NGT clears ₹92,000-cr. Great Nicobar project

A. Issue in Brief

  • The National Green Tribunal (NGT) disposed of challenges to the 2022 Environmental Clearance (EC) for the ₹92,000-crore Great Nicobar Island mega-infrastructure project, citing strategic importance and finding no good ground to interfere, while directing strict compliance with EC conditions.
  • The project includes a transshipment port, international airport, power plant, and township on Great Nicobar Island; concerns raised include coral reefs, leatherback turtle nesting, and siting near ecologically sensitive zones.

Relevance

GS 2 (Polity & Governance)

  • Environmental governance, role of NGT, CentreStatejudiciary interface, transparency vs national security.

GS 3 (Environment, Infrastructure, Security)

  • EIA regime, biodiversity conservation, coastal regulation, strategic infrastructure, maritime security (SAGAR, Indo-Pacific).

B. What the NGT Held ?

  • Relied on the findings of a High-Powered Committee (HPC) earlier constituted to examine coral reefs, turtle nesting sites, and protected zones; found no error in the Terms of Reference and no additional substantial issues.
  • Accepted the Union government’s position that the HPC report contains strategic/defence-sensitive information; limited disclosure was considered justified.
  • Emphasised a balanced approach—permit development at a strategic location while ensuring compliance with the Island Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 2019 (ICRZ).
  • Directed the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) to ensure coral protection/regeneration and to prepare an implementation plan; placed responsibility on MoEFCC to avoid shoreline erosion.

C. Constitutional / Legal Dimension

  • Article 48A & 51A(g): State and citizen duties to protect the environment.
  • EIA Notification, 2006: Norm of three-season baseline data; deviation justified by the government on geomorphological grounds (no high-erosion sites).
  • Forest clearance issues related to the project are under judicial scrutiny before the Calcutta High Court—illustrating multi-forum environmental adjudication.
  • ICRZ 2019 provides the regulatory framework for coastal/island development with safeguards for fragile ecosystems.

D. Environmental Dimension

  • Biodiversity hotspots: Great Nicobar hosts tropical rainforests, coral reefs, mangroves, and endemic fauna; nearby habitats support leatherback turtles (critically endangered).
  • Risks include habitat fragmentation, dredging impacts, turbidity affecting corals, and shoreline morphology changes.
  • Proposed mitigation: coral transplantation/regeneration, controlled construction windows, and erosion management—effectiveness depends on scientific design and monitoring.

E. Governance / Administrative Dimension

  • Strategic rationale: Location near major East-West shipping lanes enhances maritime logistics, SAGAR vision, and Indo-Pacific presence.
  • Capacity challenge: Ensuring credible MRV (Monitoring, Reporting, Verification) for EC compliance over long project timelines.
  • Transparency vs security dilemma: Limited disclosure can protect national interests but may weaken public trust and participatory governance.

F. Economic / Security Dimension

  • Aims to position India as a regional transshipment hub, potentially reducing dependence on foreign ports and improving trade competitiveness.
  • Infrastructure build-out could catalyse island connectivity, tourism, and employment, but requires costbenefit realism given ecological externalities.
  • Dual-use value (civil + defence logistics) strengthens the national security case.

G. Social / Ethical Dimension

  • Concerns of local communities and indigenous groups regarding displacement, cultural impacts, and livelihood transitions.
  • Ethical balance between national development and ecological stewardship; principle of inter-generational equity applies strongly in island ecosystems.

H. Key Criticisms / Gaps

  • Baseline data adequacy (single-season EIA) contested by applicants; seasonality matters for marine ecology.
  • Cumulative impact assessment across port, airport, township, and power plant may be under-specified.
  • Carrying capacity of a small island system and disaster risks (cyclones, tsunamis) require robust modelling.

I. Way Forward

  • Establish independent scientific oversight panels for coral/turtle safeguards with public summaries (non-sensitive).
  • Deploy real-time environmental monitoring (turbidity, reef health indices, shoreline change mapping via satellites).
  • Phase construction with adaptive management triggers—pause/modify if ecological thresholds are crossed.
  • Strengthen community consultation, benefit-sharing, and grievance redress.
  • Integrate disaster-resilient design and strict waste/water management for island sustainability.

J. Exam Orientation

Prelims Pointers

  • NGT is a statutory body (NGT Act, 2010) for expeditious environmental justice.
  • ICRZ 2019 governs coastal/island development norms.
  • EIA 2006 typically requires multi-season data; exceptions may be argued case-specifically.
  • Leatherback turtle: among the largest sea turtles; globally threatened.

Practice Question (15 marks)

  • “Strategic infrastructure in ecologically fragile regions requires a calibrated balance between national security and environmental sustainability.” Discuss with reference to the Great Nicobar project.

Book a Free Demo Class

February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728  
Categories