Call Us Now

+91 9606900005 / 04

For Enquiry

legacyiasacademy@gmail.com

Less than 40% of disabled persons have ID needed for benefits

Basics

  • PwDs in India: ~2.68 crore as per Census 2011 (~2.2% of population; real number likely higher).
  • UDID Scheme:
    • Launched by the Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities (DEPwD).
    • Aim: Create a national database of PwDs; issue Unique Disability ID (UDID) cards.
    • Benefits:
      • Access to welfare schemes (ADIP for assistive devices).
      • Scholarships, reservations in jobs/education.
      • Recognition of disability uniformly across states.
  • Earlier system: State-specific disability certificates at district/taluka level → fragmented, not portable.

Relevance : GS II (Governance – Welfare Schemes, Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, Digital Divide) + GS II (Federalism – Centre–State implementation gaps).

Current Status

  • Coverage: Less than 40% of projected PwDs have UDID cards.
  • Only 4 states (TN, Odisha, Meghalaya, Karnataka) crossed 50% coverage.
  • West Bengal: ~6% coverage (lowest).
  • Pending Applications: Over 11 lakh, with 60% pending for 6+ months.
  • High pendency: Himachal Pradesh (80%+), Ladakh, Mizoram.

Causes of Low Coverage

  • Implementation Delays: Staggered rollout, weak ground-level communication.
  • Digital Divide:
    • Applications only via website.
    • Need to upload scanned documents → barrier for digitally illiterate.
    • Govt survey: Only 60% of Indians above 15 yrs can use basic digital tools (copy-paste); lower among women.
  • Administrative Bottlenecks: Processing delays at state/district levels.
  • Funding Constraints: While overall PwD schemes saw higher allocation, UDID sub-scheme funding declined.
  • Political Marginalisation: PwDs (~2.68 crore) form a small vote bank, hence low political priority.

Implications

  • Exclusion from Welfare: PwDs without UDID denied assistive devices, scholarships, reservations.
  • Inequity in Access: State-specific disparities widen inequalities.
  • Trust Deficit: Long pendency erodes faith in institutions.
  • Digital Inequality: Exposes systemic exclusion of vulnerable groups in “Digital India” push.

Governance & Policy Concerns

  • Rights Perspective: PwDs’ rights enshrined in Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.
  • Failure of Convergence: UDID intended as a universal identity for seamless access → failing due to weak implementation.
  • Centre–State Gaps: Execution uneven, states vary widely in outreach & processing.
  • Data Reliability Issues: Projections based on 2011 Census & NSSO → outdated, underestimates real PwD population.

Global Comparisons

  • US: Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) ensures rights + central database integration with welfare programs.
  • EU: European Disability Card → mutual recognition across member states.
  • India: Still struggling with universal coverage, digital barriers, and fragmented implementation.

Way Forward

  • Administrative Efficiency: Clear deadlines to process applications; reduce pendency backlog.
  • Offline/Hybrid Access: Allow UDID applications at CSCs, panchayat offices, PHCs → bridge digital divide.
  • Awareness Campaigns: Grassroots communication on benefits of UDID.
  • Digital Literacy Training: Special modules for PwDs and caregivers.
  • Updated Data: Use NFHS/updated census for realistic PwD numbers.
  • Enhanced Funding: Increase UDID-specific allocation, not just general PwD schemes.
  • Political Mainstreaming: Recognise PwDs as a rights-based constituency, not just a welfare target.

September 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
Categories