Call Us Now

+91 9606900005 / 04

For Enquiry

legacyiasacademy@gmail.com

Russia’s Su-57 Offer and India’s Tepid Response

 WHY IS IT IN NEWS?

  • Ahead of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s recent India visit, Moscow aggressively pitched major defence platforms:
    • Su-57 fifth-generation stealth fighter
    • S-500 air defence system
    • Geran (Shahed-136 variant) kamikaze drones
    • Submarines and long-range UAVs
  • India responded lukewarmly, signalling no major defence procurements despite 19 agreements signed during the visit.
  • The muted response reflects India’s accelerating shift toward self-reliance (Aatmanirbharta) and declining appetite for large-ticket foreign hardware.

Relevance

GS-II – International Relations

  • IndiaRussia defence relations: continuity & change
  • Strategic autonomy; diversification of partners (US, France, Israel)
  • Impact of Ukraine war on Russian export capacity
  • CAATSA sanctions & geopolitical constraints

GS-III – Defence & Security

  • Indigenous defence manufacturing & Aatmanirbhar push
  • Evaluation of 5th-gen aircraft, drones, missile systems
  • Tech transfer issues; reliability of foreign suppliers
  • Naval capability building: submarines, UAVs, air defence

INDIA–RUSSIA DEFENCE RELATIONSHIP

  • Russia has been India’s largest defence supplier for decades (50–60% of inventory legacy).
  • Key platforms:
    • Su-30MKI, MiG-29
    • T-90 and T-72 tanks
    • S-400 air defence
    • Kilo-class submarines
    • BrahMos (joint development)
  • Historically based on technology transfer and long-term maintenance frameworks.

Over the past decade, however, India is diversifying suppliers and building domestic capability.

WHAT EXACTLY DID RUSSIA OFFER? WHY?

a) Su-57 (5th-gen stealth fighter)

  • Russia’s flagship stealth platform; export version Su-57E.
  • Earlier joint Indo-Russian FGFA project (based on Su-57) collapsed in 2018 due to Indian concerns over:
    • Stealth quality
    • Sensor fusion
    • Engine performance
    • Cost
    • Technology transfer limitations

b) S-500 Prometey

  • Next-gen long-range missile defence system (higher-tier than S-400).

c) Geran (Shahed-136 type) kamikaze drones

  • Key to Russia’s low-cost attrition strategy in Ukraine.
  • Capable of mass-swarm saturation attacks.

d) Submarines & long-range UAVs

  • Russia seeks revival of conventional submarine deals + naval cooperation.

Why Russia is pushing these platforms

  • Sanctions + Ukraine war → Russia seeks revenue, market stability, and geopolitical signalling.
  • India is Russia’s largest defence partner outside CSTO, making it economically important.

WHY INDIA’S RESPONSE WAS TEPID ?

A) Strategic Shift: Aatmanirbhar Bharat in Defence

  • Defence Minister Rajnath Singh highlighted:
    • Production: ₹1.51 lakh crore (2024) → up from ₹46,000 crore (2014)
    • Exports: ₹24,000 crore → up from < ₹1,000 crore (2014)
  • India wants domestic development, not dependence on imports.

B) Preference for Indigenous Alternatives

  • Drones → Indian firms already developing:
    • Loitering munitions
    • MALE/HALE UAVs
    • Joint ventures with Israel
  • Fighters → focus on
    • LCA Tejas Mk1A
    • AMCA (5th-gen Indian stealth fighter)
    • MRFA (where U.S., France, Sweden competitive)

C) Concerns about Russian reliability

  • War with Ukraine has:
    • Reduced production capacity
    • Created delivery delays
    • Impacted supply chains & spares
  • CAATSA sanctions risks add further complexity.

D) Technology Transfer Limitations

India wants:

  • Full transfer of technology
  • Local manufacturing
  • Intellectual property access
    Russia cannot fully meet these expectations for Su-57/S-500.

E) Cost & Capability Doubts

  • Su-57 still under limited Russian induction; unclear combat performance.
  • Geran drones considered low-tech, not aligned with India’s requirement for high-end, survivable UAV systems.

INDIA–RUSSIA DEFENCE MECHANISM UPDATE

23rd IndiaRussia Working Group Meeting (Oct 29, 2024)

  • Co-chaired by Secretary (Defence Production) Sanjeev Kumar.
  • Covered tri-service cooperation + R&D.
  • Ended with a new Protocol identifying fresh collaboration areas.
    However, no big-ticket deals were finalised.

Putins visit outcomes

  • 19 agreements signed — mostly trade, energy, connectivity, logistics.
  • No announcements on Su-57, S-500, submarines, or drones.

BROADER GEOPOLITICAL CONTEXT

Indias diversification

  • U.S., France, Israel, and domestic suppliers increasingly relevant.
  • Quad-related tech cooperation rising.
  • Russia wants to retain strategic foothold.

Russias own constraints

  • Ukraine conflict drains resources.
  • Export commitments hard to meet.
  • Sanctioned supply chains delay deliveries.

December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
Categories