Context: Conceptual Misunderstanding of Public Health
- Public health in India is often wrongly seen as a sub-discipline of medicine, ignoring its interdisciplinary nature.
- It combines medical science (e.g., germ theory), engineering (e.g., sanitation systems), and social sciences (e.g., poverty’s impact on health).
- Public health also involves communication, behaviour change, and trust-building—making it both a science and an art.
Relevance : GS 2(Governance ,Health)
Governance Fragmentation
- Public health is treated as a State subject per the 7th Schedule, but responsibilities also lie in Union and Concurrent Lists.
- Example:
- Union List: Quarantine, international health regulations.
- Concurrent List: Drug safety, food safety, pollution control.
- This leads to:
- Poor coordination among ministries (Health, Water Resources, Food Safety, Municipalities).
- Overlapping jurisdictions and diluted accountability.
- Colonial legacy of fragmented governance persists in a federal setup.
Structural Contradictions in Policy
- Public health policies often conflict:
- E.g., promoting tobacco farming while running cancer prevention programmes.
- Institutional contradictions:
- ICMR fights tobacco-related diseases while ICAR’s Central Tobacco Research Institute boosts its cultivation.
Flawed MPH Education Ecosystem
- MPH curriculum mirrors public health governance—fragmented and inconsistent.
- Eligibility issues:
- Some programmes restrict to medical/allied fields; others allow all graduates—without a common foundation.
- Content gaps:
- Minimal focus on crucial areas like:
- Public health engineering (sanitation infrastructure),
- Nutrition (food technology and safety),
- Behavioural sciences (psychology, social marketing),
- Health technology assessment (cost-effectiveness of interventions).
- Minimal focus on crucial areas like:
- Delivery problems:
- Courses often theoretical or managerial, lacking field exposure.
- The 2-year duration is too short to cover diverse skillsets in-depth.
Systemic Invisibility of MPH Graduates
- No structured public health cadre across most states.
- MPH holders are relegated to temporary NGO or clerical roles.
- Their technical skills remain underutilized, violating the vision of the National Health Policy 2017.
Implications and Way Forward
- Without a skilled public health workforce, India’s response to challenges like antimicrobial resistance, climate-related diseases, and pandemics will be inadequate.
- Urgent reforms needed:
- Nationally standardized MPH curriculum with scope for regional adjustments.
- Modular, flexible programme structure to handle the field’s breadth.
- Creation of a formal, well-defined public health cadre.
- Integration of public health into national policymaking akin to national security.