genuine Indian national interest in Arctic climate monitoring and stabilisation — beyond symbolic scientific presence.
Geopolitical reconfiguration of Arctic Council: Finland and Sweden’s NATO accession (2023-24) means Russia is now the only non-NATO member of the Arctic Council — transforming it from a scientific/environmental forum into one with clear NATO vs. Russia geopolitical undercurrents. India’s “observer” status allows scientific engagement while avoiding taking sides — consistent with its multi-alignment policy, but limiting its influence.
India’s Arctic capacity gaps: Unlike the other 4 Asian Arctic Council observers (China, Japan, South Korea, Singapore), India lacks: (1) a Special Envoy for Arctic Affairs; (2) an Arctic-capable ice-class vessel fleet; (3) a clear commercial Arctic strategy beyond scientific research. These gaps, as the editorial notes, risk India being locked out of early-mover advantages in Arctic shipping and energy logistics.
🔹 F. Exam Orientation
📌 Prelims Pointers
  • Arctic Council: 8 Arctic states (Canada, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Russia, Sweden, USA); India observer since 2013; observers cannot vote; Russia’s sole non-NATO Arctic Council member status after Finland (2023) and Sweden (2024) joined NATO.
  • Himadri: India’s Arctic research station at Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard (Norway); since 2008; climate, geology, atmospheric research.
  • IndARC: India’s first moored underwater observatory; Kongsfjorden, Svalbard; deployed 2014; studies Arctic Ocean processes.
  • India’s Arctic Policy 2022: 6 pillars — Science, Climate, Economic Development, Transportation, Governance, Capacity Building; released March 2022.
  • Northern Sea Route: Arctic shipping route along Russia’s coast; could reduce Europe-Asia transit time by ~40%; increasing viability as Arctic melts; strategic for India-Europe-Japan connectivity.
  • Nordic countries: Norway (LNG/energy, maritime), Sweden (Ericsson telecom, Saab defence, IKEA), Finland (Nokia, defence tech), Denmark (Greenland, Maersk shipping), Iceland (geothermal).
📝 Model Mains Question (GS-II · 15 Marks)

“India’s engagement with the Nordic countries at the Oslo Summit 2026 marks a transition from episodic climate cooperation to sustained strategic partnership. Examine the strategic significance of this relationship with particular reference to the Arctic’s growing geopolitical importance for India.”

Hint: Arctic as new geopolitical frontier (shipping routes, energy, critical minerals, military), India’s Arctic research (Himadri, IndARC, 2013 observer), Arctic Policy 2022 (6 pillars), Arctic-monsoon linkage, NSR commercial potential, Chennai-Vladivostok corridor extension, Finland/Sweden NATO accession, India’s capacity gaps (no Special Envoy, no ice-class fleet), Nordic energy partnerships (LNG, offshore wind, green H2), critical minerals (Sweden rare earths, Greenland), technology (Ericsson, ASML). ~250 words.
🎯 Probable UPSC Prelims MCQ
Q. Consider the following about India’s Arctic engagement:
1. India became an observer to the Arctic Council in 2013.
2. India’s research station Himadri is located in Svalbard, Norway.
3. IndARC is India’s moored underwater observatory deployed in the Arctic Ocean.
4. As an observer to the Arctic Council, India can vote on decisions taken by the Council.
5. India released its Arctic Policy in 2022.
Which of the above are correct?
  • (a) 1, 2 and 3 only
  • (b) 1, 2, 3 and 5 only
  • (c) 1, 2, 3 and 5 only ✓
  • (d) 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5
Explanation: Statement 4 is incorrect — observers to the Arctic Council CANNOT vote on decisions; only the 8 member states have voting rights. Observers can participate in meetings, present scientific papers, and contribute to working groups. Statements 1 (observer 2013), 2 (Himadri in Svalbard), 3 (IndARC = moored underwater observatory), and 5 (Arctic Policy 2022) are all correct. Answer: (c).
GS-I · History · Cultural Heritage · GS-II · IR

Leiden/Anaimangalam Copper Plates — Repatriation, Chola History & India’s Cultural Heritage Recovery

1000-year-old Chola plates returned from Leiden University; Raja Raja Chola I; Buddhist vihara donation; Leiden copper plates; 2 centuries abroad

🔹 A. Issue in Brief
  • The Anaimangalam copper plates — popularly known as the Leiden copper plates — were returned to India by the Netherlands at a ceremony in The Hague on Saturday, in the presence of PM Modi. The plates had been in the possession of Leiden University for almost two centuries.
  • The 21 large + 3 small copper plates are among the most important documents of Chola history — recording Raja Raja Chola I’s (985-1014 CE) gift of land to a Buddhist vihara (Chulamanivarma Vihara) in Nagapattinam, built by a Javanese king in honour of his father. This is the first repatriation of Chola-period copper plates.
  • The repatriation has sparked demands for further recoveries — including the Velvikkudi copper plates (Pandya era) from the British Museum, and the idol of goddess Saraswati from the London Museum (directed by Bhojshala HC verdict).
🔹 B. Historical & Policy Background
  • Raja Raja Chola I (985-1014 CE): Greatest ruler of the Imperial Chola dynasty; known for: Brihadeeswarar Temple (Thanjavur, 1010 CE — UNESCO World Heritage); extensive maritime trade with Southeast Asia; naval campaigns to Maldives, Sri Lanka, Southeast Asia; patronage of arts, literature, and religion including Buddhism.
  • Leiden copper plates significance: 21 large plates (5 Sanskrit + 16 Tamil, written by Rajendra Chola I honouring his father Raja Raja’s oral commitment) + 3 small plates (Tamil, Kulottunga Chola I’s additional grants); strung together by a ring with royal Chola insignia (tiger, two fish of Pandyas, bow of Cheras) — signifying Chola supremacy over defeated rivals; record a unique example of a Shaivite king supporting a Buddhist vihara.
  • India’s cultural property repatriation policy: India has been actively pursuing repatriation of stolen/looted artefacts; notable successes: Nataraja idol from Australia (2014), Chola bronzes from the US, Germany, UK; PM Modi personally handed over 157 artefacts returned by USA in 2023; 1973 Antiquities and Art Treasures Act provides framework for preventing export of antique objects.
  • UNESCO 1970 Convention: Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property; India a signatory; provides legal basis for repatriation claims. UNESCO also has 1954 Hague Convention on protection of cultural property in armed conflict.
🔹 D. Critical Analysis
Diplomatic repatriation vs. legal repatriation: The return of Leiden copper plates was through diplomatic negotiation (bilateral agreement), not legal compulsion. Leiden University voluntarily returned the plates — unlike cases requiring legal proceedings (which are slow and uncertain). PM Modi’s European visits have consistently incorporated cultural repatriation as a diplomatic agenda item — a soft power strategy that leverages bilateral goodwill.
Inventory deficit: India does not have a comprehensive national inventory of cultural property taken abroad during colonial rule and pre-independence period. Without a systematic inventory, India cannot systematically pursue repatriation. Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) and Ministry of Culture maintain partial records, but a comprehensive database (similar to Poland’s “cultural loss” database) is needed.
Historical significance for maritime and Buddhist history: The copper plates document Indian Ocean trade networks in the 11th century — a Javanese king building a Buddhist vihara in Tamil Nadu, funded by the Chola emperor, with emissaries making claims across multiple Chola rulers. This multi-generational, multi-kingdom documentary record is a unique window into Chola-era trade, diplomacy, and religious pluralism.
🔹 F. Exam Orientation
📌 Prelims Pointers
  • Leiden/Anaimangalam copper plates: Chola-era; 21 large + 3 small copper plates; record Raja Raja Chola I’s land grant to Chulamanivarma Buddhist Vihara (built by Javanese king); written by Rajendra Chola I (5 Sanskrit + 16 Tamil plates); in Leiden University for ~2 centuries; returned to India May 2026.
  • Raja Raja Chola I (985-1014 CE): Built Brihadeeswarar Temple (Thanjavur, 1010 CE); naval power; maritime trade with SE Asia; patronised Buddhism despite being Shaivite.
  • Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972: Prohibits export of antiques (objects over 100 years old, or objects declared antiquities); ASI administers; provides legal framework for repatriation claims.
  • UNESCO 1970 Convention: Prohibiting illicit import/export of cultural property; basis for diplomatic repatriation claims.
  • ASI (Archaeological Survey of India): Under Ministry of Culture; maintains 3,693 centrally protected monuments; conducts archaeological surveys; administers Antiquities Act.
  • Chulamanivarma Vihara: Buddhist vihara in Nagapattinam, Tamil Nadu; built by Sri Mara Vijayotunga Varman of Java in honour of father Sri Chudamani Varman; funded by Raja Raja Chola I; tower demolished by Jesuit priests in 1867.
📝 Model Mains Question (GS-I · 10 Marks)

“The repatriation of the Leiden/Anaimangalam copper plates illuminates both a remarkable chapter of Chola imperial history and India’s ongoing diplomatic efforts to recover its cultural heritage. Examine the historical significance of these plates and India’s cultural property repatriation policy.”

Hint: Chola empire overview, Raja Raja Chola I (Brihadeeswarar, maritime power), plates’ content (Buddhist vihara, Javanese king, multi-generational grants), significance (maritime trade documentation, religious pluralism, Chola insignia), diplomatic repatriation (vs. legal), India’s track record (Nataraja, PM Modi 157 artefacts 2023), Antiquities Act 1972, UNESCO 1970 Convention, systematic inventory need. ~150 words.
🎯 Probable UPSC Prelims MCQ
Q. Which of the following correctly describes the Anaimangalam (Leiden) copper plates returned to India in May 2026?
1. They were issued during the reign of Raja Raja Chola I and record his land grant to a Buddhist vihara in Nagapattinam.
2. The plates were written exclusively in Sanskrit with no Tamil inscriptions.
3. The vihara was built by a Javanese king in honour of his father and is called Chulamanivarma Vihara.
4. The plates had been in the possession of Leiden University (Netherlands) for nearly two centuries.
  • (a) 1 and 3 only
  • (b) 1, 3 and 4 only
  • (c) 1, 3 and 4 only ✓
  • (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4
Explanation: Statement 2 is incorrect — the plates were written in BOTH Sanskrit (5 plates) and Tamil (16 plates); they are NOT exclusively in Sanskrit. In fact, Tamil inscriptions dominate. Statements 1 (Raja Raja Chola I’s land grant to Buddhist vihara in Nagapattinam), 3 (Chulamanivarma Vihara, built by Javanese king), and 4 (in Leiden University for ~2 centuries) are correct. Answer: (c).
GS-III · Environment · Urban Ecology · Forest Conservation

Tree Felling Protests Across India — Urban Trees, NGT Orders, Compensatory Afforestation Critique

83,000 trees felled in Uttarakhand (5 years); Chipko echoes; Jaipur 600 trees for mall; Delhi Ridge 673 ha reserved; NGT role

🔹 A. Issue in Brief
  • A wave of citizen protests is erupting across India against mass tree-felling for development projects — road widening in Uttarakhand (4,400 trees for Dehradun-Rishikesh road; 83,000 trees felled in 5 years); a mall/fintech park threatening 600+ trees in a dense urban forest near Jaipur airport; 5,000 trees potentially lost in Maharashtra for Kumbh Mela; and a million trees threatened in Nicobar Island for the ₹92,000-crore transshipment terminal.
  • The protests invoke the spirit of the Chipko Movement (1973, Chamoli, UP/now Uttarakhand) — where residents embraced trees to prevent commercial logging. The NGT (National Green Tribunal) has stayed tree felling in Jaipur (Nashik Kumbh) cases.
  • A key victory: Delhi’s Ridge — 673.32 ha of jungle in the capital — notified as a reserved forest on May 10, 2026, after a three-decade campaign.
🔹 B. Static Background
  • Chipko Movement (1973): Bishnoi tradition + Sundarlal Bahuguna leadership; women of Chamoli (UP/now Uttarakhand) embraced trees to prevent commercial logging by sports goods company Symonds; led to Himachal Pradesh Hill Areas Development Programme and eventual 15-year ban on green felling in Himalayan forests (1980).
  • Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 (FCA): Prohibits diversion of forest land for non-forest purposes without prior approval of Central government; requires compensatory afforestation when forest land is diverted; managed through CAMPA (Compensatory Afforestation Fund Management and Planning Authority).
  • CAMPA (Compensatory Afforestation Fund): States collect funds from project developers when forest land is diverted; used for afforestation elsewhere. National CAMPA has collected ~₹72,000 crore but utilisation has been slow and criticised for planting in different ecological zones than those cleared.
  • National Green Tribunal (NGT): Established under NGT Act 2010; specialised tribunal for environmental disputes; can grant stay orders and impose penalties; has jurisdiction over matters relating to Forest (Conservation) Act, Environment (Protection) Act, Water Act, Air Act etc.
  • Reserved Forest: Under Indian Forest Act, 1927 — the highest degree of protection; all activities inside are prohibited unless specifically permitted; stricter than “Protected Forest” (where only listed activities are banned).
  • Great Nicobar Island Project: ₹92,000 crore megaproject; transshipment port, airport, township; ~1 million trees at risk; coral colony and leatherback turtle nesting habitat impact; tribal rights concerns (Forest Rights Act).
🔹 D. Critical Analysis
Compensatory afforestation — the fundamental flaw: The article captures the critical point made by ecologist Harini Nagendra: “If trees are cut in one area, and compensatory afforestation is conducted in another location, it doesn’t compensate for the loss of ecological services in that area.” A 200-year-old banyan in Dehradun provides cooling, carbon sequestration, biodiversity habitat, and cultural value that saplings planted in a different district cannot replicate for decades — if ever. The CAMPA model perpetuates this logical inconsistency.
Urban heat island amplification: The Jaipur case is emblematic — a forest in the middle of a city that regularly hits 45°C in summer reduces temperatures by several degrees. Destroying it for a mall and fintech park not only removes the ecological service but also creates additional heat from concrete and human activity — a double whammy in an era of climate change and heatwave mortality.
Translocation of trees — failure rate: The Uttarakhand protest highlighted a “graveyard of trees” — failed transplantations near a cricket stadium. Studies globally show tree translocation success rates below 20% for mature trees — the root systems, mycorrhizal networks, and microbiome that make old trees ecologically valuable cannot be transplanted. Government’s use of “we will transplant the trees” as a mitigation measure is scientifically inadequate.
Delhi Ridge victory — a model: The 673.32 ha Delhi Ridge reservation after a three-decade campaign demonstrates that sustained citizen action can achieve results. The Ridge — Aravalli hills remnant in central Delhi — provides cooling, dust filtration, and biodiversity (migratory bird corridor) for 32 million+ Delhi-NCR residents. The “reserved forest” notification (under Indian Forest Act 1927) is the highest protection available for urban green spaces.
🔹 E. Way Forward
  • Tree census and digital mapping: Every urban local body should maintain a georeferenced digital tree inventory — enabling environmental impact assessment that accounts for individual tree values before any development project is approved.
  • Urban Forest Policy: Draft National Urban Forest Policy (2020) has not been notified as a binding policy — it should be made mandatory for all cities above 1 lakh population to maintain minimum green cover percentage.
  • Reform compensatory afforestation: CAMPA rules should require in-situ compensation (afforestation within the same ecological zone and watershed) rather than allowing remote afforestation; age of trees planted should be verified; 10-year survival monitoring mandatory.
  • Link with SDG 15 (Life on Land — halt deforestation, restore degraded ecosystems), SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities — urban green spaces), SDG 13 (Climate Action — trees as carbon sinks and urban cooling).
🔹 F. Exam Orientation
📌 Prelims Pointers
  • Chipko Movement (1973): Chamoli, UP (now Uttarakhand); women embraced trees to prevent commercial logging; Sundarlal Bahuguna; led to green felling ban in Himalayas (1980); inspired “Appiko” movement in Karnataka (1983).
  • Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980: Prior Central government approval required for diversion of forest land; compensatory afforestation required; amended 2023 (Forest Conservation Amendment Act — renamed, expanded scope to non-recorded forest lands).
  • CAMPA: Compensatory Afforestation Fund Management and Planning Authority; ₹72,000 crore+ collected; utilisation slow; funds used for afforestation of degraded lands as compensation for diverted forests.
  • NGT (National Green Tribunal): Established NGT Act 2010; specialized environmental court; Principal Bench in Delhi; regional benches; can stay projects, impose penalties, award compensation; appealed decisions go to Supreme Court.
  • Reserved Forest vs. Protected Forest: Indian Forest Act 1927; Reserved Forest = highest protection (all activities prohibited unless specifically allowed); Protected Forest = activities prohibited if specifically listed.
  • Great Nicobar Island Project: ₹92,000 crore; transshipment port + airport + township; ~1 million trees at risk; leatherback sea turtle habitat; Shompen tribal land; Forest Rights Act concerns.
📝 Model Mains Question (GS-III · 15 Marks)

“The mass felling of trees for development projects across urban and semi-urban India represents a systemic failure of environmental governance. Critically examine the legal framework for tree protection and the adequacy of compensatory afforestation as a mitigation measure.”

Hint: Urban tree ecological value (cooling, carbon, biodiversity, cultural), Chipko Movement legacy, Forest Conservation Act 1980, CAMPA (₹72,000 cr collected, utilisation issues, different location problem), NGT’s role, translocation failure rate, Delhi Ridge victory (reserved forest), Nicobar million-tree risk, Great Nicobar FRA concerns, national urban forest policy need, tree census, SDG 15 and 11. ~250 words.
🎯 Probable UPSC Prelims MCQ
Q. Consider the following about the Chipko Movement and India’s forest conservation framework:
1. The Chipko Movement began in the Chamoli district of what is now Uttarakhand in 1973.
2. The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 requires prior Central government approval for diversion of forest land for non-forest purposes.
3. A “Reserved Forest” under the Indian Forest Act, 1927 provides less protection than a “Protected Forest”.
4. CAMPA funds are used for compensatory afforestation when forest land is diverted for non-forest purposes.
Which of the above are correct?
  • (a) 1 and 2 only
  • (b) 1, 2 and 4 only
  • (c) 1, 2 and 4 only ✓
  • (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4
Explanation: Statement 3 is incorrect — it is REVERSED; Reserved Forests have MORE protection (all activities prohibited unless specifically allowed) than Protected Forests (only specifically listed activities prohibited). Statements 1 (Chipko 1973, Chamoli), 2 (FCA 1980 — prior Central approval required), and 4 (CAMPA funds for compensatory afforestation) are correct. Answer: (c).
GS-II · Polity · Electoral Governance · Essay

SIR, Electoral Rolls & Democracy — “One-Horse Races Are No Triumph for Democracy”

Ashok Lavasa analysis: competition as democracy’s haemoglobin; ECI’s neutrality; 27 lakh West Bengal deletions; Article 326; TINA trap

🔹 A. Issue in Brief
  • Former Election Commissioner Ashok Lavasa argues that competition — not just elections — is the essential prerequisite of democracy. Using the West Bengal SIR experience (27.16 lakh electors deleted; judicial officers “sprinting through a marathon”; non-existent Appellate Tribunals), he indicts the ECI’s neutrality in the electoral process.
  • His core argument: The ECI used faulty software (“logical discrepancy tool”), arbitrary criteria, and flawed methodology in the SIR — resulting in mass deletions that exceeded victory margins in 150+ seats, potentially altering Bengal’s election outcome. The ECI’s slogan “No voter to be left behind” was contradicted by 27 lakh voters effectively disenfranchised.
  • He raises the deeper democratic concern: One Nation One Election, “Opposition-mukt Bharat”, and weakening regional rivals are trends that undermine competitive democracy — and a “one-horse race” produces a tainted mandate even for a deserving winner.
🔹 B. Key Constitutional and Democratic Concepts
  • Article 326: Guarantee of universal adult franchise — every citizen 18+ entitled to vote; SIR-based mass deletions of legitimate voters directly violate this Article’s spirit.
  • Article 324: ECI’s mandate — “superintendence, direction, and control” of elections; Lavasa’s piece directly challenges whether ECI fulfilled this mandate faithfully in the Bengal SIR.
  • Section 53(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951: Provides for “unopposed” winners — allowing a contestant to win without a contest (walkover); Lavasa notes this means competition is not constitutionally essential to an electoral outcome, only “participation” of enough candidates.
  • Robert Dahl’s “plebiscitary autocracy”: Political scientist’s term for systems with high participation but low contestation — like one-party states with high voter turnout; Lavasa uses this to frame the risk of India’s trajectory.
  • Competitive democracy theory: Schumpeter’s competitive elite theory — democracy is a method for choosing leaders through competitive struggle for votes; without genuine competition (level playing field, neutral referee), elections become a legitimacy ritual rather than a true mandate transfer.
🔹 D. Critical Analysis
The “logical discrepancy tool” scandal: The ECI’s SIR software deleted entire sets of “duplicate names” rather than only the excess entries — meaning if two people had similar names, both were deleted rather than the duplicate entry alone. This systemic software error, combined with centralised decision-making in ECI New Delhi (bypassing local Electoral Registration Officers), created mass deletions that were disproportionate to the stated goal of removing “ineligible” voters.
Burden of proof inversion: Standard electoral roll management places the burden on ECI to establish eligibility criteria and verify them before deletion. The SIR inverted this — electors were asked to prove eligibility to remain on rolls, with a very short adjudication window, non-existent Appellate Tribunals, and judicial officers handling impossible caseloads. This violates the principle of innocent until proven guilty in the civic right context.
Assam comparison — the cruel irony: Lavasa’s most powerful point: The NRC in Assam classified 19+ lakh people as “non-citizens” — yet their voting rights remain unaffected. Yet in West Bengal, 27 lakh people who had no such formal declaration of “non-citizenship” had their voting rights suspended through the SIR process. This inconsistency is constitutionally untenable and politically optics-laden.
SC’s role — supervision over adjudication: The SC, in Lavasa’s analysis, chose “managerial supervision over adjudication” — directing deployment of judicial officers and acceptance of more identity documents, while leaving the fundamental legal questions (Section 21(3) of RPA, shifting of burden of proof) unresolved. This failure to adjudicate the constitutional validity of the SIR process perpetuates the uncertainty for future phases.
🔹 E. Way Forward
  • SIR methodology reform: Restore burden of proof to ECI — deletions should require positive proof of ineligibility, not merely a BLO report of “not found”; adequate notice, genuine Appellate Tribunals with real hearing opportunities.
  • Election Commission appointment independence: As the SC has observed (May 15, 2026 hearing) — a selection committee where 2 of 3 members are effectively from the government cannot produce an ECI perceived as truly independent.
  • One Nation One Election critique: ONOE would reduce the number of election cycles but also reduce accountability opportunities — fewer elections mean longer periods between voters’ ability to “fire” incumbents, reducing the accountability mechanism that is the heart of competitive democracy.
  • Link with Preamble (democratic republic), Article 14 (equal treatment of voters), Article 326 (universal adult franchise), SDG 16 (just and inclusive institutions).
🔹 F. Exam Orientation
📌 Prelims Pointers
  • Article 326: Universal adult franchise; every citizen 18+ entitled to vote subject to disqualifications (non-citizen, unsound mind, corrupt practices); SIR-based deletions potentially violate this.
  • Article 324: ECI — superintendence, direction, control of elections; CEC removable by Presidential address (same as SC judge); ECs removable on CEC’s recommendation.
  • Section 53(3), RPA 1951: Provision for “unopposed” winners — candidates declared elected without voting if no other candidates contest.
  • Robert Dahl: Political theorist; developed “polyarchy” concept — competitive democracy with participation AND contestation; “plebiscitary autocracy” = high participation but low contestation.
  • Ashok Lavasa: Former Election Commissioner of India; also former Finance Secretary; wrote a dissent note in 2019 Elections on certain ECI decisions; resigned to join ADB (Asian Development Bank).
  • SIR D-voter parallel: Assam’s D-voter (Doubtful voter) list — created under NRC process; many D-voters’ rights unresolved for years — similar “missing in action” risk for 27 lakh West Bengal SIR deletions.
📝 Model Mains Question (GS-II / Essay · 15 Marks)

“Democracy demands not merely elections but meaningful competition and a neutral referee. Examine how the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in India has raised fundamental concerns about the Election Commission’s independence and the sanctity of universal adult franchise.”

Hint: Competition as democracy’s essence (Schumpeter, Dahl), Article 326 (universal franchise), Article 324 (ECI mandate), SIR methodology flaws (software error, burden of proof inversion, judicial sprint), West Bengal 27 lakh deletions, Assam NRC contrast, non-existent Appellate Tribunals, 2023 EC appointment Act (loss of independence), SC supervision vs. adjudication, ONOE concerns, SDG 16. ~250 words.
🎯 Probable UPSC Prelims MCQ
Q. Which of the following constitutional provisions are directly relevant to ensuring that electoral rolls accurately represent all eligible voters in India?
1. Article 326 — Right to vote based on universal adult franchise
2. Article 324 — Superintendence, direction, and control of elections vested in Election Commission
3. Article 327 — Parliament’s power to make provisions with respect to elections to Legislatures
4. Article 19(1)(a) — Freedom of speech and expression
Select the correct answer:
  • (a) 1 and 2 only
  • (b) 1, 2 and 3 only ✓
  • (c) 2, 3 and 4 only
  • (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4
Explanation: Statement 4 is incorrect — Article 19(1)(a) (freedom of speech and expression) is not directly relevant to electoral roll accuracy; it pertains to expression rights, not voting rights or electoral administration. Articles 326 (franchise — who can vote), 324 (ECI administers elections including rolls), and 327 (Parliament legislates electoral provisions, including Representation of the People Acts that govern electoral rolls) are all directly relevant. Answer: (b).
GS-II · International Relations · GS-III · Sci&Tech · Semiconductors

India-Netherlands Strategic Partnership — TATA-ASML Semiconductor Deal & 17 MoUs

First upgrade to Strategic Partnership; ASML is monopoly supplier of EUV lithography; WAH framework; press freedom/minority rights pushback

🔹 A. Issue in Brief
  • India and the Netherlands upgraded bilateral ties to a Strategic Partnership during PM Modi’s visit — signing 17 agreements/MoUs in areas of water, agriculture, health (WAH framework), renewable energy, critical minerals, and a semiconductor fabrication project between TATA Electronics and Dutch company ASML.
  • The TATA-ASML deal is particularly significant — ASML is the world’s sole manufacturer of Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) lithography machines, which are essential for producing advanced chips (below 7nm). ASML’s EUV machines have been at the centre of the US-China chip war (US pressured Netherlands to deny EUV machine exports to China).
  • Diplomatically, the Dutch PM raised concerns about press freedom and minority rights in India during press interactions — which the Indian Ministry of External Affairs pushed back strongly, denying the claims were raised in bilateral meetings.
🔹 B. Key Concepts
  • ASML (Advanced Semiconductor Materials Lithography): Headquartered in Eindhoven, Netherlands; manufactures photolithography machines — the equipment used to “print” circuit patterns onto semiconductor wafers. ASML holds a virtual monopoly on EUV (Extreme Ultraviolet) lithography — without which no advanced chip below 7nm can be manufactured. Even Intel, TSMC, and Samsung depend entirely on ASML’s EUV machines.
  • India Semiconductor Mission (ISM): ₹76,000 crore incentive scheme; approved under the “India Semiconductors Policy” 2022; provides up to 50% of project cost for semiconductor fabs, display fabs, and compound semiconductors. Tata Electronics is the primary Indian anchor investor — Tata is building a semiconductor fabrication plant (first of its kind in India) in partnership with PSMC (Taiwan-based) in Gujarat.
  • EUV vs. DUV lithography: Older Deep Ultraviolet (DUV) machines (which ASML also makes) can produce chips down to ~5nm; EUV machines are needed for cutting-edge 3nm and below chips. US export controls deny EUV machines to China — ASML cannot sell them without US government approval even though ASML is Dutch.
  • India-Netherlands bilateral: ~700 Dutch companies operate in India; ~150 Indian companies in Netherlands; bilateral trade ~$19 billion; Netherlands is a major European financial hub (shell company registrations); Hindustan Unilever, Shell India are legacies of Indo-Dutch corporate partnerships. India-Netherlands have had issues over the Insiya child abduction case (sub judice).
🔹 D. Critical Analysis
ASML partnership — strategic semiconductor autonomy: ASML’s EUV machines are the choke point of global semiconductor supply chains. Any nation or company that wants to manufacture advanced chips must have access to ASML’s technology. A TATA-ASML collaboration (even if initially for DUV-era chips, not the most advanced EUV chips given India’s fab maturity) is a critical step in India’s semiconductor journey — and signals ASML’s willingness to anchor some operations in India, potentially providing a pathway to eventual EUV technology access.
Netherlands press freedom pushback — diplomatic sensitivity: The Dutch PM’s comments on press freedom and minority rights in India — made during press interactions even if not raised in bilateral meetings — represent the tension between Europe’s values-based foreign policy and India’s sovereignty sensitivity. India’s response (“lack of understanding”) reflects its standard diplomatic posture of rejecting external characterisations of domestic governance. This values tension will be a recurring feature of India-EU/European bilateral relations.
WAH framework — water, agriculture, health: The “WAH” framework reflects the Netherlands’ specific comparative strengths — it is globally leading in water management (70% of the country is below sea level), precision agriculture (world’s second largest food exporter by value after USA), and health systems. India’s water crisis (groundwater depletion, urban flooding, irrigation efficiency) and food security challenges make Dutch expertise strategically valuable.
🔹 F. Exam Orientation
📌 Prelims Pointers
  • ASML: Advanced Semiconductor Materials Lithography; Dutch company (Eindhoven, Netherlands); sole manufacturer of EUV lithography machines essential for advanced semiconductor fabrication; subject of US export controls (cannot sell EUV to China without US government approval).
  • EUV (Extreme Ultraviolet) lithography: Uses light at 13.5 nm wavelength to “print” chip circuits; enables chips below 7nm; only ASML manufactures EUV machines; each machine costs ~$150 million.
  • India Semiconductor Mission: ₹76,000 crore; approved 2022; provides 50% capital subsidy for semiconductor fabs; Tata Electronics (Gujarat, with PSMC), Micron Technology (Gujarat memory chips), ISMC (Intel-Tower, Karnataka) have announced projects.
  • Tata Electronics: Building India’s first-ever semiconductor fabrication plant in Dholera, Gujarat (with PSMC Taiwan); under ISM; expected to produce chips from 28nm down to eventually 16nm.
  • Netherlands-India bilateral: ~700 Dutch firms in India; ~150 Indian firms in Netherlands; ~$19 billion trade; Netherlands is key European financial hub and India’s gateway to EU markets.
  • WAH framework: Water, Agriculture, Health — India-Netherlands specific cooperation pillars leveraging Dutch expertise in water management (polders, dikes), precision agriculture, and health systems.
📝 Model Mains Question (GS-III / GS-II · 10 Marks)

“The India-Netherlands Strategic Partnership and the TATA-ASML semiconductor collaboration are strategically significant beyond their commercial value. Examine this significance in the context of India’s semiconductor policy and the global chip geopolitics.”

Hint: ASML as global EUV monopoly, EUV-DUV distinction, US-China chip war (ASML export controls), India Semiconductor Mission (₹76,000 crore, 50% subsidy), Tata Electronics-PSMC Gujarat fab, ASML partnership as step toward semiconductor autonomy, Netherlands’ Water/Agriculture/Health expertise (WAH), press freedom tension as EU-India values gap indicator. ~150 words.
🎯 Probable UPSC Prelims MCQ
Q. With reference to the global semiconductor supply chain, consider the following:
1. ASML is the sole manufacturer of Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) lithography machines essential for advanced chip production.
2. India’s Semiconductor Mission provides a financial incentive of up to 50% of project cost for semiconductor fabrication units.
3. Tata Electronics is building India’s first semiconductor fabrication plant in partnership with a Taiwanese company in Gujarat.
4. EUV lithography machines can produce chips at 5nm and below, while older DUV machines are limited to 28nm only.
Which of the above are correct?
  • (a) 1 and 2 only
  • (b) 1, 2 and 3 only
  • (c) 1, 2 and 3 only ✓
  • (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4
Explanation: Statement 4 is incorrect — DUV (Deep Ultraviolet) machines can produce chips from 28nm down to ~5nm (not limited to 28nm only); EUV machines enable chips below 5nm (3nm, 2nm). The distinction is that for the most advanced chips (sub-5nm), EUV becomes essential, but DUV can handle a wider range than stated. Statements 1 (ASML EUV monopoly), 2 (ISM 50% subsidy), and 3 (Tata-PSMC Gujarat fab) are correct. Answer: (c).

❓ FAQs for UPSC Revision

An Ordinance under Article 123 of the Constitution is a legislative measure promulgated by the President when Parliament is not in session and the President is satisfied that “circumstances exist which render it necessary to take immediate action.” Ordinances have the same force and effect as Acts of Parliament. Key conditions and limitations: (1) Parliament must not be in session; (2) President must be satisfied of circumstances requiring immediate action; (3) The ordinance must be placed before both Houses when Parliament reassembles; (4) It lapses after 6 weeks of Parliamentary reassembly unless approved, or if both Houses pass resolutions disapproving it; (5) The President can withdraw the ordinance at any time. Why used for SC judges: The Union Cabinet approved the proposal to increase SC strength from 33 to 37 (excluding CJI) about two weeks before the ordinance. Parliament was not in session, and the government used Article 123 to immediately implement the change. Legally valid, but normatively questionable — such a fundamental change to the composition of the country’s highest court ideally warrants full parliamentary debate. Total SC sanctioned strength (including CJI): rises from 34 to 38. The SC currently has a backlog of over 93,000 cases — the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated e-filing, increasing case influx. This is the first increase since 2019 (30→33). Historical progression: 8 (1950) → 11 (1960) → 18 (1977) → 26 (1986) → 31 (2009) → 34 (2019) → 38 (2026 Ordinance).
A PHEIC (Public Health Emergency of International Concern) is the highest health alert level under the International Health Regulations (IHR) 2005 — the legally binding international agreement for global health security with 196 States Parties. The WHO Director-General declares a PHEIC on the recommendation of an Emergency Committee of experts when an event: (1) Is serious and unusual or unexpected; (2) Has risk of international spread; (3) May require a coordinated international response. Crucially, a PHEIC declaration does NOT automatically mandate travel bans or border closures — WHO explicitly advised against these in the 2026 Bundibugyo outbreak. The 2026 Congo-Uganda Bundibugyo Ebola outbreak is unique because: (1) Bundibugyo strain — rare; first identified in Uganda in 2007-08; unlike the most common Zaire strain (which has an approved vaccine — rVSV-ZEBOV/Ervebo — and therapeutic — mAb114), there are NO approved vaccines or therapeutics for the Bundibugyo strain; (2) Kinshasa case — a confirmed case appeared in Congo’s capital Kinshasa (~1,000 km from the epicentre in Ituri province); this is alarming because Kinshasa is a city of 17+ million with a major international airport — urban Ebola is much harder to contain; (3) 300+ suspected cases, 88 deaths at time of declaration — case fatality rate ~29%. PHEIC without “pandemic emergency” criteria: the WHO specified the outbreak does not meet COVID-19-level pandemic criteria because Ebola spreads through bodily fluids (not airborne), limiting its pandemic potential. Previous PHEICs include H1N1 (2009), Polio (2014), Ebola W. Africa (2014-16), Zika (2016), Ebola DRC (2019), COVID-19 (2020-23), Mpox (2022, 2024).
The Arctic is becoming a major geopolitical flashpoint for several reasons that directly affect India: (1) Arctic warming — the Arctic is warming 3 times faster than the global average; ice loss in the Barents-Kara Sea has been scientifically linked to variability in India’s summer monsoon — making Arctic climate stabilisation a direct Indian national interest; (2) Northern Sea Route (NSR) — melting Arctic ice is making the shipping route along Russia’s Arctic coast increasingly navigable; this route could reduce Europe-Asia shipping time by ~40% compared to the Suez Canal, creating massive implications for India-Europe trade; (3) Critical minerals — the Arctic holds vast reserves of rare earth elements, lithium, cobalt, iron ore, and other critical minerals essential for green energy transition; (4) Energy resources — significant oil and gas reserves; Norway is already a major LNG exporter to India; (5) Military competition — Russia-China Arctic partnership, China’s “Polar Silk Road,” US strategic interests, NATO’s Arctic posture. India’s Arctic engagement: (a) Observer in Arctic Council since 2013 (cannot vote, only 8 Arctic states can); (b) Himadri research station at Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard (Norway) — since 2008; climate, geology, atmospheric research; (c) IndARC — moored underwater observatory in Kongsfjorden (Svalbard); deployed 2014; first by any non-Arctic nation; (d) Gruvebadet atmospheric laboratory at Ny-Ålesund; (e) India’s Arctic Policy 2022 — 6 pillars: Science, Climate, Economic Development, Transportation, Governance, Capacity Building. India’s gaps: No Special Envoy for Arctic Affairs; no Arctic-capable ice-class vessel fleet (unlike China, South Korea, Japan); no commercial Arctic strategy. The Oslo 2026 summit should mark India’s transition from scientific engagement to strategic Arctic partnership.
The Anaimangalam (Leiden) copper plates are 21 large + 3 small copper plates from the Chola imperial era — among the most important documentary records of Tamil and Indian history. They record Raja Raja Chola I’s (985-1014 CE) oral commitment to give land to the Chulamanivarma Buddhist Vihara in Nagapattinam (Tamil Nadu) — a vihara built by the king of Java (Sri Mara Vijayotunga Varman) in honour of his father. The plates were formally committed to writing by Rajendra Chola I and later implemented by Kulottunga Chola I. Historical significance: (1) Multi-generational, multi-kingdom documentary record; (2) Evidence of a Shaivite king patronising a Buddhist institution — religious pluralism in 11th century India; (3) Documents Indian Ocean maritime trade networks — Javanese royalty building religious institutions in Tamil Nadu, funded by Chola empire; (4) The Chola royal insignia on the ring (tiger, two fish of Pandyas, bow of Cheras) signals Chola supremacy over defeated rivals. The plates were in Leiden University (Netherlands) for nearly 200 years — returned through diplomatic negotiation at PM Modi’s Netherlands visit on May 17-18, 2026. India’s cultural property repatriation policy: India uses multiple approaches — (a) Diplomatic negotiation (most effective — as in Leiden plates, Nataraja idol from Australia 2014, 157 artefacts from USA 2023); (b) Legal channels under UNESCO 1970 Convention (slow but available); (c) Antiquities and Art Treasures Act 1972 — prohibits export of antiques (objects 100+ years old); domestically, ASI and Ministry of Culture track stolen artefacts. India lacks a comprehensive national inventory of cultural property removed during colonial rule — without this systematic database, pursuing repatriation is ad hoc and reactive.
Compensatory afforestation is the requirement, under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, that when forest land is diverted for non-forest purposes (roads, mines, dams, real estate), the developer must fund plantation of equivalent forest area elsewhere. This is managed through CAMPA (Compensatory Afforestation Fund Management and Planning Authority), which has collected over ₹72,000 crore but whose utilisation has been slow. The fundamental problems with compensatory afforestation as actually practiced in India are: (1) Geographic dislocation — trees are cut in an urban area (e.g., Dehradun’s Parade Ground) and “compensated” by afforestation in a rural area hundreds of kilometres away. The ecological services (cooling, dust filtration, carbon sequestration) are lost from the place where people actually live and need them. A Jaipur city forest cannot be compensated by saplings in a remote Rajasthan district; (2) Age-at-planting vs. age of cleared trees — a 200-year-old banyan tree that is felled is “compensated” by saplings that will take 30-40 years to provide even a fraction of the ecological services; for the next generation living near the felled site, the compensation is irrelevant; (3) Tree translocation failure — governments often claim trees will be “transplanted” rather than felled; research and Indian experience (Uttarakhand’s “graveyard of trees”) show mature tree translocation has below 20% success rate — root systems and mycorrhizal networks of old trees cannot be transplanted; (4) Monoculture vs. biodiversity — compensatory afforestation often uses fast-growing monoculture species (eucalyptus, teak, rubber) that provide less biodiversity value than the native mixed forest they replace; (5) Monitoring gaps — survival of compensatory afforestation plantations is rarely systematically monitored beyond 3-5 years; CAMPA fund utilisation is also poorly tracked. The Chipko Movement’s legacy challenges this model — recognising that trees have intrinsic ecological and cultural value that cannot be offset by planting saplings elsewhere.
ASML (Advanced Semiconductor Materials Lithography, headquartered in Eindhoven, Netherlands) is arguably the most strategically important company in global semiconductor supply chains that most people have never heard of. Here’s why: To manufacture semiconductor chips, manufacturers must “print” circuit patterns onto silicon wafers using light — a process called photolithography. As chips get smaller (enabling more powerful, efficient electronics), the light used must have shorter wavelengths to “print” finer patterns. ASML has developed Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) lithography machines that use light at 13.5 nanometres wavelength (shorter than deep-UV light) to produce chips below 7nm (Apple M-series, Qualcomm Snapdragon, TSMC’s leading-edge chips). Critically, ASML is the ONLY company in the world that can manufacture EUV machines. Not Intel (USA), not Tokyo Electron (Japan), not any Chinese company — only ASML. Every advanced chip manufacturer in the world — TSMC (Taiwan), Samsung (South Korea), Intel (USA), and all others — depends entirely on ASML’s EUV machines. This monopoly makes ASML a geopolitical asset for the Netherlands and for Western semiconductor strategy. US-China chip war: The US pressured the Netherlands government to prevent ASML from selling EUV machines to China (even though ASML is Dutch, many components are US-origin). This denial has severely constrained China’s ability to manufacture advanced chips below 7nm. TATA-ASML deal (India-Netherlands 2026): The collaboration between Tata Electronics (building India’s first semiconductor fab in Gujarat with PSMC of Taiwan under the India Semiconductor Mission/₹76,000 crore scheme) and ASML is strategically significant because: (1) It anchors ASML’s technology partnership in India; (2) As India’s fab capabilities mature, access to progressively more advanced ASML technology (moving toward EUV eventually) becomes feasible; (3) It positions India in the “trusted” supply chain camp for advanced semiconductors — alongside the US, Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, Netherlands; (4) It creates leverage in semiconductor diplomacy — India as a partner rather than merely a market for chips.
Former Election Commissioner Ashok Lavasa makes a profound argument that democracy requires not just elections but genuine competition — with a level playing field and a neutral referee (the Election Commission). He argues that the SIR (Special Intensive Revision) of electoral rolls in West Bengal failed on both counts. On the level playing field: West Bengal saw 27.16 lakh electors deleted after a “lightning exercise” carried out by hastily appointed judicial officers who had an impossible task (disposing hundreds of thousands of cases quickly). The ECI used a “logical discrepancy tool” (software) that deleted entire sets of duplicate names rather than only the excess entry — a systemic error that disproportionately affected marginalised communities. Deleted electors were asked to appeal before “non-existent Appellate Tribunals.” In 150+ constituencies, the victory margin was less than the number of deleted voters — meaning the outcome might have been different without SIR deletions. On the neutral referee: Lavasa questions whether the ECI fulfilled its Article 324 mandate of “superintendence, direction, and control” faithfully. The ECI centralised decision-making in New Delhi rather than empowering local Electoral Registration Officers; conducted booth rationalisation simultaneously with enumeration (obscuring deletion scale); and never released data on how many deleted electors were actually found “ineligible” under Article 326 — the stated purpose of SIR. Lavasa’s broader warning: The combination of (a) ECI’s appointment mechanism (2023 Act making 2 of 3 selection committee members from the government), (b) weakening regional rivals through SIR-aided electoral outcomes, (c) ONOE (reducing accountability elections), and (d) “Opposition-mukt Bharat” rhetoric collectively creates conditions for “plebiscitary autocracy” (Robert Dahl’s term) — high participation but low genuine contestation — which is not true democracy but a legitimacy ritual.
The Census of India is conducted decennially (every 10 years) under the Census Act, 1948 by the Office of the Registrar General of India (RGI) under the Ministry of Home Affairs. India’s last completed Census was in 2011. The 2021 Census was first postponed (due to COVID-19) and has now been rescheduled for 2027 — creating a 16-year data gap. Census 2027 houselisting (Phase I): The houselisting and housing census exercise (begun April 16, 2026 across multiple states) records data about HOUSES — not people. It captures: housing conditions (pucca/kutcha), availability of basic amenities (drinking water source, sanitation/toilet facility, electricity, cooking fuel), assets owned (cars, two-wheelers, mobile phones, internet access), and household-related details. This is preparatory data for the subsequent Population Enumeration (Phase II) which will count individuals and record their demographic data. Karnataka challenge: The exercise covers 51.86 lakh census houses in the Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA) limits; as of the original May 15 deadline, only 47.61 lakh had been covered; deadline extended to May 22; challenges include locked houses, residents unavailable during visit, enumerators juggling multiple duties. 2021 Census postponement policy crisis: India has been making major policy decisions with 15-year-old data: (1) PMAY (Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana) housing shortage estimates; (2) Jal Jeevan Mission water coverage targets; (3) Swachh Bharat Mission toilet coverage; (4) OBC data — the 2011 Census did not count OBC population; (5) Delimitation of Lok Sabha and State Assembly constituencies (requires current Census data); (6) Welfare scheme targeting and beneficiary identification; (7) Migration patterns (massive since COVID-19); (8) SC/ST reservation seat allocation; (9) Religious demography for educational institution seat allocation. Census 2027 innovation: First census to use mobile app-based digital enumeration at full national scale — the Centralised Data Collection app allows real-time data entry and validation, reducing the months-long data processing time of paper-based censuses.

Legacy IAS · UPSC Civil Services Coaching · Bengaluru, Karnataka

© 2026 Legacy IAS. Prepared for educational purposes to aid UPSC Civil Services aspirants.

Content is value-added analysis of publicly reported news. All news credits to The Hindu (May 18, 2026, Bengaluru City Edition).

Book a Free Demo Class

Free Demo Class

Call us at 9606900005
Recent Posts
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
Categories
Tags

Get free Counselling and ₹25,000 Discount

Fill the form – Our experts will call you within 30 mins.