Call Us Now

+91 9606900005 / 04

For Enquiry

legacyiasacademy@gmail.com

Don’t use COP30 to change Paris deal ‘architecture’: India

 Why in News ?

  • At the 30th UN Climate Change Conference (COP30) in Belém, Brazil (Nov 2025), India reiterated that the global climate regime must stay anchored in equity and common but differentiated responsibilities (CBDR).
  • India cautioned against attempts to alter the Paris Agreement architecture (2015) during its 10th anniversary discussions.
  • India, on behalf of LMDC (Like-Minded Developing Countries) and BASIC (Brazil, South Africa, India, China), emphasized adaptationclimate finance, and early net-zero commitments by developed countries.

Relevance:
GS 2 – International Relations
• 
Indias stance on Paris Agreement architecture and CBDR principle
• 
Role in Global South, BASIC, and LMDC groups
• 
Climate negotiations and geopolitical divide on climate finance
• 
COP30 (Belém, Brazil) – agenda, expectations, and equity debate

GS 3 – Environment
• 
Implementation of NDCs and long-term low-emission strategies
• 
Climate adaptation, mitigation, and finance mechanisms
• 
Role of domestic policies aligned with global commitments

Background — Climate Governance Architecture

  • UNFCCC (1992) – Established the principle of CBDR-RC (Common But Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities).
    • All nations must act on climate, but responsibilities differ by historical emissions and capacities.
  • Kyoto Protocol (1997): Binding emission targets only for developed nations.
  • Paris Agreement (2015):
    • Voluntary Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) for all countries.
    • Aims: Limit warming to well below 2°C, pursue 1.5°C.
    • Introduced bottom-up approach, but reaffirmed CBDR.

India’s Key Points at COP30

(a) Defending the Paris Architecture

  • India warned that revisiting or “reinterpreting” CBDR undermines trust and equity.
  • Argued that developed nations must not shift the burden of mitigation onto developing countries under new terminologies like “net-zero alignment” or “global stocktake”.

(b) Focus on Adaptation

  • India stressed adaptation as an equal pillar with mitigation — critical for the Global South facing:
    • Heatwaves, floods, droughts, coastal inundation.
    • Low adaptive capacity despite minimal per capita emissions.
  • Called for submission of National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) aligned with national priorities.
  • India’s own NAP and updated NDC (2035) are pending submission.

(c) Climate Finance Deficit

  • Developed nations pledged only $300 billion/year by 2035, far below the $1.35 trillion demanded by developing countries.
  • India highlighted:
    • Chronic failure of the $100 billion/year (by 2020) promise.
    • Need for predictable, new, and additional finance and technology transfer.
    • Urged reforms in multilateral development banks (MDBs) to deliver concessional finance.

(d) Net-Zero and Negative Emissions

  • India (and BASIC bloc) urged developed countries to:
    • Achieve net-zero earlier than projected.
    • Invest more in negative emission technologies (carbon capture, direct air removal, afforestation).
  • India’s own net-zero target: 2070, announced at COP26 (Glasgow, 2021).

(e) Unity Among Global South

  • LMDC & BASIC represent ~50% of global population.
  • They collectively resisted attempts to:
    • Dilute CBDR,
    • Overemphasize mitigation targets, and
    • Ignore adaptation and finance gaps.

Broader Context — Climate Politics 2024–25

  • US withdrawal (Trump era) weakened Paris funding mechanisms.
  • Finance pledge gap: Only $300 bn by 2035 vs demand for $1.35 trillion annually.
  • COP28 (Dubai, 2023) – Global Stocktake exposed slow progress; developed nations missed targets.
  • COP29 (Baku, 2024) – Disputes over the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) on finance unresolved.
  • Hence, COP30 becomes a make-or-break moment for rebuilding trust and revising commitments under equity.

Key Principles Reasserted by India

Principle Description India’s Stand
CBDR-RC Nations share responsibility based on capability & historic emissions Non-negotiable
Equity Developed nations must lead, developing nations need space for growth Must guide all climate actions
Climate Justice Least emitters suffer most impacts Requires finance + adaptation focus
Adaptation–Mitigation Balance Both pillars essential Adaptation must not be sidelined
Climate Finance Accountability Fulfilling past pledges, not creating new excuses Must be frontloaded & transparent

India’s Domestic Context

  • NDCs (2015, updated 2022):
    • Reduce Emission Intensity of GDP by 45% by 2030 (from 2005).
    • Achieve 50% cumulative electric power capacity from non-fossil sources by 2030.
  • Major Initiatives:
    • National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC) – 8 missions.
    • LiFE Mission (Lifestyle for Environment, COP26 initiative).
    • National Hydrogen MissionPM Surya Ghar SchemeE-MobilityBiofuel blending.
  • Adaptation Efforts:
    • National Adaptation Fund for Climate Change (NAFCC).
    • State Action Plans on Climate Change (SAPCCs).

Challenges for India

  • Balancing development needs vs emission reduction.
  • Securing low-cost finance and technology access.
  • Increasing climate resilience in agriculture, water, health, and coastal sectors.
  • Meeting energy transition goals amid global geopolitical volatility and supply-chain issues.

Global Implications

  • India’s position strengthens the Global South narrative — equity, justice, and adaptation.
  • Exposes continued NorthSouth divide in climate negotiations.
  • Reinforces need for trust restoration through genuine financial and technological transfers.

November 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
Categories